Commons:Deletion requests/2023/11/18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
17 November 2023
19 November 2023
Deletion requests on 18 November 2023

November 18[edit]

File:Official Logo of Alen Štigmond.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Comment. There is a Wikidata entry for Alen Štigmond (d:Q96460203). Whether we should have a Wikidata entry for him is another question. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Official logo of Alen Štigmond - black.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep as file is in use. There is a Wikidata entry for Alen Štigmond (d:Q96460203). Whether we should have a Wikidata entry for him is another question. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Spid Logo.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use outside userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep. Used in a good-faith userspace draft. This seems to be a subsidiary of a notable company (Cencosud) which has Wikipedia articles across multiple languages. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cygnett logo.JPG[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Comment. I am on the fence with this one. Wikipedia doesn't have any articles on Cygnett, but they are noteworthy enough to be sponsoring major sports leagues in Australia. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:CYGNETT1 LOGO RGB (jpg).jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Comment. I am on the fence with this one. Wikipedia doesn't have any articles on Cygnett, but they are noteworthy enough to be sponsoring major sports leagues in Australia. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:CYGNETT LOGO RGB (jpg).jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Comment. I am on the fence with this one. Wikipedia doesn't have any articles on Cygnett, but they are noteworthy enough to be sponsoring major sports leagues in Australia. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sugeng Riyanta.jpg[edit]

© 2023 IDN Media | All Rights Reserved https://sumut.idntimes.com/news/sumut/prayugo-utomo-1/sugeng-dilantik-jadi-pj-bupati-tapteng-diingatkan-jaga-kondusifitas Urang Kamang (talk) 03:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo Val di Fiemme 2013 FIS Nordic World Ski Championships.png[edit]

Copyvio image:
This logo was used in a FIS ruled event. The FIS states at its TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
«All elements of the Website, including the FIS content, are protected by copyright, trade dress, moral rights, trademark and other laws relating to the protection of intellectual property.» (https://www.fis-ski.com/en/international-ski-federation/terms-and-conditions) Leonprimer (talk) 04:13, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep The logo is too simple to be copyrighted, just letters with a very basic embossing effect. Darwin Ahoy! 23:19, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dan Turrells plads (8589859940).jpg[edit]

There is not panorama freedom in Denmark with respect to sculpturs Fnielsen (talk) 06:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

True. And I guess it isn't just a bunch of open-licensed letters. Palnatoke (talk) 06:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dan Turells Plads.jpg[edit]

There is not freedom of panorama in Denmark with respect to sculptures. The letter sculpture in the left part of the image may be a problem Fnielsen (talk) 06:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Carte des participants.png[edit]

Based on copyrighted Google Maps. Komarof (talk) 06:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:SydneyBuilding0108.jpg[edit]

Bad quality slide scanned at low res, plenty of alternative shots Sardaka (talk) 07:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Statue of Taras Shevchenko, Romny[edit]

Violation of sculptor's copyright. Ukraine does not allow commercial freedom of panorama. The 1918 sculpture was designed by sculptor І. П. Кавалерідзе (died 1978) according to w:uk:Пам'ятники Ромен. This image under commercial-type Creative Commons license is a copyright violation. Since this sculpture is already in public domain in the United States, the images can be undeleted on January 1, 2049 (70+1 years after the sculptor's death).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep The source country of this monument is Ukrainian State (and the Ukrainian State kept controlling the city for 30 days, the monument being installed on 27 October and the Ukrainian State losing control of the city mid-December), which, as far as I could find out, was not a part to any copyright treaties, and neither Ukraine nor any other country recognises itself as its successor. As a result, a norm similar to {{PD-RusEmpire}} should apply. This monument is pretty much THE only prominent structure built during times of the Ukrainian State (which existed for just 7 months, entirely during wartime), so this question never arose before — NickK (talk) 19:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @NickK how does it applies when the template provides a cutoff date of "7 November 1917", a year before the year of this sculptural work? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @JWilz12345: I don't say the norm from {{PD-RusEmpire}}, but a similar one does. The logic in {{PD-RusEmpire}} applies to works created in Russian Empire, a recognised state that was not party to any copyright treaty and has no legal successor. This sculptural work was created in the Ukrainian State, a different recognised state that similarly was not party to any copyright treaty and also has no legal successor. This work is pretty unique because a) the state was very short-lived and existed only in wartime, b) most works from 1918 are already in public domain by death of their authors, c) very few of them survived (many were deliberately destroyed by the Soviets), which probably explains why this problem was never discussed before — NickK (talk) 22:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @NickK perhaps the state's successor was USSR (Soviet Union) (?). COM:FOP Soviet Union hints that USSR had a non-commercial FoP that was inherited in almost all of current successor states like Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan et cetera. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @JWilz12345: USSR absolutely was not the successor of the Ukrainian State. The Ukrainian State lost a war to the Ukrainian People's Republic, its government emigrated and continued a monarchical dynasty as the Hetman movement (uk:Гетьманський рух). The Hetman movement government-in-exile ceased to exist in 1957 when its last representative died, and it had no legal successor. (At the same time, Ukraine is the legal successor to the Ukrainian People's Republic, and USSR deliberately did not proclaim itself legal successor of any state) — NickK (talk) 22:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @NickK then Ukrainian laws apply. Just the similar situation: non-commercial FoP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @JWilz12345: Can you please explain why Ukrainian laws apply here but not in case of {{PD-RusEmpire}}? — NickK (talk) 23:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @NickK the cutoff date itself which is a year before this monument (from 1918). Only works made or published before November 7, 1917 are applicable to the Russian Empire P.D. license. Also, like what you said, Ukrainian People'S Republic won over the war you mentioned, taking Ukrainian State. Then, the successor of Ukrainian People's Republic is Ukraine itself. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:08, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @JWilz12345: I don't understand your logic. The Russian Empire lost to (among others) the Ukrainian People's Republic in 1917, the Russian Empire government emigrated and no modern state recognises itself as its successor. Russian Empire works are in public domain. The Ukrainian State lost to the Ukrainian People's Republic in 1918, the Ukrainian State government emigrated and no modern state recognises itself as its successor. Still you think that Ukrainian State works are not in public domain. What is the difference between these two cases? There is nothing magic in the 1917 date from copyright point of view, it is the date of the revolution that the Russian Empire lost. The same date for the Ukrainian State is 1918 — NickK (talk) 23:36, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @NickK haven't you notice the cutoff date on the template? It just means it is invalid for works made after November 7, 1917. And this monument is a 1918 work, that is no longer bound for PD-RusEmpire template. Ukrainian State lost to Ukrainian People's Republic (which was succeeded by Ukraine), so the latter is the successor state and copyright rules of the latter apply. It is highly probable that commercial reusers of this monument will lose in front of Ukrainian courts (with the heirs of the sculptor winning). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:56, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @JWilz12345: International law just does not work this way. Winning a war does not mean becoming a legal successor. USSR won a war against the Russian Empire, but opted not to become its legal successor, instead the government of Russian Empire continued in exile. Ukrainian People's Republic won a war against the Ukrainian State, also did not become its legal successor, instead the government of Ukrainian State continued in exile. USSR eventually won a war against Ukrainian People's Republic, again did not become its legal successor, the government of Ukrainian People's Republic continued in exile but eventually signed an agreement with Ukraine recognising legal succession. Ukrainian State never had such an agreement with Ukraine, nor with any other state. It is in exactly the same position as Russian Empire: had no copyright treaty, has no legal successor.
    On your second point, there is no difference from the point of view of Ukrainian copyright law between works created in Russian Empire and works created in Ukrainian State because Ukraine is not a successor to either. What matters for Commons is the country of origin (in this case: not a part to any copyright treaty) and the US (in this case: in public domain) — NickK (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Lia Coadă (talk · contribs)[edit]

Photos of physical photos. No proof of ownership or permission.

Gikü (talk) 08:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:IE road sign F-331 (GA).png[edit]

Superseded by SVG. EthanL13 (talk) 10:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cruise leaves Venice (5020866501).jpg[edit]

very bad quality, blurry, too dark, low resolution, better File:Venecia - panoramio - jmsolerb.jpg, File:Campanile St. Mark's Basilica Venezia 06 2017 2685.jpg, File:Piazza San Marco (dal mare).jpg, File:San marco - Flickr - Stiller Beobachter.jpg, File:Campanile St. Mark's Basilica Venezia 06 2017 2944 8x10.jpg, File:Along the Grand Canal 22 (3549825336).jpg Oursana (talk) 10:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:"Jeux dans la neige".jpg[edit]

Author died less than 70 years ago ; no freedom of panorama in France Omnilaika02 (talk) 11:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bonjour si cette photo pose problème, j'irai en prendre une autre demain et comme pour la bachelière changerai au plus tôt l'image en question. Pas de souci… Merci pour votre travail. Cordialement. Christian Satgé (talk) 13:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Bonjour, vous ne pouvez pas : l'image n'est pas dans le domaine public, elle appartient toujours aux héritiers de l'artiste. Omnilaika02 (talk) 16:22, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:King M6.jpg[edit]

Copyright. Pas un travail personnel. https://www.instagram.com/p/CxN3pDFIH4y/?img_index=1 Aréat (talk) 12:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:AW PT 2010 - Cristóvão Pires - L uso de la Biquipédia na rebitalizaçon de lhénguas minoritairas L causo de l mirandés.pdf[edit]

Presentation is replete with copyrighted material, including two comic book covers on slide 10. There is so much copyrighted material there that I don't think it can be rescued by removing it. Darwin Ahoy! 12:57, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The other version has almost no images, but it has the two covers on page 5. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Asclepias In the case of that one, if someone wants to keep the file here, it's easier. These 2 comic book covers are just a curiosity about the use of Mirandese in general, and not related to Wikimedia, so they can be removed without affecting the value of the presentation. Darwin Ahoy! 23:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:AW PT 2010 - Béria Lima - Edição na Wikipédia passo a passo.pdf[edit]

Slides 15, 16 and 17 have an entire row of copyrighted stock images. Either they are removed, or the whole thing should be deleted from here. Darwin Ahoy! 13:03, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Would it not be surprising that Beria would have included non free images in her free licensed work? Why remove the images if they're public domain or free? Or how did you conclude that she used non free images? -- Asclepias (talk) 14:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Asclepias More than 13 years ago? No, it's not surprising, and she uploaded much worst stuff replete with copyrighted material back then. At that time many users just didn't care much about copyright, specially when it came to presentations. In any case, you can find these kind of stock images all over the internet, apparently they were popular in the 2000s to decorate websites and presentations, as can be seen here and here, without any care for their copyright as was usual at the time. Darwin Ahoy! 23:15, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:AnnaRosaDoeller Photo.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio from https://www.instagram.com/annarosadoeller.official/ M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ربيب أيت عطا.jpg[edit]

out of scope.-- Faisal talk 13:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Telenuovo2012.png[edit]

is a logo of television, not Own work, not cc3 ZioNicco (talk) 13:33, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:TelenuovoLogoDefinitivo2012.jpg[edit]

is a logo of television, not Own work, not cc3 ZioNicco (talk) 13:34, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Telenuovo.png[edit]

is a logo of television, not Own work, not cc3 ZioNicco (talk) 13:34, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Telenuovo 2021.png[edit]

is a logo of television, not Own work, not cc4 ZioNicco (talk) 13:34, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Telenuovo 2012 Lucido.png[edit]

is a logo of television, not Own work, not cc4 ZioNicco (talk) 13:34, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Mrmw (talk · contribs)[edit]

These are logos created by Amtrak which, contrary to the claim in them, is neither the Federal Government nor a subdivision of the government of California. It's creations are copyrighted in the usual way.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Список городов Свидригайло, 1402-1432гг.jpg[edit]

Авторство участника вызывает сомнения Lishleb (talk) 13:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files on Fadaat Media[edit]

I think these probably have copyrights.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dota2artwisp951412560x1440.jpg[edit]

copyright violation DSwissK (talk) 13:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stijl vol 04 nr 01 p 010.jpg[edit]

Unused fragment. Has been replaced by File:Stijl vol 04 nr 01 p 009-010.jpg. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 14:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Cassassandra (talk · contribs)[edit]

out of scope: personal fiction, unused

Enyavar (talk) 14:52, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep some. The Kastovia and Urzikstan flags/maps appear to be part of the fictional universe of the w:Call of Duty video game series. The "Castle of Glass" election map does appear to be a personal fiction and should be deleted. Omphalographer (talk) 07:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I had checked the article of the corresponding CoD game before the DR, and it appeared that the pretty extensive English version doesn't even mention those fictional countries.
Correction: I seem to have checked the wrong article, en:Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (2019 video game) in fact mentions them. So, next question: are these maps (i.e. borders/extents of Kast/Urzi) and flags actually depicted in the game? If not, personal fiction applies; if yes, then keep and categorize properly as "maps of fictional Earth" and under the game's category. --Enyavar (talk) 09:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ahmet Yildirim (HDP).png[edit]

The shootings in the Turkish Grand National Assembly are carried out by the Turkish Radio and Television Corporation (TRT). For this reason, I think the images are copyrighted and should be deleted. Zafer (talk) 15:52, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am not sure if this one is made by the TRT, at least it doesn't say. Could also be recorded by a member of the HDP. The image is from a video published under a Creative Commons license by his parties YouTube channel. There are several similar DRs some opened by me, others by other editors. One here another one here (that one was uploaded by me, but to me it seems likely that the video from which the image was taken was recorded by the TRT) In my opinion it would be good to clarify the rules. According to Turkish law, the speeches are allowed to be published for means of information, but they are not under public domain. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The Camberwell Beauty.jpg[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 16:11, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep per COM:FOP UK; ceramic tile murals are works of artistic craftsmanship. 09:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Без названия209 20231105174308.png[edit]

Duplicate of File:Coat of Arms of the First Republic of Armenia.png. Fry1989 eh? 16:17, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Laurent Couson .jpg[edit]

copyright inthe left corner. gpesenti (talk) 16:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Recueil. "Sud" de Albert Paluel-Marmont, "Fanouche" de P. Vandenberghe et Guy Rapp - btv1b10507456q (11 of 30).jpg[edit]

Not in the public domain in USA yet. Yann (talk) 16:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Yann: is it not? (and why is the undelete category 2035? Commons:Hirtle_chart is quite complex).
Also, aren't all files in Category:Recueil. "Sud" de Albert Paluel-Marmont, "Fanouche" de P. Vandenberghe et Guy Rapp - btv1b10507456q in the same case?
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 09:06, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This was published in 1939, so it will be in the public domain in USA 95 years after publication. I didn't check other files. This one was proposed as the 100 millionth file, but it is a bad choice for that. Yann (talk) 15:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Yann: 1939 + 95 = 2034, not 2035... Plus, US Public domain is not just 95 years post-publication, could you explain clearly why you think it's falling under this case?
AFAIK, it was not "proposed", it is the 100 millionth file (and kept or deleted doesn't change anything, except maybe that we must be even more careful in this request).
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:33, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It will be in the public domain at the end of the year, or on January 1st, 2035. Yes, the French copyright expired on 1939+70=2009 (December 31st), after 1996, so the US copyright was restored by URAA. Yann (talk) 17:26, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Why 1939? The author died 1941, so the 70 years expired in 2012. Do the 95 years really apply to simple texts? GPSLeo (talk) 10:51, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
1939 is the date of publication. Simple texts do not get a copyright, but this is much more than a simple text. And yes, unfortunately the URAA applies to everything which has a copyright. Yann (talk) 11:02, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
But according to the Hirtle Chart this is only true if the Copyright was renewed. Stanford Libraries doesn't have eny entries for 1939 [1]. --Ailura (talk) 12:13, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No, it is the opposite. If the copyright was renewed, then it expired definitely. See PD-1996 for a short summary. Yann (talk) 13:26, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If the work is not in the public domain according to legislation in the USA, then who owns the rights? Can we find out if the legislation of the original country in such cases can interpret public domain as CC0 in other countries? VisbyStar (talk) 08:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@VisbyStar: The copyright is always owned by the heirs unless the author decides otherwise in her/his will. CC0 is for public domain given by the copyright holder themselves, so not appropriate here. Yann (talk) 10:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for the reply @Yann! I like these questions so this a just an example for understanding. I see a problem here, if I take two files in the public domain according to country of origin and create a new work, that I claim the copyright for, and choose to set it in CC0 - example this mixed poster of Théâtre de l'Étoile, can it be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons with CC0? VisbyStar (talk) 11:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@VisbyStar: This is not in the public domain in USA, so not with this file. But otherwise OK. Yann (talk) 11:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Delete - not PD US. I am also nominating another bunch of files in a similar category (Category:Recueil. "Blanche Neige et les sept nains" film de David Hand produit par Walt Disney - btv1b105075279) for deletion here. (Oinkers42) (talk) 17:55, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Info de:Datei_Diskussion:Georges_Le_Cardonnel_Sud_1939.jpg. --Goesseln (talk) 09:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:20210814 nonna anna jpeg 13.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Hjart as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 18:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Objektet fetare osmane Kostur.jpg[edit]

CopyVio. (Even if permission was given, the blatant watermark still makes the image unusable within scope) Enyavar (talk) 19:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Imam Omar Suleiman.jpg[edit]

No evidence of a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license nor that the site even owned the rights to the photo https://web.archive.org/web/20150213033735/http://www.shaykhpedia.com/view/omar-suleiman.html Trade (talk) 19:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2009 National Award.jpg[edit]

Duplicate of File:National Award, Commander of the Most Illustrious Order of Merit (CM) Award Ceremony sky view.jpg Fl.schmitt (talk) 19:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bandera de Amapala.svg[edit]

Possibly unfree flag from Honduras. Abzeronow (talk) 19:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Abzeronow The municipal flags are created by municipal decree by the municipal gazette, which according to article 54 of the Copyright Law, these may be freely displayed where any individual desires, the same provision that Korea has, as happens in here.
The emblems, flags, etc. are the product of a decree therefore they are free of copyright as stated by law. Just as the coat of arms of Honduras would be in public domain, even if it were not more than 75 years old (after the death of the author). COAmaker17 (talk) 21:57, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Juche.png[edit]

Blurry/low-res, have File:WPK Emblem.svg as high-quality alt. DMacks (talk) 20:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ricardo Quaresma performing a bicycle kick against France at Euro 2016 final.jpg[edit]

No indication that this is anything but copyrighted. Immediate link is to Dawn.com which is copyrighted, images on page credited to AP and AFP which are commercial image agencies that by definition do not put their images in the public domain. Amazing that it's taken seven years for anything to be done about this. Unknown Temptation (talk) 20:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:42-01 entera.jpg[edit]

Photograph of non-notable band 42-01. Abzeronow (talk) 20:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/42-01 for why the article on the band was deleted. Abzeronow (talk) 21:01, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vexillum Vaticanum.jpg[edit]

Out of scope: Wrong version of the flag (red under the tiara, should be white). Unused file GiovanniPen (talk) 21:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree with the deletion as long as we keep the cropped one. It is the best file we have to show that the incorrect version was used also by churches. --GAL13 (talk) 21:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
GAL13, your link didn't work. I fixed it. And that photo has to be kept per COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:PuntaEntinasSunset.jpg[edit]

Duplicate of PuntaEntinas.jpg Roquex Messages 21:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Komentar na Google maps.jpg[edit]

Out of scope Milićević (talk) 21:57, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gloria Trevi encarcelada.png[edit]

The uploader didn't provide a link to the government page where it states it has a CC-BY license. The image is all around the web, this news article from 2004 attributes the image to Associate Press news agency. Günther Frager (talk) 22:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:New routemaster on 149.jpg[edit]

Poor quality duplicate of File:LT 586 (LTZ 1586) Arriva London New Routemaster - Flickr - hotspur star.jpg. Don’t think the uploader (of this one) is the original author based on the upload date of the original image (Flickr page linked in file above). S5A-0043Talk 22:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cranberry Farm receives newspaper exposure. (19055409866).jpg[edit]

1998 excerpt from newspaper with photographs. Unlikely that this is actually CC. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 22:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Beirat Museum Delmenhorst 2006.png[edit]

"Mit Quellenangabe dürfen Sie in verwenden." does not mean we can use it under a free licence. Unfortunately I believe, that we have to delete this picture. Paintdog (talk) 22:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hoaxilla-Logo quadratisch.PNG[edit]

"Alle Fotos können mit dem Hinweis „(c) Privat“ genutzt werden. Über eine Information bei Verwendung würden wir uns sehr freuen. Größere Vorschau der Bilder durch Klick." Is not sufficient permission Trade (talk) 23:15, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep At the bottom of the source page, it reads "Die Logos können mit dem Hinweis: „Urheber: Kai Daniel Du, Lizenz: CC-0“ verwendet werden." –IagoQnsi (talk) 00:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cala-A-Boca Show podcast logo.png[edit]

AFAIK RogueScholar does not seem to be affiliated with the podcast in any way so i doubt he owns the rights to the logo Trade (talk) 23:19, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cow-vigilantism india AI.png[edit]

Extremely poor quality AI image. All the background men are eyeless mutants, several cows are mutated and the guy in front barely have any fingers at all

It's unlikely that this will be useful in any articles Trade (talk) 23:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete Agree this is comically bad, but I love the tiny faced guy in the blue shirt on the right Dronebogus (talk) 02:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Церковь(2015).jpg[edit]

No EXIF small res image, no way it's own work Gikü (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:PrototypeRadio.jpg[edit]

Above threshold of originality? Trade (talk) 23:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2023/11/18&oldid=825010097"