Commons:Deletion requests/2023/11/14

13 November 2023

15 November 2023

Deletion requests on 14 November 2023

• archive
• gallery
• purge this page's cache
• ±

November 14

File:Hknu.jpg

Image was here in 2010, well before 2014 upload. Эlcobbola _talk 01:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:M0KC BmJeCuZLzaeFg.webp

Self-made files that are presumed not to have received permission from the copyright holder and are suspected of unauthorized use. 211.197.54.36 01:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag of GPGP.png

Self-made files that are presumed not to have received permission from the copyright holder and are suspected of unauthorized use. 211.197.54.36 01:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag of Wolong.png

Self-made files that are presumed not to have received permission from the copyright holder and are suspected of unauthorized use. 211.197.54.36 01:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag of Pattaya.svg (thailand).png

Self-made files that are presumed not to have received permission from the copyright holder and are suspected of unauthorized use. 211.197.54.36 01:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag of Petele island.svg (Norway).png

Self-made files that are presumed not to have received permission from the copyright holder and are suspected of unauthorized use. 211.197.54.36 01:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag-map of Taiwan.png

Self-made files that are presumed not to have received permission from the copyright holder and are suspected of unauthorized use. 211.197.54.36 01:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag-map of Abkhazia.png

Self-made files that are presumed not to have received permission from the copyright holder and are suspected of unauthorized use. 211.197.54.36 01:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag-map of Ningxia.png

Self-made files that are presumed not to have received permission from the copyright holder and are suspected of unauthorized use. 211.197.54.36 01:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag-map of Inner Mongolia.png

Self-made files that are presumed not to have received permission from the copyright holder and are suspected of unauthorized use. 211.197.54.36 01:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag-map of Uighur.png

Self-made files that are presumed not to have received permission from the copyright holder and are suspected of unauthorized use. 211.197.54.36 01:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag of Post-Soviet Republic of China.png

Self-made files that are presumed not to have received permission from the copyright holder and are suspected of unauthorized use. 211.197.54.36 01:54, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag of Gilgit Baltistan.png

Self-made files that are presumed not to have received permission from the copyright holder and are suspected of unauthorized use. 211.197.54.36 01:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag of Marie Bird.jpg

Self-made files that are presumed not to have received permission from the copyright holder and are suspected of unauthorized use. 211.197.54.36 01:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Marie Bird coat of arms.png

Self-made files that are presumed not to have received permission from the copyright holder and are suspected of unauthorized use. 211.197.54.36 01:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of Spanish Morocco.png

Self-made files that are presumed not to have received permission from the copyright holder and are suspected of unauthorized use. 211.197.54.36 02:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Woman on a Free Palestine Protest in Berlin, Germany.jpg

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Julio Sanguinetti firma jpg.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Platonides as no permission (No permission since). COM:SIG? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

• Argentina is not mentioned at COM:SIG, so how would we know? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:59, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Logotipo de Argentina 78 Televisora Centro de Producción a colores (1978).svg

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as no permission (No permission since)

• File:Logotipo de Argentina 78 Televisora Centro de Producción a colores (1978).png

COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@King of Hearts: It is certainly distinguished from others, the criterion at COM:TOO Argentina.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 04:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

How distinctive is it really? This looks just like the CCTV logo. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Григорий Павлович Мясоедов.jpg

Not own work Kursant504 (talk) 04:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Pachelbel's Canon in Pop Variations (Geoge Winston Notation) Player Jason, Han.ogg

While Pachelbel's Canon is in the public domain, this arrangement is by George Winston and is not in the public domain Johnj1995 (talk) 05:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Night's Piano-Song, Piano Pupil Siqi Ren.ogg

The original composer is 石进. Not in the public domain Johnj1995 (talk) 05:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Tears In Heaven, Vocal Singer Jason M. C., Han.ogg

Derivative of the copyrighted song Tears in Heaven Johnj1995 (talk) 05:16, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:MARIAGE D'AMOUR (Dreaming Wedding Ceremony), Piano Student Yixuan Wang.ogg

Performance of the song Mariage d'amour, which is copyrighted Johnj1995 (talk) 05:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:ARENA pide inscripción de candidatos.jpg

no proof of Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license at listed source PizzaKing13 (talk) 07:08, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:वास्तुशास्त्र एवं दिशाएं सम्पादन.jpg

Image has clipping text, may convey incomplete or incorrect information. ~ Saur ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:सॉफ्टवेयर इंजीनियरिंग.png

Suspected copyright violation. Source of hand with marker illustration not properly indicated. ~ Saur ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Emblem of the Antimonopoly Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan.svg

Fake license. Logo of a state department can't be own. Bilderling (talk) 07:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Love bike.jpg

purtroppo è firmato Luangiphoto (talk) 16:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

@Luangiphoto: If you want to have this file deleted, please remove it from Commons:Photo challenge/2023 - November - Bicycles first. --Rosenzweig τ 07:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

purtroppo è firmato Luangiphoto (talk) 07:25, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:विष्णू बुवा जोग महाराज.jpg

Too small to serve any real purpose. ~ Saur ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:शांति मैरी.jpg

Suspected copyright violation. Watermarked site does not publish under a free license. ~ Saur ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:KORMEM1.jpg

Artist has challenged unlicensed reproductions in the past--see notice at top of Category:Korean War Veterans Memorial DanielPenfield (talk) 09:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:KORWARM2.jpg

Artist has challenged unlicensed reproductions in the past--see notice at top of Category:Korean War Veterans Memorial DanielPenfield (talk) 09:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:KoreanWarMemorialNight.jpg

Artist has challenged unlicensed reproductions in the past--see notice at top of Category:Korean War Veterans Memorial DanielPenfield (talk) 09:19, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Claire Rosinkraz.jpg

Picture from music video like stated in description. Obviously not "Own work" and almost certainly with copyright issues. Not sure if this is the correct deletion procedure here; I'm much more familiar with English Wikipedia. Trialpears (talk) 09:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Bandlogo PhalAngst.jpg

Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello Kontrabassmensch, Thank you for your answer. As you are not the author, you need to create an OTSR request as instructed on this page Commons:Volunteer Response Team. Please let me know if you have further questions. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:PhalAngst members.jpg

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, From Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello Kontrabassmensch, Thank you for your answer. As you are not the author, you need to create an OTSR request as instructed on this page Commons:Volunteer Response Team. Please let me know if you have further questions. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:46, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Armanzarinkob.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 10:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Ibragimka33 (talk · contribs)

Questionable claims of own work: File:Tatiana Korsakova.jpg is lowish resolution with Facebook EXIF, and other photos of the same shoot as File:Anna Linnikova.jpg appear in older news stories credited as Provided by the management of the Miss Russia contest. User also uploaded File:Tatiana korsakova.jpg (marked for speedy deletion) a month after it appeared on Instagram.

• File:Tatiana Korsakova.jpg
• File:Anna Linnikova.jpg

Belbury (talk) 11:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Chong Chieng Jen 2022.png

Uploader did not acknowledge the copyright and request permission from the copyright holder of this professional photograph taken from the Parliament of Malaysia website. HejTuWou (talk) 11:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Cusack.gif

Copyright in question, image found on https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/life-diana-princess-wales-100-photographs-1636596 with a credit given to Reuters. Hogyncymru (talk) 11:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Austin North 2014.jpg

Very low resolution picture, suggestive of having been taken from a web profile, perhaps from https://www.moviemeter.com/celebrities/1449393/austin-north with no camera details, again suggestive of having been scraped, but not conclusive. This is not as simple as "copyvio" nor as "Permission required" but COM:PCP is relevant. I have a string feeling that permissions should be lodged with COM:VRT for this to remain here. An alternative, the more so since it is reasonably widely in use is to replace it with a correctly licenced picture. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 11:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Women-led-startup-India.png

scaled down duplicate of File:Abandoned car interior.jpg. 0x0a (talk) 11:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ashurai exercise in Ahar, East Azerbaijan (01).jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep This deletion concerns a sentence someone added to the {{Tasnim}} template several years ago. We have since learned, as discussed in greater detail here, that photographs taken by local offices of Tasnim are often not watermarked with the name of the photographer. This photo was taken by a local office, specifically the East Azerbaijan office. Further, the photo does not exist in higher resolution or without the bottom Tasnim News watermark. So even if there is a general presumption that works without photographer credits are non-free, we have specific evidence to rebut that presumption in this case. Streamline8988 (talk) 06:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ashurai exercise in Ahar, East Azerbaijan (02).jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep This deletion concerns a sentence someone added to the {{Tasnim}} template several years ago. We have since learned, as discussed in greater detail here, that photographs taken by local offices of Tasnim are often not watermarked with the name of the photographer. This photo was taken by a local office, specifically the East Azerbaijan office. Further, the photo does not exist in higher resolution or without the bottom Tasnim News watermark. So even if there is a general presumption that works without photographer credits are non-free, we have specific evidence to rebut that presumption in this case. Streamline8988 (talk) 06:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ashurai exercise in Ahar, East Azerbaijan (03).jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep This deletion concerns a sentence someone added to the {{Tasnim}} template several years ago. We have since learned, as discussed in greater detail here, that photographs taken by local offices of Tasnim are often not watermarked with the name of the photographer. This photo was taken by a local office, specifically the East Azerbaijan office. Further, the photo does not exist in higher resolution or without the bottom Tasnim News watermark. So even if there is a general presumption that works without photographer credits are non-free, we have specific evidence to rebut that presumption in this case. Streamline8988 (talk) 06:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ashurai exercise in Ahar, East Azerbaijan (04).jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep This deletion concerns a sentence someone added to the {{Tasnim}} template several years ago. We have since learned, as discussed in greater detail here, that photographs taken by local offices of Tasnim are often not watermarked with the name of the photographer. This photo was taken by a local office, specifically the East Azerbaijan office. Further, the photo does not exist in higher resolution or without the bottom Tasnim News watermark. So even if there is a general presumption that works without photographer credits are non-free, we have specific evidence to rebut that presumption in this case. Streamline8988 (talk) 06:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ashurai exercise in Ahar, East Azerbaijan (10).jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep This deletion concerns a sentence someone added to the {{Tasnim}} template several years ago. We have since learned, as discussed in greater detail here, that photographs taken by local offices of Tasnim are often not watermarked with the name of the photographer. This photo was taken by a local office, specifically the East Azerbaijan office. Further, the photo does not exist in higher resolution or without the bottom Tasnim News watermark. So even if there is a general presumption that works without photographer credits are non-free, we have specific evidence to rebut that presumption in this case. Streamline8988 (talk) 06:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ashurai exercise in Ahar, East Azerbaijan (09).jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep This deletion concerns a sentence someone added to the {{Tasnim}} template several years ago. We have since learned, as discussed in greater detail here, that photographs taken by local offices of Tasnim are often not watermarked with the name of the photographer. This photo was taken by a local office, specifically the East Azerbaijan office. Further, the photo does not exist in higher resolution or without the bottom Tasnim News watermark. So even if there is a general presumption that works without photographer credits are non-free, we have specific evidence to rebut that presumption in this case. Streamline8988 (talk) 06:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ashurai exercise in Ahar, East Azerbaijan (08).jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep This deletion concerns a sentence someone added to the {{Tasnim}} template several years ago. We have since learned, as discussed in greater detail here, that photographs taken by local offices of Tasnim are often not watermarked with the name of the photographer. This photo was taken by a local office, specifically the East Azerbaijan office. Further, the photo does not exist in higher resolution or without the bottom Tasnim News watermark. So even if there is a general presumption that works without photographer credits are non-free, we have specific evidence to rebut that presumption in this case. Streamline8988 (talk) 06:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ashurai exercise in Ahar, East Azerbaijan (07).jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep This deletion concerns a sentence someone added to the {{Tasnim}} template several years ago. We have since learned, as discussed in greater detail here, that photographs taken by local offices of Tasnim are often not watermarked with the name of the photographer. This photo was taken by a local office, specifically the East Azerbaijan office. Further, the photo does not exist in higher resolution or without the bottom Tasnim News watermark. So even if there is a general presumption that works without photographer credits are non-free, we have specific evidence to rebut that presumption in this case. Streamline8988 (talk) 06:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ashurai exercise in Ahar, East Azerbaijan (06).jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep This deletion concerns a sentence someone added to the {{Tasnim}} template several years ago. We have since learned, as discussed in greater detail here, that photographs taken by local offices of Tasnim are often not watermarked with the name of the photographer. This photo was taken by a local office, specifically the East Azerbaijan office. Further, the photo does not exist in higher resolution or without the bottom Tasnim News watermark. So even if there is a general presumption that works without photographer credits are non-free, we have specific evidence to rebut that presumption in this case. Streamline8988 (talk) 06:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ashurai exercise in Ahar, East Azerbaijan (05).jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep This deletion concerns a sentence someone added to the {{Tasnim}} template several years ago. We have since learned, as discussed in greater detail here, that photographs taken by local offices of Tasnim are often not watermarked with the name of the photographer. This photo was taken by a local office, specifically the East Azerbaijan office. Further, the photo does not exist in higher resolution or without the bottom Tasnim News watermark. So even if there is a general presumption that works without photographer credits are non-free, we have specific evidence to rebut that presumption in this case. Streamline8988 (talk) 06:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ashurai exercise in Ahar, East Azerbaijan (11).jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep This deletion concerns a sentence someone added to the {{Tasnim}} template several years ago. We have since learned, as discussed in greater detail here, that photographs taken by local offices of Tasnim are often not watermarked with the name of the photographer. This photo was taken by a local office, specifically the East Azerbaijan office. Further, the photo does not exist in higher resolution or without the bottom Tasnim News watermark. So even if there is a general presumption that works without photographer credits are non-free, we have specific evidence to rebut that presumption in this case. Streamline8988 (talk) 06:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ashurai exercise in Ahar, East Azerbaijan (12).jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep This deletion concerns a sentence someone added to the {{Tasnim}} template several years ago. We have since learned, as discussed in greater detail here, that photographs taken by local offices of Tasnim are often not watermarked with the name of the photographer. This photo was taken by a local office, specifically the East Azerbaijan office. Further, the photo does not exist in higher resolution or without the bottom Tasnim News watermark. So even if there is a general presumption that works without photographer credits are non-free, we have specific evidence to rebut that presumption in this case. Streamline8988 (talk) 06:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:सर रोनाल्ड एलेमर फिशर.jpg

Unverified copyright status. A larger copy of this image is dated Christmas 1934. It may be kept if it is confirmed that the photographer is unknown (since the copyright for anonymous works is 70 years from publication). ~ Saur ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Keep PD-UK-unknown. Tineye has not found anyone named as the creator. --RAN (talk) 23:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:सावित्रीबाई.jpg

Per COM:NOTHOST: Self-created artwork. ~ Saur ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:42, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Assembly of Experts congress 201901 01.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:43, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Assembly of experts chairmans 2021.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ahmad Amzad Hashim.png

This is a professional photograph with no EXIF metadata, making it doubtful that it is the uploader's own work. HejTuWou (talk) 11:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Assembly of Experts congress 201901 02.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Assembly of Experts congress 201901 03.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Assembly of Experts congress 201901 04.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Assembly of Experts congress 201901 05.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Assembly of Experts congress 201901 06.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Assembly of Experts congress 201901 08.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Assembly of Experts congress 201901 09.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Assembly of Experts congress 201901 10.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Assembly of Experts congress 201901 10 (cropped).jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Athletics at the 2020 Summer Paralympics – Men's Shot put F53 awarding ceremony.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 11:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Sean Strickland at a UFC event walk-in.jpg

Link doesn't work. Also Sexto Round doesn't own these clips or photos. These are the from the UFC and put into its videos. No evidence these are under CC4 Imcdc (talk) 11:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Coolpad Quattro 4G.gif

Likely COM:FLICKRWASH. Images appear in https://uk.pcmag.com/smartphones/1451/coolpad-quattro-4g-metropcs and other review articles. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Propeller island city lodge hotel berlin.jpg

Probable Flickrwashing, image was published in a 2004 Boingboing article, well before the Flickr upload: https://boingboing.net/2004/03/29/berlin-themehotel-of.html Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:43, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:DS TITM - passport size 01.jpg

This file is a professional photograph which lacks EXIF metadata that could support the uploader's claim that it is their own work. HejTuWou (talk) 12:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Spot Szkoła Inicjatyw Strażniczych.wav

Jednak nie mogą dać zgody. Marek Mazurkiewicz (talk) 12:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ariel Atkins WNBA.jpg

A cropped version of this image appears at https://s.secure.espncdn.com/stitcher/artwork/collections/media/0aef00a5-5824-493a-9a31-5882d5054af2/16x9.png. Please verify the source information via COM:VRT. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Hamzah Zainudin sedang berswafoto.jpg

This file is a selfie of the subject and therefore the subject probably owns the copyright to it. Moreover, it lacks EXIF metadata that could support the uploader's claim that it is their own work. HejTuWou (talk) 12:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghurba (talk • contribs) 13:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Faisal and Abdul Sattar Edhi, 20 March 2016.jpg

1) duplicate / already on wiki commons 2) colours do not correspond with the original Ghurba (talk) 13:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Own work but when uploading the colours keep changing to pitch black. This work was previously uploaded on 14 August 2023 with a water mark. This photo was meant to be a technically improved version to replace it but it is not. Hence I request deletion. Ghurba (talk) 13:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:SoI-War 23-11-01 IDF 18-03.webm

contravening international law Wickey (talk) 13:42, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Publication of video's of interrogations of prisoners of war (POWs) may contravene international law. You may have a look at this page of the ICRC. This file is even a more serious case, as it is also part of propaganda.

This also apply on the other files in Category:Interrogation of terrorists who invaded Israel on October 7, 2023. --Wickey (talk) 13:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

The argument made in the deletion request is misleading and inaccurate in various ways, and it should be rejected.

In international law, there is a clear distinction between POWs and militants of armed groups such as Hamas. Under the law, generally speaking, 'prisoners of war' are combatants that fight formally and lawfully as part or on behalf of a State's armed forces against another State. Similarly to personnel in groups such as ISIS, Al-Quaeda or Boko Haram, Hamas militants by no means meet the criteria required to attain POW status (since the conflict is between Israel and Hamas, which is not a State; since they do not fight in accordance with the law of war; and for other reasons, each of them suffices on its own to fail Hamas terrorists from being entitled to POW status). In fact, to the best of my knowledge Hamas themselves have never claimed such status for their detainees, and I'm not aware of any terror group in history whose operatives were recognized by states as POWs. The definition of "prisoner of war" can be found in Article 4 of the Third Geneva Convention. Note that the words "a party to the conflict" that appear in the Convention refer only to States, as clarified here (under "who qualifies as a prisoner of war") for example by the Red Cross. These are part of the reasons why the deletion request should be rejected. קוונטום דוץ (talk) 21:23, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Israel is wellknown for torturing prisoners. Commons should not be a platform for spreading interrogations performed with the use of torture. --Wickey (talk) 09:30, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

This is not serious. You were given a thorough and respectful response for your claims. Any unsupported and undocumented claim has nothing to do with this discussion, but you have nothing serious to say. קוונטום דוץ (talk) 15:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

File:FBI exhibit - Joe Biggs in the Capitol on January 6, 2021.png

This file was initially tagged by Fourthords as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: G4: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joe Biggs from DOJ Case Number 1-21-cr-175 Biggs - Affidavit.png
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as uploader claims (User talk:Túrelio#File:FBI exhibit - Joe Biggs in the Capitol on January 6, 2021.png) license to be o.k. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

• I'm unsure why this doesn't qualify for speedy deletion under G4, but this is the explanation I included with the {{Speedydelete}}:

  The same image was previously nominated and deleted from this discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joe Biggs from DOJ Case Number 1-21-cr-175 Biggs - Affidavit.png.

  To elaborate on that original deletion: this video frame simply isn't a US governmental work. The linked source itself is testimony from an FBI agent who writes about the accompanying image, "I have reviewed video footage that was live streamed on the social media site Parler on January 6, 2021. One of those clips shows what I believe to be people entering the Capitol shortly after the events described in the preceding paragraph. One of those individuals, who entered the door within 20 seconds of its opening, is a person that I believe to be BIGGS. In the video, a voice off camera says, 'Hey Biggs, what do you gotta say?' The person depicted below smiles broadly and replies, 'this is awesome!' before pulling his gaiter up to cover his face."

  Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

• Seems not to be a photo made by a US Federal Gov't employee in course of duties. @Feoffer: is there any counter argument supporting the claimed license? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:04, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

  It's not taken from Parlor, it's taken from the FBI's public domain filing. FBI-published suspect photos are pd-usgov (e.g. File:Fbi wanted.jpg, File:Bhadreshkumar Chetanbhai Patel.jpg for two completely random examples out of what I'm sure are many thousands). Feoffer (talk) 06:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

  The FBI agent's affidavit, which you are sourcing, specifically says the image is from "video footage that was live streamed on the social media site Parler on January 6, 2021." That FBI agent includes a frame of that live-streamed video as evidence, but they themselves did not create it as required by {{PD-USGov}}.

  As for your other two concerns: (a) Considering Ray has previous stints in federal custody before the publishing of File:Fbi wanted.jpg, and their appearance as booking photos, I'm sufficiently satisfied with the claimed provenance. (b) Since Bhadreshkumar Chetanbhai Patel has never been in federal custody, there's no reason to assume File:Bhadreshkumar Chetanbhai Patel.jpg—or any of the miscellaneous disparate photos used on his wanted poster—are the works of the FBI or US federal government, and so I've begun that deletion discussion as well. Fourthords | =Λ= | 12:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

  The two images cited are just a few of a multitude. If you disagree with Wikimedia policy that suspect photos published by the FBI are pd-usgov, you shouldn't pick on single image just because I randomly cited it, you should propose a change to Wikimedia policies and generate consensus for that change. I encourage you to withdraw your objection to the single image I randomly cited and instead propose a change to Commons policy. There are literally tens of thousands of images in the same class, perhaps more.

  Decades of Wikimedia precedent are clear: When the US's FBI is distributing a photo of a suspect, US copyright can't be invoked to stop that distribution. Feoffer (talk) 14:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

  Photos taken by the FBI fall into the public domain, because as {{PD-USGov-FBI}} says, they're "a work of a Federal Bureau of Investigation employee, taken or made as part of that person's official duties." This video frame of Biggs is explicitly not a work of the FBI, as stated by the FBI in the affidavit. If the FBI (or federal government at large) shares somebody else's copyrighted work, that doesn't launder the licensing into the public domain; it's still the copyright of whomever was uploading the video to Parler on 6 January 2021. If there's a Commons policy, guideline, or licensing page that explicitly states "the federal government strips third-party copyright holders of their rights by virtue of using or sharing their work", I would be keen to see it. Barring that, this image simply isn't a US governmental work. Fourthords | =Λ= | 16:07, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

  Dozens of years and thousands of images establish the precedent that when the FBI publishes suspect photos, they do so as part of their official duties and the images are PD-USGOV on Commons. To overturn that would result in the deletion of untold thousands of images that are in the public domain under US law because the FBI published them to identify or convict criminals.

  Fourtholds suggests this "strips" someone of their rights, but that's incorrect. The US Gov's right to place individual image of suspects into the public domain does not "strip" the larger work of its protections -- but neither is a federal effort to distribute an image somehow absurdly limited by federal copyright, whether it's the court docket or the congressional record or the FBI -- the Fed get to publish whatever they want and we all get to distribute it. Feoffer (talk) 17:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

  Also, not to be POINTY -- it's standard practice to upload the criminal complaint, and I've done so. The image is a crop from that public domain document -- Do you suggest the document also needs to be deleted? Feoffer (talk) 21:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete per the speedy tag referenced in the nom and special:diff/822567412.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 11:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

  I should say -- I'm not convinced my interpretation is incorrect, but I am convinced that many many longtime pillars of our community are telling me it's incorrect, and I want to hear that. I'll consult with experts I trust and see if I can sort out whether my educators were mistaken, whether I am confused, or whether we're missing out on the full extent of what US Public Domain entails. Feoffer (talk) 17:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

   Comment You seem under the impression that this is something new here. I recall more than a dozen years ago the point being made on Commons that US Gov't agencies sometimes republish 3rd party photos - the photos may not be US Gov works and thus not PD-USGov. Eg if image caption says "Courtesy of (name of commercial news service)", assume the 3rd party still has the rights. *Generally* images in US Gov publications without caption credit to 3rd parties can be assumed to be US Gov works, but this seems an example of when one must check the text in a bit more detail to determine proper credit - as noted above, in this case the Gov publication states that they reuse images from social media. Thanks, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:14, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

File:WAD 09262.png

This file is a professional photograph of the subject. It lacks EXIF metadata that could support the uploader's claim that it is their own work. HejTuWou (talk) 14:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Noraini Ahmad recent photo.jpg

This file is a professional photograph. It lacks EXIF metadata that could support the uploader's claim that it is their own work. HejTuWou (talk) 14:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Manndzri Nasib.jpg

This file is a professional photograph. It lacks EXIF metadata that could support the uploader's claim that it is their own work. HejTuWou (talk) 14:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Wong Chen Profile 2022.png

This is a professional photograph of the subject. It lacks substantial EXIF metadata that could support the uploader's claim that it is their own work. HejTuWou (talk) 14:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Najwan Halimi.jpg

This file is a professional photograph of the subject. It lacks EXIF metadata that could support the uploader's claim that it is their own work. HejTuWou (talk) 14:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Mohd Sany Hamzan sedang berswafoto.jpg

This file is a selfie of the subject and therefore the subject probably owns the copyright to it. Moreover, it lacks EXIF metadata that could support the uploader's claim that it is their own work. HejTuWou (talk) 15:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Pinging @Thegreatrebellion: are you familiar with the COM:VRT process? Can you get the photographer/subject of the selfie to grant the relevant license? Otherwise, the license is currently meaningless, since you can't grant a license for someone else's work. - Jmabel ! talk 18:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Profil-AzliYusof.png

This file is a professional photograph of the subject. It lacks EXIF metadata that could support the uploader's claim that it is their own work. HejTuWou (talk) 15:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Dr hafidzah mustakim.webp

This file is a professional photograph of the subject. It lacks EXIF metadata that could support the uploader's claim that it is their own work. HejTuWou (talk) 15:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:2017 Mustafa Pasha Mosque.ogv

I think one calls this Out of Scope: Underexposed unclear movie of what seems to be some gathering of people, with just a second or two of the outside of the külliye in the backjground. Dosseman (talk) 15:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Frere daniel marie thevenet.png

Duplicate AntoineBa (talk) 15:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

The picture used in the wikipedia article (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel-Marie_Th%C3%A9venet#/media/Fichier:Fr%C3%A8re_Daniel_Marie_Th%C3%A9venet.jpg) is better and as a user wrote me this one is deformed (why ?).

There is no used of this deformed picture which is both redundant and inappropriate to represent the person's aspect. Therefore this deletion request AntoineBa (talk) 15:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Punjab Folk Dance.jpg

Not an own work, unclear copyright status. 0x0a (talk) 15:25, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Bandera de la Provincia de Salta.png

Duplication of File:Bandera de la Provincia de Salta.svg. Fry1989 ^eh? 15:26, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Richard Hunt in Lill Street Studio Chicago 2018.jpg

The subject of the photograph (Richard Hunt) has asked for removal of this portrait. He has supplied me with several alternates to upload to Wikimedia commons he doesn't like this picture of him and would like it removed. Artlover1017 (talk) 15:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by PaulGamerBoy360 (talk · contribs)

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size images without EXIF data, visual characteristics suggest screengrab.

• File:Photo of St.George Utah.jpg
• File:Panorama of St.George Utah.jpg
• File:Old Highway 91 Bridge in Middleton Utah.jpg

P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

I have provided the links with the EXIF data on your talk page, I can't edit it on mobile editor so I can't update the file pages. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 19:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

With The claim that they are most likely not my own work, i can send you the link to my google photos with all the mete & EXIF data.

Link to album: https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipMqOJFN8aCTJLpDx-ZRR1c32RqtO1eG9oWhprKN6rqgMJP4fwJkUABy2kz2dMrILg?key=RHR1dExybDVzazJmWUVFTmtZa2RWRXNJNmVKMWdB (https://photos.app.goo.gl/n2yTTDbaEdrnhKAN8)

😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (talk) 18:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@PaulGamerBoy360 Thanks for that, I've updated File:Old Highway 91 Bridge in Middleton Utah.jpg accordingly. Could you please add the other two to the album and ping me when you have done so? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

I will have to do that this afternoon, because the others I realized are on my old photos account & need to be transfered. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 15:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

@Mdaniels5757 Here are the others, They are in a different album due to them being on my old account:

https://photos.google.com/u/2/share/AF1QipOC2SpjJiHumvToeXqofiyKQYvi0UI47WkdRBMIe-tatnKUGWqtydS9OO5IQ1TcQQ?key=VE11dEhFM2RuVWs2TXJqSURRUW1sNHpYVW9IV2ln (https://photos.app.goo.gl/QuDDR1xAdUe8X67C7) PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 02:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you.  Keep all. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

File:ColinQuinn071r-1 (cropped).jpg

This is a cropped version of a file that was deleted for lack of permission last year. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  16:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Sanu Sharma.jpg

Small image, appears several places on the Web with a copyright notice. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

(Jameslwoodward), this picture was taken by me. yes, it is used widely. there is no copyright issue. Could you please help me showing those 'several places with copyright notice' ? ~ Nepaus (talk) 16:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

As a general rule you can do a Google search to find an image's uses. These include:

• https://soundcloud.com/sumanpokhrel
• https://genius.com/artists/Sanu-sharma

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

I agree that Google search is indeed a valuable tool for identifying an image's uses. However, my specific inquiry was aimed at locating instances where the image is accompanied by a 'copyright notice.' As the creator of the image, I can confirm that there should be no valid copyright claim against it.

I want to acknowledge that the image has been utilized in various locations, including one of the links you kindly provided. If the presence of the image in other places contravenes Wikimedia policy, I am open to its removal. Nepaus (talk) 03:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Glen T. Martin, President, WCPA.jpg

privacy and possible copyright issues BeLucky (talk) 16:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

 Comment Privacy is not a concern with this picture. I rather think you have to do better than possible copyright issues. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:54, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

This seems to be from person's own blog, which is copyrighted:

https://oneworldrenaissance.files.wordpress.com/2023/11/at_delhi.jpg BeLucky (talk) 19:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Yet on your other deletion request, you are claiming the exact same thing for a file that you uploaded as your own work. This file may be a result of paid promo and/or a copyvio, but something isn't quite right here. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:BC83:A16C:79B4:592E 22:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

It is also odd that the earliest web archive capture date for that page postdates this upload by quite a few months, I'd also be interested in hearing what the connection is between you and the uploader of this file given the odd coincidences here. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:1069:C7F8:C8E:B74B 03:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

File:GLAMimAlpenraumIcon1.png

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Botanist in Berlin (talk) 19:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:NinaMaleika.jpg

URV Text und Foto Ralf Roletschek 19:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Texte bei Twitter / X können vom Verfasser jederzeit gelöscht verändert werden. Das wird hier vermutlich bald auch der Fall sein. Um einen Beleg für die gravierende Aussage zu behalten, muss ein Screenshot als einzige Belegmöglichkeit, denn es gibt zur Zeit wohl keinen weiteren, erhalten bleiben. Andernfalls wäre auch das Zitat in einem Wikipedia Artikel nach Löschung oder Änderung des Tweets nicht mehr haltbar. Daher: Der Screenshot muss solange bleiben, auch wenn dieser nicht unbedingt unmittelbar im Artikel integriert /sichtbar sein muss. Dr. Frank Gaeth (talk) 20:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Übrigens ist der jetzt auf Wikipedia veröffentlichte Text eine Fehlinterpretation und sollte geändert werden: Maleika drückt nicht "ihre Unterstützung für Palästina" (was auch immer das sein soll) aus, sondern bezieht sich wegen des explizit genannten Datums auf den Massenmord in Israel ausgehend von der HAMAS in Gaza sogar mit deren Schlachtruf, damit auch jeder weiß, was gemeint ist. Dr. Frank Gaeth (talk) 20:54, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Es gibt andere Wege, etwas im Internet zu speichern, z. B. archive.org

Commons ist dafür nicht der richtige Ort. Ralf Roletschek 12:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Twiggy (Lesley Lawson) 1960-tal.jpg

Potential license laundering, no photographer information given, except the watermark that says "SPIERSCHUTZ" (?). It's possible the photographer is alive or died within the last 70 years and the photograph is still copyrighted. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

The photograph says it has a new license: public Domain Dedication (CC0). I could not find the photographers name 81.170.150.42 07:23, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

@Tyrahoglund It seems incredibly unlikely that a photo published in 1960 has a Creative Commons license, something that didn't exist before this century. Plus, the Flickr user is blacklisted for posting found photographs with free licenses. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:05, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

I will delete it. Tyrahoglund (talk) 14:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

• Delete. Undocumented photo. Bad flickr account. Probable copyvio. -- Asclepias (talk) 10:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Powar Rajput soilders.jpg

Copied picture of "File:Rajput_rebels_from_Bihar,_1857.jpg", but given the name of another community. It is sourced from "The Illustrated London News", dated 1857. Image is of "Rajput rebels from Bihar" Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:17, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Adolf Hitler lächeln, smile, color.jpg

wrong date, wrong author etc. Xocolatl (talk) 20:19, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:DRIMG 7194.jpg

copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 20:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:LOGO VF COULEUR CSBJ RUGBY - RVB copie.svg

Français : Les logos de marque déposée ne doivent pas être importés sur Wikimedia Commons mais localement sur fr.wiki afin de respecter les droits d'auteur. Seuil d'originalité franchi. Voir import corrigé : fr:Fichier:Logo Club sportif Bourgoin-Jallieu rugby (3).svg.

English: Non free logo above threshold of originality, it should have been uploaded locally on fr.wiki.

- Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 21:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Record News 2023.svg

This file was initially tagged by Eric Duff as Logo {{PD-textlogo}}? Yann (talk) 21:27, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Bust of Jose B. Lingad.jpg

This file was initially tagged by TheJediMaster327 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Corrupted, infected by a virus Yann (talk) 21:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Files found with Special:Search/intitle:"The Beatles - All You Need Is Love & Baby, You're a Rich Man"

The photograph by Henry Grossman was initially published in June 16, 1967 in Life magazine on page 100, the copyright notice is on page 3. This image is also the cover of the Asian edition of Life magazine on July 24, 1967. The argument to consider it in the US public domain was that it appeared as an ad in Billabord magazine. However, that publication was on July 29, 1967 [1], i.e., 43 days after the initial publication. Also, File:The Beatles - All You Need Is Love & Baby, You're a Rich Man, 1967.jpg and derivates were taken from a recent New York times article where it clearly states "Henry Grossman/Grossman Enterprises. All rights reserved."

• File:The Beatles - All You Need Is Love & Baby, You're a Rich Man, 1967 (Paul).jpg
• File:The Beatles - All You Need Is Love & Baby, You're a Rich Man, 1967.jpg
• File:The Beatles - All You Need Is Love & Baby, You're a Rich Man, 1967 (Paul).png
• File:The Beatles - All You Need Is Love & Baby, You're a Rich Man, 1967 (cropped).jpg
• File:The Beatles - All You Need Is Love & Baby, You're a Rich Man, 1967 (2).jpg
• File:The Beatles - All You Need Is Love & Baby, You're a Rich Man, 1967 (cropped).png
• File:The Beatles - All You Need Is Love & Baby, You're a Rich Man, 1967 (John and Paul).png
• File:The Beatles - All You Need Is Love & Baby, You're a Rich Man, 1967.png

Günther Frager (talk) 22:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)