Commons:Deletion requests/2023/11/09

8 November 2023

10 November 2023

Deletion requests on 9 November 2023

• archive
• gallery
• purge this page's cache
• ±

November 9

File:Retinal cell responses.png

Reasons for deletion request: Wrong information - cone response curves don't look like this (they look like the chart here - Cone cell). The information here is simply a derivative from CIE 1931 color matching functions -Vinokurov Demis (talk) 00:06, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Can't be deleted as long as it's COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:University of Central Florida (UCF) Pegasus on Building.jpg

As the creator of this photograph, I have been contacted by the University of Central Florida's Office of the General Counsel. I was asked to delete the file on the grounds that it allegedly constitutes trademark infringement. Although I do not acknowledge any infringement, I am willing to comply with their request, and I ask that Wikimedia please delete the image to assist with that, since I am unable to delete the image myself. - Steevven1 (talk) 01:28, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Question What is the rule in the U.S.? Is this considered a sculpture and therefore not OK under COM:FOP US, or is it considered part of a building, and therefore OK? If it's OK in terms of copyright, we should keep it because it's COM:INUSE, and Commons does not enforce trademarks, nor could a university demonstrate that you injured their trademark just by posting for free a photo of their logo on a building. If it's not OK per COM:FOP US, it should be uploaded locally at en.wikipedia as fair use, and the Wikimedia Foundation can then dare the university to try to sue them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:El Tigre Anzoátegui.jpg

The source of this file is a photograph from Google, but there does not appear to be any evidence of a suitable free license at source. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag of Marhaenia.svg

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Glitcher By Geranlodes (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: various personal and unofficial flags, unused outside a ruwiki sandbox.

• File:A25be77af2-450.webp
• File:Flag of the Fireland.png
• File:Flag of the FAS.png
• File:Flag of Bir Tawil.png
• File:Flag of Jawa.png
• File:Flag of SINZ.png
• File:Flag of the Colin Republic.png

Omphalographer (talk) 01:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Thaitdth (talk · contribs)

No permission from the source

• File:Chodaumoihoacuonganh2.jpg
• File:Chodaumoihoacuonganh1.jpg
• File:Chodaumoihoacuonganh5.jpg
• File:Chodaumoihoacuonganh4.jpg
• File:Chodaumoihoacuonganh3.jpg
• File:Chodaumoihoacuonganh6.jpg
• File:Chodaumoihoacuong2.jpg
• File:Chodaumoihoacuong.jpg

A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Otobe heliport aerial photograph.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as no permission (No permission since) The uploader has sourced the Geospatial Infomrarion Authoriy of Japan, which publishes satellite photos with a CC license. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Kamil Houska 03.jpg

Imagevio ? https://cz.linkedin.com/in/kamilhouska?trk=public_post_feed-actor-image OJJ (talk) 04:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Bohumil Rameš.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Gampe as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Bohumil Rames 70 let.jpg - Not an exact duplicate but much lower quality and unused. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Previn Vedan.jpg

High quality with no meaningful exif, uploaded by a new user and credited to ICCR , PCP Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

This is a photograph that I took out and I have permission from the person that I took the image off. Shayomo (talk) 14:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Human Urinal Fetish.jpg

No confirmation of license on source site. 95.155.87.99 07:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Chirped pulse amplification.png

From the talk page: Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 07:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, I accidentally submitted this nomination before completing it. The message on the talk page is:

This image was created by the contractor operating LLNL on behalf of the Department of Energy. The contractor is the Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. This image however is available under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. See [1]https://www.llnl.gov/copyright-reuse. 128.12.200.84 00:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

In the {{PD-USGov-DOE}} template there is a link to some discussion at w:en:Template talk:PD-USGov-DOE regarding the copyright policies of various national laboratories. LLNL is listed under "Labs with ambiguous or nonexistent copyright policies". Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 07:41, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag of Alghero.svg

This file was initially tagged by Arrow303 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3|2=DW of File:Brasão Algueiro.jpg, deleted for Copyvio from https://www.araldicacivica.it/comune/alghero/ (CC-BY-NC-ND as per https://www.araldicacivica.it/info/disclaimer/). Heavily used flag, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

The source image (File:Brasão Algueiro.jpg) was previously tagged by his uploader with a Commons-compatible license, but then tagged with Copyvio and deleted as is source was araldicavica.it, that publishes under CC-BY-NC-ND. I'm sure that the creator of the flag was in good faith, but now that the source image has been deleted, I think the flag should be deleted too as DW of a non-free image.

Also, the intense use of this flag should not be a problem, as the image can be easy recreated using this CC-BY-SA-4.0 CoA. Anyway, this flag design does not seem to have an official recnognition by the municipality, as it's not mentioned in the Statuto comunale and the municipality itself uses the version without CoA. --Arrow303 (talk) 13:59, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Then perhaps we should edit and keep? The resulting flag would be below COM:TOO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

@King of Hearts are you referring to keeping the flag, but without CoA? Arrow303 (talk) 21:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Yes. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

@King of Hearts Understood. But in that case this file would be a duplicate of File:Flag of Catalonia.svg. Arrow303 (talk) 21:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

It can always be the same design with a different file name. There are many similar cases in Commons. Since I'm the original uploader of this file and indeed I had no idea that the CoA was copyrighted when I created and uploaded the file, I agree that editing sounds reasonable. Any idea btw why this following file with the CoA hasn't been deleted too?

Thanks. -- Argean (talk) 09:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

@Argean @King of Hearts, That CoA has been redesigned by the uploader, that published it under CC0. The copyright, in the context of coats of arms, it's measured by looking at the single representation that any artist can make starting from the same blazon (which, being a written description, is free from copyright). The CoA included in this image was mistakenly tagged by its uploader with CC-BY-SA, when it was not. I agree with changing the central coat of arms (we also have this version, that may be better), but shouldn't we upload this new version as a separate file as per COM:OW?

I suggest to make this image a redirect to File:Flag of Catalonia.svg (also because the official flag seems to be without CoA), then create and upload the flag with the CoA, that can be named File:Flag of Alghero (de facto).svg, or something similar. Opinions? Thanks :) -- Arrow303 (talk) 22:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Looking more closely at the policy, in this case it would seem that the CoA can be directly replaced. So for me  Keep if edited. Thanks :) --Arrow303 (talk) 22:49, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Luis Walter Alvarez 1961.jpg

https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7665726 is clearly the original image, and was taken in California, not Sweden. The Nobel Prize Committee photographs are not necessarily by the Nobel Prize organization, which seems to be the fundamental mistake made here, by presuming that, since this was published alongside the Nobel Prize announcement, that it was taken in Sweden. We know the photographer per that link: It's Donald Cooksey, who is not Swedish. Clearly, given the National Archives has a less-cropped version of the photo which copyright is claimed on, this was not taken in Sweden, is not an "Official Nobel Prize photo" in any sense that would move the copyright to Sweden, and the argument based on it being a Swedish photo is not accurate. Now, it sucks to have to delete it, I fully agree, but, we do have a good photo of him, File:Luis Alvarez with a magnetic monopole detector.jpg, which I would argue is in some ways better.

It's possible that the University of California copyright claim is one that we at Wikipedia shouldn't accept per {{PD-Art}}. That's a fair arguement if we can show that Donald Cooksey was working for the federal government - He's Donald Cooksey, so this shouldn't be hard - or we could argue a PD-US-no-notice if it was published without a copyright claim. However, that's not at all what's being argued for the reason the photo is out of copyright, and we'd need to update the file pages to a valid copyright claim at a minimum.

So, to bulletpoint the problems:

• The author is not the Nobel Foundation, it's Donald Cooksey
• It was not taken in Sweden, it was taken in California, at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
• It was not taken in 1961; it was taken on January 2, 1962.
• He got his Nobel Prize in 1968, so the dates don't even add up for this being anything to do with the Nobel Prize Foundation.
• {{PD-Sweden-photo}} does not apply to photos taken in California by Americans. Forgive me if that comes off as really sarcastic, but the point is that, if it's kept due to other arguments than the ones currently made for it being out of copyright, we really need to fix the bullshit documentation. We can't keep using an obviously incorrect license for it.
• For {{PD-US-no-notice}} to apply, we'd need evidence of it being published in the United States without a notice during the period where that caused it to lose copyright. A modern Dutch archive or a modern Swedish webpage won't do that.
• For {{PD-USGov-DOE}} to apply, we'd need to get around the Federal Government asserting a copyright for the University of California. Now, bullshit arguments for copyright exist all over the place, and Cooksey was Associate director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, so there's probably good reason to think this is bullshit, especially as the phrasing might indicate that the University of California are claiming copyright for scanning it ("has asserted a continuing legal interest in the digital versions of the images included in the NARA accession"). But it's not completely clear whether that's the exact claim made.

Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

In File:Luis Walter Alvarez 1961.jpg, I have uploaded front and back of a photo published in U.S. by Keystone Press. There is no copyright notice, and hence {{PD-US-no-notice}} should apply. Materialscientist (talk) 10:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

That's fair. In that case, as long as we update everything, we're good, but we really do need to get all this right. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

I've updated everything, and think we're good now. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Keep per Materialscientist --RAN (talk) 16:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LWA_Picture_Final.jpg

Per en:Template talk:PD-USGov-DOE, works by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory are not PD. howcheng {chat} 16:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

 Keep Probably {{PD-US-no notice}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:29, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

"Probably" isn't good enough. howcheng {chat} 23:08, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the official Nobel photo, {{PD-Sweden}}, see here. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

---

Kept, just squeezes into {{PD-Sweden}}. Stifle (talk) 11:33, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Luis Walter Alvarez 1961.jpg

File:IE Traffic Calming 400m Sign.png

Replaced by SVG EthanL13 (talk) 09:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:IE Traffic Calming Do Not Pass Sign.png

Replaced by SVG EthanL13 (talk) 09:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:IE Traffic Calming Gateway Sign A (Inbound).png

Replaced by SVG EthanL13 (talk) 09:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:IE Traffic Calming Gateway Sign A (Outbound).png

Replaced by SVG EthanL13 (talk) 09:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:IE Traffic Calming Gateway Sign B (Inbound).png

Replaced by SVG EthanL13 (talk) 09:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:IE Traffic Calming Gateway Sign B (Outbound).png

Replaced by SVG EthanL13 (talk) 09:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:فرزانه واز.jpg

https://jemika.ir/farzaneh-naz-biography-farzaneh-naz-pictures/ Hosseinronaghi (talk) 10:02, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:فرزانه واز با سیتا قاسمی.jpg

https://jemika.ir/farzaneh-naz-biography-farzaneh-naz-pictures/ Hosseinronaghi (talk) 10:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:IE road sign P-011.png

Superseded by SVG EthanL13 (talk) 10:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:IE road sign P-057.png

Superseded by SVG. EthanL13 (talk) 10:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Dr Mohan Gundeti.jpg

Copyrighted, according to the metadata, and no evidence that the uploader is actually the copyright holder Fram (talk) 10:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi , i am creating a page behalf of Dr Mohan Gundeti. Please let me know, how to get evidence or proof of this image...share if any process for the same. thank you Gashriram (talk) 10:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Sure. Have the photographer (not the subject, unless he can prove the copyright was transferred to him) contact COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Marco Nespolo Fedrigoni 2023.jpg

Not own work & previuosly published here: https://www.industriaitaliana.it/gruppo-fedrigoni-chiude-2022-record-fatturato/ (see this file) Bradipo Lento (talk) 11:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:探偵はもう、死んでいる。 logo.png

Obviously not meeting the PD-textlogo, the color of the font and the word "死" are clearly designed GY Fan★ 11:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep: See Cup Noodles case in COM:TOO Japan. BlackShadowG (talk) 08:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Takt op logo.svg

Obviously not meeting the PD-textlogo, the letter ”p" and "t" are clearly designed GY Fan★ 11:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Keep The 'T' is just a connected line and two circles, I don't think they are complex enough to be copyrightable. The 'P' has swooshes but still clearly read as 'P'.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

  When these line and circles are just simply placed on the image, it may meet PD-textlogo. But in this images these elements are clearly elaborate designed to show some arts.--GY Fan★ 07:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Hibike! Euphonium logo.png

Obviously not meeting the PD-textlogo, the "!" mark is clearly designed GY Fan★ 11:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

 Delete: per GY Fan VegBird3 (talk) 15:00, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

File:My Hero Academia logo in Japan 20150106.png

Obviously not meeting the PD-textlogo, the japanese characters are clearly designed GY Fan★ 12:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ksalcedocif1031 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

• File:Marcela Benjumea.png
• File:Jorge Herrera Colombia.png
• File:Luis Mesa.png
• File:Mario Duarte.png
• File:Ricardo Mejía.png
• File:Andrés Felipe Martínez.jpg
• File:Jorge Cao.png
• File:Diego Cadavid.png
• File:Aida Bossa.png
• File:Julio Cesar Herrera.png
• File:Luis Eduardo Arango.png
• File:Kepa Colombiano.jpg
• File:Maru yamayusa.jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

---

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 09:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Ksalcedocif1031 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own works: low quality, missing EXIF.

• File:Taxi Kia Soul en Bogotá.jpg
• File:Taxi en Colombia..jpg

0x0a (talk) 12:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Tournage d'un court-métrage avec une PXW-FS5II.png

Préservation anonymat Rémi sim (talk) 12:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Files in Category:Election commissions

No indication of CC licensing.

• File:Logo de la Registraduría Nacional del Estado Civil Colombiana (versión negro).png
• File:Logo de la Registraduría Nacional del Estado Civil Colombiana.png
• File:REGIS SIG XXI.png

0x0a (talk) 13:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Najanibul (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: plain text, dubious mathematical claims.

• File:How many primes less than 10⁵⁰.pdf
• File:GOLDBACH'S STRONG AND WEAK HYPOTHESIS.pdf
• File:MOCNA I SŁABA HIPOTEZA GOLDBACHA.pdf

Omphalographer (talk) 16:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

These articles are from my book Jan Lubina "Number Symmetry", published on Amazon. Najanibul (talk) 19:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Najanibul (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: additional similar plain text content.

• File:SYMETRIA LICZB PIERWSZYCH I ICH ILOCZYNÓW.pdf
• File:Ile liczb pierwszych jest mniejszych od 10.pdf

Omphalographer (talk) 13:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

These articles are from my book Jan Lubina "Number Symmetry", published on Amazon. Najanibul (talk) 19:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Площадь объединённых наций.jpg

Not own work, but an unidentified Webmap. Doesn't look like OSM, so likely a CopyVio of a service like Google, Bing, Yandex. Enyavar (talk) 13:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Queen Camilla & King Charles (State Opening 2023).jpg

The metadata says Roger Harris is the copyright holder. The original flickr file has two competing licenses: one saying cc-by and the other saying it is copyrighted. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Mühlensignet am Haus Ratinger Straße 42 "Zur Windmühle", Düsseldorf, 1909.jpg

better scan of the exact same photograph now available: File:5697644.Erwin Quedenfeldt.jpg Carl Ha (talk) 14:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Ich denke nicht, dass ein "better scan of the exact same photograph" ein Grund für den "delition request" ist oder gibt es zum Beispiel mit dem Urheberrecht oder einer Richtlinie Probleme.

Beste Grüße Jula2812 (talk) 15:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Keep, as the photos are not at all similar. Did you mean another filename? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Düsseldorf, Haustür Liefergasse 30, Erwin Quedenfeldt, 1909.jpg

better scan now available: File:5723066.Erwin Quedenfeldt.jpg Carl Ha (talk) 14:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Auch hier denke ich nicht, dass ein "better scan of the exact same photograph" ein Grund für den "delition request" ist. Nochmals beste Grüße Jula2812 (talk) 15:02, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

I think so, too. -- Kürschner (talk) 21:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Wkma6w5ilnhy.png

Not own work, missing permission, credit on map not matching the uploader. Needs COM:VRT. Also added:

• File:Gigiher8qghy.png

P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:SIM7467.jpg

Metadata credits ARDA GULER. Please confirm that this is the same person as the uploader. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Vatanpartisilogo.png

Unused logo, above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete User:P199, you say it's unused? It's COM:INUSE in 8 Wikipedia articles! However, the en.wikipedia article states that it was founded "10 July 1992 (as Workers' Party); 15 February 2015 (rebranding)," so it's way too new for their logo to be in the public domain, and I'd have to think it's above COM:TOO Turkey. So a representative of the party would have to give permission for it to be licensed here. Despite the inconvenience, I think it'll have to be uploaded locally on Wikipedias as fair use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

• Oops, how did I miss that?!?! Anyway, my main argument is that it is above TOO. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Seal of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (1989–2012).jpg

Unused, bad JPEG, superseded by SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 16:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:МБ.jpg

Fake license — 1. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 16:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Print 600948 675740.jpg

Fake license — 1. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 16:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Matheus010.jpg

A crop of this photo is found at https://www.instagram.com/p/CyuSlizt8Cy/?ref=xlLbWXw0&hl=am-et&img_index=7 with a photographer credit that doesn't match the uploader name. Please verify the source/license via COM:VRT. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Home of Daniel Nelson - Nelsonville, Ohio - Athens County, Ohio - DPLA - 9d4dc78c0d5322573a23575b31c97745 (page 254) (cropped).jpg

duplicated Wolfgang8741 (Ohio University) (talk) 18:20, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Jovan todorovic.pdf

Plain text document, promotional biography. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 18:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Horror couch shadow.jpg

Unidentifiable subject, nonsense description, outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 18:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Hafizullah Amín.jpg

This file was initially tagged by PashtunHistorian as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: [2]

Circa 1979 photograph. Soonest this could become PD in Afghanistan is 2030. Converted to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Темо Свирели.jpg

Behind the perosn are one or more works of art, presumed original and presumed in copyright. Permission to feature these should be lodged with COM:VRT. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep I have just accepted heir's permission per Ticket:2023111010008892. --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:21, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Boas práticas de segurança (3 de 5).png

copyright violtaion, see:https://openverse.org/image/4bddef76-dbb3-4b24-9038-7cd772b925df?q=DDoS%20attack BahYajé e Y4guarEtã (talk) 19:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Rallivideo-logo.png

Unused logo for advertisement, no educational value. Zafer (talk) 19:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:30 Ağustos 1922 zafer bayramı kutlu olsun! (26).png

Unused file. Photo without much information about purpose. Zafer (talk) 19:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:ΜTorrent screenshot.png

It is dubious to say this screenshot is not copyrightable. It contains a clearly copyrightable and recognisable layout. By this logic software like Photoshop and Sibelius aren't copyrightable (even though they clearly are) —MATRIX! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 20:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

 Delete Now is complex.--EEIM (talk) 02:58, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Suomenkielinen-youtube-kuvakaappaus.jpg

The video thumbnails are copyrighted. Huaqin (talk) 20:28, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Logo Del Monte.svg

While it seems doubtful to me that the raster image would be in the public domain, the svg tracing also weighs in favour of its copyrightability. The image is also hosted as non-free on enwiki, so it would be good to have a verdict either way. Felix QW (talk) 20:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Keep Per this aeticle about the history of the logo it orginates from a shield that the company created the design for in the earlier 1900s. Although this verison is admittedly a few iterations from that, but its essentially the version from the 1960s which probably wasn't copyrighted due to a lack of a copyright symbol on it at the time. But a shield is a shield regardless. So you could argue its either to close to the 1960s version to be copyrighted since that kne probably wasn't or the one from the early 1900s hundreds if you want to go that far back. But its PD either way. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep The logo was published without a copyright notice from at least the 1920s to the 1970s, which is a time period when a copyright symbol and other formalities must have been attached to "every published copy" for copyright to vest. The Copyright Office was occasionally willing to overlook occasional technical noncompliance with the copyright laws and register a copyright in the 1970s, but millions of copies of the logo without a notice over decades certainly injected the historical logo into the public domain.

Whether the drop shadow, changes to the stem of the logo, and outlining could perhaps be sufficient to create a new copyright for current version is more difficult. IMO the changes fall below the TOO for the US. Streamline8988 (talk) 00:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Poder Legislativo, Cámara de Senadores.png

Duplication of File:Senate Seal (Mexico).svg. Fry1989 ^eh? 14:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

---

Kept: We can keep both, png is a different format from svg. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Poder Legislativo, Cámara de Senadores.png

No we do not. Not when the SVG pre-exists the raster image by over a decade. I've had this debate numerous times and have always been deemed correct in my interpretation of policy. Fry1989 ^eh? 20:41, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cámara de Diputados México.png

Duplication of File:Chamber of Deputies (Mexico).svg. Fry1989 ^eh? 14:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

---

Kept: We can keep both, png is a different format from svg. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:24, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Cámara de Diputados México.png

No we do not. Not when the SVG pre-exists the raster image by over a decade. I've had this debate numerous times and have always been deemed correct in my interpretation of policy. Fry1989 ^eh? 20:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Record 2023 with wordmark.png

• File:Record 2023.svg

Very unlikely own work, numerous prior publications on the internet. Only question is the threshold of originality. The Brazilian one is very high, but I am unsure whether this even matters for the US copyright status of contemporary works. Felix QW (talk) 21:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

 Delete Current logo of a large open television station in Brazil, in this case I don't think it's a simple image, so much so that all previously uploaded logos have been eliminated. Eric Duff (talk) 18:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Düsseldorf, Wirtschaftszeichen am Hause Ratingerstr. 14–16, "Zur Uel", Erwin Quedenfeldt, 1909.jpg

besserer scan verfügbar: File:5697643.Erwin Quedenfeldt.jpg Carl Ha (talk) 21:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

No relevant reason for delation -- Kürschner (talk) 09:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag of algeirs.jpg

Hoax flag with no sources confirming it, and is probably taken the coat of arms of Algeirs. Strenatos (talk) 22:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of Algiers - Wikimedia Commons Strenatos (talk) 22:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ma-sta-mi-rece-Rsum.ogg

The uploader, who gave permission is not real copyright holder of the recording. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Chinchilla Cafe 11-10-2023.jpg

Possible copyvio: Poster for a music event CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I made the poster myself and I took the photos in the poster. I made all the artistic elements. Related concert photos of the musicians are coming to commons soon. Fabebk (talk) 00:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello Fabebk, Thank you for your answer. In this case, as it is related to an event, it might be that you need to create an OTSR request as instructed on this page Commons:Volunteer Response Team. Please let me know if you have any questions. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:52, 15 November 2023 (UTC)