Commons:Deletion requests/2023/11/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
14 November 2023
16 November 2023
Deletion requests on 15 November 2023

November 15[edit]

Is this scrollbar above COM:TOO? I thought about this again and was not sure.

The files in question:


Thanks --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:09, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Human Urinary and reproductive system (Labelled).jpg[edit]

I believe this image was made by superimposing this non-free 3d anatomy model on a photograph. Genericusername57 (talk) 01:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Zan TV.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Krd as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Koh Nai Wong.jpg[edit]

This file is a scan of a professional photograph of the subject. It lacks EXIF metadata that could support the uploader's claim that it is their own work. HejTuWou (talk) 02:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gambar YAA Dato Setia Dr. Hj. Mohd Na'im.png[edit]

This file is a professional photograph of the subject. It lacks substantial EXIF metadata that could support the uploader's claim that it is their own work. HejTuWou (talk) 02:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:BALASUBRAMANIAM NACHIAPPAN.png[edit]

This file is a professional photograph of the subject. It lacks substantial EXIF metadata that could support the uploader's claim that it is their own work. HejTuWou (talk) 02:39, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Taras Shevchenko monument in Buenos Aires[edit]

The monument was completed in 1971 by Leo Mol (1915–2009) and Orio Dal Porto (1938–2016). There is no freedom of panorama in Argentina for non-architectural works. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2087.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep at least File:Winnipeg Shevchenko for Buenos Aires.jpg because it is in Winnipeg, Canada. It was created earlier than the one in Argentina (it is the author's copy of the Argentinian monument). There is definitely no reason to delete the Canadian one, and maybe the Argentinian one is also legal depending on the definition of source country (it might be Canada at least for the main statue part, probably still Argentina for the relief). I don't know Argentinian and Canadian copyrights law well enough, can someone with more knowledge of it look at it? Thanks — NickK (talk) 14:41, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Edison High School tigers wall Fresno CA 2023-07-17 18-49-32.jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Keep This isn't a violation.
  • The photos isn't just of the mural, it contains other elements of the building and surrounding area
  • The Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990 appears to cover murals on the sides of buildings as part of FoP. (There have been several cases but non have gone to trial so no precident, see [1] )
  • This is a permanent, not a temporary mural (yes, that somehow matters)
  • This is on the side of a building not on a non-building structure such as a fence or freestanding wall. (yes, this also matters)
  • This is not an accurate reproduction. If it was not taken at an angle and if it was cropped to exclude the non-mural portions then it is possible it wouldn't fall under FOP
Lorax (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Smiley Children Society Logo Square.jpg[edit]

Redundant to File:Smiley children society logo png.png --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Manos The Hands of Fate 1966.ogv[edit]

Likely derivative of a copyrighted script (see here). — Racconish 💬 07:06, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's an interesting argument. There were several cases where courts ruled that as much of an unpublished screenplay became published when the movie was published. For screenplays which were not registered, the statutory copyright started at publication, so any copyright was then tied to the movie, and a lack of notice would also inject any portion of screenplay existing in the movie, into the public domain. Several such cases are mentioned here. However, some of those plainly point to the fact that no copyright was previously registered in the screenplays -- if they were, the statutory copyright started from the date of registration, not publication. That was May 18, 1966 for this movie. The publication date of a movie is when copies were sent to distributors, which was generally before the release date when moviegoers can see the movie. The release date was November 1966. It does seem likely that the screenplay was registered before that (indeed, probably before it was filmed). There have been several cases where the pre-existing copyright on a previously-published book had control over derivative movies, even though the movie itself had expired. Manos: The Hands of Fate#Copyright_dispute mentions the copyright uncertainty. That says that there is no precedent for this case, but that may only because of the publication status -- the screenplay was unpublished when the movie was published, which may slightly distinguish it from rulings about previously-published books. It was the same copyright owner who published the movie without a copyright notice, which included first publication of any relevant part of the screenplay.
There well may be validity to the argument, given the earlier registration -- any rulings based on the common-law copyright expiring upon publication are probably inapplicable. Of course, a lawsuit would actually have to produce the screenplay (has a copy been found?), and show that the movie was a derivative work -- if the director changed huge parts of the movie during filming such that it no longer contained much of the screenplay, it's possible that the movie was an independent work. Any screenshots from the movie are fine, of course. They would not be derivative of the screenplay. There would likely be many mitigating factors in an actual lawsuit, but if the screenplay has substantial similarities to the plot and/or dialogue of the eventual movie, there could well be some rights in play until 2062. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:L.E.J[edit]

Unlikely to be own works, "FBMD" in metadata indicates these were downloaded from Facebook.

0x0a (talk) 07:53, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bonjour.
Ce sont bien mes photos. J'étais présent sur place avec un ami dont je lui avais partagé ces 3 photos via Facebook (d'où l'indication des métadonnées). Vous pouvez cependant les supprimés en vu de la qualité très médiocre.
Bien cordialement, Kev22 (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Kev22, please email COM:VRT. That's always required when images are posted somewhere else before being uploaded here, and it's not a problem. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:16, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Dalvago (talk · contribs)[edit]

User with bad history, none of these is probably own works, and no evidence of a free license.

Yann (talk) 08:22, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Yann, I appreciate your message and concern for authentic files on Wikimedia, but quite literally all of these photos have been taken by me. I don't understand how to prove it to you and I don't appreciate the threat that I will be blocked. I have visited La Pobla de Farnala almost every year since I was born. Same with Bogotá, where I took the photo of the Parque Portugal in January. TWICE is my favorite girl group and I've been to both of their latest tours, the photo being the one in March last year. The WVBR photo inside the studios above the stairs was taken by me, and I actually commissioned the custom vinyl pictured to be made in Colombia. I literally took the screenshot of the Zoom photo with John Legend and was the one who recorded the whole video as well. I appreciate you to find actual copyright violations rather than act on absolutely unfounded suspicion. "None of these is probably own works" is not proof of any kind and is merely your personal speculation. Dalvago (talk) 10:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seeing your past record, and your poor understanding of copyright, we have legitimate reason to doubt that these are your own pictures, specially the ones without EXIF data. Could you please upload the original pictures with full EXIF data, or confirm the permission via COM:VRT? Why does File:Danny Alvarado-Gómez in front of flowers.jpg have a mention of Instagram in the EXIF data? Yann (talk) 11:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vietnamese Tiến Quân Ca.ogg[edit]

This music is under copyright by the Vietnamese government under Law No. 36/2009/QH12. Therefore, this file is a free content only in the United States but non-free or potentially non-free in its country of origin. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 09:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Datu Abdurrazaq dan Keluarga - Gerbang Makam 001.jpg[edit]

Double with File:Datu Abdurrazaq dan Keluarga - Gerbang Makam.jpg. Exagren (talk) 09:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Trans DDR Flag.svg[edit]

educational value? Kelly The Angel (talk) 09:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This raises the question, what is the educational value of any historical or present nation state inspired queer flags? would the following flags not come under the same scrutiny?
  • Betsy Ross flag

    Betsy Ross flag

  • Kurdish flag

    Kurdish flag

  • (U)SSR flag

    (U)SSR flag

    • Zt-freak (talk) 12:38, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Some of those are in use, so their value is proven. The DDR ceased to exist before the pride movement even really started, so I don't see where this could be used. PaterMcFly (talk) 15:43, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    The use of the Betsy Ross flag and the USSR flag precedes the pride movement too. Many different variations of queer DDR flags currently are in use too. Zt-freak (talk) 19:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    The USSR one is popular among Authoritarian/Totalitarian socialists who identify as LGBT. The Betsy Ross flag variation is currently being sold at various internet outlets. The Kurdish one is mostly likely supposed to represent the solidarity between the Kurdish movement and the LGBT community, or Kurdish queer people. Kelly The Angel (talk) 16:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    There are communists who fly some variation of a queer DDR flag. DDR is seen by these people as a historically progressive country in terms of queer rights. Zt-freak (talk) 19:33, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Could you please provide any evidence of the use of this flag? At least one photo/video of the physical version of the flag is enough to withdraw the nomination. Kelly The Angel (talk) 03:40, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Zt-freak (talk) 06:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I see.  Keep Kelly The Angel (talk) 08:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    The Betsy Ross flag variation is currently being sold at various internet outlets - this is a circular problem; many of those outlets source their flag images from Commons and other Wikimedia sites. Omphalographer (talk) 00:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Alec Chambers.jpg[edit]

    Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Chip Musik Records[edit]

    Possible copyvio: Logo of a label, X banner --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Beat Schwendimann.jpg[edit]

    copyvio, uploader is not photographer, no permission of photographer visible Alabasterstein (talk) 10:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Vald-v.jpg[edit]

    © 2010 - 2023 Solomon203 (talk) 10:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Lofo officel d'Europe Équitable.png[edit]

    Possible copyvio: Logo d'un parti politique CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Fulvio Saini.jpg[edit]

    Source at https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fulvio_Saini.jpg suggests that this image should not be on Commons: Carica l'immagine su Commons con le licenze [...] solo se l'immagine è precedente al 1976, altrimenti l'immagine verrà cancellata. ("Upload the image to Commons with licenses [...] only if the image is pre-1976, otherwise the image will be deleted.") The photo is from 1983. Belbury (talk) 10:52, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:ScottPutskiWrestler.png[edit]

    Seems to come from Paul Billets that have all been removed CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:04, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Vladimir Obradović oktobar 2023.png[edit]

    Not the work of SRBIN.info but rather a re-uploaded content of Party of Freedom and Justice. The original video can be found on the Party of Freedom and Justice facebook page. Vacant0 (talk) 11:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Files uploaded by জয়শ্রীরাম সরকার (talk · contribs)[edit]

    Not own works, and no evidence of a free license, or public domain.

    Yann (talk) 11:56, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Hauptverwaltung mit Anbau 2016 18.jpg[edit]

    copyvio, see: https://versicherungswirtschaft-heute.de/unternehmen-und-management/2023-01-04/itzehoer-verbucht-deutlichen-gewinneinbruch/ no permission visible Alabasterstein (talk) 12:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Roman Kubanskiy (talk · contribs)[edit]

    Nonsense PD claim. Works must be free (PD) in US and country of origin per COM:L. Even if PD in the US, it would not be in Somalia (country of origin) which is, per COM:SOMALIA, pma + 30. Image is far too recent for this condition to be met.

    Эlcobbola talk 19:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Roman Kubanskiy (talk · contribs)[edit]

    I understand that the user has taken photos from krd.ru - a government site that declares to publish its materials under a free license. But these photos were obviously taken by other people, not this government. It is highly probably that they are not PD yet as we don't have proper information about their publication.

    So, I suggest we delete them

    rubin16 (talk) 21:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    By the way the site files krd.ru even earlier, they were distributed by CC-BY-3.0 (see here; 2013 blind version).
    And this has been shown more than once. Let's recall the same archive of Putin and his photos of his parents. It's not clear who took the photos, it's not known when, but we must attribute for some reason kremlin.ru and call the author Vladimir Putin (it's like "personal archive"). File:Vladimir Spiridonovich Putin.jpg, File:Maria Ivanovna Shelomova.jpg, File:Spiridon Putin.jpg (check out this nomination - Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Vladimir Putin). Roman Kubanskiy, (talk) 09:10, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I understand that you have some basis for assumptions but I still believe it is more likely that krd.ru just released photos without thorough review of their status (sometimes it happens, even with kremlin.ru or ria.ru and we individually delete such files despite being published on a cc-by website). People being related to Krasnodar just explains that they are posted on the website, but it is highly possible that they had no review of the original authorship/date of publication, otherwise they would post author's details somewhere around the photo. If the authors are unknown, it is another way of thinking about being in public domain due to age. But for Russian PD we need to be sure that photos were published (not made) 70+ years before and still we have no such evidence. rubin16 (talk) 08:13, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    The grainy photos that are obviously scanned from books and newspapers should not be kept on Commons since the CC licence is for when the claimant is the owner and first publisher, not a republisher of a work.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination and the precautionary principle. These are obviously just republished by that website, and we don't have enough information to determine their actual copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 19:44, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Roman Kubanskiy (talk · contribs)[edit]

    Derivative work of art project berlin.1969 by Russian photographer Krista Sudmalis --Trade (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


     Keep in my opinion this is below TOO. If you don’t know the meme it looks like a b&w photo of some random guy. Dronebogus (talk) 19:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I'm not sure what that's meant to prove. Of course if you aren't familiar with a source work, you won't recognize a derivative work - but that doesn't make it any less derivative. Omphalographer (talk) 22:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    No, I meant to say that “black and white photorealistic image of bearded muscular man” is not copyrightable. The only way to “rip off” Gigachad in this case would be to use the actual image or a functionally identical one. Dronebogus (talk) 12:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
     Delete. Given the filenames and description, the author's intent was clearly to create a lookalike of the berlin.1969 photos. That makes these images a derivative work. Omphalographer (talk) 21:54, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
     Delete, per @Omphalographer and @Trade. This AI-generated derivative work obviously used the specific copyrighted art linked by Trade.
    Ooligan (talk) 03:07, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:58, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Files uploaded by Roman Kubanskiy (talk · contribs)[edit]

    AI-generated fakes. As well as being derivative work of presumably non-free content, these images are highly problematic as being represented as being images of real life people when they are in fact inventions of a computer program.

    TommyG (talk) 12:52, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    They are not presented as images of people, the source indicates Midjourney, and the license says that it is in the public domain, as it is generated by a neural network. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 12:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
     Delete. Fictitious, potentially misleading pictures of identifiable living people. Omphalographer (talk) 00:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
     Keep – No valid deletion rationale has been provided so far. The images are high quality and show how images of real people can by generated by AI among other possible purposes. There are also other AI-generated images and even -videos of Putin which never were challenged with any (in this case invalid opinions-based) DRs. Moreover, agree with Kubanskiy and the images are well titled and categorized to prevent this from being mistaken as actual photographs. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Files uploaded by Skogshare (talk · contribs)[edit]

    Random AI-generated out of scope images

    TommyG (talk) 12:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

     Delete. Most of these images are unlikely to be usable for educational content. Notes on specific images follow:
    Omphalographer (talk) 00:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
     Keep indiscriminate nomination. Most of these are easily in scope. They illustrate video game genres, social issues, tropes in LGBT manga and anime, etc. or are just unremarkable images of things like anime women in hijabs or JK Rowling. a few are out of scope or problematic but that’s an overwhelming minority. I think this should be closed as a bad mass nomination and the nominator can re-nominate ones they can actually think of a legitimate specific reason to delete. Dronebogus (talk) 18:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    •  Keep The nominator has not provided specific rationale(s) for deletion. All indiscriminately listed images glanced over seem fine and various seem useful. File:Farm sim AI.jpg and File:Jk rowling sketch AI.png are good examples of an images to keep, regarding the latter drawings/artworks showing specific well-known people are not prohibited. However, some of these images are low-quality because they include AI misgeneration (without being educational in regards to AI misgeneration or an early stage of AI art). --Prototyperspective (talk) 18:24, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


    File:WinterintheNordicCountriesBanner1.jpg[edit]

    Unused crop of File:Iceland lake Northern Lights (Unsplash).jpg. 0x0a (talk) 13:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Rondache cegn vf.png[edit]

    Cette rondache peut-elle figurer sur Wikimedia Commons ? Avec quelle licence ? Doit-elle être versée uniquement sur Wikipédia fr où les règles de copyrigth sont différentes ? Avec quelle licence ? Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 13:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Bonjour,
    C'est moi qui ai ajouté cette rondache. Je travaille au cabinet communication du commandement des écoles de la gendarmerie nationale. Il m'a été demandé de mettre à jour la page wikipédia du commandement.
    La rondache a été faite par le centre de production multimédia de la gendarmerie nationale pour le commandement. Je pensais qu'en citant le CPMGN il n'y aurait pas de problème.
    Il en est de même pour la carte des écoles que j'avais mise sur la page et qui a été retirée. Ces fichiers sont disponibles sur notre site internet.
    Par ailleurs, une alerte a été mise sur la page disant qu'il n'y avait pas de sources à mon écrit. J'y ai donc ajouté le site internet que l'on a retiré car site officiel. Je ne vois pas quoi mettre d'autres à part ça ou ma parole.
    Je vous remercie de m'indiquer la marche à suivre pour ces 2 questions.
    Cordialement CabinetCEGN (talk) 14:23, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Bonjour,
    effectivement le graphisme https://www.gendarmerie.interieur.gouv.fr/storage/var/gendarmerie_cegn/storage/images/_aliases/full/3/9/6/3/23693-8-fre-FR/b1a3aee77d12-rondache-cegn.png se trouve sur https://www.gendarmerie.interieur.gouv.fr/cegn/les-ecoles-de-gendarmerie/commandement-des-ecoles-de-la-gendarmerie-nationale-cegn
    Il reste à savoir si la licence qui l'accompagne est compatible avec celles de Wikimedia Commons ou s'il peut être versé dans Wikipédia fr, sachant qu'il est spécifié : « Tous droits réservés © Ministère de l'intérieur/Gendarmerie nationale ».
    Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 19:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Begging your pardon, I'll write in English, because my French might not be precise enough in this situation. CabinetCEGN, if you really want to license this file on Wikimedia Commons, not just Wikipedia, please contact COM:VRT and tell them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:05, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Files in Category:Müller und Sohn[edit]

    The graphics of this board game are by Matthias Wittig, who is alive. So they are still protected by copyright, and the files should be deleted.

    Rosenzweig τ 13:48, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    In the case of File:Müller und Sohn.jpg I don't see anything that might be copyrighted. The print on the flour sack is to simple and the graphics on the board are not shown. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 09:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:2023 Signs in Waterdown Laslovarga (4).jpg[edit]

    Duplicate to this File:2023 Signs in Waterdown Laslovarga (33).jpg which is better quality --László (talk) 14:23, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    • Not really a duplicate, but you're entitled to a courtesy deletion, anyway. When you post filenames in text, please put a colon before the name, so we don't see the entire photo here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Lim Yi Wei (April 2020).jpg[edit]

    This is a professional photograph probably originating from Facebook. It lacks EXIF data that could support the uploader's claim that it is their own work. HejTuWou (talk) 14:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Tourism in Banff.jpg[edit]

    Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    •  Comment Nice photo, though a bit unfocused at full size. Could be used to portray an outdoor hot tub in the mountains, a portrait of 5 women, etc. I'd keep it, edit the description and tweak the categories, but I won't argue that it's an image of really excellent technical quality. Judgment call. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Flag of Chinese Taipei (Overwatch World Cup).svg[edit]

    This file was initially tagged by Sangjinhwa as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Chinese Taipei esports flag.svg - Not identical so CSD doesn't apply, but also not used and unlikely to be used b/c of the other file The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    I can't see the flag image in [2] provided in Chinese Taipei esports flag.svg too. 筆和擦膠必有用 (talk) 16:43, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Localização peróglifos galaicos-portugueses.png[edit]

    Remplacé parː Xicodaponte (talk) 15:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Róbert Atya Újmiséje 2002. június 30 017 (51002151513).jpg[edit]

    Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 15:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


    File:Viva.españa.jpg[edit]

    Duplication of File:Flag of Spain (1945–1977).svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Contemporary US Politics Month in UkWiki.png[edit]

    This file was initially tagged by 0x0a as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G8|derived from non-free image: Jasper Johns's 'Flag' Yann (talk) 16:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Drapeau territorial de l'Union européenne.png[edit]

    Distorted raster of File:Flag of Europe.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Robert Eichenauer.jpg[edit]

    possible copyvio (c) chris zenz - 8010 graz M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    stimmt, Fehler beim Eintragen im Copyright. Beste Grüße Erika39 (talk) 16:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Ich habs ausgebessert. Erika39 (talk) 16:39, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Anjuman and Aziz Charitable Trust (AACT).jpg[edit]

    FBMD in metadata. Unlikely to be own work. Copyvio? Correct permission is required See COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Frances Lee on CSPAN.jpg[edit]

    PD-CSPAN does not apply here. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Chris Stirewalt.jpg[edit]

    PD-CSPAN does not apply here. This is a committee hearing. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Frances Haugen C-SPAN[edit]

    PD-CSPAN does not apply here as this is a committee hearing. --BadzilBot (talk) 17:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Catherine Crump at Intelligence Squared.png[edit]

    PD-CSPAN does not apply here. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Arnold Kanter testifies to the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee.jpg[edit]

    PD-CSPAN does not apply here as this is a committee hearing. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:28, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Maybe not, but is allowed because of C-SPANs policy “Individuals are permitted to use C-SPAN video coverage of federal government events on a non-commercial public Internet site so long as C-SPAN is attributed as the source of the video.” GameOfAwesome (talk) 19:39, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    "on a non-commercial public Internet" is not compatible with Commons. See Commons:Project scope#Required licensing terms. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 19:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Well, thats not a good rule. Thanks for pointing this out to me. I implore you to try to find a useable image of this man GameOfAwesome (talk) 19:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Releasing free works under licenses that permit commercial use enables new applications by individuals and small businesses that would have been impossible before, producing value for everyone. Fair use imposes too many restrictions. The GFDL is accepted, but impractical.

    — in: Commons:Licensing/Justifications
    Cryptic-waveform (talk) 20:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Richard D. Parker, Williams Professor of Law at Harvard Law School.png[edit]

    PD-CSPAN does not apply here as this is a committee hearing. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Michael-MccGwire-Brookings.jpg[edit]

    PD-CSPAN does not apply here as this is a committee hearing. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Donald Fowler, on C-Span, 10th December 2005.jpg[edit]

    PD-CSPAN does not apply here. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:31, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Caricature of Huma Adedin[edit]

    Source image is not free per PD-CSPAN. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Barduk Castle2020 2.jpg[edit]

    all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} talk 18:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Barduk Castle2020 3.jpg[edit]

    all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} talk 18:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Barduk Castle2020 4.jpg[edit]

    all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} talk 18:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Barduk Castle2020 5.jpg[edit]

    all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} talk 18:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Barduk Castle2020 6.jpg[edit]

    all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} talk 18:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Barduk Castle2020.jpg[edit]

    all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} talk 18:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Barduk Castle2020 7.jpg[edit]

    all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} talk 18:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Hozanaydin.jpg[edit]

    no source no metadata no permission no author cannot be a selfie as is claimed Hoyanova (talk) 18:04, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Partiya Wekhevî û Demokrasiya Gelan.jpg[edit]

    no permission given, protected logo, no author given Hoyanova (talk) 18:04, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Hozandîno.jpg[edit]

    no source no author no permission cannot be a selfie as is claimed Hoyanova (talk) 18:05, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Files uploaded by Leoncio Wong (talk · contribs)[edit]

    Google Lens finds one or more versions of this prior to upload here

    🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 18:53, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senator Chuck Schumer respond to President Trump (C-SPAN).webm[edit]

    PD-CSPAN does not apply here. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 18:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Corinex Standar Logo Green.png[edit]

    "Own Work" is claimed. Unless the uploader is the copyright holder, and/or the actual creator of the logo, the claim is false. Permission must be presented to COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Buyni Yugun Castle2018.jpg[edit]

    all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} talk 19:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Buyni Yugun Castle2018 2.jpg[edit]

    all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} talk 19:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    File:Bombing of the Syrian army in Hama, Idlib against the Al Nusra Front.jpg[edit]

    No attribution to one of Tasnim in-house photographers. Therefore, {{Tasnim}} conditions are not met. 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:28, 30 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Kept: Watermark is present in lower left, which seems a reasonable claim of Tasnim authorship. Attribution to a specific in-house photographer is not a condition of general site notice: "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License". --Эlcobbola talk 19:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Bombing of the Syrian army in Hama, Idlib against the Al Nusra Front.jpg[edit]

    all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} talk 19:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Sen. Ted Cruz to Twitter CEO - 'Mr Dorsey, who the hell elected you...'-7oeHylP48ws.webm[edit]

    C-SPAN videos, not USGov. Not eligible for PD-CSPAN. I'm also unable to confirm whether the video was published under CC license, despite it having an automated license review. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 19:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:BRA vs IRI Futsal 2018 YOG.jpg[edit]

    all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} talk 19:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Is this a general rule for Tasnim images? Because searching the source of the image using Google only gives Tasnim as a result.--BugWarp (talk) 01:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Exelente.jpg[edit]

    Possible copyvio: Image used for this Youtube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQwQVdaafdA CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Simonmartinez.jpg[edit]

    wrong author, copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 21:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    File:Edvard Munch - Bleeding Man and Sunflower.jpg[edit]

    The motif is the wrong way round. We have two files with the motif correct; File:Edvard Munch - Bleeding Man and Sunflower - MM.M.00857 - Munch Museum.jpg and File:Edvard Munch - Bleeding Man and Sunflower - MM.M.00857 - Munch Museum (cropped).jpg. The artwork can be seen at Munch Museum https://www.munchmuseet.no/en/object/MM.M.00857 I have been in contact with the Munch Museum here in Oslo per email and they have confirmed that this motif is the wrong way round. I have removed all use of the wrong file from the Wikipedia-editions which used it. Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 21:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2023/11/15&oldid=824869605"