Commons:Deletion requests/2023/11/06

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
5 November 2023
7 November 2023
Deletion requests on 6 November 2023

November 6[edit]

File:Fomenko little family scheme.jpg[edit]

From book of 2017, contemporary author Nikolay Omonov (talk) 00:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ничего подобного. Как и отмечено в описании файла, схема взята из книги "Фоменко А. Т. Как было на самом деле. Каждая история желает быт рассказанной. М., Изд-во АСТ, 2017." Представитель Фоменко разрешила использовать файлы из книг Фоменко. Matsievsky (talk) 03:10, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
«Представитель Фоменко разрешила использовать файлы из книг Фоменко»
Где и кому, где что-либо подтверждающее эти слова? Nikolay Omonov (talk) 08:11, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Keep If the info is factual I don't think it is eligible for a copyright. --RAN (talk) 04:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    This book is a primary source, written by a member of this supposed family, not by a genealogy researcher. There is no evidence from reliable independent sources. There is no guarantee that this information is factual. Nikolay Omonov (talk) 08:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:20180526 - 09 - Boston, MA (Downtown Crossing) - "The Quickest Route to the Soul of Boston...?".jpg[edit]

Likely a copyrighted work. Ooligan (talk) 00:11, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dayton - Rhea County Courthouse - 20220607144046.jpg[edit]

It appears this statue was erected in 2017. Artist permission needed - no freedom of panorama for public art in the United States. Quercusechinus (talk) 00:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Foggy night, Witmer Road, North Tonawanda, New York - 20220113.jpg[edit]

Low quality image and Out of Scope (COM:OOS) Ooligan (talk) 00:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep Totally usable as a thumbnail, and how are grade railroad crossings out of scope? How narrow do you think Wikimedia's scope is? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cr 42 2.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Cr 42.JPG - Not a duplicate - these are the before/after of an image lab request. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

yes the image was created by the laboratory, but it has never been used, so it is not needed at this moment ZioNicco (talk) 07:26, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MLKMemorial.jpg[edit]

Permission from Duane Lempke is required A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cape Town in July 2018 - 142.jpg[edit]

No FOP in South Africa. Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 03:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This seems like a general street shot, rather than focusing on a specific building or buildings. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cape Town in July 2018 - 237.jpg[edit]

No FOP in South Africa. Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 03:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This seems like a general skyline shot, rather than focusing on a specific building or buildings. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:22, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cape Town in July 2018 - 238.jpg[edit]

No FOP in South Africa. Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 03:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This seems like a general skyline shot, rather than focusing on a specific building or buildings. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Banda de Músicos Puneño del Perú 03.jpg[edit]

Imagen de baja calidad sin mayor relevancia cultural. Ciudades (talk) 04:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Banda de Músicos Puneño del Perú 04.jpg[edit]

Imagen de baja calidad sin mayor relevancia cultural. Solicitud de borrado por el mismo autor de la fotografía. Ciudades (talk) 04:59, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Muhammad Arifin Ilham, Tito Karnavian, and Muhammad Rizieq Shihab while attending the Action for Defending Islam on December 2, 2016.jpg[edit]

The photo is from Liputan 6. 120.188.5.162 07:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Carmel IWI Carmel 1024x275 0539.jpg[edit]

I doubt that this image is really own work as claimed. Same or very similar images are widely published, but I was unable to find the original source. Some examples: https://gunsmagazine.com/news/safety-recall-notice-iwi-carmel/, https://www.deviantart.com/corvuscoalition01/art/CARMEL-ASSAULT-RIFLE-5-56-X-45-878877429 MKFI (talk) 07:59, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:John Huyler, Paul Rogers & David Harris Press Conference.jpg[edit]

There is no evidence that the stated author of this file, Dmitri Morningstar, has released this under a free license. If they agree with this license, they should send permission to Commons:VRT. HeminKurdistan (talk) 08:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I will contact the photographer.JohnKent (talk) 15:26, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Chris Vineyard (talk · contribs)[edit]

User with bad history, small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works. Probably a sock of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Thpthn.

Yann (talk) 09:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Héraldique famille (De)GUEIFFIER.jpg[edit]

erreur héraldique 90.113.162.120 09:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Photo de Marian R. De GUEIFFIER en promouvant du vin.jpg[edit]

je ne souhaites plus apparaitre sur internet 90.113.162.120 09:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Marian R. (De) GUEIFFIER en 2019.jpg[edit]

je ne souhaites plus apparaitre sur internet 90.113.162.120 09:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:HSBA Hamburg School of Business Administration Logo 2018 Wappen und Schrift rechts.svg[edit]

Das Logo ist nicht mehr aktuell, ist veraltet und darf nicht mehr verwendet werden. MarcusBraeunig (talk) 10:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep. We don't delete old logos of notable institutions. And why on Earth should we? Upload the new logo if you have the right to do so, and feel free to edit the file description of this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:60 years liberation rib.png[edit]

Есть SVG-дубликат - File:BLR Medal '60 years of the Liberation of the Republic of Belarus from the Nazi Invaders' ribbon.svg MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 11:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cierre de campaña de Bordón, 1995.png[edit]

Image taken from an Argentine newspaper published in 1995. The image is in the PD in its country of origin, but it is not in the US due to Berne Convention. Günther Frager (talk) 11:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bordón y Álvarez proclaman la fórmula del FREPASO.png[edit]

Image taken from an Argentine newspaper published in 1995. The image is in the PD in its country of origin, but it is not in the US due to Berne Convention. Günther Frager (talk) 11:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cierre de campaña de Massaccesi, 1995.png[edit]

Image taken from an Argentine newspaper published in 1995. The image is in the PD in its country of origin, but it is not in the US due to Berne Convention. Günther Frager (talk) 11:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:EquiposTC-TC2000-95 (El Grafico).jpg[edit]

Image published in an Argentine magazine in 1995. The image is PD in Argetina, but it is not in the US due to Berne Convention. Günther Frager (talk) 11:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Marianne Hultman 3.jpg[edit]

Copyright Patrick Miller according to "Metadata". Picture used on the web (https://wisefoolpod.com/bts-liaf-marianne-hultman-director-of-the-north-norwegian-art-centre-nnks/). labelled "Own work" but it is not shown that uploader is Patrick Miller. LittleGun (talk) 13:20, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/insource:"historiatc.com.ar"[edit]

The source of this image is the Internet forum https://historiatc.com.ar and their real source are Argentine sport magazines like "El Gráfico", "Corsa", etc. The images are from the 1990s and in the Argentine public domain. However, they are still protected by copyright in the US as they were published after 1 March 1989, when the US entered the Berne Convention.

Günther Frager (talk) 13:21, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I understand that the photos are still protected by copyright in the US but why is the PD-AR-Photo tag allowed to use here? And what license tag can we use for the photos if there is any available? I would appreciate it if you could help me with that. Regards. Maxi-Napo-99 (talk) 21:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Maxi-Napo-99 The issue is that our policy requires images to have a free license (like CC-BY), or to be in the public domain in both its country of origin and the United States. This usually requires having two tags, one for Argentina and another for the US. An example is this image that uses {{PD-AR-Photo}} and {{PD-US-1996}}. As a rule of thumb, photos from Argentina after 1 March 1989 need a Creative Commons license, photos published between 1971 and 1989 require a lot of care as the majority are copyrighted in the US (you need to read about COM:URAA), photos published in Argentina before 1971 are mostly fine (tags should be like I showed before), and photos published in Argentina more than 95 years ago are completely fine. I will try to update the tag for Argentina to make uploaders aware of it as it is not fun to get photos deleted when there was good faith. Günther Frager (talk) 22:12, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for responding. I understand. Should I update the photos with the PD-AR-Photo and PD-US-1996 tags then? Or I wait until the PD updated tag is available? Maxi-Napo-99 (talk) 06:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In order to apply {{PD-US-1996}} the photos must be published before 1 January 1971, these images are from the 1990s. If the solution was to apply a missing tag I wouldn't have nominated them for deletion. Günther Frager (talk) 10:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok thank you for the info! I will read about the URAA in more detail. Cheers. Maxi-Napo-99 (talk) 10:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:GÖD-Vorsitzender Mag. Dr. Eckehard Quin.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (c) Andi Bruckner M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:29, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Aristoteles der Stagirit.jpg[edit]

Copyright status of the statue is not clear, see the discussion at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#License_tags_for_photographs_of_original_works Phlsph7 (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


If the author is Νικόλαος Παυλόπουλος (1909–1990), as seems probable, I don't see how the photo could be kept. Copyright in Greece lasts 70 years pma and they have no relevant FoP (according to COM:Greece). Additionally, US copyright applies: it is unlikely that the statue was erected before 1928.
However, before deletion, projects that allow fair use should be allowed time to upload the file locally, and this discussion should be put in an undelete-in-X category.
Probably the file has to remain deleted until the later of 2061 and 95 years after the "publication" of the statue. Does somebody know the latter year?
–LPfi (talk) 10:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Apparently it was erected in 1956, which would make it free in the US before it will be free in Greece. So undelete in 2061, from my perspective Felix QW (talk) 13:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Thailand Spain Locator.png[edit]

This file couls be update as a new file on the original file on File:Spain Thailand Locator.png Pomznp (talk) 13:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:UFL Foto Claudia Seitz 04 06 2021.jpg[edit]

copyvio, upload is not copyrightholder "FOTOSTUDIO-WEISHEITINGER" (see EXIF) Alabasterstein (talk) 13:53, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Upload was a misstake, the uploader agrees to the deletion, comment on German [1] Alabasterstein (talk) 14:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Application of high intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of open-angle glaucoma in Indian patients.pdf[edit]

This is a multi-page scan of a scientific paper, and on the bottom of its first page contains a copyright claim. Doesn't that make this upload a copyvio, by definition? DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Agusschneiter (talk · contribs)[edit]

Covers from Argentine magazine Gente. As the issues were published in the 1990s they are still copyrighted in the US due to Berne Convention.

Günther Frager (talk) 14:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Photomicrogram planaria head end eyespots visible mag40x ImgPx2000x2176 Karisah Smith via NelsonExpression.png[edit]

Copyright status unclear. Uploaded states at my Wikipedia talk page that We're a scholarly non-commercial photo group with the purpose of putting useful images on Wikipedia. All member-photogs understand that and all give copyright to NelsonExpression and then give it up to PD from there. No evidence of any donation of copyright. Velella (talk) 14:55, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

keep (OP) More of that quote: "All member-photogs understand that and all give copyright to NelsonExpression and then give it up to PD from there. We use the one account for uploading since there's only one experienced Wikipedian in the group. Just as if Magnum Photo or Time Magazine or UPI were the account, they'd still identify their original photographers while controlling the member images." If one wants to hyper-parse words on image descriptions so much, then what evidence is there of any WP image's donation of copyright? Each image uploaded says specifically in its description that the photog donated copyright and it's PD for Wikipedia to use. Thought that was clear enough. Would you suggest different wprding? The account is doing a name change per an admin's advice to reflect uploading by the individual editor of the photos donated by the photogs. It's okay! The group formed in order to put photos on WP and everyone knows they donate the copyright so WP may use them.
NelsonExpression (talk) 16:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For each image, the copyright holder needs to provide evidence of permission by either providing a link to a site with an explicit release under a free license or by sending a declaration of consent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. There's full instructions at Commons:Volunteer Response Team. This applies to the following uploads:

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AR VLD (talk · contribs)[edit]

Derivative work, statue is created by Mohammad-Hossein Mamurian. No FOP in Iran.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AR VLD (talk · contribs)[edit]

Derivative work, no COM:FOP Iran. Also, the EXIF indicates that Peroz Bavandi is the photographer, own work claim questionable.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AR VLD (talk · contribs)[edit]

Clearly not own works. According to the information put here by the uploader, these maps are created by the Institute of Geography and published in an unknown date. These would fall in the public domain per Iranian law if there is a proof they were published before 1993 and the institute was the copyright holder, but we cannot confirm that for now.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by AR VLD (talk · contribs)[edit]

Clearly not own works. While some of these files may be freely-licensed, lack of information on their origin makes their copyright status unknown.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Beveiliger van Securitas.jpg[edit]

no photographer given, no permission from the person portrayed (privacy), used for promotion of this company (see label) on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 15:42, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:NL 220908 6104.jpg[edit]

no permission from author - see metadata "Author i Ingemar Lindewall" - used for company promotion on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 15:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:AMEI ASMR World Tour.jpg[edit]

There does not seem to be sufficient evidence provided to validate the free use claim on this image. Without sufficient evidence, this image seems like a professional image, and thus most likely non-free. Steel1943 (talk) 15:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cosplay of Volstagg.jpg[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, profesional photography with metadata that points to Facebook. Günther Frager (talk) 15:59, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jones-huala-1.jpg[edit]

This image was not produced by ANRed and therefore we cannot use their licensing terms. The link provided is from this year, but a quick reverse image search points to older news articles 2017 2018. Without a proper source we cannot keep this image. Günther Frager (talk) 16:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Gouramii (talk · contribs)[edit]

Likely not own works: inconsistent or missing EXIF data (File:Samurai gourami (Juvenile ).jpg credited to "Author Kim SeungChan"); unreliable uploader with proven copyvios.

P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by RookleysE (talk · contribs)[edit]

Historical photos/magazine cover/artwork, all missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission.

P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Iliao2345 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of Scope: Files were used in en:User:Iliao2345/sandbox which was Speedy deleted as a blatand hoax by User:Liz -> en:User_talk:Iliao2345#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_User:Iliao2345/sandbox

Emha (talk) 16:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Behshahr municipality logo.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by HeminKurdistan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 16:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Behshahr Logo.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by HeminKurdistan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 16:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Image proba.png[edit]

No source provided for an evident non own image Theklan (talk) 16:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Image halo.png[edit]

non source provided for an image that couldn't be made without an electron microscope. Theklan (talk) 16:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Balaena biscayensis.jpg[edit]

copyvio, non clear source Theklan (talk) 16:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Euskal balea eta Ipar balea.jpg[edit]

copyvio, no source Theklan (talk) 16:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Швайківці5285.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Works by Dmytro Pylypiak Yann (talk) 17:11, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wab Kinew Swearing In.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Discospinster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://twitter.com/WabKinew/status/1714737016401703098 HR with EXIF, this is not the source. Yann (talk) 17:12, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/insource:"@fabiolamoonphotography"[edit]

Source is Facebook and there is no indication of CC-BY license.

Günther Frager (talk) 18:04, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ansan May 2014 07.JPG[edit]

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Korea. Gamgol Citizen's Hall was built in 2001, and so still under architect's copyright and is unfree. As no architect or designer is named, copyright remains for 70 years from the year of completion. Do not restore this image until 2072 (assuming the architect remains unknown to Commons admins and license reviewers). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Keep. Realistically, this is just a classic case of meta:Copyright paranoia. Sure, I know, Commons:PP says otherwise, but common sense would be nice to have around here. Shrug. At least make sure to tag it for undeletion in 72. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Piotrus we don't keep unfree content here. Commons strictly adheres to the Definition of Free Cultural Works, which is a basis of COM:Licensing policy and the media archive site's disallowance of copyrighted public structures from countries that do not allow commercial exploitations of those works without permissions from artists and/or architects, like the supposedly-free Korea (North Korea is better here as their law allows free reproduction of public landmarks, something South Korean law restricts). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:12, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Freedom of panorama is an interesting concept. I fully support reforming various laws to make it a global concept. However, the fact that it is not happening is related to the simple truth that nobody cares about it because outside Wikipedia nobody enforces it or knows about it... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:58, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Piotrus real-life FOP-related cases have been heard in the United States (like the Gaylord v. United States over the Korean War Veterans Memorial, as well as cases of commercial uses of murals and graffiti by fashion, retail, and automobile companies there), in France (especially two 1990 cases involving Grande Arche and La Geóde, and the case of Place de Terreux of Lyon that established French incidental defense for commercial users), and in India (over a wall painting, in the 50s/60s). There has been a case in South Korea though, concerning a building (see w:en:Freedom of panorama#South Korea), but the court ruled in favor of the user in the first trial because the building just happened to be a small part of the advertisement, though before another trial was to be conducted, the architect decided to make a settlement outside the court, so no conclusive decision has been reached. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thank you. Do we describe these cases here or on Wikipedia? I'd like to use them as teaching examples in my class. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 13:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ECLIPSE-BANDA COLOMBIANA.jpg[edit]

Possible opyvio: Picture available the 12 Octobre on Tik Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@e_clipse_band/video/7288907010895121669 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:12, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ansan City Hall.jpg[edit]

Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ansan city Hall.jpg. Wikimedia Commons does not allow content under non-commercial licensing, therefore Korean freedom of panorama is unacceptable. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Mauro Germán Camoranesi.jpg[edit]

Image taken from Facebook and clearly published early in a magazine, but no real source is given. Finding it on Facebook is not enough to claim it is an anonymous work (the excuse to argue it is in the PD). Also {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} can only be used for images published before URAA date (1996), and for uploads prior to 1 March 2012. This image doesn't satisfy neither. Günther Frager (talk) 19:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image was published on Facebook on August 10, 2019, but was originally uploaded to the club's old official website, as can be seen in the original post on the social network, it's just that the file was retouched. The website went offline on April 10, 2012 and cannot be accessed, even by using the Wayback Machine website. So, the file does not have a machine-readable source, and the author is not clarified either. Cementeɾo (talk) 01:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Team rockit live 2013.png[edit]

Low quality LevandeMänniska (talk), 19:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Drie Eijghen 1700.png[edit]

I created a new version of my map, and uploaded it under a new file name. I want the incorrect file (previous versions included) to be deleted, so they won't keep circulating on the Internet. Wimpi (talk) 20:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Drie Eijghen.png[edit]

I created a new version of my map, and uploaded it under a new file name. I want the incorrect file (previous versions included) to be deleted, so they won't keep circulating on the Internet. Wimpi (talk) 20:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kinrooi 1842.png[edit]

I created a new version of my map, and uploaded it under a new file name. The new version is both more accurate and clearer. I want the incorrect map to be deleted, so it won't keep circulating on the Internet. Wimpi (talk) 20:26, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Molenbeersel 1842.png[edit]

I created a new version of my map, and uploaded it under a new file name. The new version is both more accurate and clearer. I want the incorrect map to be deleted, so it won't keep circulating on the Internet. Wimpi (talk) 20:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ICM logo big.jpg[edit]

G10; cross wiki spam, see meta:Wikiproject:Antispam/Archives/2021/Wikibusiness#I Johnj1995 (talk) 20:55, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tsubakisannomiya2023portrait.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by IagoQnsi as no permission (No permission since). It sounds like IagoQnsi hasn't seen an original. Stolen images tend to be in a smaller size than this (1,732 × 2,309 pixels), actresses may pose for amateur photographers for a fee. I would say there is a too weak basis for speedy deletion ("Unless this issue is resolved, the file will be deleted seven days after this tag was added "), so I'm converting this to a regular deletion request. whym (talk) 12:45, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I understand that the file I uploaded has been nominated for deletion.
I followed the guide and sent a license approval email to VRT (March 25th).
What else can I do?
I trimmed it when I uploaded it, but I also have the original image (with Exif information created by my digital camera) before trimming.
If you would like to send it for proof, please indicate where to send it.
Thank you.
--Kuro itengineer (talk) 14:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Keep No reason to assume the uploader stole it from an unidentified source. The original deletion rationale is refuted, from my perspective. A non-trimmed version would be nice but not strictly necessary, given the lack of argument for deletion. whym (talk) 12:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    thank you.
    I am ready to upload the original photo, so if there is an opinion that it should be deleted, I will upload the original file.
    However, since it is a landscape and has an unnecessary background, I would like to avoid re-uploading if possible.
    --~~ Kuro itengineer (talk) 13:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I thought it was concluded that the file subject to the deletion discussion would survive, but it seems that it was deleted today.
    I don't understand the reason or the basis.
    I also sent the permission to VRT as instructed, but was there any reason why it didn't work?
    You asked me to request the cancellation of the deletion after 14 days, but do I have to wait until then?
    I would appreciate it if you could let me know.
    12:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC) Kuro itengineer (talk) 12:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Comment A ticket is mentioned in the file: ticket:2023032510003115. Yann (talk) 14:24, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
ticket:2023032510003115 was closed 2 weeks ago, which does not mean a rejection. In this case, the ticket is deemed unnecessary. [2][3] If we have reasons to be extra careful, we could do more (like requesting and verifying other versions of the picture as suggested above), but that costs extra time and effort and I would rather do that only when necessary. whym (talk) 03:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
ticket:2023032510003115 is accepted now. A new email arrived. Although I personally didn't demand it, I have no problem with accepting voluntarily sent evidence. whym (talk) 12:39, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: Permission OK now. --Yann (talk) 13:30, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tsubakisannomiya2023portrait.jpg[edit]

Time has passed since the photo was taken Kuro itengineer (talk) 21:55, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • You probably removed it from the article where it was being used. But what is your issue? You jumped through hoops this April to make sure it could be used, and now you want it deleted in November? How is that logical? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    thank you for your reply. I apologize for making a request that is difficult to understand.
    For a long time, there was no photo of "Tsubaki Sannomiya" on the Japanese version of Wikipedia, so I thought some kind of photo was needed, so I added the one I took to Commons, and then added it to the Japanese version of Wikipedia.
    However, the photo was extremely unpopular, with many saying it was drastically different from the person's appearance, and multiple channels advised me to take it down.
    For this reason, I immediately removed the photo from the Japanese Wikipedia that I had added.
    However, during that period, it was discovered that another user added the photo to the Chinese version of Wikipedia, causing the inappropriate photo to be displayed in searches.
    For this reason, I decided that I wanted to delete the original Commons file.
    I don't know the details, but even if I created a photo, can I delete it if I think it's inappropriate?
    Thank you for your judgment.-- Kuro itengineer (talk) 21:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • What did people consider inappropriate about the photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    The photo was taken by me, but it was pointed out that it was far from the actual appearance of the person, perhaps because my skills were inexperienced, the timing of the photo was bad, or there was a lighting issue. If you were an ordinary person, you might not have made such a point, but since he is a person with many fans, I think they are particularly concerned about his appearance. I myself am confused and exhausted and would like to escape from such problems.-- Kuro itengineer (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I'm sympathetic to you, but I just looked at the category, and this is the only photo of her on Commons, so I have to oppose deletion on that basis. However, if you are able to take a better photo and upload it, you'd have a much stronger argument for a courtesy deletion of this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thank you for your kind reply. In fact, I have already uploaded and published new another photos that I took in the Japanese Wikipedia article. However, in consideration of unintended disclosure like this, I chose to upload the Japanese version locally. There is a way to upload this file to Wikimedia Commons instead of requesting its deletion, but I cannot decide on this right away at this time. Kuro itengineer (talk) 06:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Unless there's a copyright issue, photos should be uploaded to Commons, not locally to Wikipedias. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thank you for your advice! Although I'm a little nervous, I decide to upload the new photo to Commons. Once that's done, the best option seems to be to delete your old photos. Kuro itengineer (talk) 20:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I just imported a new photo from the Japanese version of Wikipedia. I would be happy if you could delete this if there is no problem. Kuro itengineer (talk) 21:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I can't delete anything, but could you link the photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I don't really understand the detailed mechanism or procedure, but if you can't delete it, you can leave it as is. I apologize for the inconvenience. The new photos that were in the Japanese version locally were imported to Wikimedia Commons, and the original local files were also deleted. I would like to add this Commons image to the Chinese version as well. Old photos will remain, but there will be no objections as long as they are actually used. thank you very much. Kuro itengineer (talk) 05:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Delete Thanks. The new photo is better than the old one. I think a courtesy deletion is OK. You said you had more pictures? I encourage you to upload what you have. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thank you very much. I have several photos, but they are from similar angles, so I will think carefully about whether to upload them.-- Kuro itengineer (talk) 15:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Time has passed since the photo was taken Kuro itengineer (talk) 22:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Recoin-arch.pdf[edit]

Out of scope: outdated and redundant to File:Recoin Architecture.png. Omphalographer (talk) 22:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Affiche du film Bric-à-brac.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:22, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bonjour ! Bric-à-brac est un film du cinéaste Martin Guérin. Une figure importante du cinéma en Abiti-Témiscamingue. Est-ce possible de savoir la raison pour laquelle vous croyez que cette photo doit être supprimée ? https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Gu%C3%A9rin Kimfon10 (talk) 14:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Bonjour Kimfon10, je demande la suppression de cette image, parce que je doute qu'elle obéisse aux règles des Creative Commons ou soit dans le domaine public. Comme elle est marquée comme Travail personnel, pourriez-vous, svp, clarifier si vous en êtes l'auteure ? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Bonjour, Le fichier est proposé pour suppression parce que, actuellement, il n'y a pas de preuve que vous êtes l'artiste qui a créé cette affiche, ou que vous êtes le propriétaire des Productions Radical Libre 2003, ou que vous en aviez explicitement acquis les droits d'auteur par contrat. Si l'une ou l'autre de ces possibilités s'applique, une preuve doit en être fournie tel que précisé dans Commons:VRT. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete. Requires VRT confirmation if the uploader was the owner of the copyright as claimed. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2023/11/06&oldid=824417345"