Commons:Deletion requests/2023/11/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1 November 2023
3 November 2023
Deletion requests on 2 November 2023

November 2[edit]

File:Wrestling Referee 19576383 10211618295426357 1934180707 n.jpg[edit]

This appears to the work of someone else, and lifted from Elham Heidari's LinkedIn M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 00:24, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Woman's valva.jpg[edit]

Low quality vulva photo, we had better options in the category A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep Pretty detailed photo. I'd keep it, but if the closing admin finds that there are many equally good or better photos, I wouldn't be upset. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Detailed, but slightly blurry, and I think we had more better photo about the vagina. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Delete we have tons of far better closeup images of vulvas that actually call them that and not “valvas” Dronebogus (talk) 11:59, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The spelling is irrelevant, of course, as it's so easy to change. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I know but someone not even spelling a simple word like “vulva” right in the age of autocorrect is a sign of extremely low effort Dronebogus (talk) 15:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Probably not a good English-speaker. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Великий Голицын – князь Василий Васильевич, фаворит царевны Софьи.jpg[edit]

No source provided. As far as the description at the bottom is printed on Old Orthography, this picture is taken from some book published in Russia before 1917. The problem is that this description is totally unrealistic: it reads that the portrait was created around 1710 while this person was either imprisoned or exiled since 1691 till his death in 1714, so it is absolutely impossible that it is his portrait indeed (not to say that his clothes and haircut have nothing in common with the historical appearance of Russian people circa 1700). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep I added a source for the image. Armor and wearing a powdered wig was always something worn by nobility in that era, look at any of the images we have from that era. Artists also kept stock images of bodies, in which they would add the face when needed, or recycle an older image by paining over the old face, for a new client. --RAN (talk) 12:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It is nice that you have found the same picture at the archived version of some website but you cannot claim this page is the source of our image: their version of image is of much worse quality and bears no printed description taken from some pre-1917 Russian edition. Your link can only prove that some other websites also believe this portrait to be of this person. Then about the picture itself: you are totally wrong. Russian nobility of that era never wore this kind of armour and haircuts of this style, and Russian painters of the time never worked in this style. You can compare this picture with three real portraits of the same person in Category:Vasiliy Golitsyn and see that this picture has nothing in common with them. This portrait was created between 1687 (when he was awarded with the order he has on his chest) and 1691 (when he lost all his positions, honors and property). After that he was exiled to the Far North of then Russia where he spent the rest of his life in the remote villages with no armours, no hairdressers and no painters. There is not a smallest chance that this portrait is really of Vasiliy Golitsyn. It would be possible to keep it as a false portrait of Vasiliy Golitsyn if we have the real source claiming that. But we have no idea what this source might be and what is the real origin of that portrait (which could be easily painted in the early XX century instead and in this case even could be copyrighted). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:09, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Commons:PCP requires that we have evidence that the image is incorrect or contemporary, we have two version of the image, and both make no claim that it is either an different person or a contemporary illustration. You are welcome to move this thread to the image page so people can be wary of using it to illustrate the person in question. If we delete it, it will just leave the two copies potentially misidentified elsewhere. We currently house over 4,000 images that are disputed. See: [1]. --RAN (talk) 19:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Great. We have the portrait of we don't know who taken from we don't know where and created we don't know when by we don't know who. Let's use it for educational purposes according with the task of Commons. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Собор Петра Митрополита (Высоко-Петровский монастырь) в 1976 до "состаривания".jpg[edit]

Picture of 1976 atributed to some A. V. Shatokhin, probably not an own work Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Close Up (1990) - With English Subtitles.webm[edit]

Despite the original video resolution on YouTube, this file was uploaded in low quality Kelly The Angel (talk) 04:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Question Why is that a deletion reason? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    The file has a low resolution, although the original video is 720p. In my opinion, the best solution is to delete the file and re-upload it in better quality. Kelly The Angel (talk) 03:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Why don't you use the "Upload a new version of this file" button to upload a new version? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I am aware of this button. I uploaded this file using the video2commons tool Kelly The Angel (talk) 07:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gone with the Wind and the Lies America Tells- Sarah Churchwell in conversation.webm[edit]

Despite the original video resolution on YouTube, this file was uploaded in low quality Kelly The Angel (talk) 04:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Question Why is that a deletion reason? The real question is whether there's a copyright problem. If there isn't, why don't you withdraw this nomination and upload the full-size version? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I uploaded it using the video2commoms tool. I tried Yt-dlp, but it just didn't want to work properly on my computer Kelly The Angel (talk) 03:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Regrettably, I can't help you with that technical issue. But why would it be better to delete a low-quality version and have no version on Commons - again, unless there is a copyright problem? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:PlantUML Aktivitätsdiagramm.png[edit]

Falsche und irreführende Weiterleitung nach Umbenennung nicht mehr verlinkt Fruchtzwerg94 (talk) 08:24, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Bdtkac (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unlikely own work. Small historical photos with no EXIF. File:AntonTkac-OS-1976-DanielMorelon.jpg is taken from news website that is no longer available (not even via archive.org). File:TKACAnton-3.jpg probably contains reprographic halftone screen. File:TKACAnton-3 (cropped).jpg also affected.

Gumruch (talk) 09:29, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:16786-Shenzhen (35129133844).jpg[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D works in China. Ox1997cow (talk) 09:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Pfad des I-Pz-Gren.Rgt.2, Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler, 12.1941-6.1944.png[edit]

Copyvio, see source https://insubricahistorica.ch/blog/2019/10/13/breve-storia-del-i-battaglione-panzer-grenadier-regiment-2-della-divisione-leibstandarte-ss-adolf-hitler-prima-e-dopo-gli-eccidi-di-ebrei-sul-lago-maggiore/: "Copyright: Ekaterina Rues". Mautpreller (talk) 10:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The map was posted on the internet as an “open source map” by the rights holder, Raphael Rues, on September 9, 2018. For me this means that it is legal to use it if the source is cited (as I have done it), but I would be happy to disapprove if the reasons are valid. Dirk-Franz (talk) 13:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I thought, probably mistakenly, that 'open source' meant that you could use the map with attribution to the source on Wikipedia. I have now sent an email request to the rights holder and the website as to whether they agree to the map being used on Wikipedia. Dirk-Franz (talk) 16:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC Dirk-Franz (talk) 16:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mercedes-Benz W31 540 G4 (Spain) 01.jpg[edit]

Author's request TheRichic (talk) 11:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files with fake "Mil.gov.ua" license 2[edit]

Invalid license. Probably a non-free images. License (Mil.gov.ua) applies only to materials posted on the web-site Mil.gov.ua, not on their social media. Needed link where this fotos published at Mil.gov.ua. --Kursant504 (talk) 11:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep. I've started a topic with explanations here:
--VoidWanderer (talk) 14:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Topic is closed and no one has provided any evidence that this content can be considered free:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/11#Media_published_by_press_services_of_Ukrainian_military Kursant504 (talk) 04:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Kursant504: Please use internal links like Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/11#Media published by press services of Ukrainian military.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:CSNS.jpg[edit]

File:National Social Party of Czechia.svg is a vector version of this file.
File:Deletion requests/2023/11/02 → File:National Social Party of Czechia.svg
For more information, see Help:SVG.
In other languages
Alemannisch ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ British English ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Frysk ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Ido ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ Scots ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ vèneto ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ нохчийн ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ татарча/tatarça ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ தமிழ் ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
New SVG image

2001:999:681:C617:7987:284:FBBC:FF23 11:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:PMC5370226 MGG3-5-141-g001.png[edit]

Unused picture of a minor, privacy issue, permission from parents needed. Yann (talk) 11:44, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

actually this is from.... https://openi.nlm.nih.gov/detailedresult?img=PMC5370226_MGG3-5-141-g001&query=Kleefstra%20syndrome&it=xg&req=4&npos=2 NIH... with license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/....and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5370226/ article ...?
The picture should be edited so that the person is not recognizable. Yann (talk) 17:21, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Athletico PR.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Eric Duff as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:00, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Comment For me seems a simple logo, but educational value is not shown. Out of scope? Taivo (talk) 12:58, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Logo of the Czech National Socialist Party.svg[edit]

File:National Social Party of Czechia.svg is a vector version of this file.
File:Deletion requests/2023/11/02 → File:National Social Party of Czechia.svg
For more information, see Help:SVG.
In other languages
Alemannisch ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ British English ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Frysk ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Ido ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ Scots ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ vèneto ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ нохчийн ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ татарча/tatarça ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ தமிழ் ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
New SVG image

2001:999:681:C617:7987:284:FBBC:FF23 12:04, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Markttische (Cloister of Basel Münster)[edit]

Bettina Eichin is still alive Switzerland has a standard of life plus 70 years and COM:FOP Switzerland does only apply for places permanently accessible to the public. The Cloister of the Minster of Basel has opening hours, is usually closed during the night and is therefore not permanently accessible to the public. I only nominate those files where her art appears to be the focus of the image.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


The Place have free Accsees, that enough from FOP. Your are wrong, the place must not have a 24h/7d free acsess. Then specialist solicitor say night closing are compatible with FoP. See de:Panoramafreiheit#Schweiz cite_note-213 «Barrelet/Egloff: Das neue Urheberrecht. 3. Aufl. 2008, Art. 27, Rn. 4; Cherpillod in: von Büren/David: Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte. 3. Aufl. 2014, Rn. 917; Hilty: Urheberrecht. 2011, Rn. 236; Macciacchini/Oertli in: Müller/Oertli: Handkommentar Urheberrechtsgesetz. 2. Aufl. 2012, Art. 27 Rn. 4.» ore de: . Bobo11 (talk) 01:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hm, and what about the interior of a church can not be depicted of the same de:Panoramafreiheit#Schweiz? Note 220 Cherpillod in: von Büren/David, Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte. 3. Aufl. 2014, Rn. 918; Macciacchini/Oertli in: Müller/Oertli: Handkommentar Urheberrechtsgesetz. 2. Aufl. 2012, Art. 27 Rn. 6; Rehbinder/Viganó: URG. 3. Aufl. 2008, Art. 27 Rn. 2; Fanny Ambühl, Stephan Beutler: Fotografieren verboten! – Zum Spannungsverhältnis von Urheber- und Eigentumsrecht im Fotografiebereich. In: recht. 2011, S. 14–19, hier S. 18. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:01, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Pls dont make Deletion requests, if You misunderstand so a lot of Details. This Arte are not in a Room/chamber, then covered are not in either case interior. Then covered can bee outside. In that case you have not a windows or doers inside the position of arte and the courtyard. And in the courtyarg from the Basel Minster are quite certain a Position how FoP Swizerland are valid. Bobo11 (talk) 08:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep As Bobo11 pointed me to this discussion, I will not be involved as a closing admin here (as it is my principle in such cases to avoid any appearance of doing favours). However, I know this place, I have been there, and I think that given the nature of this cloistered court, Swiss FoP is applicable. COM:FOP Switzerland explicitly states, with good sources from scholarly literarature, The place does not need to be accessible to the public all the time. If a park is closed during night hours, it may still be “accessible to the public” within the meaning of Article 27 provided the other criteria are met. The question then is, of course, whether we can consider the cloistered court as an exterior space. In my opinion, yes. It's not fully covered, and during the day, it is used by the public to pass through from Rittergasse street to the "Pfalz" platform at the Rhine. If the Markttische were placed in the church itself, I would agree with the deletion request. Gestumblindi (talk) 08:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have also been at the place, I have added two files to the Category:Ceilings of the cloister of Basel Münster, and I thought it was part of the interior of the church, so I believed the deletion request was valid. But I can also follow Gestumblindi in his assumption that it is not inside the church as there are usually not held any masses, at least not in my experience. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 11:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:St. Karl (Lucerne)[edit]

Fritz Metzger, the architect of the church died in 1973, Switzerland has a standard of life plus 70 years and COM:FOP Switzerland only applies for places permanently accessible to the public. St.Karl church has opening hours and is not permanently accessible to the public. There are many more files of the interior of the church which I do not nominate for deletion as they have a VRT ticket and the focus of the images is on the art for which I believe the VRT ticket is valid. Undelete in 2044

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Files in Category:Interior of St. Agatha (Dietikon)[edit]

Adolf Gaudy, the architect of the church died in 1956, Switzerland has a standard of life plus 70 years and COM:FOP Switzerland only applies for places permanently accessible to the public. St.Agatha church has opening hours and is not permanently accessible to the public. There are some more files of the category on the interior of the church which I do not nominate for deletion as the focus of the images is on artifacts and I am unaware of their age. Undelete in 2027

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:34, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Univerzita Karlova horizontal logo 2023.svg[edit]

Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. 2023 logo, so not PD-old. Taivo (talk) 13:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request unjustified. This is not complex logo, its text logo with simple geometric shape object representing crown. Nobody stated it is PD-old. Are you sure that you have your administrator rights rightfully, when you are not familiar with logo shape policy customs used on Commons?
Examples for you: Thank you, ThecentreCZ (talk) 19:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You present images from many different countries - copyright laws are different in different countries, not the same. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Per COM:TOO Czech Republic: "The work must be 'a unique outcome of the creative activity of the author'.[[121/2000–2006 Art.2(1)]For photographs and computer programs, it suffices if the work 'is original in the sense that it is the author’s own intellectual creation'."[121/2000–2006 Art.2(2)] This is neither a photo nor a computer program, so that second sentence might not apply. The question to me is whether the shape of the crown is unique, or on the other hand, whether that shape of crown is old even though the whole logo is not, and therefore, no longer under copyright. ThecentreCZ, are you familiar with Czech legal decisions based on threshold of originality issues? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:41, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kanew mit Deutschlandflagge.jpg[edit]

its very doubtful, that this is own work Mateus2019 (talk) 15:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Andreizc1974 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Last remaining images after deleting copyvios, small images without EXIF, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 15:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, did not understang deletion request motivation Andreizc1974 (talk) 20:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, did not understand that deletion request motivation Andreizc1974 (talk) 20:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Both images were taken by myself during 2022 Brazilian Curling Championship. Andreizc1974 (talk) 20:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
All your pictures are copyright violations, so how can we trust you? Can you upload the original images with EXIF data? Yann (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:DownloadGoiás.png[edit]

Unused, low quality/resolution with bogus self-claim and non-descriptive name/summary--probably speediable as scaled-down duplicate with non-descriptive file name (F8). Unnecessary when highly used, superior quality, and properly licensed File:Flag of Goiás.svg is available. Эlcobbola talk 15:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Max and Anna Blumenfeld-Grunwald.jpg[edit]

German photograph that dates in the range of 1925 to 1936. Source is a family photo album so it may have been unpublished until recently. Abzeronow (talk) 15:51, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: Closing duplicate entry. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Max and Anna Blumenfeld-Grunwald.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) RAN (talk) 02:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep License added. While the image may have resided in a family album it appears to have been taken by a professional photographer and been made public when it was given to the sitter. The extremely narrow depth of field points to a professional photographer. --RAN (talk) 03:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2795 - Molecaten Flevostrand - copyright wve.jpg[edit]

no permission from author see data and metadata "{c} WandavanEck" Hoyanova (talk) 16:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Oberbürg Gondorf Anfang 20. Jh..jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Circa 1920 German postcard. Could be public domain if the photographer died before 1953. Abzeronow (talk) 17:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep PD-EU-no author disclosure. --RAN (talk) 02:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sydney P. Noe (1885-1969).jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). Circa 1930 American photograph. Could be public domain (source has a non-commercial license), or we might have to wait until 2026. Abzeronow (talk) 17:32, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep No images of Poe appear in either the copyright registration database or the renewal database. --RAN (talk) 02:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Siga, mas olhe..jpg[edit]

No permission. 2804:14D:5C32:4673:28B7:63D:EAAE:2086 17:53, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:AdamRosieka001.JPG[edit]

Likely stolen from [2] and [3]. Veverve (talk) 18:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Samsung Notebook 9.jpg[edit]

Redundant by the new SVG vector equivalent File:Samsung Notebook 9 wordmark.svg Cfsprt (talk) 18:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Samsung Notebook wordmark.png[edit]

Redundant by the new SVG vector equivalent File:Samsung Notebook wordmark.svg Cfsprt (talk) 18:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Galaxy Book wordmark.png[edit]

Redundant by the new SVG vector equivalent File:Galaxy Book wordmark.svg Cfsprt (talk) 18:07, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:S Pen wordmark.png[edit]

Redundant by the new SVG vector equivalent File:S Pen wordmark.svg Cfsprt (talk) 18:07, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Aura (Till Nowak) 10.jpg[edit]

Bei dem hier gezeigten Foto handelt es sich NICHT um das Werk AURA von Till Nowak, sondern um eine Nachnutzung der Glaskuben durch die beauftragte Hausverwaltung. Im Gegensatz zu AURA geben nun LED-Leuchten dekorativ und dauerhaft Licht ab. Aura war ein komplexes System, nachzusehen unter: https://www.aura-hamburg.de/. Ich bitte darum, die Zuordnung des Fotos mit dem Künstlker- und Werknamen zu löschen! ClausFriede*Contemporary Arts, Hamburg Djclaupe (talk) 18:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep: To be renamed and desc cleaned up. --Achim55 (talk) 18:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Das es sich nicht mehr um das Originalkunstwerk handelt ist zunächst einmal eine Behauptung. Das Schild mit der Beschreibung des Kunstwerks findet sich immer noch (siehe: Bild Aura (Till Nowak) 06.jpg) an der Wand neben einem der Kuben. Bevor das Bild (bzw. die ganze Kategorie) gelöscht oder geändert wird, sollte ein Beleg beigebracht werden, dass (und wann) das Originalkunstwerk stillgelegt wurde Wikipeter-HH (talk) 18:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ich habe mal per E-Mail bei ClausFriede*Contemporary Arts nachgefragt, ob es entsprechende Belege (z.B. Pressemitteilung o.ä.) zur Stilllegung von AURA gibt. Wikipeter-HH (talk) 11:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Inzwischen ist, auf meine mail hin, auf der Webseite https://www.aura-hamburg.de/ ein Vermerk, dass die Installation nicht mehr in Betrieb ist. Ich werde die Bilder daher innerhalb der nächsten Tage umbenennen und die Beschreibung entsprechend anpassen (wie von @Achim55 vorgeschlagen. Ich gehe davon aus, dass sich der Löschantrag damit erledigt hat. Wikipeter-HH (talk) 09:30, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/bournemouth youtube[edit]

Sourced to AFC Bournemouth's YouTube channel, which has a blanket CC license for all its videos, but match footage belongs to the league and its licensed broadcasters. The club only owns its original content (i.e. interviews, behind the scenes footage etc), not match footage.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:07, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And I'd like to revisit File:Liam Delap CC video screenshot.png. It's sourced to AFC Bournemouth, but the it's the same shared Carabao Cup footage with the club's own commentators. The club owns the audio, but not the video. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:14, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Agree. The Dominic Solanke one for example is a screenshot from at least two videos showing the same highlights but for some reason the commentators audio can't be heard from both Fulham's and Bournemouth's channels making the videos identical to each other.
Also by looking at "File:Steve Cooper.jpg", that file is reviewed by Dudek1337, I don't see that info on any of those listed here excluding the Liam Delap picture which was reviewed by a different user. Iggy the Swan (talk) 15:50, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do not delete. The uploaded images pass all guidelines of (licence) verifiability. The unsourced reason to delete them does not meet te verifiability guidelines. According to Wikipedia:Verifiability everything must be verifiable (en:Wikipedia:Verifiability). The copyright of the images I uploaded are verifiable according to the "Guidelines for images and other media files" (en:Wikipedia:Copyrights#Guidelines for images and other_media files). The official AFC Bournemouth YouTube channel has posted video's since 2012 and their video's have not been taken down by YouTube. We/I dont have access to their standard (license) contracts and/or addidional (license) contracts. Please provide a verifiable claim to the copyright concerns or don't delete the images. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlippyFlink (talk • contribs) 09:50, August 29, 2022‎ (UTC)

@FlippyFlink: Hi, thank you for responding. A few things:
  • WP:V is guideline for encyclopedia content on the English Wikipedia. It's entirely irrelevant to licensing questions on Commons.
  • The reason YouTube hasn't taken the video down is because the EFL generally allows clubs to post match footage on their sites and social media content. The question is whether it is licensed correctly on YouTube.
  • COM:License laundering is something that can happen intentionally or unintentionally, where a YouTube user takes copyrighted content and assigns a free license. Even if YouTube shows a Creative Commons license, if the source material is copyrighted, then the resulting work is considered copyrighted.
  • Sure, we don't have access to the EFL's media contract terms. But we follow COM:PCP, specifically, #4. Not knowing who really owns the footage isn't a reason to keep an image. If there's doubt, the onus is on the uploader to show that the content is actually free to use. Since we have a pretty good idea that match footage belongs to the EFL, it's up to you to show that AFC Bouremouth correctly licensed the video.
I hope this answers your questions. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:27, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/bournemouth youtube[edit]

Same as above - content created by the club is fine, match footage is not.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Really... I mean he is a prominent footballer in a country where football sadly isnt very well covered, and he just made history for the Pakistan national team as staten in his Wikipedia page. As staten by FlippyFlink, the uploaded image clearly pass the guidelines of license verifiability. I really struggled to find an image of him watching the whole match for nearly 2 hours and the image in question is just a mere screenshot of a fraction of the whole video lasting just a few seconds as I precisely stated in the source section. I will eagerly wait for the conclusion of the discussion but this is just straight up disheartening. Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 00:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sağsağan yumurtası.pdf[edit]

This is a scan of pages from an Azerbaijani book of unknown publication date and copyright. The book includes poems by Mohammad-Hossein Shahriar, Khalil Rza Uluturk, and Ramiz Rovshan, whose works are still copyrighted in Azerbaijan. At the very least, would need to know if the uploader "Shazcanavar" is the same person as the author "Əli Çərkəzoğlu". Johnj1995 (talk) 18:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fayzrakhmanov Jaudat Ibragimovich.jpg[edit]

Защищено авторским правом, см. также File:Mavrina_letter_(2023-10-27).pdf MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:36, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Neo-Posadism flag.svg[edit]

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Posadism was a real political ideology, but this was not its flag; "neo-Posadism" (as well as this flag) appears to be a joke. Omphalographer (talk) 19:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep per COM:INUSE. Di (they-them) (talk) 18:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Since you're the author of this file: can you confirm whether this image represents an actual flag commonly used by members of this ideology other than yourself? If so, can you identify a source for it? Omphalographer (talk) 19:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If I remember correctly, I based it on online memes when I made it, and I had seen similar things used on Reddit. Either way, it's not really relevant whether it's a real flag or not, because it's in use, so it's automatically within scope. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:41, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The reason I'm asking is because I'm considering removing the image from the Wikiquote page. If the flag is a modern creation and is primarily used as a joke, that doesn't seem particularly relevant to a page about a political figure who was active in the 1940s. Omphalographer (talk) 02:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think that removing an image from pages so that it is no longer in use so as to allow for its deletion is probably not a good idea. Di (they-them) (talk) 02:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Feel free to add a better description Trade (talk) 12:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Delete not buying Di’s “in use” argument. If something is in legitimate educational use, maybe, but this is in use on a user gallery, a general gallery of political flags, and a Wikiquote page (in a non-essential and basically deceptive manner, promoting the flag as significant enough to be one of only two images)— all trivial or decorative uses at best. Dronebogus (talk) 03:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Can't we just keep it as an internet meme? Commons already have plenty of those Trade (talk) 19:07, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Dronebogus: Regarding it being in a user gallery: "by custom the uploading of small numbers of images for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed if you are an active, constructive participant on Commons." I think that I count as an active, constructive participant on Commons considering I have been here for several years at this point and I am a patroller. Also regarding its apparent inappropriate use on Wikiquote: "It should be stressed that Commons does not overrule other projects about what is in scope." Di (they-them) (talk) 20:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Valeev Nail Mansurovich.jpg[edit]

Защищено АП (File:Mavrina_letter_(2023-10-27).pdf) MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Event-20230910-berlin-codefor-summit-15.jpg[edit]

the release was withdrawn Wolfram.eberius (talk) 19:41, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:14020810000774638344554359651470 64810 fear of collapse.jpg[edit]

Copyright info provided is dubious; link doesn't lead to the source proposed in the copyright disclaimer, and I wasn't able to find the suggested image on the website it states it's from AquilaFasciata (talk) 20:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flemish Cluedo box.jpg[edit]

Per commons:Packaging. Fma12 (talk) 20:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Roger Waters - This is Not a Drill tour, National INdoor Arena, Birmingham 31st May 2023 - 52942922089.jpg[edit]

Not Steve Knight’s own work, according to description: "Thanks to Ken Browne for use of his pictures from the posh seats on the floor and for driving!" RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Roger Waters - This is Not a Drill tour, National INdoor Arena, Birmingham 31st May 2023 full band.jpg[edit]

Not Steve Knight’s own work, according to description: "Thanks to Ken Browne for use of his pictures from the posh seats on the floor and for driving!" RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:13, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Roger Waters - This is Not a Drill tour, National INdoor Arena, Birmingham 31st May 2023.jpg[edit]

Not Steve Knight’s own work, according to description: "Thanks to Ken Browne for use of his pictures from the posh seats on the floor and for driving!" RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I believe he means that some of the photos are from the person he went to the gig with, doesn't mean that all of the photos are not his work, and it's not like he stole them from the internet so there isn't any copyright infringement in these photos. Mewhen123 (talk) 21:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
But Ken Browne still needs to give permission for the type of COM:Licensing Commons needs. He should contact COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Under your logic this photo is also copyright infringement as the father isn't credited. Preferably I think a 3rd party should look over this issue. Mewhen123 (talk) 18:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's not my logic but COM:Licensing, and yes, for that photo, it needs to be established who owns the copyright. The fact that the uploader's father owned it doesn't prove he shot the photo and therefore owned the copyright, but an explanation to COM:VRT would be able to clarify that point. Would you like to request deletion of that photo? Go ahead if you like. Meanwhile, I don't make deletion decisions here, and a 4th party called the closing admin will be the one to make that decision, but I don't think you strengthened your argument with your last reply. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:МагIарул боязул цIарал.png[edit]

This is not real map 109.252.72.175 09:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:36, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:МагIарул боязул цIарал.png[edit]

Нет АИ. Фальсификация 212.154.56.32 22:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Speedy keep COM:INUSE. The Russian translates as "No AI." I don't see how that's relevant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:35, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    The Russian says "No RS", meaning "reliable sources". It also says that this is a hoax. Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Thanks for giving the proper translation. I should have stated that it Google-translated the way I stated. But the problem is, even if it's a hoax, it can't be deleted as long as it's in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Travis King.webp[edit]

Firstly, the linked source does not source the photo to "United States Armed Forces". As to any assumption of military provenance:

The US military has, in the past, contracted out its portrait photography to third party companies who've retained the copyrights to their work (e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amir Mirza Hekmati USMC.png, as well as my own experience in USAF basic training). To offer further context from NARA archivist Rachael Salyer: "Usually, the instructor of a training facility paid a civilian photographer to come to the base to take pictures. These photographs sometimes are filed in the records of the unit but oftentimes they are just distributed to the individual members with no permanent copy kept. […] In addition, the "official" photographs of individuals are not considered permanent federal records by the respective military services and are not retained in separate collections by the services." Additionally, Basic Training Photos—a third-party who has contractual agreements with Fort Leonard Wood, Fort Moore, Lackland Air Force Base, and Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island—says, "For personal use only. No commercial use, resale, sharing with others or posting to social media sites is allowed. All images contained on this site are copyrighted and may not be used in any form without prior licensing." Fourthords | =Λ= | 22:23, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jack Teixeira (JPEG version).jpg. I expect free pictures to come soon enough w/ his court martial. NAADAAN (talk) 18:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2023/11/02&oldid=824417204"