Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Oeuvre Max Van der Linden Ottignies TOTAL.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Freedom of panorama was introduced to Belgium in 2016, which covers 3D artworks A1Cafel (talk) 07:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Why do you suggest that FoP applies here? Also, if the photo was made in public space, we need an evidence that the art still remained there in 2016 (the photo is from 2012). Ankry (talk) 01:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC) @A1Cafel: pinging. Ankry (talk) 16:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done no response; this image looks rather like an image from a gallery, not a public space image. Ankry (talk) 20:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Antey III.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Should these two (deleted via this and that, as no FOP in Russia) depict "buildings", then these should be covered by {{FoP-Russia}} by now since 2014. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 Support per above. Ankry (talk) 20:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nesterov PtVVasnecova.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nesterov PtVVasnecova.jpg

1925 work. Author died in 1942 so it would be public domain in country of origin which is Russia. Abzeronow (talk) 02:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

What is the copyright status in the US though? De728631 (talk) 15:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
The portrait is dated 1925 here. We generally consider creation date = publication date for paintings unless evidence of otherwise. Ankry (talk) 20:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Ok, then let's undelete it as PD-US-expired. De728631 (talk) 20:56, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per {{PD-Russia-expired}}. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Venera10surface.gif

Reason For Deletion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Venera10surface.gif

In the time since this image was deleted, a new understanding that autonomous Soviet space probe imagery is exempt from copyright was reached for similar images (see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Luna_3_moon.jpg). This appears to have been reinforced by a ruling by the Russian Supreme Court, as described in Template:PD-RU-exempt-autocam. I request File:Venera10surface.gif be undeleted in light of this more recent understanding of the circumstances. --Subsider34 (talk) 06:27, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

 Support per Template:PD-RU-exempt-autocam. Ankry (talk) 20:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Composer Conductor John Beal.jpg

This image is from COMPOSER CONDUCTOR JOHN BEAL and is provided for publication and dissemination by John Beal and should not have been deleted from the page about him https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Beal_(composer) His approved for publication photos are here https://composerjohnbeal.com/hi-res-photos/ This photo is on that page with all John Beal photos covered by "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License." http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ It says it on the page with the photo. WikiBob47 (talk) 23:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC) WikiBob47 2/26/2021

 Info The image metadata states: "Copyright: Reeltime Creative Inc." As the source page does not belong to Reeltime Creative Inc., we need an evidence either that Reeltime Creative Inc. granted the license or that copyright has been transferred to the page owner. (Eg. information that Reeltime Creative Inc. standard contract contains a clause of copyright transfer to the client; this van also be resolved through COM:OTRS if the information is not public). Ankry (talk) 20:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 Oppose per Ankry. While the website in general may have a free licence, it is now doubtful that those photographs can be included into this licence. De728631 (talk) 21:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:38, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:民主陣線議員石景澄出席元朗區議會會議.jpg

Please refer to Template:The Stand News. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.78.190.240 (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. I only saw facebook at source which is generally not compatible with commons. --JuTa 17:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

BJP election symbol

Regarding Commons:Deletion requests/File:BJP Election Symbol.png I would like to note that the BJP symbol that was deleted can be seen as a derivative of File:India National Level Parties symbols.JPG which comes with a free licence. So I'm requesting the undeletion of

The design is arguably creative enough for copyright but there is a free licence available. @Taivo: Since you were the deleting admin, I'm leaving you a note here. De728631 (talk) 14:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Does Government of India really have right to publish logos of political parties under free license? I thought, that only party itself has the right. Taivo (talk) 18:41, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Those logos were actually not created by the parties themselves. Per List of political parties in India, "all registered parties contesting elections need to choose a symbol from a list of available symbols offered by the [Election Commission]." The election commission in turn is an independent constitutional authority of India. It is therefore reasonable to assume that a government publication offering the logos under a free licence can be trusted. De728631 (talk) 21:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above @De728631 and Taivo: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:38, 27 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files by Eric le Brun

With Ticket:2021022610004271 we received permission at OTRS for

Can they please be restored? I will then add the permission tag.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 21:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Mussklprozz: FYI. --De728631 (talk) 22:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rizal House.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/File:CALAMBA City.jpg, as uploaded by CHrizYOu. However, a search through Commons and enwiki logs reveals this file was actually from Eternal dragon on enwiki, and CHrizYOu may have transferred this file from enwiki. The user upload log of Eternal dragon on enwiki lists the entry: {{Information |Description=Jose Rizal's house in Calamba City |Source=own work |Date=January 2009 |Author=|other_versions= }}. Perhaps this was collaterally deleted due to that DR, deleted without studying if this was an original upload of CHrizYOu or was just only a transfer from enwiki. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: It was indeed a transfer from en.wp. However, CHrizYOu had claimed it as they own work when it was uploaded to Commons. This was later corrected by an administator. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:21, 1 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Respond Letter from the Malaysian Attorney General for the Release of Siti Aisyah.jpg

Hello. I want to request the undeletion of this file since User:廣九直通車 had mistakenly opined that the {{PD-Malaysia}} only for government works which have become public domain after 50 years from publication. If he reads the license under the Section 3, it has been clearly stated Regardless of the above, the texts of laws, judicial opinions, and government reports are always free from copyright. This works as a text clearly falls under the "judicial opinions" where it remain under public domain unless there is a change on the Malaysian laws.  Ṉight Ḻantern 🏮 04:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

@Night Lantern: My fault for not noticing there's an exception for Malaysian government copyright, but I'm not sure whether the term "pendapat kehakiman" in Malaysian (in item 4 of {{PD-Malaysia/ms}}) covers texts that are not judicial documents (eg. judgments, court orders, etc.). Probably better to ask a Malaysian-speaking user to verify for the terminology.廣九直通車 (talk) 04:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Also note that Malaysian is the sole official language of Malaysia.廣九直通車 (talk) 04:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 Support Ah, so I asked for opinions from Malaysian-speaking user (maybe useful), and searched for the Malaysian Copyright Act. It did explicitly exclude government works from the protection of copyright (based on ss. 3(literary works), 7(1)(a)). I apologize again for my rash decision of nominating the file for deletion.廣九直通車 (talk) 11:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per the Copyright Act 1987, Art 3. "“literary work” includes— [...] (e) letters, reports and memoranda;", Art 7. (1) "Subject to this section, the following works shall be eligible for copyright: [...] (a) literary works;", Art 11. (1) "Copyright shall subsist in every work which is eligible for copyright and which is made by or under the direction or control of the Government and such Government organizations or international bodies as the Minister may by order prescribe.". The letter is protected under the law. Pinging @廣九直通車, Night Lantern --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
    •  Question@Nat: But the same provision defining "literary work" also stated ... does not include official texts of the Government or statutory bodies of a legislative or regulatory nature, or judicial decisions, ..., and the official translation thereof;. The file is an official letter of reply written by Malaysian Attorney-General with respect to the issue of releasing the suspect of the assassination of Kim Jong-nam. Do you think the file is covered in that exception?廣九直通車 (talk) 13:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
    • Perhaps Clindberg would be interested to chime in, as Carl does have a good grasp of what constitutes official text. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
      • I can't see the file, but... normally those exceptions are for works with legal impact -- the text of laws, or judicial opinions, decrees that people are supposed to follow, treaties, that sort of thing. The "government reports" is a step further than similar clauses in other laws, but you would think that would be for formal, published reports from a committee or other group. They clearly do claim copyright in many government works, so the exception is not for all works, and there is a dividing line somewhere. I really wouldn't know how generously, or strictly, they would interpret "government reports" though. A letter would not be in line with laws or judicial opinions, although it sounds like this is official communication between governments. It would not have direct legal effect, but is not your normal type of work either. I don't have a good feel whether it would qualify as a "report" or not. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:31, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
      • @Clindberg: The letter is more a less a FYI of sorts of the AG's decision, the steps the AG's office is prepared to take, and the likely outcome of their decision. @廣九直通車: Barring a change in opinion, I am reaffirming my position to oppose undeletion per Carl's input. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
        • I'd have to agree that calling that a "report" feels like a large stretch. On the other hand, that is nearly a form letter. I have little idea about the threshold of originality there though. Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
          • Thanks for Carl Lindberg's information. I thought that the letter describing official view on a criminal case may fall under the scope of "official text that have administrative purposes".廣九直通車 (talk) 08:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MitoHaruka21227.jpgこのファイルは水戸遥を紹介する目的の物であれば著作権を放棄するとの明記あり。

このファイルは水戸遥本人のTwitterにて使用許諾が確認されております。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 渡辺 陽奈 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @渡辺 陽奈: If you are refering to this tweet, the statement "水戸遥紹介用であれば以下の画像はフリー使用可能です。" ("The following images can be used free of charge for introducing Haruka Mito.") does not grant a free licence as required by Commons' licensing policy. (Please see Gratis versus libre). Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

Hello. My name is Alexander Popov and i am a director and editor of this movie. Everything inside all my movies is made by me. So i just want to add this covers to wiki for everybody! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KeetCinema (talk • contribs) 08:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. No file listed for undeletion. No valid rationale for undeletion. @KeetCinema: As a purely technical matter, we cannot verify, confirm, or assess your assertions here. For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alžběta Hlásková.jpg

Shot by myself on camera of Alžběta's Hlásková daughter's boyfriend.

In the files I attach to publish photo with her permission from her official Facebook account.

Here's her agreement. thumb


Petr Mutinský --Petr Mutinský (talk) 09:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Petr Mutinský: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder (the photographer) must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Amber Van Day - foto.png

The picture is an edited photo of artist Amber Van Day from her Instagram. I asked her, and she allowed me to use the photo on Wikipedia, so I don't see a point why the photo should be deleted. You can see the evidence here: https://ctrlv.link/GmoT --Panda12hy (talk) 15:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Panda12hy: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. If deleted, once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hair-extension-hidden.jpg

The licence on Flickr was changed to CC0 The7bab (talk) 07:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. File not deleted. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore File:You Xie mit Markus Söder 2014.jpg

We have a permission at OTRS with Ticket:2021022410014316.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 07:43, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. Please add the ticket; I can then close the DR. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 1 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Museum of Prilep images

About 35 images that i uploaded in 2020, have been deleted due to not getting a initial mailed permission by the author (in this case was the Museum of Prilep). After getting the notice of possible deletion, i have contacted with the representative of the Museum and then he sent a mail declaring the permission of handing over the images to public domain at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Can someone explain me whether the statement of the representative of the Museum was rejected of any kind of nature, or it was not reviewed in time, or it was because of something else? Dandarmkd (talk) 10:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

These are the deleted images:

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Re: Ticket:2021021910010508 @Dandarmkd: This is not the venue to ask about the status of a ticket. Please refer your questions to Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. With regards to undeletion, only once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion on behalf of the copyright holder. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:17, 1 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Löschung „File:Waldow-Laendernotarkasse Leipzig Treppenhaus.jpg“

Bild ist in meinem Auftrag von Rolf Kaliske angefertigt worden. Ich habe die Rechte daran und kann dies auch nachweisen. Ich habe Fotograf und quelle benannt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kunstimraum (talk • contribs) 12:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC) (Kunstimraum (talk) 12:28, 1 March 2021 (UTC))

  •  Oppose @Kunstimraum:

    English: Right-of-use does not equate Copyright. Ownership of an image and commissioning an image does not equate holding the Copyright. The Copyright Holder under federal copyright law in Germany is the creator of the work (i.e. the photographer in the case of the image and the artist in the case of the work depicted). Please ask both the photographer and the artist to send permission using the OTRS process. Thank you for your understanding.

    German (via Google Translate, as my Standarddeustch is super rusty): Das Nutzungsrecht entspricht nicht dem Urheberrecht. Das Eigentum an einem Bild und die Beauftragung eines Bildes bedeuten nicht, das Urheberrecht zu besitzen. Der Urheberrechtsinhaber nach Bundesurheberrecht in Deutschland ist der Urheber des Werkes (d. H. Der Fotograf im Fall des Bildes und der Künstler im Fall des abgebildeten Werks). Bitte bitten Sie sowohl den Fotografen als auch den Künstler, die Erlaubnis im OTRS-Verfahren zu senden. Danke für Ihr Verständnis.

    --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:53, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Kunstimraum: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder (the photographer) must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:54, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete File:Find My Suitcase 1.jpg

and

Please undelete this image and allow me to attribute the source of the screenshot. This screenshots is of the Firestorm Viewer interface, which is an open source software. (https://www.firestormviewer.org/about/) The image is intended to accompany the educational webpage explanation. I apologize for not properly attributing these in my original post. I will be sure to attribute each component of any annotated image or collage image in the future. Thank you for your consideration. BethanyWinslow (talk) 20:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)BethanyWinslow

@BethanyWinslow: Open source is not the same as freely licensed. Unfortunately, I cannot find info about the software license on the abovementioned page. "LGPL software based" also does not mean that the software is LGPL-licensed itself (LGPL licensed software can be used by proprietary software). Could you, plese, find and provide us more precise info about license of the software? Ankry (talk) 22:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done no response. Ankry (talk) 21:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Headshot II.jpg

Hello Nat, I am requesting undeletion request of Headshot I shot in the studio of Francesco Scavullo and Headshot II in the studio of Charles Tracy they are both my images. Lilbitograffiti (talk) 19:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

 Info File:Headshot II.jpg is the only deleted contribution from this user. It appears to be a portrait of Patrick di Santo, see en:Draft:Patrick di Santo. Thuresson (talk) 20:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Lilbitograffiti Does this mean that Francesco Scavullo is the photographer? Please note that owning a copy of a photograph does not make you own its copyright. Copyright usually rests with the original photographer unless you have a written contract wherein it was transferred to you. De728631 (talk) 21:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done no response. Ankry (talk) 21:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Andrey Nazimov - Play With Me Premiere WinToEu FF.jpg

Hi, the picture was deleted by mistake. It depicts Russian actor Andrey Nazimov at Window To Europe film festival. Since the shooting took place on the red carpet, I was not the only photographer there - there were a bunch of them. The photo to which you refer is absolutely different, NOT identical to mine, and was made by a different author, though was taken in the same place. Please undelete.--Ecaterina Ivanova (talk) 21:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Ping @Túrelio: for any comment. Thuresson (talk) 21:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support The photos are similar but not identical. Note in particular the white reflection spots in the upper left corner here. Also, the Commons photo showed a full portrait while in the other image there is a slight angle to the right. De728631 (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
    • Thank you. How much time does the procedure take to get the pic restored then?--Ecaterina Ivanova (talk) 17:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
@Ecaterina Ivanova: Undeleted. Thuresson (talk) 21:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files about Yerevan vine days

Please restore

We have a permission at OTRS with Ticket:2021022810004301.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:18, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done per OTRS agent request. @Mussklprozz: FYI. Ankry (talk) 21:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tbilisi TV Tower - March 23, Solidarity to Italy.jpg

Per COM:DRV#Temporary undeletion: Allowing the image to be transferred to zhwiki for local use on article 2019冠状病毒病意大利疫情. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

@A1Cafel: temporarily undeleted. Ankry (talk) 21:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: Finished transfer. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Image redeleted. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mark_Bernardini.jpg

It is not I who took MY photo from the site nuovasocieta.it, but the exact opposite: they published MY photo with my authorization! I believe that your user "Slow Sloth" is totally incompetent on the subject!--Mark Bernardini (talk) 16:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, no need to insult users (even non-existing ones). The photo was used at nuovasocieta.it before it was uploaded here. In such cases we need some kind of proof that it actually was published with a free license. This can be an earlier publication with such a license (e.g. on flickr or your own web site) or confirmation by the copyright holder to COM:OTRS. Please bear in mind that the copyright holder usually is the photographer, not the photographed person. --rimshottalk 17:01, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
The image was tagged for speedy deletion by Bradipo Lento (talk · contribs), which is Italian for "Slow Sloth." Эlcobbola talk 17:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - 1) Previously published images require COM:OTRS evidence of permission and 2) copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the mere subject. As uploader/requestor (Mark Bernardini) purports to be the subject (Mark Bernardini), evidence of permission would need to come directly from the actual author or be in the form of a copy of the document that transferred copyright from the author to the subject. The copyright issue is moot, however, as this is a COM:NOTHOST/self-promotion issue; indeed, the article for which the image was intended, it:Mark Bernardini, was deleted as such. Эlcobbola talk 17:17, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:38E185AD-A4B3-4AA2-97DE-AA71B77A8E5C.jpg

Thank you for considering! This file may be seen elsewhere, but it originates from my personal photo vault. I would really appreciate being able to share it here, to the benefit of the actor subject! It is one of my favorite captured images.

In good faith and care,

Actorville

3/01/2021

Actorville (talk) 23:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. No such file exists. @Actorville: If this is in regards to the deleted files that you have uploaded: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. N.B.: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Emmagch

I'm resurfacing this previous undeletion request by @Emmagch:

Please restore the following pages:

Reason to undelete all of these files: I just need to add the permission to show that these were uploaded under a license that permits the free use of the images in the infographics.

What I would put for each permission would be the following: "This infographics was created through the website Canva and incorporates stock images provided by Canva under their Free Media License Agreement"

I disagree with the previous deletion reason stated. The Canva license states that media "can be used for free for commercial and noncommercial use", which is what is being done in these file. What is banned is sharing the unaltered stock media images, which is not being done here (the license states "Don’t sell unaltered copies of a photo, music or video file" and "Don’t redistribute or sell the stock media on other stock media platforms"). Please check the full policy text for clarification of the quotes from the plain English summary policy as to what is considered "unaltered" and "stock media" in this context. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 02:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose @Evolution and evolvability: Their license has the same problem (Don’t redistribute or sell the stock media on other stock media platforms.) as the current Pixabay license. Such limitations are not accepted in Commons. Ankry (talk) 08:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Also, concerning the last file, copyright doubts were raised in OTRS. And they remain unresponded. This may apply also to other files. (No evidence that the declared authors are the original authors of all images used there; and source/authorship/copyright info about these images was not provided) Ankry (talk) 08:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry, and per Elcobbola in the declined UD request. Commons requires that new work and the base works be freely licence or in the public domain for files to be hosted here. If the derivative work is freely licenced by the work depicted is not, the file cannot be hosted here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Philippine Railways- Sucat.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: While this was speedily deleted as claimed to have "sourced from Facebook", I can still remember (way back mid-2017) that this contained adequate metadata (timestamp etc) indicating that this was uploader's original photo, and not directly taken from Facebook, which should have been true if it bore FBMD metadata. But I can still remember, this file has all the camera metadata. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Also the ff.

Proof: File:Philippine Railways- Bicutan.jpg. It is still an original photo as it bears camera metadata. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

    • In that case,  I withdraw my nomination. It appears the user is blocked for using dupli-accounts. I'm going to check their other uploads too. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done withdrawn. Ankry (talk) 07:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Gut Kannenberg

Please restore

We have permission at OTRS with Ticket:2021022810005426

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: by Túrelio. @Mussklprozz: FYI. {{OTRS received}} added. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:810B3590RV.jpg

I'm Jean-Francois Deroubaix, photographer and author of the picture and the man on it is a public personality and my son's grand father. I see no reason this picture should be deleted. March 2nd 2021Dirbix (talk) 11:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here.@Dirbix: As a purely technical matter, we cannot verify, confirm, or assess your assertions here. For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Аджемян_Хорен_Григорьевич.jpg

Hi! This is picture of my relative and I have this photo in paper. Please, undelete this photo. Regards, Alexander — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alik2018 (talk • contribs) 11:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Alik2018: As already explained on your talk page, for the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder (the photographer) must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kornwestheim - Wohnhaus Adlerstraße 6.jpg

You dont have any rights on this! We are the Owners of this House.

Delete that! —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:810D:600:667C:2DA4:CFE0:98F7:33DB (talk) 15:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Not an undeletion request. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Libor Fiala

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission in OTRS ticket 2021022110002503. janbery (talk) 22:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: @Janbery: Until issues on Ticket:2021022110002503 are resolved, the files cannot be undeleted. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LidenFilms.png

This image, which can be seen here on en-wiki ([2]), is below the threshold of originality in both the US and the country of origin, Japan, as it consists only of simple geometric shapes and text. See COM:TOO United States and COM:TOO Japan. — Goszei (talk) 00:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

@Goszei: No such deleted image. Which deleted image are you talking about? Ankry (talk) 07:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: oops, my bad -- the file is LidenFilms.png, not LidenFilms.jpg — Goszei (talk) 07:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 Support per COM:TOO#Japan. @1989: do you wish to comment here? Ankry (talk) 07:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above @Goszei and Ankry: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Amanda Darling's "Exist" 2017 cover art.jpg

I am constructing the wiki page "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pheanixx/Amanda_Darling_(The_Time_Traveling_DJ)" on behalf of DJ Amanda Darling with her consent because she does not have time to attend to this project and she is not comfortable writing about herself.

She also does not have a Wiki account, so her business manager will also be adding content on her behalf although I doubt he will upload images. He (and when she, Amanda, reviews the draft as it nears completion) will tell me what other images she wants to include and where on the page.

As such, all pictures and images used by me belong to her and I have her imprimatur to use them on her Wiki page.

Images used are sourced from her social media and video channels; i.e. her Instragram page, facebook photos pages and her YouTube channel. --Pheanixx (talk) 07:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

If you need a note from her, please provide an e-mail address for her to use to verify my statements here.

PS... the same goes for other 'cover art' images that appear to have been quarantined (no longer visible on the page). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pheanixx (talk • contribs) 07:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Also, if you need further information from me (Pheanixx), please let me know. --Pheanixx (talk) 07:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

@Pheanixx: Are you personally the copyright holder of the album cover and the author of the photo used there (the photographer) as you claimed at upload? If so, please provide an evidence for this as it is required for any already published image. Ankry (talk) 07:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC) Ankry (talk) 07:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Pheanixx: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files of User_talk:Myshlov

All of them are parish registers from Russian Empire for respective years, and should have source=Institution:Central State Historical Archives of Ukraine in Kyiv, author={{unknown|author}}, license={{PD-Scan|PD-RusEmpire}} --Madvin (talk) 11:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Madvin: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nella Genkina.jpg

Hello, Nella Genkina is my grandmother and I took a picture of her and we used it for her personal website genkina.art. Please undelete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Titan1432 (talk • contribs) 00:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

  • @Titan1432: As a purely technical matter, we cannot verify, confirm, or assess your assertions here. There are two options to help facilitate undeletion:

    (1) The copyright holder of the derivative work (i.e. the photographer) and the copyright holder of the works depicted (i.e. the artist of the work in the background) must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence for the photo using the OTRS process. Please note that OTRS is unable accept forwarded or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion.

    (2) If you are the webmaster of the website, you can place a notice on the page stating the image is under an accepted free licence. For example:
    "The photo of Nella Genkina by [your name] is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
    This can be accomplished with the following code if the site uses HTML:
    <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The photo of Nella Genkina by [your name] is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License</a>.
    This can be written in Russian if desired. Once you have done so, you can always resubmit a new undeletion request once this is done.

    Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mihaela Erceg.jpg

Photo is made by Larisa Šmitran (Location: Gallery GRETA, Zagreb, 26/3/2018 and given to Mihaela Erceg rights to use it without restriction, to distribute as EPK, so Mihaela send it to other sources, including for Wikipedia article) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Željko Erceg (talk • contribs) 09:30, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose. Commons is strict in copyright matters and in such cases demands evidence of free license. Please open COM:OTRS page and look, what kind of e-mail should be sent to our permissions department at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. The permission must come from copyright holder, that means from photographer Larisa Šmitran, not from you or from depicted person. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Željko Erceg: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:59, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Margit Stumpp

The files were kept after regular deletion requests, but DerHexer deleted them speedily without discussing it with anybody. Deletion rationale "personality rights" is not good, we have even template {{Personality rights}}. DerHexer said in his talkpage, that maybe he made a mistake and another look is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 Support Should not have been speedily deleted. DR here Commons:Deletion requests/File:2020-02-13 Margit Stumpp (KPFC) 01.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:2020-02-13 Margit Stumpp (KPFC) 02.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 12:33, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Taivo and Thuresson: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Keisha-White-3.jpg

Keisha-White-3.jpg should be undeleted as Keisha White herself owns the rights to this photograph. The photograph was taken by Indra Lazinda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mn2spr (talk • contribs) 11:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose. Of course, that's difficult to believe. Normally photographer owns copyright. Please open COM:OTRS page and look, what kind of e-mail should be sent to our permissions department at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. The permission must come from copyright holder. If you claim, that Keisha White is the copyright holder, then she must send copies of written documents, which show, that the copyright has passed from Indra Lavinda to Keisha White. If such documents do not exist, then the permission must come from Indra Lazinda. Taivo (talk) 12:01, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Mn2spr: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bert and Ernie (2841396233).jpg

I think this was the image of the Bert and Ernie puppets at a museum, probably a Jim Henson exhibit. I also believe it was a photograph taken by a Wikipedia user to use on the website. What do you guys think? —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:282:0:7E80:C105:A184:78DA:2C64 (talk) 13:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No valid rationale for undeletion. Does not respond or attempt to respond to issues raised at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sesame Street. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sunstar SA Headquarters - Switzerland.jpg

Dear Wikimedia,

Can you please restore our file we will update the license since it seems it wasn't set properly when uploaded.

Thank you & best regards, Dejan --Ehrro (talk) 13:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

@Ehrro: The image was previously published elsewhere, so not only a license info is required, but also evidence of the license. Please provide both here, or ask the copyright holder to provide it following COM:OTRS. Ankry (talk) 13:54, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO. Appears here with no evidence of an accepted free licence. @Ehrro: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder (the photographer, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyence) send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:05, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ladislav Kudrna, 2020.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS Ticket 2021010710003344 janbery (talk) 22:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Janbery: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:40, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

AleAscenso

File:El Clásico de La Matanza.jpg Good afternoon, a possible copyright violation was detected in the archive of the Clasico de La Matanza, it is observed that a newspaper is taken that contains an image that is not the one published since it was an own work that does not represent the exposed, likewise I clarified It is my own work, I will be grateful if you can explain the reason, thank you very much. AleAscenso (talk

 Not done: Procedural close. Not an undeletion request. File not deleted as of 01:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC). @AleAscenso: The rational for tagging is on your talk page. Instructions to challenge the speedy deletion nomination can be found on the description page of the file. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:US Embassy Athens.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: was deleted because of "no FOP in Greece" (Commons:Deletion requests/File:US Embassy Athens.jpg). However, this is an embassy of the United States, and the building is governed by laws of the country it serves/represents. Hence {{FoP-US}} applies. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

  • It is not so clear: the photo was made from outside of the US Embassy. Ankry (talk) 09:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • @Ankry: Panmunjeom case might apply here. For example, photographs of NoKor buildings and sculptures taken from SoKor soil but those structures are physically within the jurisdiction of NoKor. Embassies lie within the jurisdiction of the countries where they serve or represent, and this Panmunjeom case is applicable. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
      • OK. The cases are, indeed, similar. Ankry (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • @JWilz12345 and Ankry: The physical premises of a diplomatic or consular mission do not exist in a status of extraterritoriality -- and the land on which the mission sit is still the sovereign territory of the host state. Under the 1961 Vienna Convention and the 1963 Vienna Convention, the premises, persons, documents, etc. of a mission is inviolable, but both conventions do not grant extraterritorial status to the mission. Local laws still apply but they just cannot be enforced on diplomatic missions (the premises, the people, the documents, etc.) and in most cases on consular missions. Unless there is a specific agreement between the two states, Greek copyright law, therefore, applies to the Chancery of the U.S. Embassy in Athens. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
    • In this case,  I withdraw my nomination for undeletion of this file. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Nomination withdrawn. --GMGtalk 15:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:OMDSZ logó fekvő.png

Hi!

Can you explain what copyright problem have you noticed?

With respect, Zsolt —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 109.99.97.41 (talk) 09:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

This is not the right venue for such questions. It is up to the requester making a request here to provide an evidence that the image should be undeleted. In this case: that a free license has been granted by the logo Copyright holder or that the logo is too simple for copyright protection. And also that it is in COM:SCOPE. Ankry (talk) 09:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done not an undeletion request. Ankry (talk) 10:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Giorgia Fiorio Christian Jungwirth 2019.jpg

I specifically represent Giorgia Fiorio, who personally gave the access and ask me to publish the media that was deleted. Giorgia Fiorio is the co-owner of the copyright of the media she is depicted in. So I would ask to restore the following file as soon as possible: File:Giorgia Fiorio Christian Jungwirth 2019.jpg.

Chosen representative of Giorgia Fiorio 2021-03-04 --Kapushonchik (talk) 12:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Kapushonchik: As already explained on your talk page, for the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Please also note: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Qwert7511

Taiwan allows FoP for outdoor 2D and 3D artworks. This DR took place before detailed COM:FOP Taiwan info was available. --Wcam (talk) 14:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Support per above: seems justified. Ankry (talk) 18:50, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Wcam: FYI. Ankry (talk) 18:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pete perapols TWOconcert.jpg

{{Own Photo}} I am the photographer who took this photo. I am definitely own the copyright and authorized of this photo.

Poomsnaps --Poomsnaps/4Mar21 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poomsnaps (talk • contribs) 07:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Duplicate to File:Pete perapols in2concert.jpg. @Poomsnaps: please use the Upload Wizard when you upload photos from now on. Thuresson (talk) 07:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
And the other is going to be deleted as no license has been granted. Ankry (talk) 10:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. This file exists under a different name. --De728631 (talk) 21:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sergey Fomin.jpg

Hello, please undelete the file Sergey Fomin.jpg. I have permission from Sergey Fomin to use that image, given to me by email. Please let me know if you need evidence or if there are any further steps I should take in this matter.

Thank you for your attention.

Best, Luis Serrano

--Lgsh (talk) 19:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Please note that cannot accept forwarded permissions like this since they have been forged too often in the past. What we need to undelete the image is an email directly coming directly from the copyright holder. See COM:OTRS for details. Note also that a permission for Wikipedia only is insufficient. All uploads at Commons need to be free for anyone to use for any purpose including commercial activities unrelated to Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Per De867231. @Lgsh: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

KFrancis2.jpg

Hello Wikipedia professional

I have been in contact with Mr. Mike Laprey, Associate Director of Sports Communications, to release 2 photos of Keith Francis for use by Wikipedia. I am including here

Boston College grants permission to use photos of Keith Francis for his wikipedia page.

Please denote photo credits to: Boston College Athletics.

If you have any further questions, please let me know.

Thank you Mike Laprey [[|thumb|Boston College Athletics]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMCALIFNH (talk • contribs) 19:12, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Please note that cannot accept forwarded permissions like this since they have been forged too often in the past. What we need to undelete the image is an email directly coming directly from the copyright holder. See COM:OTRS for details. Note also that a permission for Wikipedia only is insufficient. All uploads at Commons need to be free for anyone to use for any purpose including commercial activities unrelated to Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Per De728631. @PMCALIFNH: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Isa Boletini monument.JPG

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: (DR). Now {{FoP-Albania}} exists, if this ever meets the Albanian FOP conditions. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:12, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Support FoP has been introduced in Albania, so this photo can be restored. De728631 (talk) 21:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done as per De728631: FoP-Albania applies. Ankry (talk) 12:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

KFrancis1.jpg

I received approval from Mike Laprey, Assoc Director of Sports Communications, at Boston College, who requests a Caption "Boston College Athlets

From: Mike Laprey <lapreym@bc.edu> Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 10:55 AM To: Paul Marshall <marshallbio@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Request for Permission to use Keith Francis photos in the Wikipedia page

Boston College grants permission to use photos of Keith Francis for his wikipedia page.

Please denote photo credits to: Boston College Athletics.

If you have any further questions, please let me know.

Thank you Mike Laprey

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 5:23 PM Paul Marshall <marshallbio@hotmail.com> wrote: Hello Mike:

We spoke on the phone a month ago when I made the Website for Keith Francis. I was wondering if you could send me a letter of permission to use the two photos in the Wikipedia listing for him?

I would be grateful if you could send your standard permission letter so I can forward it to the editors... Happy to discuss if you need anything from me. My contact information is below.

Here is the Wikipedia entry for Keith: Keith Francis (runner) - Wikipedia

Thanks so much for your valuable time.

Best, Paul Marshall President, Marshall Biopharm Associates, LLC marshallbio@hotmail.com 22 Adams Shore Rd. Moultonborough, NH 03254 (858)344-4606 1481824822517_MBA


-- MIKE LAPREY Associate Director • Communications Boston College • 140 Commonwealth Avenue • Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 Conte Forum 238 O: 617-552-2193 • C: 401-829-3747 • @mlaprey — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMCALIFNH (talk • contribs) 19:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Please note that cannot accept forwarded permissions like this since they have been forged too often in the past. What we need to undelete the image is an email directly coming directly from the copyright holder. See COM:OTRS for details. Note also that a permission for Wikipedia only is insufficient. All uploads at Commons need to be free for anyone to use for any purpose including commercial activities unrelated to Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 21:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Per De728631. @PMCALIFNH: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files of User:Graph_Tech_Guitar_Lab

I tagged them for advertisement. Later I figured that cropping the advertisement out, and keeping the content may be the better way to go (see: File:TUSQXL.gif). I am not sure if this is a sufficent solution. If undeleted I will crop the files. The user User_talk:Graph_Tech_Guitar_Lab has been blocked for his username. This maybe this is relevant for the decission. --Jahobr (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Resonable quality object photos for Category:Guitar parts and accessories. The parts are isolated, which is kind of rare. Could maybe illustrate guitar related articles. --Jahobr (talk) 10:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per the above explanation. Usable, no copyright-related problems. Ankry (talk) 11:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Houdini-souvenir-program.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Houdini-souvenir-program.jpg

Published in 1925, now public domain in the US. Abzeronow (talk) 03:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

 Info I can not find this item at the LOC Library of Congress but several web sites have published reproductions, like here. Thuresson (talk) 05:49, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done 1925 published work. @Abzeronow and Thuresson: maybe, some fixes in the description needed. Ankry (talk) 10:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by 'FlatNose69'

The files are uploaded from:

for licensing see bottom of each page, where it is mentioned that "The content of this webpage is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License". Previously File:Bhupinder Singh.jpg was restored, which is also from the same site. Thanks!--Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 14:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Support per nomination. De728631 (talk) 21:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. Files have been license-reviewed. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 07:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Edu Borja - voice.mp3

File:Edu Borja - voice.mp3
Sembei Norimaki - Edu Borja.mp3

Simple voice files. The first is Eduard doing his own Voice intro, and the second one is him impersonating a character on his studio. Both files are simple voice and do not need any OTRS because there is no copyright on what he is saying, as there is no script. They were mistakenly deleted because the files were uploaded alongside other files that needed of a OTRS, but it's not the case for those here.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 08:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

It's a sound recording created by me (it's Edu's voice, but recorded by me) as part of this GLAM project. It's the same situation as this file. I'm the author of the recording, and I'm releasing it.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 09:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
It's a Voice Intro Project recording, I don't understand why it has been deleted.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 09:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
  • @TaronjaSatsuma: It seems to related to a lack of sufficient permission via OTRS Ticket:2020080710002923. As there was a lack of sufficient permission for more than 30 days, both files were deleted. Unfortunately, as the files are being handled by OTRS, it is dependent on that process for the possibility of undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Files are OTRS dependent. @TaronjaSatsuma: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

It's not dependent: the OTRS was sent for files that were recorded in the 90's. The two files we are talking about were originally recorded by me and include no copyrighted material. I still keep the original recordings. It's just a Voice Intro Project recording, completely unpublished before of being uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 15:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Teresa-Ribera-2021.jpg

This picture, Teresa-Ribera-2021.jpg, belongs to the proper Ministry for the Ecological Transition and Demographic Challenge of Spain, proper Teresa Ribera is the Minister. We, the Communication Department of the Ministry, are trying to edit the photo! The photo belongs to us! --Campoleón (talk) 20:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. No file with this name exists on Commons. @Campoleón: Regarding: File:Teresa ribera.jpg, File:Teresa-Ribera.jpg, and File:Teresa-Ribera-Rodríguez.jpg, these are unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIOs. Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder (the photographer, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyence) send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dead Posey Live.jpg UNDELETE

This live picture of Dead Posey was deleted from their wikipedia page. This picture is available for public use and dosen't violate copyright use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poewritesthings (talk • contribs) 22:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. File:Dead Posey Live.jpg is an unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO: No evidence of an accepted free licence at source and a clear notice of COPYRIGHT all rights reserved.

@Poewritesthings: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder (the photographer, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyence) send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 06:29, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PurvottarSamwad-LOGO.png

यह लोगो मेरे द्वारा बनाया गया है, यह किसी भी प्रकार के काॅपीराइट के अंतर्गत नहीं आता है। इसलिये इसे डिलीट न किया जाये। यह संस्था का अधिकृत लोगो है। यह विकिपीडिया की किसी भी नीति के विरुद्ध नहीं है। आपसे पुनः अनुरोध है, कृपया इसे अकारण किसी भी श्रेणी में डालकर डिलीट न किया जाये। विकाश शर्मा जी (talk) 06:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @विकाश शर्मा जी: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 07:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Purvottar Janajati Shiksha Samiti.jpg

यह लोगो किसी भी प्रकार के काॅपीराइट का उल्लंघन नहीं करना है। यह विकीपीडिया की किसी भाी नीति का उल्लंघन नहीं करता है। यह मेरे स्वयं के द्वारा पूर्वोत्तर जनजाति शिक्षा समिति के लिये लोगो बनाया है। इस लोगो पर हमारा ही अधिकार है, इसलिये यह काॅपी राइट के अंतर्गत नहीं आयेगा। आपसे अनुरोध है अनुचित रूप से इसे डिलीट न किया जाये। — Preceding unsigned comment added by विकाश शर्मा जी (talk • contribs) 06:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @विकाश शर्मा जी: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 07:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kuniyoshi 1925 girl on sofa.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/paintings by Yasuo Kuniyoshi Yasuo Kuniyoshi was living in the US in the 1920s. These paintings are apparently from 1924 and 1925. Abzeronow (talk) 03:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

@~riley: Ankry (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done undeleted per lack of opposes; we generally consider paintings to be published around their creation date unless there is some evidence of otherwise. Ankry (talk) 10:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Villa-money.jpg

This is a banknote issued in 1913 by Pancho Villa as the governor of Chihuahua State. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mexico: "Works created by the Mexican government do not default to being public domain, being protected 100 years after publication. This applies to the federal, state and municipal governments." I think it is PD in the source country. {{PD-Mexico}} would be appropriate. Thank you. --Regasterios (talk) 06:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Also per COM:CUR Mexico: Coins and banknotes produced before 23 July 1928 entered the public domain.
I think this apples to more images from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Banknotes of Mexico; some of them probably should never be deleted (like 1923 imperial notes), eg.
1823 noes:
1915 notes
Maybe more. License templates might need fixing, however. @Mattflaschen and Natuur12: pinging the nominator and closing admin for comments. Ankry (talk) 07:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done per COM:CUR Mexico Ankry (talk) 11:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo Senario TV3.png

Please Don't delete this logo because this logo was Senario's official logo since their group became famous around 1998 to 2005. So, this logo owned by Sistem Televisyen Malaysia Berhad (TV3) and i re-upload for those Don't Senario's logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suffianbakar1 (talk • contribs) 00:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

@Suffianbakar1: What is the basis of your claim that Sistem Televisyen Malaysia Berhad granted CC-BY-SA 4.0 license to the logo? We need some evidence (eg. a link to an archived webpage) that this license has been granted. Ankry (talk) 12:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done No response. Ankry (talk) 11:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Seattlehammeringmanvideo2009.ogg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: deleted because of no FOP concern (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seattlehammeringmanvideo2009.ogg). However, see Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2016-10#File:"Hammering Man" art, Seattle, Washington LCCN2011630311.tif. {{PD-US-1978-89}} may apply (SIRIS entry) as having no registration at [3]. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

 Support per above. Ankry (talk) 12:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @JWilz12345: please update description, if needed. Ankry (talk) 12:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Walesa 1985 08 21 1.jpg

Original uploader, OISV, stated in the DR that „It is my original paper photo from 1985, that I have scanned now“ (Jde o moji původní papírovou fotografii z roku 1985, kterou jsem nyní naskenoval.) I know OISV as a trustworthy contributor to the Czech Wikipedia and I assume that some of the DR at his user talk were caused by misunderstanding. — Draceane talkcontrib. 22:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

  • @Draceane: Whether OISV is a "trustworthy contributor to the Czech Wikipedia" or to Commons is irrelevant to the issue at hand. Unfortunately OISV's statement "Jde o moji původní papírovou fotografii z roku 1985, kterou jsem nyní naskenoval. (It is my original paper photo from 1985)" does not elucidate if they are the photographer or just a mere possessor of a copy of the photo. If they are just the mere possessor, then they cannot be the copyright holder. If they are the photographer, then, in the DR, OISV was asked to confirm through OTRS. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 06:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Per above. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Draceane and OISV: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder (i.e. the photographer) must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 10:29, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The logo is NOT listed under copyright law and I designed it based on the defunct version of the university logo (which was printed on a book cover published by Pahlavi University in the late 1960s) as means of fair use.

The logo DOES NOT exist like this anywhere on the internet. Neither is used by the university.

If it needs additional information, I'll be more than happy to add those needed, and please help me with it. But I don't think that it is problematic AT ALL.

Before this same thing happened with the university's official logo. All of the universities in the World do use logos and upload them here as means of fair use. So please be kind enough to undelete it.

Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amirisgosh (talk • contribs) 09:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

  • @Amirisgosh: What do you mean by not listed? Copyright law generally does not require listing a work to be copyrighted. However, if the logo was published anonymously in 1960s we will have a problem to determine its copyright status as COM:Iran says nothing about anonymous works. @4nn1l2: Can you help us here? Ankry (talk) 09:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: @Amirisgosh: Copyright under Iranian law has a duration of the life of the author/creator of the original work + 50 years after their death. Furthermore, the threshold of originality in Iran is fairly low, and as such relatively simple works are afforded protections under the law. Per policy, the onus is on you to provide evidence that the work is in the public domain. No evidence of such was on offer in this request. To determine if the work is in the public domain, we would need to know who is the author/creator of the work in question and, if deceased, what year did the author die. Otherwise, the file will need to remain deleted per Commons' precautionary principle as there is significant doubt as to the freedom of the work. Regarding your arguments concerning fair use: fair use is not permitted on Commons and non-free works, regardless of whether or not they were uploaded under a fair use rationale, is subject to immediate deletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Neo Socapismo Expresivo.jpg

Hi, Im new to wikipedia and I believe I have uploaded the same image about 6 or 7 times today, I think wikipedia now automatically detects this image has been uploaded so that is why looks like copyright infringement but I can assure you I made this image with Pablo Ruiz Amo. This is an original image. Hope this clarifies the misunderstanding and the image can be now published. Sorry about that, many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annabiernat (talk • contribs) 17:17, 6 March 2021‎ (UTC)

Procedural close. "Do not request undeletion of a file that has not been deleted.". Thuresson (talk) 17:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Reopenning. Image already deleted. Ankry (talk) 19:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 Oppose @Annabiernat: This is cover of recently published book. As such it cannot be licensed as {{Own}} per policy, even if you are indeed the original cover author as you claimed at upload. Please note, that providing false info about authorship and/or copyright as well as reuploading a deleted image is serious violation of Wikimedia Commons policies. Do not do this. In order to host this image we need COM:OTRS permission from the original cover author. Or, if the image is so old that its copyright expired, we need an evidence of this (for anonymous images, generally a publication that is 50-95 years old - depending on publication country). Ankry (talk) 19:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Ankry. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Annabiernat: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 10:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Two files of User_talk:Olena-vet

Both are census records from Ukraine for 1926, and should have source={{scan}} w:uk:Центральний державний архів вищих органів влади та управління України, author={{unknown|author}}, license={{PD-Scan|PD-Ukraine}} -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madvin (talk • contribs)

@Madvin: undeleted and started Deletion Requests. Please fix description / copyright info and discuss deletion reasons there. {{PD-old}} template is definitely inapropriate if you do not specify named author with known death date. Ankry (talk) 12:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: Done --Madvin (talk) 12:28, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Removing DR templates is against policy and does not close the deletion discussion. Your input there is still needed. They should be closed by an uninvolved admin (not me) after 7 days (or more). Ankry (talk) 12:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done DRs created, please continue discussion there. Ankry (talk) 12:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Temple16051987.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS permission. Is it truly nonsense? The user's talk page does indicate that it is, but please check. Thanks! Bencemac (talk) 11:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

@Bencemac: This is disputable quality personal image categorized as "God". Question about scope would be appropriate. Ankry (talk) 12:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: I think we then can close the ticket and keep the picture deleted. Thoughts? Bencemac (talk) 13:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done withdrawn. Ankry (talk) 13:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mera Jism Meri Marzi (My Body, My Choice).jpg

The file was deleted owing to mention of Twitter as source in an article. While it is still unclear that who exactly is the original uploader since this image has been uploaded by so many users on Twitter itself. Along with it, this was all over the social media and internet. So I believe this image was in public domain and request its undeletion. Thanks! USaamo (talk) 14:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO. A copy of the image was posted to Twitter at 18:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC) prior to the upload here on Commons at 20:09, 12 March 2020 (UTC). @USaamo: Why do you believe that the work is in the public domain? Widely available works do not mean that they are in the public domain. This is a confounding of gratis vs libre. From the moment of creation, unless the copyright has expired, been forfeited, expressly waived, or inapplicable, works are copyrighted and afforded protections. Under Pakistan's copyright rules, works are copyrighted for the life of the author + 50 years after their death (unknown authorship is protected by copyright for 50 years after first publication). Furthermore, US copyright laws would also apply: works are copyrighted for the life of the author + 70 years after their death (unknown authorship is protected by copyright for 95 years after first publication). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Nothing to be accomplished here. File is an unambiguous COM:NETCOPYVIO. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:13, 8 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Asecna-logo-large.png

This is the logo of an international nonprofit organization, analogous to the logo of the United Nations or Doctors Without Borders. It's instructive (educational) to include it articles about the organization, especially since African topics are severally under covered. OnlyRegisteredUsersMatter (talk) 04:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

@Nat: If I have to ask them in writing, will the email being in French be a problem? OnlyRegisteredUsersMatter (talk) 05:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. Nothing to be accomplished here. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:58, 8 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_MaddAnna

Please restore. We have a permission at OTRS with Ticket:2021030310003026.

Thank you, --Mussklprozz (talk) 06:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

@Mussklprozz: The permission is clearly false: the client cannot be the author of a 1911 photo. However {{Temporarily undeleted}} as most of the images are likely PD; just proper sourrce / authorship information is needed. Ankry (talk) 07:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: Thanks for paying attention. The sender of the permission claims that she is the legal heir of the photographer. I will check. --Mussklprozz (talk) 07:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Well, I noticed thei claim I, [...] am the creator... Ankry (talk) 07:42, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
I, [...] am the creator is clearly rubbish, but that is owed to the formulation in the template: I [...] am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright. Usually we make a backloop in those cases, asking the sender what exactly she is, creator or copyright holder. Yet her first mail, she clearly stated: I am the heir. Seeing her mail address and considering the circumstances, I see no reason to doubt that. Hence I accepted the permissions and made the necessary file changes. – Cheers, thanks again, --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Ankry (talk) 15:42, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alexandrov-9.tif

Добрый день! Хотела узнать, почему фото было удалено? Я автор фото. Hi! I don't understand why my photo has been deleted. I'm the author of this image. --Nadya Davydowa (talk) 09:43, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done not an undeletion request. Image deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alexandrov-9.tif as it presents a copyrighted sculpture without evidence of free license permission from the sculpture copyright holder (likely the sculptor or their heirs). Ankry (talk) 15:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:01-Collegium-Vocale-Uni-Logo.png

The rights holder of the image has expressly granted me permission to use the image on Wikimedia and related projects. The authorization was verbal, but can be provided in writing if necessary. --Schmuelias (talk) 13:55, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Schmuelias: "The rights holder of the image has expressly granted me permission to use the image on Wikimedia and related projects" is wholly insufficient. For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2-P40A0588.jpg, B. M. Ruia Girls' College, Mumbai?

Dear Undeleters,

The above image File:2-P40A0588.jpg was deleted because it lacked description etcetera. Now it appears that the uploader User:Bmrgirls also uploaded other images which i could identify and categorise in Category:B. M. Ruia Girls' College, Mumbai. The name "Bmrgirls" suggests that the uploaders were students at B. M. Ruia Girls' College, affiliated to S.N.D.T. Women's University, Mumbai. The deleted image probably can be identified and might be useful like the other two, of an Indian Independence Day celebration and a school debating contest in Mumbai. So please undelete. NB. This image was previously undeleted, but deleted again last February in a few days. I was not aware of that, i was not pinged. So please let's have a look at this image. We should not delete unduly. Thank you, Hansmuller (talk) 07:53, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose @Hansmuller: As previously stated, lacking a description is not the only rationale for deletion. Furthermore, it was uploaded here on 4 November 2019 -- 2 months after it appeared on YouTube (1:09) first (Work was published on that platform on 16 September 2019) with no mention of an accepted free licence. Works previously published elsewhere requires that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Thank you for your understanding. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 08:18, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
@Nat OK, thanks but there should be the assumption of innocence. This image i didn't see might be - and probably is? - by the same authors as the video, but then they should formally give free permission for their video indeed. Or... the image is bona fide of the same occasion, NOT from the video, and therefore necessarily similar... Then the image is legal and should not be deleted! Have a good day!, Hansmuller (talk) 08:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  • What do you mean by "innocence"? Nobody is declared "guilty". The image publication just violates some commons policies: (license evidence needs to be provided by uploader for previously published images, COM:PCP for plaque, COM:SCOPE as it is useless without proper categorization / description /filename). If theese can be fixed, the image may be undeleted. But this needs cooperation from the uploader. Ankry (talk) 09:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  • ... However, I would  Support reopenning the deletion discussion if you (@Hansmuller: ) find it apropriate. Ankry (talk) 12:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  • @Ankry: I am of the opinion that reopening a DR at this time is very much out-of-process. It is clear that the image was previously published elsewhere. The onus will be on the party seeking restoration to

    (1) request that the copyright holder contact OTRS or to change the licensing on YouTube, and

    (2) provide a compelling argument as to why the rationales in the DR are incorrect.

    Permission via OTRS or relicensing on YouTube is paramount to any possibility of undeletiom, even temporary. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per discussion. Ankry (talk) 22:58, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Stdi.jpg

Прошу отменить удаление этого скриншота, поскольку он относится к программе, распространяемой по СВОБОДНОЙ ЛИЦЕНЗИИ - это указано в верхней строке скриншота Stdi.jpg. Та же ссылка на свободную лицензию указана на сайте скачивания этого ПО http://statsoft.msu.ru/Podr2~1.htm ("бесплатная версия для самообучения и работы по свободной лицензии"). Поэтому я могу свободно использовать любые скриншоты этого ПО везде безо всякого разрешения! Более того, я загрузил это изображение не на Викисклад для общего доступа, а в свой личный архив изображений! AKU-47 (talk) 12:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Please cancel the deletion of Stdi.jpg screenshot (you made on March 7), since it refers to a program distributed under a FREE LICENSE - this is indicated in the top line of the screenshot Stdi.jpg (in Russian). The same link to the free license is listed on the download site of this software http://statsoft.msu.ru/Podr2~1.htm (in Russian: "free version for self-study and work under a free license"). Therefore, I can freely use any screenshots of this software everywhere without any permission! AKU-47 (talk) 14:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AKU-47 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done procedural close: image not deleted. Ankry (talk) 15:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mia Heikkinen.jpg

Mia Heikkinen holds the rights of her own photograph. She and the photographer Ville Paul Paasima asked me to upload them to Commons (they don't know how to do this and don't have user accounts here) in order to link them to the Wikipedia articles about Mia Heikkinen. How can I proof this? Rießler (talk) 15:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

@Rießler: If this photo was not published initially under a free license, we need a written free license permission sent to us directly by the actual copyright holder following COM:OTRS. Also, if the copyright holder is not the photographer, we need an evidence of copyright transfer (eg. a copy of copyright transfer contract). Ankry (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Rießler: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:07, 8 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mia Heikkinen bw.jpg

Mia Heikkinen holds the rights of her own photograph. She and the photographer Ville Paul Paasima asked me to upload them to Commons (they don't know how to do this and don't have user accounts here) in order to link them to the Wikipedia articles about Mia Heikkinen. How can I proof this? Rießler (talk) 15:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

@Rießler: If this photo was not published initially under a free license, we need a written free license permission sent to us directly by the actual copyright holder following COM:OTRS. Also, if the copyright holder is not the photographer, we need an evidence of copyright transfer (eg. a copy of copyright transfer contract). Ankry (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Rießler: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dvizhona.jpg

Hello!

Photographer granted the right to this photo, not sure why it was deleted

Skfd (talk) 18:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Skfd: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Eliminando "GLADIADORAS_FINAL_BOCA_RIVER.jpg" y "COPA_DEL_TORNEO_TRANSICIÓN_2020.jpg".

Buenas tardes. Lucila Guede el 22 de enero del 2021 envio la autorización para el uso de estas dos fotos. Recién volví a reenviar la autorización.

Muchas gracias. @CommonsDelinker — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matibro (talk • contribs) 18:19, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Matibro: To quote the instructions on the main undeletion request page: If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers. (the bolding added for emphasis) Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:09, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Methodist Poster 2.5.png

When I saw it had been deleted, I expected it was for being non-notable or similar, but it was for copyright infringement. An email has now been sent via OTRS explicitly releasing the poster under CC BY-SA. JohnSmith5000100 (talk) 19:29, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @JohnSmith5000100: To quote the instructions on the main undeletion request page: If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers. (the bolding added for emphasis) Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Straw Dogs.jpg

I am creating a Wikipedia article for Straw Dogs, a book by Philosopher John Gray, and uploaded a book cover from here. I have mentioned it in the metadata that the purpose of the upload was a book cover. I have no other intentions in uploading the image. Could you please undelete it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sataralynd (talk • contribs) 00:15, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Unambiguous COM:NETCOPYVIO: No evidence of accepted free licence at source @Sataralynd: Please familiarise yourself with Commons' licensing policy. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

For updating of new logo in infobox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennyoh123123 (talk • contribs) 08:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. File:Bank of Singapore Logo.png has not been deleted as of 15:24, 9 March 2021 (UTC). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:24, 9 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Sivakumar Kuppusamy

Sivakumar Kuppusamy is an Indian ecologist best known for his work on the Nicobar megapode and marine biodiversity conservation. He was born in India in 1972. Dr. K. Sivakumar, who head the Department of Endangered Species Management at Wildlife Institute of India has 25 years of research experiences on threatened fauna of India especially marine biodiversity management. He has been working for the integrated management of aquatic biodiversity and its habitats in India. In the recent past, he focused on environmental flows assessment in context with hydro projects in three largest rivers of India i.e. the Ganga, the Brahmaputra and the Godavari. Further, he is coordinating the wildlife monitoring programme of India in Antarctica. Apart from research, he is involved in the teaching and training of postgraduate students, in-service forest officers and Ph.D. Scholars in wildlife techniques, wildlife management and conservation biology.

He involved in the preparation of 5th National Biodiversity Report of India and 3rd National Wildlife Action Plan of India. Dr Sivakumar was one of the pioneer to initiate the capacity building programs to enhance the integrated management of marine protected areas in India especially for forest and fisheries sectors. He is a member various International bodies including ‘World Commission on Protected Areas’, IUCN/SSC- Galliformes, Invasive Species, Marine Mammals, and Wetland and Freshwater Fish specialist Groups. So far, he has published more than 150 research articles/reports and supervised about 30 Post Graduate and Ph. D students. He is the Nodal Officer for CITES and CMS cells of Wildlife Institute of India and advice the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India on these subjects. Provide technical inputs to MoEFCC with respect to International Whaling Commission and CBD. He has been coordinating the CAMPA-Dugong Recovery Programme of India and his efforts in recovering marine biodiversity in India has already started showing positive results.

Reference https://wii.gov.in/k_sivakumar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksivakumarwii (talk • contribs) 14:52, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No valid rationale per policy (such as COM:L and COM:SCOPE) has been provided for undeletion. No file(s) have been listed for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:41, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences (1976)

(Above per original listing.) The images are derived from the document. The issues of the bulletin relevant here were published in the United States between 1975 and 1978, inclusive, without a notice. The document would thus fall under the domain of both PD-US-no-notice and PD-US-1978-89. For copyright to exist under the former, there must have been a immediate registration. For copyright to exist under the latter, there must have been registration within five years of publication. There was neither immediate nor subsequent registration, as appropriate. Thus, the work is in the public domain. I raised this point during the deletion discussion, but it was ignored in the decision. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:17, 8 March 2021 (UTC).

 Info I have checked the PDF and found no copyright notice there. @Gbawden and ShakespeareFan00: could you comment, please, whether you have any objection to undelete these as {{PD-US-no-notice}} / {{PD-US-1978-89}} does not apply to a 1976 publication, IMO. And the original copyright templates in these files are indeed invalid. Ankry (talk) 01:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Ankry: The images are from 1976, I believe (although I am not positive). The document covers issues from 1975–1978, as I have stated; thus the additional copyright notice reference. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:46, 8 March 2021 (UTC).
    • Fixed. Ankry (talk) 07:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done per above.

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Soul-6 TM Prod

Soul-6 is a true artist with a copyright. He have a verified artist account on Spotify.

https://open.spotify.com/artist/6bphJAte2pKJthuiM2iLxc?si=EfoefQWGTNmpg_C4I-_pdw&utm_source=copy-link —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.122.96.26 (talk) 01:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done Bogus request: no such page or file. Ankry (talk) 17:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MurmanskSeaport.png

Good day!

I am the official representative of the Murmansk commercial seaport. Our company agrees to use the official logo on the port's page.

Добрый день!

Я являюсь официальным представитилем мурманского морского торгового порта. Наше предприятия дает согласие на использование официального логотипа на странице порта. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmtp51 (talk • contribs) 05:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

@Mmtp51: (1) anybody can say this and your claim is not verifiable on-wiki, (2) permission to use is not suitable for Commons, see COM:L. We need a written free license permission from authorized representative of the logo copyright holder, see COM:OTRS for datails. Ankry (talk) 17:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ROBERTO FERRI.jpg

I request to insert the image because i have the permission of Roberto Ferri to insert this image --Califfo10 (talk) 08:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose The same photo File:Roberto ferri artista.jpg has been nominated for deletion today. Thuresson (talk) 15:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
@Califfo10: Permission from the subject is one thing. But a license from the photographer is still missing. Ankry (talk) 16:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ufukbayram.jpg

Hi;

I contacted the person who owns the photo and he opened a Flickr account. Currently, the photos are not covered by copyright.Bilimeinanan (talk) 12:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

No such file. Do you mean File:Ufuk BAYRAM.jpg? This one is not deleted yet, so cannot be undeleted at the moment. We need an evidence that the permission is from the original photo author (photographer, camera operator). No information on the Flickr account proving this. Ankry (talk) 16:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. File not deleted as of 23:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Transparent New Logo.png

Hello, recently we find out that Wikipedia has deleted Cyprus west university logo. Could you please undelete it since it is the official logo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abojmei (talk • contribs) 13:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Please ask an official representative of Cyprus West University to verify the license by following the instructions at COM:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 15:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. @Abojmei: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will request or perform undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Maurice Ehlinger dans son atelier à Montparnasse.jpg

Maurice Ehlinger dans son atelier à Montparnasse — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christianehlinger (talk • contribs) 14:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Subject died in 1981 so this can not be a photo from 2007. Thuresson (talk) 15:18, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No rationale for undeletion. Aucune raison pour la restauration. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Florian Jelinek.jpg

On 21 December 2013, upon request, Jameslwoodward (talk) deleted the file Florian Jelinek.jpg uploaded by Chaosflo44 (talk). Since Chaosflo44 was a relatively small YouTuber at the time, the reason for the deletion was out of scope. However, since the YouTube channel of Chaosflo44 has flourished since then and counts more than one million subscribers, he is now considered encyclopedically relevant and has his own article in the German Wikipedia. I therefore request the restoration of the file, provided that the license chosen by Chaosflo44 is still valid. --Rossel44 (talk) 18:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done per above. Ankry (talk) 22:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Flight movie 2021.jpg

Here is official movie detail page. https://www.flightthemovie.com for the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhirajrawat2009 (talk • contribs) 07:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. No valid rationale for undeletion. No evidence of an accepted free licence on source provided. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." @Dhirajrawat2009: Please familarise yourself with Commons policy. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 08:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Christian Lüscher photo.jpg

Please restore. We now have a permission at OTRS with Ticket:2021030910009706.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:39, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Mussklprozz: FYI. However, please read the note I left on Ticket:2021030910009706 before completing the processing. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 11:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Drapeau de la République Autonome de la Cochinchine.png

This flag was deleted as being fictitious, but looking at old logos of the Cochinchinese Republican Guard and this Wikipedia article (#Historical flags, can't anchor ⚓ on mobile lately for some reason) lists it as an alternative design of the flag of the Autonomous Republic of Cochinchina. In fact, quite a number of flags by the original uploader were deleted as fictional (most in fact are fictitious), but it might have been better to tag them as fictitious flags in case they do have historical value (like this one) than to outright delete them, as they still have educational value as (common) misconceptions. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Wikipedia is wrong, but the image still has educational value, but I will request a rename after undeletion, this flag was falsely attributed to be the flag of the Autonomous Republic of Cochinchina in a 1946 publication which conflated it with the coat of arms of the Republican Guard. It is still valuable to illustrate that it's a common misconception. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 23:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Info I suggest reopenning the deletion discussion in the DR. Ankry (talk) 06:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Donald Trung and Ankry: FYI. New DR opened at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Drapeau de la République Autonome de la Cochinchine.png#File:Drapeau de la République Autonome de la Cochinchine.png 2. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 07:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1925-Caroline Singer.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1925-Caroline Singer.jpg

I can't see all the information that's provided. DR says artist died in 1977 but I can't see that in the file information so I don't know who it is. It would appear this was created in 1925. If I knew artist, I could better research the copyright status of this. Abzeronow (talk) 03:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

  • OK, Delinker log gives the artist: w:Cyrus Leroy Baldridge. Closest thing in time I could find to 1925 was their 1926 book Turn to the East but I have no idea if this file is from that book. Abzeronow (talk) 03:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  • It's possible as Singer was the author of the book. But it's also possible that it didn't appear until Baldridge's autobiography in 1947. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 07:52, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Yes, I was thinking similarly that it's possible this wasn't published until 1947 which would (edit:may since Ankry's post points toward nonrenewal) put undeletion at 2043. Abzeronow (talk) 20:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Question Is the autobiography still copyrighted? I cannot find it among renewed copyrights. It may be {{PD-US-no renewal}}. Or, was it published outside US? Ankry (talk) 21:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  • @Abzeronow: In order to make any progress here we need a volunteer to identify the real source of the image. Otherwise, it is going to be closed as Stale in few weeks. Ankry (talk) 15:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Significant doubt remains as to the freedom of the work. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Ergotelis123

I kindly request these files be undeleted. These files are my own work, not reproduction from another file, I rather painted every single pixel in these files on my own in order to recreate the All-Star kits as best I could. Given that almost all sports team uniforms on Wikipedia (including the ones on NFL team pages) include meticulous details on the uniforms (e.g. team-specific patterns, logos, manufacturer logos, etc.), it does not make sense that these uniforms were deleted, while others remain. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ergotelis123 (talk • contribs) 09:29, 9 March 2021‎ (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Roberto-Velasco-Conference.jpg

This file is from the Mexican government, and it is free to use. That is why other sites have used it previously. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bo.260221 (talk • contribs) 01:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

@Bo.260221: Why do you claim that the subject of this photo also owns the copyright? How can it be verified that the Mexican owns the copyright and allows anybody to use this photo for any purpose? Thuresson (talk) 15:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: no response to query. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vishal & Shekhar (TM Talent Management).jpg

I needed some help, so whosoever is reading this message please tell me - this image was provided to me by TM Talent Management, the company which manages Vishal & Shekhar. While talking to an employee who works at this talent management company, the team themselves have no idea as to who clicked this photograph. They searched a lot regarding the original photographer but finally, they have settled down to keeping it in the company's name to avoid any confusion. So, please guide me on how to mention the proper credits so that it isn't deleted in the future. I added their website's link and probably that's why it was deleted. If there is any specific & proper way to mention the credits then please guide me.

Thank you. --Tarun Paul Kachhap I (talk) 03:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

@Tarun Paul Kachhap I: Photos by unknown photographers are copyrighted in US 120 years since creation or 95 years since initial publication. So unless you provide an evidence that it is PD for another reason of freely licensed by the actual copyright holder (copyright transfer evidence is needed if the copyright holder is not the photographer), we need to wait until one of the terms expires. Note: per policy, it is up to the uploader to provide an evidence of the declared copyright status. Ankry (talk) 22:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:06, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Finance House Logo New.jpg

I have updated the logo, kindly retrieve the logo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocolate.social (talk • contribs) 06:37, 10 March 2021‎ (UTC)

@Chocolate.social: We need an evidence for your claim that you are the original logo author who should be attributed by everybody using the logo. Does this page violate your copyright not attributing you? BTW, the article w:en:Finance House is going to be deleted so the logo may be also out of COM:SCOPE. Ankry (talk) 16:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A CMOS, VLSI, implementation of a FFT for cyclic spectral analysis (IA acmosvlsiimpleme109457535).pdf

The document as a whole is in the public domain, although it may contain material which is still under copyright. The file may be restored, and the offending portion removed, so that the file may be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Per the file name, it is available over at Internet Archives. It can be downloaded from that site, and the offending portions can be removed. The file without the copyrighted portions can then be uploaded here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A concept of operations for an unclassified common operational picture in support of maritime domain awareness (IA aconceptofoperat1094552954).pdf

The document as a whole is in the public domain, although it may contain material which is still under copyright. The file may be restored, and the offending portion removed, so that the file may be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Per the file name, it is available over at Internet Archives. It can be downloaded from that site, and the offending portions can be removed. The file without the copyrighted portions can then be uploaded here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A conceptual framework for tactical private satellite networks (IA aconceptualframe109453932).pdf

The document as a whole is in the public domain, although it may contain material which is still under copyright. The file may be restored, and the offending portion removed, so that the file may be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Per the file name, it is available over at Internet Archives. It can be downloaded from that site, and the offending portions can be removed. The file without the copyrighted portions can then be uploaded here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A defense-in-depth approach to phishing (IA adefenseindepthp109452667).pdf

The document as a whole is in the public domain, although it may contain material which is still under copyright. The file may be restored, and the offending portion removed, so that the file may be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Per the file name, it is available over at Internet Archives. It can be downloaded from that site, and the offending portions can be removed. The file without the copyrighted portions can then be uploaded here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A Design Comparison between IPv4 and IPv6 in the Context of MYSEA, and Implementation of an IPv6 MYS. (IA adesigncompariso109459860).pdf

The document as a whole is in the public domain, although it may contain material which is still under copyright. The file may be restored, and the offending portion removed, so that the file may be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Per the file name, it is available over at Internet Archives. It can be downloaded from that site, and the offending portions can be removed. The file without the copyrighted portions can then be uploaded here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Acquisition planning for tactical avionics systems. (IA acquisitionplann00engl).pdf

The document as a whole is in the public domain, although it may contain material which is still under copyright. The file may be restored, and the offending portion removed, so that the file may be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Per the file name, it is available over at Internet Archives. It can be downloaded from that site, and the offending portions can be removed. The file without the copyrighted portions can then be uploaded here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Active damping of vibrations on space station freedom using Linear Quadratic Gaussian control and H x001B p00 x001B s control. (IA activedampingofv00mccl).pdf

The document as a whole is in the public domain, although it may contain material which is still under copyright. The file may be restored, and the offending portion removed, so that the file may be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Per the file name, it is available over at Internet Archives. It can be downloaded from that site, and the offending portions can be removed. The file without the copyrighted portions can then be uploaded here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Adaptive control in positioning a rigid-flexible robot arm (IA adaptivecontroli00mard).pdf

This report was published in the U.S. in 1988, without a copyright notice, and was not subsequently registered; thus, it is in the public domain by virtue of PD-US-1978-89. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

✓ Done per above. Ankry (talk) 20:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Additions to the KERMIT system for transferring binary files through CMS (IA additionstokermi00lyon).pdf

This report was published in the U.S. in 1986, without a copyright notice, and was not subsequently registered; thus, it is in the public domain by virtue of PD-US-1978-89. The document as a whole is in the public domain, although it may contain material which is still under copyright. The file may be restored, and the offending portion removed, so that the file may be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Per the file name, it is available over at Internet Archives. It can be downloaded from that site, and the offending portions can be removed. The file without the copyrighted portions can then be uploaded here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aerosol optical depth model assessment with high resolution multiple angle sensors (IA aerosolopticalde109451216).pdf

The document as a whole is in the public domain, although it may contain material which is still under copyright. The file may be restored, and the offending portion removed, so that the file may be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Per the file name, it is available over at Internet Archives. It can be downloaded from that site, and the offending portions can be removed. The file without the copyrighted portions can then be uploaded here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aerosol optical depth retrievals from high-resolution commercial satellite imagery over areas of high surface reflectance (IA aerosolopticalde1094510119).pdf

The document as a whole is in the public domain, although it may contain material which is still under copyright. The file may be restored, and the offending portion removed, so that the file may be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Per the file name, it is available over at Internet Archives. It can be downloaded from that site, and the offending portions can be removed. The file without the copyrighted portions can then be uploaded here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aerothermodynamics of a jet engine Test Cell. (IA aerothermodynami00nico).pdf

The document as a whole is in the public domain, although it may contain material which is still under copyright. The file may be restored, and the offending portion removed, so that the file may be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Per the file name, it is available over at Internet Archives. It can be downloaded from that site, and the offending portions can be removed. The file without the copyrighted portions can then be uploaded here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Pacheco Neves_V1.jpg file to undeleted

This photo is my grandfather and belongs to my family. Please don't delete it. Thankyou very much filipa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filipamr (talk • contribs) 23:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

  • @Filipamr: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights.  Question Who is the photographer of the original image? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No response to query. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Uploads by Jafar Keita Wali

Hi sir i hope you are doing well, i wish you can undelete my file because i'm a pro mma fighter and this file represent me a lot as a pro in your web, i sweaer i haven't done anything wrong to get my files & my account deleted, this is my own picture and this is my copyright. I wish you understand me and help me, i would appreciate this a lot, i won't publish any file next time i promise you guys. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jafar Keita Wali (talk • contribs) 23:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générale (IA archivesdezoo2521909pari).pdf

Most of this document is in the public domain. The file should be restored, and the offending portions removed, so that those parts of the file which are in the public domain may be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Per the file name, it is available over at Internet Archives. It can be downloaded from that site, and the offending portions can be removed. The file without the copyrighted portions can then be uploaded here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Arkiv för zoologi (IA arkivfrzoologi05kung).pdf

Most of this document is in the public domain. The file should be restored, and the offending portions removed, so that those parts of the file which are in the public domain may be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Per the file name, it is available over at Internet Archives. It can be downloaded from that site, and the offending portions can be removed. The file without the copyrighted portions can then be uploaded here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Centralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde und Infektionskrankheiten (IA centralblattfurb6919unse).pdf

Most of this document is in the public domain. The file should be restored, and the offending portions removed, so that those parts of the file which are in the public domain may be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Per the file name, it is available over at Internet Archives. It can be downloaded from that site, and the offending portions can be removed. The file without the copyrighted portions can then be uploaded here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sitzungsberichte. (IA mobot31753002089628).pdf

Most of this document is in the public domain. The file should be restored, and the offending portions removed, so that those parts of the file which are in the public domain may be kept. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Per the file name, it is available over at Internet Archives. It can be downloaded from that site, and the offending portions can be removed. The file without the copyrighted portions can then be uploaded here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:Internet Archive document agrarianproblem00tawn

(Above per original listing.) This work was originally published in the U.S., where the copyright has expired. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

✓ Done by Nat. @TE(æ)A,ea.: Please, fix the copyright info. Ankry (talk) 20:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:The flower book (1910)

The only relevant file is File:The flower book (IA cu31924003407933).pdf. The images are under copyright, as mentioned in the deletion discussion; but the text itself may not be. Do you know when the author died, ShakespeareFan00? TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

 Oppose The book is available in IA; we do not want to undelete the copyrighted content. You can upload the book after the copyrighted content is removed. Ankry (talk) 21:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." The documents are currently accessible via Internet Archive, per their file names, and can be retrived from there. Once the copyrighted portions have been removed, the remaining parts of the file can be reuploaded here. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mucem by Night.jpg

I am 100% owner of this picture, it is me who took it, indeed, it was taken from Wikipedia, but mostly, I am quoted (Quentin Caron) so I would like it to be accepted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quentin Caron (talk • contribs) 10:39, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Commons:FOP France. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:jafar_keita_wali.jpg

I'm a professional MMA fighter and this was my picture and i have all the rights of it, i don't understand why you keep deleting my files, i didn't do anything wrong, i wish you can help me and undelete all of my files and re publish it , thanks !!. ( 11/03/2021)--Jafar Keita Wali (talk) 12:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Coastal photo from Dawu Sea View Trail, taken by t981130.jpg

On 9 January, I received an email from t981130 (author) informing me that he has emailed to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Kai3952: To quote the instructions on the main undeletion request page: If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers. (the bolding added for emphasis) Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Coastal photo from Nantian Observation Platform, taken by t981130.jpg

On 9 January, I received an email from t981130 (author) informing me that he has emailed to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

@Kai3952: This seems to be ticket:2021010910001511 and the ticket is awaiting for a responses to the OTRS agent's questions. You can ask about its status at COM:OTN. Please note, that it is important to associate the correct filename with the permission. Otherwise, the ticker cannot be processed. Ankry (talk) 20:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Kai3952: To quote the instructions on the main undeletion request page: If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers. (the bolding added for emphasis) Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Trece-barangay-map-color.png

The Map is uploaded on the City Government's website under public domain. http://www.trecemartirescity.gov.ph/img/trece-map-color.png --Butteredgarlic (talk) 15:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - What part of "Ⓒ 2020. City Government of Trece Martires City. All Rights Reserved" [4] do you interpret to mean public domain? Эlcobbola talk 15:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:City Hall Building.png

Please know that this photo was captured for public use by the City Government of Trece Martires, it is uploaded on the City Government's official website, which is also on a public domain. link here --Butteredgarlic (talk) 15:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - What part of "Ⓒ 2020. City Government of Trece Martires City. All Rights Reserved" [5] do you interpret to mean public domain? Эlcobbola talk 15:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ron Ryckman, Jr.jpg

Hello,

I am attempting to upload an image of the Kansas Speaker of the House, Ron Ryckman, Jr., found here: http://kslegislature.org/li/b2021_22/members/rep_ryckman_jr_ron_1/

Similar photos of the governor and lt. governor of Kansas have been uploaded, found here (File:Laura Kelly official photo.jpg and File:Lynn Rogers official photo.jpg). These photos can be found here: https://governor.kansas.gov/newsroom/official_photos/ The upload policies are under the same umbrella: the Information Network of Kansas. , just as these images have been: File:Laura Kelly official photo.jpg and File:Lynn Rogers official photo.jpg. Those photos can be found here: https://governor.kansas.gov/newsroom/official_photos/.

If the Ryckman photo cannot be uploaded due to public domain concerns, then why were the Kelly and Rogers photos uploaded? The images are published by the same exact publisher via the sites portal policies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericth20 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose The photos of Kelly and Rogers are not public domain. They have been published with permission from the governor's office. If you have such a permission in writing, please have a look at COM:OTRS with information on how to proceed. Thuresson (talk) 16:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tay Masters' early design.png

I am not planning to use it for Wikipedia, I am uploading them as test images for Wikipedia sandboxes. I'm not vandalizing any articles at all. I edit known articles for a little when incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielNugren (talk • contribs) 00:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Deletion discussion on-going at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tay Masters' early design.png. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Divino B'Atista.jpg

--BatistaDi (talk) 01:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No rationale for undeletion. Incomplete request. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dmitri Gluchowski.jpg

I took this photo and demand that it be restored. I grant Wikipedia the rights of use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GameGuru (talk • contribs) 05:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: @GameGuru: File already exists at File:Dmitry Glukhovsky.jpg. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 06:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ticket#2021031110009327

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2021031110009327 regarding File:Produzent Alexander Kiening.jpg‬. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ganímedes: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Halt die Klappe.jpg

This is the official logo of the webshow Halt die Klappe. I am the CEO of the production company that produced the show and also sole copyright owner of this file. --Klingeling47 (talk) 15:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

@Klingeling47: This is irrelevant, as we cannot and may not verify your identity on-wiki. Can you provide an evidence that the poster is freely licensed basing on public records? Otherwise COM:OTRS is the only acceptable procedure. Note, that CC-BY-SA license requires information about the photo/poster author(s), not about the uploader. Have you personally created both? Ankry (talk) 20:39, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No response to query. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mohammad Tanbiruzzaman Koushal.jpg

Hello sir, This photo isn't for promotion or advertising. please review this and don't delete this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Tanbir (talk • contribs) 13:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. File not deleted as of 15:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC). @The Tanbir: If you wish to challenge the speedy deletion tagging, please follow the instructions listed on the tag itself. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Vitaly Zdanevich

== Multiple files from Complex Numbers musical group ==

Please restore every file below 01-uvertura.opus on User_talk:Vitaly_Zdanevich. They were removed because of the wrong license, but now license on the source is CC BY-SA 4.0 Vitaly Zdanevich (talk) 14:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. Files licenced reviewed. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Acute myocardial infarction - setting priorities for effectiveness research - report of a study by a committee of the Institute of Medicine, Division of Health Care Services (IA acutemyocardiali00matt).pdf

This is an unclear case. If the National Research Council is considered a part of the U.S. government, then this report would be, as well. I do not know enough to make a determination, however. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  • The former National Research Council, currently its program units, is the operating arm of the National Academies of Sciences. Per [6], the National Academies are private, nonprofit corporations chartered by acts of Congress. While chartered by acts of Congress, they are not part of the U.S. Government. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:39, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Per above. Work is not the work of the United States Government and is therefore eligible for copyright protections under US law. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:An algorithm for control volume analysis of cryogenic systems. (IA algorithmforcont00stan).pdf

The copyright claim by MIT is evidently fatuous. (Other theses also made at MIT with legitimate copyright claims reserve their copyright to their respective authors.) This work is plainly PD-USGov. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

@TE(æ)A,ea.: Why do you think that this work was made by the author as their official duty? Ankry (talk) 20:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Most works like this are given the equivalent of a PD-USGov tag by NPS Calhoun, though this one was not. I believe the lack of a notice is due to the age of this document; the tags are generally only applied to born-digital documents. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC).
  •  Oppose Work is prepared by an officer of the United States Navy, and, therefore, of the United States Government -- however, the work was not prepared as part of their official duties. The title page states the followng:

    An Algorithm for Control Volume Analysis
    of
    Cryogenic Systems

    by
    Lieutenant Michael B. Stanton, USN

    B.S.M.E., United States Naval Academy
    (1983)

    SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENTS OF OCEAN ENGINEERING
    AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
    OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREES OF

    NAVAL ENGINEER

    and

    MASTER OF SCIENCE in MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

    June 1989

    © Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1989. All rights reserved.
    The author hereby grants to the United States Government and its agencies permission to
    reproduce and to distribute copies of this thesis document in whole or in part.

    --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: {{PD-USGov}} does not apply. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:11, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lizans de Devon.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: lo quiero recuperar, ademas estaba en mi taller de usuario y no estaba listo. Fue un error lo siento mucho en verdad, lo hicieron ver como un fake articulo, es lo unico que tengo hasta ahora Prenticenauj (talk) 15:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here.@Prenticenauj: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:37, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Neil-.Buchanan-Biography.uk.jpg

center LICENSE ACQUISITION: I recently got permission from the author's official page after the deletion of the currently photo on Neil Buchanan's Wiki. This was the request that I made to communicate with the official page asking the permission of the photo rights. center Sorry for not announcing ahead of time, thank you so much. --Sistiurni (talk) 18:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Only for use in Wikipedia infoboxes. Unacceptable license restriction. Thuresson (talk) 20:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Neil-Buchanan-Portrait-uk.jpg

I need more information regarding the reason for this decision, please.. --Sistiurni

Please, I need more information regarding the reason for this decision. The service did not make it clear to me despite the accepted permission. I have requested from the author. And I repeat, the author gave me permission to upload this file on the main page. The same page that owns the rights to the image replied my request: "Permission granted for the use of the photograph requested, solely for the use of the main photo in the celebrity's infobox exactly as requested." Excuse my English if my words are wrong. I'm not a professional with these issues, the response of the staff is appreciated. Thank you. --Sistiurni (talk) 23:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. To quote the instructions on the main UDR page: "Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone." @Sistiurni: The licence provided is wholly unacceptable on Commons per our licensing policy. Policy requires that, for works still protected by copyright, the copyright holder grant permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to allow the work in question to be by anyone and for any purpose. Furthermore, the permission was granted by the subject. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights.. @Sisitiurni: Please familarise yourself with our policies. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Shervin Haghsheno KIT.jpg

We received permission at OTRS with Ticket:2021030110013055.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 21:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done No consensus to undelete. Please make a new request if you have any new information. Thuresson (talk) 15:27, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:Picturesque Nepal (1912)

(Above per original listing.) The two documents appear to be identical. This work was simultaneously published in the U.S., where it is in the public domain. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose. Undeletion previously and recently rejected at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-01#Files in Category:Picturesque Nepal (1912). Requester still has provided no evidence to support assertions of simultaneous publication. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
    • I did not intend to duplicate requests; I was merely listing requests from a different source. There is clear indication within this work of publication in the U.S. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 00:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC).
      • This argument was clearly rejected last time. Nothing within the work provides clear evidence of simultaneous publication. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
        • The argument was not legitimately rejected; I was unable to defend my claim due to extraneous concerns. The work does provide clear evidence of simultaneous publication. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 14:42, 11 March 2021 (UTC).
          • The arguments provided by you at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-01#Files in Category:Picturesque Nepal (1912) were clearly and legitimately rejected. And again, no evidence was provided to support your assertions here. My opposition to undeletion stands. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
            • That is incorrect, as I have already stated. This work was simultaneously published in the U.S., making that country the country of origin (for Wikimedia Commons licensing purposes); thus, the images should be undeleted. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 19:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC).
              • Per current practise, we need not only an evidence that the work was published in both countries, but also that the both publications were within 30 days. Same policy was used in enwikisource. Ankry (talk) 20:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per discussion: no evidence that this is a US work. Ankry (talk) 05:27, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Duck - panoramio (9).jpg

Rubber Duck is not complex enough to be protected by copyright —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.78.190.173 (talk) 10:28, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - Originality, not complexity, is the threshold; there no discussion or analysis on offer here that this work does not owe its origin to its author (see, for example, User:Elcobbola/Stuffed_Animals#Originality). Indeed, as referenced in the DR, the author is famously litigious and the various lawsuits and related arguments surrounding this work are readily available through internet searches. It is quite telling that the defenses have general been parody (i.e., fair use), not that it was lacking originality. Эlcobbola talk 14:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Christ Esabe.jpg

i send request at permissions-fr@wikimedia.org , it's my picture can you undelet my file please — Preceding unsigned comment added by EsabeSquad (talk • contribs) 15:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @EsabeSquad: To quote the instructions on the main undeletion request page: If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers. (the bolding added for emphasis) Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:49, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files from User:Raymond

These images were deleted out of process with reasons not supported by established policy. These images need to be restored and subjected to a DR for a community discussion. 2603:301D:22B2:4000:28A4:587C:C7AA:66D0 15:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

De728631 (talk) 16:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose i dont care if they were kept in the past, lewd creep shots from admins shouldnt be on the website, this is the same ip who started the discussion at an btw 2600:6C64:4F3F:D66A:588D:2A65:5C78:CE56 17:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. The speedy deletion of these files did not conform to policy (Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion) and the files have been therefore undeleted. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Panty lines for the new deletion discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ace of Clubs.jpg

This image was created by me and is owned by my organisation The Jazz Centre (UK). I own the copyright to this image. Please undelete the image.

  •  Oppose Since this has been published before and we cannot verify your identy through your Wikimedia account, our rules require that we get a permission by email from the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions. De728631 (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per De728631 @TheJazzCentreUK: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:10, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Jazz Centre UK Expansion Opening 2017 Peter Bolton.jpg

I hold the copyright to use this image on behalf of my organisation The Jazz Centre (UK). Please undelete this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheJazzCentreUK (talk • contribs) 16:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @TheJazzCentreUK: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder (i.e. the photographer, Peter Bolton LRPS) must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:12, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jacqui Dankworth and Charlie Wood by Matthew Fisher.jpg

I took this image and hold the Copyright to use this image on behalf of my organisation The Jazz Centre (UK). Please undelete this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheJazzCentreUK (talk • contribs) 16:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @TheJazzCentreUK: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder of the photo (i.e. the photographer, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written contract) and the copyright holder of the painting (i.e. the artist, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written contract) must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ngô Đình Khả 2.jpg

This file was tagged by a user for speedy deletion, this user tagged a lot of obvious public domain files for (speedy) deletion because they simply do not understand how copyright on many of the images they tagged works. For example a book published during the late 19th (nineteenth) century uploaded by me was tagged for speedy deletion, no template was left on my talk page and I discovered it by accident. Their rationale at the time was that "it came from a website" despite the author having died over a century ago. Anyhow, I discovered this specific file missing when I was browsing the English-language Wikipedia and noticed that it was gone from the article, naturally I assumed vandalism, but alas it was the same user tagging this image as was done with many other old Vietnamese images in the public domain now deleted from Wikimedia Commons, which is why I would also like to ask a reviewing admin to check for any other files deleted thanks to this user.

This file CAN LITERALLY NOT BE COPYRIGHTED © in Vietnam, in fact files half a century newer than this are typically in the public domain if they are anonymous (like this one is). This file is 100% (one-hundred percent) eligible for "{{PD-Vietnam}}", unfortunately Túrelio didn't tag this image as such and it was still deleted. If it gets restored then I will add the proper copyright license to it. The problem is that many public domain files on Wikimedia Commons are simply tagged with wrong licenses, but this file is simply impossible under Vietnamese law to be copyrighted, in fact of one of the children in this picture many photographs of him as an adult exist on Wikimedia Commons. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: The nomination was not totally wrong as the uploader claimed to be the author who has to be attributed by reusers. It is up to the uploader to provide correct authorship / copyright info (or up to anyone else who knows how to fix it - if they wish this image to remain in Commons even if the uploader does not care)
The information of this file states:
== {{int:filedesc}} ==
{{Information
|description=
{{vi|1=gia đình quan Thượng thư Ngô Đình Khả. Ngô Đình Diệm là chú bé. (thứ hai từ phải sang)}}
{{en|1=Family Affairs Minister Ngo Dinh Kha. Ngo Dinh Diem is a little boy. (second from right)}}
|date=190x 
|source=http://thang-phai.blogspot.com/2017/11/02112017-oc-tham-khao-ngo-inh-diem-1901.html
|author=[[Fataobstant]]
}}
== {{int:license-header}} ==
{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
At least authorship / copyright are incorrect and need to be fixed while undeleting. How do you suggest to fix this?
Note also, that in order to apply {{PD-Vietnam}} we need appropriate publication date or the author death date. Creation date is irrelevant (unless we want to apply {{PD-old-assumed}}). Ankry (talk) 21:11, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • @Ankry: , this blog (and also this blog) notes that the source of the image is this provincial government. It is likely an unpublished work which under 2009 Vietnamese copyright laws would be "For cinematographic works, photographic works and works of applied art which remain unpublished within 25 years from the date of fixation, the term of protection is 100 years from the date of fixation.", but I can't find anything about unpublished works in any prior copyright laws. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    • @Donald Trung: If this is anonymous 1905 work, remaining unpublished till 2003, then per COM:Hirtle chart it should belong to Category:Undelete in 2026 (120 years since creation). Ankry (talk) 05:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
      • @Ankry: , I have done some further research and haven't been able to find anything about it, the 2009 law mentions unpublished works but can't find much about the previous copyright law. Though this page in English mentions that the previous copyright laws were a lot less strict and I know that retroactivity only applies to works not in the public domain 50 (fifty) years before 2010 (two-thousand-and-ten). The problem with Vietnamese works is that most are entirely offline with no trace of an online presence so it's not possible for me in my current location to find if the file was previously archived. I will contact the provincial government for answers, but if you believe that the old copyright law linked above is still too restrictive then you can close this undeletion request as unsuccessful. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:27, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
        • I agree that the image may be PD in Vietnam, but my previous comment was about US copyright which relies on publication date. And for images published after 1989 the country of origin and local copyright status are irrelevant (while it is one of Berne convention countries). Ankry (talk) 08:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
          • @Ankry: I can't find much information about its publication prior to being online, so I don't think that I can make a case for this work to not be copyright © protected based on publication. You can close this request, I will try to find more information on it, but will only (re-)open another undeletion request for this file once I have find clear and direct evidence of prior publication(s). As this seems to be a private family photograph I think that it's highly unlikely, despite the prominence of basically every male person in the picture. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done withdrawn; undelete in 2026. Ankry (talk) 10:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hattemse_Mixed_Hockey_Club.jpg

See discussion (in Dutch) here. Picture was taken from public road, a cut-out of a permanent sign (which can be seen here). Therefore this falls under freedom of panorama. Nominator RonnieV didn't bother to ask or discuss first but simply placed a request for deletion, which was honored without responding to my request for an explanation. StuivertjeWisselen (talk) 21:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

It wasn't at all clear from the picture that it was taken in a place where it would fall under freedom of panorama. You also didn't mention FOP in the discussion. Anyhow, the Netherlands do have FOP and I believe you when you say you took the image from a public place. I  Support undeletion. --rimshottalk 23:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
I am new here, I didn't know I had to mention FOP (nor was I aware of that law). Therefore my request for help. But thank you for undeleting :-) StuivertjeWisselen (talk) 07:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per {{FoP-Nederland}}. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Zhangshixuan.jpeg

File:Zhangshixuan.jpeg

<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/"> <img src="http://i.creativecommons.org/p/zero/1.0/88x31.png" style="border-style: none;" alt="CC0" /> </a>
To the extent possible under law, <a rel="dct:publisher" href="https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zhangshixuan.jpeg"> Zhangshixuan</a> has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to Zhangshixuan. This work is published from: 台灣.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 張泰嚴 (talk • contribs) 05:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done procedural close: image not deleted. Adding appropriate copyright template by the uploader is still required by policy, however. Do not use raw <a> HTML tags: they cannot work. Ankry (talk) 06:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rachel Prager aka Baby Blue2.jpg

I am making this request because I believe it was deleted unnecessarily and for the wrong reason given.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.whosdatedwho.com/copyright

The following is the conversation that took place on the talkpage of the user responsible for deleting the file

Have you read https://www.whosdatedwho.com/terms 6.1?
6. Proprietary Rights in Content on Lucy Media.
6.1
Lucy Media does not claim any ownership rights in the text, files, images, photos, video, sounds, musical works, works of authorship, applications, or any other materials (collectively, "Content") that you post on or through the Lucy Media Services. By displaying or publishing ("posting") any Content on or through the Lucy Media Services, you hereby grant to Lucy Media and other users a non-exclusive, fully paid and royalty-free, worldwide, limited license to use, modify, delete from, add to, publicly perform, publicly display, reproduce and translate such Content, including without limitation distributing part or all of the Site in any media formats through any media channels. Lucy Media and/or other Users may copy, print or display publicly available Content outside of the Lucy Media Services, including without limitation, via the Site or third party websites or applications (for example, services allowing Users to order prints of Content or t-shirts and similar items containing Content). 48Pills (talk) 05:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

@48Pills But the premise is that this is your work. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 11:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
I never claimed it was my work, and the above doesn't specify any such restrictions. 48Pills (talk) 03:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

I am still uncertain why it was deleted given the clarity of the terms as I read them. 48Pills (talk) 06:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@48Pills: This is not CC-BY-SA 4.0 license as you claimed. Note: the highlighted license is required to be granted to Lucy Media and other users of their service only, not to anybody in the world. Ankry (talk) 06:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

But technically, couldn't anybody in the world be a user of Lucy Media Services? 48Pills (talk) 08:19, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Well, I do not know? But such limitation may be considered unacceptable per COM:L. You need to discuss in COM:VPC whether a separate license template may be created for this particular license. I see no appropriate license template among existing ones. And without an acceptable license we cannot undelete the image. Ankry (talk) 10:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - 1) We require licenses to be explicitly perpetual/irrevocable. I see no related reference in the cited terms; and 2) this is almost certainly license laundering. The image is clearly professionally staged/posed/shot and that a professional photographer of a notable singer would upload their work to "www.whosdatedwho.com" is the definition of a COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 11:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry and Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:16, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Estafanía Soto.jpg

Picture is owned by Estefanía and used all websites (including facebook) and journals — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ludokoenders (talk • contribs) 08:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@Ludokoenders: And does any of these sites claim that Wikimedia user Ludokoenders is the photo author and copyright holder?
Otherwise, we cannot accept the license you declared as {{Own}} and you need to provide an evidence that the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license has been granted by the actual photo copyright holder. Either basing on public records, or the copyright holder needs to follow COM:OTRS procedure. This especially applies to images that were already published elsewhere. Ankry (talk) 10:17, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. @Ludokoenders: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Christ Esabe.jpg

We have a permission message at OTRS unter Ticket:2021031410004844. – Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - This image appears in a much more complete form here where it a) appeared more than a year before upload to commons and b) credits the photographer as Vanessa Sirven." There is no evidence of permission from Sirven in that ticket. Эlcobbola talk 11:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Insufficient permission per Elcobbola and per note on Ticket:2021031410004844. @Mussklprozz: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

I have a permission from the copyright holder of this image to use it freely for the Wikipedia. If needed, I'll ask them for sending a letter to WikiCommons to proove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Марія Балабанова (talk • contribs) 10:49, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. No file listed for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:16, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Білий ворон.jpg

I have a permission from the copyright holder to use this image on Wikipedia page. If needed, I'll ask them to send a letter to WikiCommons to prove this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Марія Балабанова (talk • contribs) 11:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. @Марія Балабанова: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by MpecNS96

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I have a permission from the copyright holder to use this image on Wikipedia page. If needed, I'll ask them to send a letter to WikiCommons to prove this. MpecNS96 (talk) 11:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. @MpecNS96: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg Undelete please because I have the permission from the artist itself (Catherine Durand) to use the album cover art. I am in charge of creating her profile pages on Wikipedia. Thank you. The Music Guides Playlists (talk) 11:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Catherine_Durand_Coeurs_Migratoires_pochette.jpg Hi, Undelete please because I have the permission from the artist itself (Catherine Durand) to use the album cover art. I am in charge of creating her profile pages on Wikipedia. Thank you. The Music Guides Playlists (talk) 11:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. @The Music Guides Playlists: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirea_Flavia_Stellato

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirea_Flavia_StellatoWiki on Sky (talk) 11:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Undelete this page or recover this page: Reason: This is a paid Contribution. Employee name: http://hrpakistan.org/, client: Mirea Flavia Stellato. Please recover the page https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirea_Flavia_Stellato so we can improve the page. The client "Mirea Flavia Stellato" is a notable actress and I have write the article according to Wikipedia standards. Please recover my page & help me to improve the page references & citations. I think it wasn't any advertisement or promotion & wasn't necessary to delete the article/page. It doesn't make sense to delete the Wiki page immediately, You can put some notice for improving the article instead of speedy deletion. Please recover the page & invite some wiki members to help me to improve the page.Wiki on Sky (talk) 11:58, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Wrong project. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Wiki on Sky: This is Wikimedia Commons, not the Italian Wikipedia. We are not able to restore anything on that project. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dahlberg Mosaic at Copper Mountain Park, Butte,MT..jpg

This is a photo of a community art work that itself is a depiction of a 1915 photograph, now in the public domain, of Harry Swede Dahlberg. Details on the origin of the mosaic, as a depiction of a public domain image is described in this news story. https://mtstandard.com/news/local/sports-figures-remembered-in-mosaics/article_da547985-d357-577e-8157-7ed3cedb6af6.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobdahlberg (talk • contribs) 23:12, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

@Bobdahlberg: :
  1. Why the 1915 photo is PD? When and where the photo was initially published? 1915+120+1=2036 > 2021 (copyright expiration date for unpublished anonymous US photos)
  2. You, Bobdahlberg, declared to be the author and exclusive copyright holder; are you the community? Operating an account by multiple people is against ToU.
  3. If this is cooperative work, we need a free license permission from ALL authors. Or from the actual copyright holder whom they transferred copyright to (in written form; an evidence needed).
Ankry (talk) 22:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done no response. Ankry (talk) 23:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:Books in the Library of Congress/unchecked

(Above per original listing.) The first work was published in 1961, with a notice. It was not renewed, and is thus in the public domain. (The only registration relevant to that work is of an index published in a later edition.) The second work was published in 1954, with a notice. It was not renewed, and is thus in the public domain. The other three works were published without a notice, and are thus in the public domain by virtue of PD-US-no notice. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

✓ Done per above. @TE(æ)A,ea.: FYI. Ankry (talk) 23:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Andrés Borghi en 1993.jpg

I am not sure about this one; can it please be restored temporarily so I can check? I have an email with Ticket:2021030810009691, saying that the picture was deleted due to a misunderstanding and that it was taken by his brother – possibly the person who uploaded it.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 17:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

@Mussklprozz: Temporarily undeleted. Ankry (talk) 17:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done redeleting and closing. Ankry (talk) 23:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files by Nguyen-red

Please check the files by Nguyen-red here:

I found this by accident through a websearch and these files are all from this book which is in the public domain. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Just checked more from this user, only files with this book in the file name, as they are a serial copyright © abuser. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

They are here:

--Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

 Support, if useful. I see no reason why these images might be copyrighted. Ankry (talk) 21:42, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

The book itself has already been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons with this time description:

{{Book |title=Hymnes et pavillons d'Indochine |author={{unknown author}} |description={{en|1=A scan of the 1941 (Vichy-)French book first published in Hanoi, Tonkin, French Indo-China ''Hymnes et pavillons d'Indochine'' about the symbols of French Indo-China.}} |date=1941 |city={{city|Hanoï}} |source={{ARK-BNF|ark:/12148/cb34199098p}} [http://www.hubert-herald.nl/Vietnam.htm#vietnamstate Armorial of Vietnam by Hubert de Vries] |Language=fr |image page=4 |permission= {{Tl|PD-Vietnam}} & {{Tl|PD-France}} |other versions= }}

I can simply copy the relevant information over. I don't have access to how the original uploads looked but I'm sure that they are likely tagged as "{{Own}}". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:51, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Donald Trung: Please, fix the description of these files, if necessary. Ankry (talk) 23:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

سلام لطفا این فایل رو حذف نکنید این عکس خودمه — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sara.nika fans2 (talk • contribs) 18:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

@Sara.nika fans2: Please specify, which of deleted files you wish to be undeleted. Ankry (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done incomplete request. Ankry (talk) 22:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Zeharkako flauta.jpg

Hello! A bunch of images uploaded by User:Soinuenea from their collection has been deleted WITHOUT notifying the uploader, claiming that the OTRS wasn't sent (it was sent). The author hasn't been notified in any way, so there's no way to know that there was an error with the image, since the OTRS was sent and pending. the images were deleted on February 21st, most of them by User:JuTa. Please, undelete them till the OTRS is resolved. -Theklan (talk) 11:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@Theklan: I cannot find any OTRS ticket mentioning this filename. If you know the ticket number (the sender should have received it in an automatic response), you can ask about ticket processing details in COM:ON. Ankry (talk) 23:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. @Theklan: To quote the UDR instructions: If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by PrincessofCastles and 1Kiscsillag1

Dear Commons-admins, dear User:AntiCompositeNumber, please undelete the following images. The images were taken by a professional photographer in the frame of a contract with a governmental institution under the Prime Ministry of Hungary. After the deletions, we received a permission for these images in OTRS (Ticket#2021030310009691). I will personally check these images one by one. Thank you in advance.

Uploaded by PrincessofCastles (talk · contribs):

Uploaded by 1Kiscsillag1 (talk · contribs):

Samat (talk) 18:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Samat: FYI. And it would be nice if you add the OTRS template to your userpage to make verifying your OTRS-member status easier. Ankry (talk) 22:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lost Saints.jpg

We have submitted approved images of which we are released for public use, by the copyright holder. The deletion reference comes from a page owned by the artist who released this image to us for use on Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by DalexDesign (talk • contribs) 18:25, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Info The page is here: facebook.com. Thuresson (talk) 19:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
@DalexDesign: At upload you claimed that you are personally the author (photographer) and the copyright holder of this photo. Now you say something else. How can we rely on your statements? Ankry (talk) 22:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @DalexDesign: Works previously published elsewhere requires that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined that received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SuperBallJump_Achievements_SBJLOGO.jpg

I am declaring this picture non-free using rational.

{{Non-free use rationale | Description = This is the logo owned by VUXIA for Super Ball Jump | Source = The logo may be obtained from VUXIA.com | Article = https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Super_Ball_Jump | Portion = The entire logo is used to convey the meaning intended and avoid tarnishing or misrepresenting the intended image. | Low resolution = The logo is of a size and resolution sufficient to maintain the quality intended by the company or organization, without being unnecessarily high resolution. | Purpose = The image is used to identify Super Ball Jump, a notable product or service. The significance of the logo is to help the reader identify the product or service, assure the readers that they have reached the right article containing critical commentary about that product or service, and illustrate branding associations of the product or service in a way that words alone could not convey. | Replaceability = Because it is a non-free logo, there is almost certainly no free representation. Any substitute that is not a derivative work would fail to convey the meaning intended, would tarnish or misrepresent its image, or would fail its purpose of identification or commentary. | Other information = Use of the logo in the article complies with Wikipedia non-free content policy, logo guidelines, and fair use under United States copyright law as described above. }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vuxia (talk • contribs) 01:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. @Vuxia: Fair use is not permitted on Commons -- non-free content, whether under a fair use rationale or not, uploaded to Wikimedia Commons will be deleted on sight, without warning. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Jaipogo0123

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: All of the pictures are screenshotted by me and it's not in the internet or someone else Jaipogo0123 (talk) 11:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Screenshots are DW of the screenshotted work and information about its author / copyright status / license is needed to go on. Ankry (talk) 11:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: Ok I got it thanks (I forgot to read the rules). Jaipogo0123 (talk) 12:13, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:41, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rector MAI Mikhail Pogosyan.jpg

Добрый день!

Прошу восстановить недавно удалённую фотографию ректора МАИ Михаила Погосяна на странице https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%8F%D0%BD,_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B8%D0%BB_%D0%90%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87. Фотография сделана пресс-службой МАИ и размещена на википедии пресс-службой МАИ, является фотографией для свободного использования. Как я могу подтвердить, что эта фотография действительно может быть свободно размещена на вики? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Berta686 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@Berta686: You declared at upload that the image is licensed under CC-SA 1.0 license. I cannot find any evidence for this at the source page. Can you point out where an evidence for this license can be found? Ankry (talk) 22:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No response to query. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kaddish.pdf File:Benedizioni e canti per Chanukkah Traslitterati.pdf File:Haggadah di Pesach Traslitterata.pdf File:Tu Bishvat.pdf File:Benedizioni e canti per Chanukkah.pdf File:Haggadah di Pesach.pdf

File:Kaddish.pdf

File:Benedizioni e canti per Chanukkah Traslitterati.pdf

File:Haggadah di Pesach Traslitterata.pdf

File:Tu Bishvat.pdf

File:Benedizioni e canti per Chanukkah.pdf

File:Haggadah di Pesach.pdf

Si richiede undelete per cancellazione arbitraria specificata prima di Pasqua: richiedere la cancellazione dei files di Pasqua sempre nel mese precedente la Pasqua (si tratta già della terza volta), trattandosi di files che non violano alcuna regola, non è corretto.

La licenza di rilascio è specificatamente compatibile con Wikimedia ed i files vengono sviluppati e pubblicati appositamente su Wikimedia per essere disponibili nelle pagine di Wikipedia in italiano ed in ebraico ed in tutte le lingue che pubblicano pagine di ebraismo a cui le immagini e le opere possono riferirsi.

Si richiede il reintegro immediato ed il reinserimento in tutte le pagine delle diverse lingue di Wikipedia che già le pubblicavano

Grazie

Joram (talk) 23:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done out of scope and unclear license. Ankry (talk) 09:06, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Redemption-paws-logo.png This file was provided by Redemption Paws

This file was provided by the founder of Redemption Paws (Nicole Simone) and should not be deleted.

--JustACodeMonkey (talk) 11:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose It is irrelevant who provided the work. It is up to uploader to provide an evidence that the uploaded work is freely licensed (or not copyrighted due to precisely defined reason). Claiming Own work on somebody else's work is blatant copyright violation (plagiarism). Ankry (talk) 11:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Ankry. Nothing to be accomplised here. @JustACodeMonkey: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:32948774xg7.jpg

Update: Disregard this request; it pertains to a different file. Nissimnanach (talk) 03:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Nissimnanach

Submitting this Non-free use rationale:

{{Non-free use rationale
|Description = Cover art of To Eliminate the Opiate, Vol. 2 (2002), copyright holder is presumably that of the book namely David Perkins however may be the artists Sylvia Antelman
|Source = Derived from a digital capture (photo/scan) of the book cover (creator of this digital version is irrelevant as the copyright in all equivalent images is still held by the same party). Copyright held by the publisher or the artist. Claimed as fair use regardless.
|Article = Marvin_Stuart_Antelman
| Portion = Book cover only, a small portion of the commercial product.
| Low resolution = Yes
| Purpose = The image serves as the primary means of visual identification of the subject (the book). It illustrates educational articles about the book from which the cover illustration was taken.
| Replaceability = There is no free equivalent of this book cover, so the image cannot be replaced by a free image.
| Other information = The use of the cover will not affect the value of the original work or limit the copyright holder's rights or ability to distribute the original. In particular, being a noticeably imperfect scan, copies could not be used to make illegal copies of the book.
}}

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nissimnanach (talk • contribs) 18:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Nissimnanach (talk) 18:13, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Nissimnanach

The scan is of minimum quality to show detail of the coin in the lower right that is dicussed in the page w:Marvin_Stuart_Antelman#To_Eliminate_the_Opiate,_Vol._1Nissimnanach (talk) 18:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Nissimnanach
@Nissimnanach: In order to apply {{PD-Iraq}} here you need to provide 50 year old publication evidence. 2000 publication is not suitable. 2011 creation date is also not appropriate. Ankry (talk) 09:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. @Nissimnanach: Fair use is not permitted on Commons -- non-free content, whether under a fair use rationale or not, uploaded to Wikimedia Commons will be deleted on sight, without warning. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:OK Portrait Querformat-c-Martin-Lahousse-1030x686.jpg

The photo is free to use and downloadable under https://othmar-karas.at/downloads/ and https://othmar-karas.at/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/OK_Portrait_Querformat-c-Martin-Lahousse-1030x686.jpg.

The Copyright from the photographer is (c) Martin Lahousse. --Murof23 (talk) 22:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

@Murof23: Where are the words "free to use"? Thuresson (talk) 22:57, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
@Thuresson: In the imprint it says (translated to english) that you can use them if you add the (c). https://othmar-karas.at/impressum/--Murof23 (talk) 23:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. No evidence of a free licence at source. @Murof23: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder (i.e. Martin Lahousse) must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso roma.JPG

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: While Italy has no FOP, the Jubilee Church of Rome is among the cultural objects in Italy (see Blackcat's input at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso), hence part of the "Cultural Heritage of Italy" (http://www.beniculturali.it/mibac/export/MiBAC/sito-MiBAC/Contenuti/Eventi/GrandiEventi/visualizza_asset.html_1945641628.html). The subject also participated in the 2014 Italian leg of the Wiki Loves Monuments. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:31, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Perhaps {{Italy-MiBAC-disclaimer}} applies. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Maybe. And the architect copyright also applies. This is a 2003 construction. Ankry (talk) 21:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
How about the claim by Blackcat on that DR that it falls under the Italian Cultural Heritage and hence images of it can be hosted here? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
The file was proposed for deletion by a problem user who was undefinitely banned from it.wiki and since then targeted anything related to Italy on commons. That photograph was authorized by MiBac (which is an Italian ministry) so I don't know why it was deleted . -- Blackcat (write me here) 08:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
@JWilz12345: According to the template you mention, Italian Code of Cultural Heritage and Landscape is a regulation unrelated to Copyright. Which copyright law exception applies here? Ankry (talk) 09:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
@Blackcat: Do you suggest that MiBac own copyright to this building architecture (transferred to the by operation of law or in a contract)? If so, which license, where granted and what is the legal basis of their copyright? Otherwise, their permission is irrelevant to copyright. If I grant you the right to upload photos of everything from Netherland, will it become valid just because I am an admin of Commons? Ankry (talk) 09:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: I'm torn to explain that, I've explained it for the last 15 years here on Commons and invariably the answer is "yes but the architect's right?". In our country the jurisprudence favour the owner of an architectural work over its creator. -- Blackcat (write me here) 10:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
The ground of it is: if I own a villa created by a so called "archistar", If I couldn't freely photograph it and do what I want of the photos I would be limited in my use of the villa. Hence the general prevalence of the owner's rights over the creator. Of course this doesn't apply to stock works like records, books and so on.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackcat (talk • contribs) 18:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC+08:00)
Until this is an accepted policy, described in COM:Italy basing on legal acts or legal cases this will not be obvious to anybody. Per general, property ownership and the right related to ownership are unrelated to copyright and regulated by separate law. Ankry (talk) 10:40, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: admittedly there is none at COM:FOP Italy. I don't know if this statement of yours may also affect all files at Category:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso, as these were only permitted via MiBAC/{{Soprintendenza}} and the common notion that images taken during WLM have proper permissions from the architects/sculptors or their heirs (which seems not to be the case according to Vriullop at Commons talk:Wiki Loves Monuments 2012#Freedom of panorama). However, I wouldn't want to nominate all those beautiful images of the Jubilee Church. These are too beautiful to be deleted (I admit). I leave that decision to other people. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Well, I also prefer to leave this case to somebody more familiar with Italian copyright law. Ankry (talk) 10:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Copyright status of a work is still paramount on Commons. Regulations unrelated to copyright law (such as the one described at {{Italy-MiBAC-disclaimer}}) and exemptions to that regulation are secondary, and, in certain cases, irrelevant. While the Italian government is able to grant or deny authorisation to reproduce the tangible physical embodiment of the work that they own, manage or control, the work itself (i.e. the intangible intellectual property), along with the associated economic and moral rights, belongs to its author, unless, in the case of economic rights (i.e. copyright), transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyance. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso was, therefore, incorrectly closed as it did not consider restrictions imposed by copyright law. The only way that {{Italy-MiBAC-disclaimer}} can apply is if (1) the work is in public domain under Italian law, (2) but reproduction of such works is generally restricted by non-copyright regulations. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  I withdraw my nomination for image restoration. I requested the restoration of enwiki copy (w:File:Chiesa dio padre misericordioso roma.JPG). Also going to nominate non-incidental images of this copyrighted Italian building (at Category:Chiesa di Dio Padre Misericordioso) for deletion after the archival of this thread. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
    • And I think the blocking issue raised by Blackcat here is irrelevant. In our case, both Judgefloro and Ramon FVelasquez were indef'ed blocked on enwiki due to suspected sockpuppetry, but are welcomed here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done withdrawn. Ankry (talk) 17:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A decision making process for movement planning. (IA adecisionmakingp1094540083).pdf

This work was published in the U.S. in 1968, without a copyright notice; thus, it is in the public domain by virtue of PD-US-no notice. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

The author is: THOMAS JOYCE REGAN, JR. BS, United States Naval Academy
 Question @ShakespeareFan00: Could you, please, elaborate (1) why in your opinion {{PD-USGov}} does not apply here despite clear NPS note, and (2) why do you suggest the 1964 date to be critical for {{PD-US-no notice}}? Ankry (talk) 22:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
A PD US Gov notice would apply to works created as part of "official" duties. My recollection It wasn't clear from the original upload IIRC, whether this was a 'sponsered' student, undertaking those studies as part of 'official' duties.

The NPS library would I think hold papers that were produced at other institutions. An NPS thesis, by servering personnel would more clearly be PD-US Gov. This however was an M.I.T thesis.

All work after 1964 would have been renewed automatically, so the 1964 date in the original DR was additional to the lack of notice information.
This is a judgement call. The cover page is an explicit and specific PD release in 1968. The document itself was published in 1968. Though the author was US Navy and was probably under contract, the thesis itself was submitted to MIT. On balance as there is no claim of copyright, I would have gone for keep in the original DR presuming the PD release can be respected. Not especially wedded to the decision though. --Fæ (talk) 22:29, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
@Fæ: This is suggested to be no notice, not not renewed. Publications without copyright notice are ineligible for copyright renewal. Ankry (talk) 05:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Sure, I mentioned nothing about renewal, just there is no evidence that the official explicit and specific PD release is false, there is not even an alternate copyright statement nor anything that could be interpreted as a claim. --Fæ (talk) 09:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done undeleted. @TE(æ)A,ea. and Fæ: Please, decide yourself which copyright status template should be used. Ankry (talk) 17:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:S-l400_(5).jpg

Si tratta di fotografie del mio archivio di famiglia e di mia proprietà. Vi sarei grato se fossero annullate le cancellazioni delle foto di Salvarani(azienda) e Salvarani Renzo. Cordiali saluti Giovanni Salvarani cell. 346/1716617 salvarnistory@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.33.145.57 (talk) 18:50, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose advertisements are out of COM:SCOPE regardless of their copyright status. And images that were ever published anywhere else cannot be claimed {{Own}}: this is against policy. Ankry (talk) 08:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Isabelasouza.jpegimage.jpg

It's just a recently photo of Isabela Souza in 2020 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deborah.rayane (talk • contribs) 10:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - 1) This is not a reason for undeletion and has nothing whatsoever to do with the concern; 2) previously published images require COM:OTRS evidence of permission; and 3) you yourself asserted "Photo of Isabela Souza taked by Rêmulo Brandão"; where is evidence of permission from Brandão? Эlcobbola talk 14:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Big Ayeh.jpg

Hello good morning, please this file is my personal use and nobody owns a right except me myself. Big Ayeh (talk) 11:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:静岡市御幸町.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: このファイルの使用は著作者の承諾を得ている SHIZUOKACITYperson (talk) 14:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose the contributor isn't original copyright holder. they claim that get a permission but, no evidence. --eien20 (talk) 16:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. @SHIZUOKACITYperson: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

File:Alejandro Moreno Merino .jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex moreno merino (talk • contribs) 17:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done the file is not deleted. Ankry (talk) 17:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

--Mogoi87 (talk) 08:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)I still own the copyright of the photo.

 Not done: Procedural close. Incomplete request: No file listed for undeletion. Nothing to be accomplised here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:NigelPilkington.jpg

Dear Permissions

The file NigelPilkington.jpg was DELETED by you on 7 March 2021 saying “no OTRS permission since 25 January 2021".

But the copyright holder (Nina Rangoy) emailed her permission in the proper form on 25 January 2021 (see below), and an auto response was received.

Please undelete the file.

With thanks Nigel Pilkington

Begin forwarded message:

From: Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> Subject: [Ticket#2021012510013004] Confirmation of receipt (Re: {{OTRS pending}}) Date: 25 January 2021 at 21:34:14 GMT To: Nina Rangoy <nina@ninarangoy.com>

Dear Nina Rangoy,

Thank you for your email. This is an automatically generated response to inform you that your message has been received. Because all emails are handled by volunteers, it may take some time for us to reply. We kindly ask for your patience and understanding as we try our best to reply as quickly as possible. If your article or file has been deleted in the mean time, please don't worry. Any administrator can restore these later.

If you want to send more emails about the same subject, please add the following to the subject bar of the email: [Ticket#: 2021012510013004].

Yours sincerely,

The Volunteer Response Team


Begin forwarded message:

From: Nina Rangoy <nina@ninarangoy.com> Subject: {{OTRS pending}} Date: 25 January 2021 at 21:33:59 GMT To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org


I hereby affirm that I am Nina Rangoy, the creator of the media work as shown here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nigel_Pilkington.jpg , and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free licence: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so, I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the licence and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the licence chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Nina Rangoy Copyright holder 25 January 2021 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigelpilkington (talk • contribs) 09:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. @Nigelpilkington: To quote the UDR instructions: If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:19, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Maggie Cheung 20XX.png

Dear Netora， thanks for your information, but I don't think this file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://kuaibao.qq.com/s/20190307A0OYHU00?refer=spider. Because this news(aktuell actually not really is a news) comes from an informal website, there is no editor, everyone can freely publish test there without Copyright.

best wishes

Cookiekiki — Preceding unsigned comment added by CookieKiki (talk • contribs) 10:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. @CookieKiki: To quote the clear warning on your talk page: Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:23, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:No.12 CALSONIC IMPUL GT-R at 2020 FUJIMAKI GROUP SUZUKA 300km (1).jpg

投稿後に確認した際には画像が表示されず一度削除して再度あげ直した方がいいと考えたものの後日確認したら画像がちゃんと表示され問えり削除の必要がないと考え撤回依頼に至りました。--Tokumeigakarinoaoshima (talk) 12:23, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Not an undeletion request. Nothing to be accomplised here. @Tokumeigakarinoaoshima: If you wish to withdraw the DR, please do so at Commons:Deletion requests/File:No.12 CALSONIC IMPUL GT-R at 2020 FUJIMAKI GROUP SUZUKA 300km (1).jpg. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:30, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vince Cable.jpg

The participants in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vince Cable.jpg for this image erred in their application of the rules around the UK's Open Government License. The correct approach to OGL images is the one adopted in these DRs: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Olympic mascots.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Canoe Slalom - Kynan Maley.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bill McKenzie.jpg. All images which are released by central government are Crown Copyright, which automatically makes them OGL unless they fall into one of the established OGL exceptions. We have an OTRS ticket (mentioned in the "Olympic mascots" DR above) which confirms this from UK Government lawyers. Commons users frequently get this wrong, and there's plenty more of incorrectly deleted images that will need to be sorted out in the near future. UK Government departments published a great deal of images on Flickr which a CC BY-ND-NC license which people have mistakenly thought overrules the OGL license grant. It doesn't. Othertimes, Commons users have misunderstood a related but rarely-used license called NCOGL (non-commercial OGL) which exists for some very specific use cases involving material that has been exempted from the OGL—this is a red herring.

It is, alas, unfortunate that the Flickr page where the image was sourced from has been deleted. This is probably because the government department has been rebranded—something governments do occasionally—from the Department for Business, Industry and Skills (BIS) to the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). They likely closed the Flickr account as it no longer fits in with their social media strategy, although an archive.org version is available, which clearly shows what nobody disputes and the only thing which matters, namely that the image was created and released by a department of the UK government under Crown Copyright which, for the reasons given in the other DRs, makes it OGL unless an exception applies. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose As shown on this archived page the Flickr account owner was asked for license change to CC-BY-SA but decided to change it to CC-BY-NC-SA. This constitutes significant doubt about commercial use of the photo (eg. this may mean that Flickr publisher was unsure about rights to the photo) and per COM:PCP we cannot host this image until the doubt is resolved. I think COM:OTRS permission that explicitly mentions this particular photo is the right way at the moment. We need especially clear declaration that third-party rights exception does not apply in this case. @Tom Morris: Do you know who the photographer is? Ankry (talk) 12:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
The comments on Flickr are a red herring: someone asked for a license change to BY-SA, but the Department changed the stated license on Flickr to BY-NC-SA. This is irrelevant given the point I have already made—the licensing in Flickr does not supersede the statement made in the description: “This image is available for re-use by media and bloggers ‘’’under Crown Copyright’’’”. Crown Copyright means the image is owned by the Department—either it was taken by a civil servant in the course of their employment, or it is a work-for-hire. If it is Crown Copyright, and it is a work by a central government department, it is ‘’automatically’’ and perpetually licensed under the OGL (again, see the reasoning in the ‘Olympic Mascots’ and ‘Kynan Maley’ DRs as linked above). When UK government departments publish images, e.g. on Flickr, on the government website, or on other social platforms, that are not under Crown Copyright they almost always acknowledge it as such in the description along with credit to the photographer. The government have released thousands of other images of politicians which we have on Commons that have followed the same path: they’ve been released under Crown Copyright and a civil servant has put them up with a license on Flickr with a NC or ND clause, which is irrelevant as they’re OGL because of the terms of the OGL/PSI Licensing Framework. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:28, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Can you convince us that this is not a case like this one? Ankry (talk) 18:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
In that case there's literally an explicit claim of ownership by a third party. There is no such claim in this case, merely a misunderstanding of OGL/PSI Licensing Framework. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
It appeared later, not in the initial publication. Initial publication was declared OGL. And before the copyright claim appeared, the image was removed from the publication without a comment. Per COM:PCP we need to assure that such claim will not appear. Image deletion and non-commercial license constitute significant doubts about the OGL license that require extra evidence. COM:OTRS is the right way in such cases. Ankry (talk) 11:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support gov.uk (2012) shows this was published on the government website, live for a period of 2.5 years, with no specific claim of copyright against that photograph, as well as on the official Flickrstream above. The links on the bis.gov.uk page take you to the explanation (as published 2012) that "All content is available under the Open Government Licence, except where otherwise stated", clearly this photograph is OGL and should be undeleted. There are no valid COM:PRP concerns and the evidence is so clear that the burden of proof should be on those that may think a deletion rationale can be created. Note the gov.uk publication predates the Flickr publication, however, that is irrelevant, once released in an official government publication as OGL it stays OGL. Also worthy of note is that the gov.uk site directs you to this archive version at the NationalArchives --Fæ (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: {{OGL}} is not revocable per OGL legal code. Licensing changes are irrelevent, and could be considered multi-licensing. There is no evidence of third-party claims. Furthermore, while those advocating for deletion, claim that the work may fall under a NC OGL, that evidence available does not support that position: The notice "© Crown copyright 2012" links to the copyright page which clearly leads to the Open Government Licence. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:The Arts in Early England (1903)

(Above per original listing.) The only volume given in this discussion is vol. 3, which was written solely by G. Baldwin Brown (d. 1932). Some other volumes in this series were written (wholly or partially) by other authors, but not this volume. I do not know from which volume or volumes the listed images originate. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC).

 Support per above. Ankry (talk) 05:49, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. @TE(æ)A,ea. and Ankry: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Deutschlandlied.ogg

This sound recording of the German anthem by these unknown performers, which is public domain in the EU under {{PD-EU-audio}}. --Frontman830 (talk) 09:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

@Frontman830: Which of the two audio files uploaded under this name you mean? (The one uploaded by User:PONITOX in 2016 or the one uploaded by User:Nicolas Perrault III in 2017.) Neither of them provides information about when the performance was published and this information is necessary to apply {{PD-EU-audio}}. US copyright is a separate problem. Ankry (talk) 11:42, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Only this first stanza applied. --Frontman830 (talk) 11:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Deutschlandlied. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:10, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    •  Info There is no community decision in this DR, yet. So it should not be referred here as a rationale. However, we may need to  wait for a decision. Ankry (talk) 14:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • @Ankry: This is not about a community decision, but the rationale that I provided in that DR, in which I clearly outline and explain how the files don't comply with the licensing/copyright tags used. The second point certainly applies here. Like the two derivative files, this file does not comply with the conditions set by {{PD-US-record}}: "Under Title II (Classics Protection and Access) of the Orrin G. Hatch–Bob Goodlatte Music Modernization Act, which was signed into law on October 11, 2018, sound recordings that were first fixed prior to February 15, 1972 are copyrighted in the United States as follows: [...] Recordings that were first published between 1923 and 1946 are copyrighted for a period of 100 years after first publication. ... the copyright terms given above for pre-1972 recordings apply regardless of whether a recording was published with a copyright notice, or whether a recording was registered with the US Copyright Office, or whether a recording's copyright was renewed" As such, if the date of 1945 as listed in the two derivatives is accurate or correct, the earliest this recording will enter into the public domain in the US is in 2046. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Additionally, all recordings published prior to 1972 are protected in the United States: The earliest they will enter into the public domain in 2022 (for pre-1923 recordings) and, at the latest, 2067. And as we've always clear noted here, US laws apply. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Then I see no way that {{PD-EU-audio}} can be a usefull template. Unless this is FOP-like case when we can ignore US copyright. IMO, wider community discussion is needed. Note: PD-EU-audio applies only to recordings published more than 70 years ago in EU. They cannot be post-1972. Ankry (talk) 05:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per public domain in the EU, so I would change this tag to {{PD-EU-audio}}, because it's not a US work/performance. --Frontman830 (talk) 23:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  • @Frontman830: Doesn't matter if the work is public domain just in the EU. If the recording is copyrighted is the US, then it cannot be hosted here as works must either be under a free licence or in the public domain in both the source country and in the United States. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: While the file may be in the public domain in the European Union per {{PD-EU-audio}}, it is still copyrighted in the United States {{PD-US-record}}. For works to be hosted on Wikimedia Commons, they either must be under an accepted free licence or in public domain in both the country or jurisdiction of origin and the United States. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:USA MIHARU Signatures.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: simple signature not eligible for copyright. RZuo (talk) 10:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@RZuo: It does not look like an original, commonly used signature; rather a COM:DW of a signature or a creatively modified signature. {{PD-signature}} cannot be applied, IMO, to such arts. Ankry (talk) 05:50, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. The signature in question is not eligible for {{PD-signature}} (it is a doodle, used as a signature, and suffices originality requirements). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Веліченко_Олександр_Борисович.jpg, File:Виступ_на_конференції_LABAT_(Болгарія).jpg, File:Після_вручення_премії_(фото_з_Б.Є._Патоном).jpg

These files were deleted as lacking permission. Following discussions with @Anna Rzhenova: (who is a copyright holder or their representative) the license was updated to CC BY-SA (see last page of https://udhtu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Velichenko-2021-otkryv.-ssylka.pdf ). As the permission to use these files was provided at the source website, they can now be restored — NickK (talk) 11:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

@NickK: Can you tell us who are the authors of the photos and how did they grant Александр Величенко, the author of the document linked above, the right to claim the images to be CC-BY-SA licensed? And which CC-BY-SA licnse (version) applies? I do not see the authors to be properly attributed as the license requires. I suspect this CC license declaration to be COM:LL. Ankry (talk) 22:55, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: Александр Величенко is the subject of the document, not the author of it. I think @Anna Rzhenova: can provide the exact information but my understanding is that the author is an employee of UDHTU (the university where Mr Velichenko works), and that UDHTU published this biography based on their own sources. They have put this license explicitly to allow to use the information from this PDF on Wikipedia following copyvio notifications both on Wikipedia and on Commons, thus this is rather a licensing of a previously non-free work under a CC license. I would assume CC-BY SA 3.0 as their intention was to copy Wikipedia's license — NickK (talk) 10:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
@NickK: He is mentioned as the author in the PDF metadata. CC-BY-SA licenses require to attribute the author of the work (photographer for a photo). Not attributing is copyright violation. We cannot host images without correct attribution, accepted by authors. If the copyright holder is not the author, we need an evidence of copyright transfer via COM:OTRS (eg. evidence of employment contract or evidence of copyright transfer contract or evidence of heritage). We cannot rely on declarations of people who eg. provided incorrect copyright info in the past due to being not aware of copyright requirements. Or an evidence that copyright expired. We cannot host images of unclear copyright status where nobody can claim copyright because nobody knows who the author is per COM:PCP. Ankry (talk) 11:09, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: I am pretty sure the university does not know how to manage metadata. Metadata in PDFs from anything state-owned in Ukraine is known to be generally useless. Anyway, this looks like an institution (university) genuinely willing to share information but not knowing how to do that correctly. I am not affiliated with this institution (Anna Rzhenova is) so I don't know what kind of documents they have, but my assumption was that this PDF was a work by UDHTU as an institution — NickK (talk) 11:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: @NickK: Unfortunate this request needs to be closed as not done as there remains questions related to authorship of the photos. While the document is most likely the work of the institution or one of its employees, information regarding who took the photos is still missing and therefore we cannot determine if the licence/permission provided is sufficient. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alpha matte.png

The file was missing source of derivative work. The only source work used to create the derivative is the image of the lion, which is posted in https://www.flickr.com/photos/26320335@N06/4006895689 by Yagan Kiely under CC BY-SA 2.0. Other parts of the image are own work. The license information will be added after undeletion.

--Qsorter (talk) 14:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

 Support per above. Ankry (talk) 17:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. @Qsorter and Ankry: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Night of the kings only official poster.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am the Canadian producer of the film (Peripheria films inc.). This is our official poster for North America (Canada and US). The other image that was put back IS not the official poster and DOES have Copyright in Ivory Coast and they have mandated me to remove that old temp poster that was created by Wassakara Productions that doesn't even have the right actor on the poster... I hope this issue will be resolved once and for all. This is my first time using Wikipedia so I hope I'm not doing anything wrong. Wish I could speak to a real human as this is REALLY frustrating:) Yanickletourneau (talk) 23:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Yanickletourneau: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission and there is no other valid rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JimmyKeyrouz.jpg

--Ramziaboughazale (talk) 17:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Hello, I have permission to use this photo of Jimmy Keyrouz from its source Christophe Meireis.

Please ask Christophe Meireis to verify that this photo is available under a free license by following the instructions at COM:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 18:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. @Ramziaboughazale: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:45, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Beno Clothing.jpg

I made this image from scratch and i own it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benoclothing (talk • contribs) 18:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Benoclothing: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission and there is no other valid rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo SONGTV Armenia.jpg File:Logo SONGTV Russia.jpg

The copyright holder has given permission to publish logos on my behalf! Logos are taken from the official sites of the copyright holder.

https://songtv.ru/logo File:Logo SONGTV Russia.jpg https://songtv.am/logo File:Logo SONGTV Armenia.jpg

--Frend (talk) 19:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC) 18:03.2021 22:45

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. No evidence of a free licence either here or here @Frend: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:45, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Albüm Kapağı.jpg

Dear Sir/Madam;

I agree that it's not accepted to use non-copyrighted pictures from google etc. But can you please precise, in such a case if there is no record company and band anymore, where shall I find related cover image for this article I created?

Regards... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pürel (talk • contribs) 07:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Not an undeletion request. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 08:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Modernizacja sieci2.png + others by User:MpecNS96

A proper OTRS agreement has been sent from the company to undelete the files listed here: [7]. See: ticket:2021031610009541. I am not quite sure if all of them are in scope of Wikimedia Commons - one was already deleted as out of scope File:Wykres 2021.jpg - and at least several of them needs renaming - but if they are worth undeletng is hard to say without seeing it. Anyway copyright issues seems to be solved for them. Polimerek (talk) 11:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

@Polimerek: Odtworzyłem. Niektóre pliki mogą być zdublowane. Aby odtworzyć File:Wykres 2021.jpg potrzebne jest wyjaśnienie, gdzie ten plik zostanie wykorzystany i dlaczego w takiej formie. Ankry (talk) 15:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done per OTRS. Ankry (talk) 15:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

en.m.wikipedia.org and the one in my office I will be in a few minutes early on my way to get the car ready for the you ٩٨$٦٥٤٣٢١ يا قلبي والله على راسي يا قلبي والله يا عمري يا قلبي والله والله ما اقدر على اي شيء بس انا عندي مشكلة بس انا عندي شغل بس انا عندي دوام ولا ما فيه ولا دولة دز.كمًا هي ما عندك شي يا عمري يا قلبي انا احبك —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.142.116.57 (talk) 14:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Not an undeletion request. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Seven_Samurai_poster.jpg

Same as {{PD-Japan-organization}}, occasionally {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. But this poster is not protected by copyright in Japan, and also for this alternate poster. --Frontman830 (talk) 23:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

@Frontman830: {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} is a review template. It states: Files that are copyrighted in the US and that have not been released under a free license will be deleted. Why do you need the file to be undeleted in order to make review of its copyright status? (a template desribing the file US PD or free license status is needed here). Ankry (talk) 17:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Forget that, same as that alternative, which are now public domain in the US with some requirements under {{PD-1996}}. Perhaps, it was published in 1954 in Japan, which is public domain after 50 years of creation. --Frontman830 (talk) 22:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Unfortunately, URAA applies and the work is still protected by copyright in the United States. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jake Bright signs copies of The Next Africa at WorldDenver event in 2016.jpg

Please restore. We received permission from the rights holder with Ticket:2021021710008275, and they have also put a cc-by-sa license onto the source page where the photo was originally published. – Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@Gbawden: Could you comment, please, why image presence on FB overrides its OTRS permission? Ankry (talk) 17:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support There is an OTRS and a statement at FB confirming the license. I see no reason not to trust that the Worlddenver.org is not the copyright holder. --MGA73 (talk) 14:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
  • The image on Facebook is here. You will see a cc-by-sa license text in the upper right corner. --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done The image already had an OTRS tag and its speedy deletion seem to be out of process. Ankry (talk) 22:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Faudel 2001-1.jpg

Can someone please temporarily restore this one? I am not totally convinced about the permission given in Ticket:2021031510007894, but need to see the file for further check. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Mussklprozz: FYI. Please, request {{Speedy}} if you find the permission not suitable. Ankry (talk) 22:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

All deleted files of User:Soinuenea

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2021010710007181 alleges permission. I request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 Info List of files:

Thuresson (talk) 15:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: OTRS request. @Jeff G.: --MGA73 (talk) 16:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

‪File:Logo der TAG Salzgitter Icefighters.png

Bei der gelöschten Datei handelt es sich um das Vereinslogo unserer ersten Herren Eishockeymannschaft des Sportverein am Salzgitter See.

Bitte stellen Sie die Datei wieder her! —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2003:DE:3F10:1700:6DC0:7EE7:A63A:BC0C (talk) 17:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose You need to provide an evidence of free license granted by the logo exclusive copyright holder in order to restore the image. Ankry (talk) 22:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:52, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo der TAG Young Icefighters.png‬

bei dem Logo handelt es sich um das Logo der Nachwuchsabteilung des Sportverein am Salzgitter See im Bereich Eishockey. Die Rechte des Bildes liegen beim Sportverein am Salzgitter See, welcher durch mich vertreten wird.

Das Logo ist ebenfalls vor zu finden auf der Internetseite HTTPS://www.salzgitter-young-icefighters.de.

hier sind auch die Kontaktdaten des Rechtsinhabers vorhanden.

Schalten Sie das Logo bitte wieder frei! —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2003:DE:3F10:1700:6DC0:7EE7:A63A:BC0C (talk) 17:58, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose You need to provide an evidence of free license granted by the logo exclusive copyright holder in order to restore the image. I see no free license on the abovementioned webbage. Ankry (talk) 22:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:53, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

IA books

  1. File:Wisconsin Medical Journal (IA wisconsinmedical2319stat).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  2. File:Virginia Medical Monthly (IA virginiamedicalm50unse).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  3. File:Tychonis Brahe Dani Epistolarvm astronomicarvm libri, quorum primvs hic illvstriss- et lavdatiss- principis Gvlielmi Hassiae landtgravii ac ipsius Mathematici literas, vnaq (IA den-kbd-pil-130018153247-001).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  4. File:The bookseller - a newspaper of British and foreign literature (IA booksellernewspa1915unse).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  5. File:The Bankers Magazine (vol. 18) (IA BankersMagazine1864vol18).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  6. File:Technologisches Wörterbuch in deutscher, französischer und englischer Sprache ... (IA bub gb aXkKAAAAIAAJ 2).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  7. File:Sermones y pláticas diversos (IA A330033).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  8. File:Sermones de timore divinorum iudiciorum. Add- Sermo de morte (IA ita-bnc-in2-00001124-002).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  9. File:Provincial and state papers (IA provincialstatepv11newh).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  10. File:Postillae maiores, seu enarrationes in Epistolas & Euangelia totius anni, ex N. de Lyra, aliisque doctoribus ... His accessere F. Antonij (IA bub gb HW9SRrmk C0C 2).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  11. File:Ohio State Medical Journal (IA ohiostatemedical1819unse).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  12. File:Ohio State Medical Journal (IA ohiostatemedical1319unse).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  13. File:North Carolina Christian advocate (serial) (IA northcarolinachr6612unit).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  14. File:Méthode (IA imslp-punto-giovanni).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  15. File:Miscellanea genealogica et heraldica - (IA miscellaneagenea112unse).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  16. File:Kentucky Medical Journal (IA kentuckymedicalj2019unse).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  17. File:Kentucky Medical Journal (IA kentuckymedicalj1219unse).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  18. File:Journals of the House of Burgesses of Virginia (IA journalsofhouseo02virg 1).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  19. File:Journal of the Iowa State Medical Society (IA journalofiowasta15unse).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  20. File:Jahresbericht über die leistungen und fortschritte in der gesammten medicin ... (1.)-51 jahrg.; 1866-1916 (IA bub gb YzegAAAAMAAJ).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  21. File:Jahresbericht über die leistungen und fortschritte in der gesammten medicin ... (1.)-51 jahrg.; 1866-1916 (IA bub gb hwGgAAAAMAAJ).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  22. File:Jahrbücher für classische philologie, (IA bub gb hTDVAAAAMAAJ).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  23. File:Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt (IA bub gb TWQMAAAAYAAJ).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  24. File:Histoire générale de France depuis les temps les plus reculés jusqu'a nos jours (IA histoiregenerale03hugo).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  25. File:Harper's New Monthly Magazine (IA harpersnewmonthl1harp).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  26. File:Hamburger literarische und kritische blätter .. (IA bub gb XeMaAAAAYAAJ).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  27. File:Géographie générale (microforme) - contenant la géographie physique, politique, administrative, historique, agricole, industrielle et commerciale de chaque pays avec des notions sur le climat (IA cihm 49040).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  28. File:Geometria motus opusculum geometricum, a Ioanne Ceua Mediolanensi in gratiam aquarum excogitatum. Continet duos libros primum de simplici motu, alterum de composito (IA ita-bnc-mag-00001347-001).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  29. File:Francisci Bonamici Florentini e primo loco philosophiam ordinariam in almo Gymnasio Pisano profitentis De motu libri X - Quibus generalia naturalis philosophiae principia summo studio collecta (IA ARes37105).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  30. File:Dictionnaire historique des institutions, mœurs et coutumes de la France (IA bub gb DO0JAAAAIAAJ).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  31. File:Dictionnaire historique de toutes les communes du département de l'Eure. Histoire.- Géographie.- Statistique.- (IA bub gb d ssAAAAYAAJ).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  32. File:Collections on the history of Albany, from its discovery to the present time (IA collectionsonhis01muns).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  33. File:Briefe Friedrich des Frommen... (microform) (IA briefefriedrichd00frie).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  34. File:Breviarum sanctae Lugdunensis Ecclesiae. Primae Galliarum sedis. Pars hyemalis autumnalis (IA bub gb hlB3GmYYprkC).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  35. File:Bibliographie biographique universelle (IA bub gb boxBAAAAYAAJ).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  36. File:Baltische Monatsschrift (IA bub gb wxYbAAAAYAAJ).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  37. File:Argumenta Satyrarum Iuuenalis (IA ARes37201).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  38. File:Appendix to the Journals of the Senate and Assembly of the ... session of the Legislature of the State of California (IA appendixtojourna19275cali).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  39. File:Appendix to the Journals of the Senate and Assembly of the ... session of the Legislature of the State of California (IA appendixtojourna19233cali).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  40. File:Allgemeine deutsche RealEncyklopädie für die gebildeten Stände ConversationsLexikon (IA bub gb mQAbAAAAYAAJ).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) ‎
  41. File:A Collection of voyages and travels (microform) - some now first printed from original manuscripts, others now first published in English - in six volumes with a general preface giving an account of (IA cihm 33302).pdf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

These deletions were by @JuTa: due to image page text having failed to be posted, I think. Spot checks seem to show they are public domain either by an obvious expiry (like being 180 years old) or being state PD. It would be better to have these in a housekeeping category like Category:Uploads by Fæ needing license correction than outright deletion. Giving a week to do mass housekeeping when a glance at the source confirms they are public domain seems overly bureaucratic.

The root cause is by the WMF servers failing to post the page contents on uploads, not a failure of the uploader. The general failure rate using the Commons API to upload files across all upload projects is something below 0.1%, and it appears to not have an obvious pattern, but could be related to the source sites when using direct url upload. --Fæ (talk) 19:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

@Nat: done. We'll have to try to remember that Category:IA books needing metadata refresh exists and that python3 pwb.py ia_metadata_refresh is a thing I can run. --Fæ (talk) 17:55, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ShawnCampbell.jpg

As the owner of the attached picture, I give permission for it to be used.

--Isoqt (talk) 04:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Ownership or possession of a photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights.  Question @Isoqt: Who is the photographer of the original image in the newspaper? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A permission that allow an image to be used is also unacceptable. We need a free license. Ankry (talk) 22:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fahnen-Collage.JPG

Ich bitte um Wiederherstellung der Datei. Sie wurde von mir selbst erstellt und lizensiert. Wenn bei der Angabe zur Lizenz ein Fehler aufgetreten ist, dann soll die Lizenz Template:PD-selbst ergänzt werden. --Letterix (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Letterix

✓ Done: File undeleted and licence tag fixed. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tour Ariane Paris La Défense.jpg

"On 7 October 2016, the French parliament approved a law recognizing a limited version of the freedom of panorama that authorizes the reproduction by individuals (not organizations) of buildings and sculptures permanently located in public space, but only for non-commercial utilizations.

Reproductions and representations of architectural works and sculptures, permanently placed on public roads, carried out by natural persons, to the exclusion of any commercial use." --YtoSu (talk) 16:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - Deletion requests are not votes. If no additional comments have been made (and indeed one notes no !votes supporting retention either), the closing admin evaluates the merits of the nomination rationale. Here France indeed does not have sufficiently free FoP provisions. We require use by anyone (i.e., "the reproduction by individuals (not organizations)" is disqualifying) and commercial usage (i.e., "only for non-commercial utilizations" and "to the exclusion of any commercial use" are disqualifying.) Please review this page's instructions ("Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone"), COM:L, and COM:AGF ("User doing vandalism "). Эlcobbola talk 16:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tour Trinity Paris La Défense.jpg

"On 7 October 2016, the French parliament approved a law recognizing a limited version of the freedom of panorama that authorizes the reproduction by individuals (not organizations) of buildings and sculptures permanently located in public space, but only for non-commercial utilizations.

Reproductions and representations of architectural works and sculptures, permanently placed on public roads, carried out by natural persons, to the exclusion of any commercial use." --YtoSu (talk) 16:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - Deletion requests are not votes. If no additional comments have been made (and indeed one notes no !votes supporting retention either), the closing admin evaluates the merits of the nomination rationale. Here France indeed does not have sufficiently free FoP provisions. We require use by anyone (i.e., "the reproduction by individuals (not organizations)" is disqualifying) and commercial usage (i.e., "only for non-commercial utilizations" and "to the exclusion of any commercial use" are disqualifying.) Please review this page's instructions ("Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone"), COM:L, and COM:AGF ("User doing vandalism "). Эlcobbola talk 16:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tour Alto Paris La Défense.jpg

"On 7 October 2016, the French parliament approved a law recognizing a limited version of the freedom of panorama that authorizes the reproduction by individuals (not organizations) of buildings and sculptures permanently located in public space, but only for non-commercial utilizations.

Reproductions and representations of architectural works and sculptures, permanently placed on public roads, carried out by natural persons, to the exclusion of any commercial use." --YtoSu (talk) 16:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - Deletion requests are not votes. If no additional comments have been made (and indeed one notes no !votes supporting retention either), the closing admin evaluates the merits of the nomination rationale. Here France indeed does not have sufficiently free FoP provisions. We require use by anyone (i.e., "the reproduction by individuals (not organizations)" is disqualifying) and commercial usage (i.e., "only for non-commercial utilizations" and "to the exclusion of any commercial use" are disqualifying.) Please review this page's instructions ("Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone"), COM:L, and COM:AGF ("User doing vandalism "). Эlcobbola talk 16:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: perElcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mosque faycal.jpg

Bonjour Je veut la restauration de la photo de la mosqué faycal de Conakry. Elle est sous licence libre et sans signature particulier. --Aboubacarkhoraa (talk) 19:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Rough Google translation (literal): Hello I want the restoration of the photo of the faycal mosque of Conakry. It is under free license and without a special signature.
 Oppose: @Aboubacarkhoraa: you must contact the architect or his heir (whoever holds the copyright) and ask for proof of their use of free licensing of their architectural work, preferably through COM:OTRS correspondence. COM:FOP Guinea is clear: no Commons-acceptable freedom of panorama in Guinea. Unless the copyright law there is changed to allow photographic reproductions of copyrighted architecture and sculptures to be used for any purposes, most especially commercially. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:49, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose @Aboubacarkhoraa: Même si la photo est sous une licence dite «libre», la Mosquée elle-même n'est pas et il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en Guinée. En Guinée, le droit d'auteur dure pendant les quarante années civiles à compter de la fin de l'année du décès de l'auteur (c-à-d. l'architecte) dans le cas des arts appliqués (par exemple, œuvres architecturales). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No FoP in Guinea. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Joe Vitale Jr Album Cover Dancing With Shadows 2008.jpg

Greetings, I am a representative of the record label Vari Loud Records as indicated in our screen name. We believe that one of your editors maliciously or erroneously marked several of our files as copyright violations. His name is Yann. We indicated when we uploaded the files that we owned the rights to the images. Not only that but we are the ones who created the files in the first place. We are the record label for Joe Vitale Jr & we purposely posted this material for other users to be able to create possible articles about our artist Joe Vitale Jr. These files have now been deleted and we need them to be restored please.

Our team has also contacted Yann and requested him to reverse this on his side as well.

In this particular instance File:Joe Vitale Jr Album Cover Dancing With Shadows 2008.jpg

We will be requesting all other files (3 of them) to be undeleted.

File:Joe Vitale Jr Album Cover Jingle Jingle 2010.jpg File:Joe Vitale Jr Album Cover Dancing With Shadows 2008.jpg File:Joe Vitale Jr Album Cover Talk To Me 2011.jpg

Thank you for your time, Vari Loud Records Marketing Team

www.variloudrecords.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by VariLoudRecords (talk • contribs) 02:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @VariLoudRecords: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission and there is no other valid rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Joe Vitale Jr Album Cover Jingle Jingle 2010.jpg

Greetings, I am a representative of the record label Vari Loud Records as indicated in our screen name. We believe that one of your editors maliciously or erroneously marked several of our files as copyright violations. His name is Yann. We indicated when we uploaded the files that we owned the rights to the images. Not only that but we are the ones who created the files in the first place. We are the record label for Joe Vitale Jr & we purposely posted this material for other users to be able to create possible articles about our artist Joe Vitale Jr. These files have now been deleted and we need them to be restored please.

Our team has also contacted Yann and requested him to reverse this on his side as well.

In this particular instance Joe Vitale Jr Album Cover Jingle Jingle 2010.jpg

We will be requesting all other files (3 of them) to be undeleted.

File:Joe Vitale Jr Album Cover Jingle Jingle 2010.jpg File:Joe Vitale Jr Album Cover Dancing With Shadows 2008.jpg File:Joe Vitale Jr Album Cover Talk To Me 2011.jpg

Thank you for your time, Vari Loud Records Marketing Team

www.variloudrecords.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by VariLoudRecords (talk • contribs) 02:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @VariLoudRecords: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission and there is no other valid rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:12, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Работы Ереминой плакат.jpg

Прошу восстановить данный файл по следующим причинам. 1. Файл является графическим изображением работы художника Ереминой Т.А. о котором была создана статья; 2. Без возможности использования работ художника, делает стью безсмысленным; 3. Большинство работ этого художника находятся в свободном доступе; 4. Данная статья была размешена с использованием личного архива художника, использование материалов было согласовано с правообладателями наследия данного автора. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Саша 4х4 (talk • contribs) 17:49, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. Посмотрите на COM:OTRS, пожалуйста. Нам нужно письменное согласие правообладателей на свободную публикацию работ. rubin16 (talk) 18:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Rubin16. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Книга Стальное колечко.jpg

Прошу восстановить данный файл, так как он является неотъемлемой частью информации о художники, о котором создана статья. Ни какие права при размещение не были нарушены. Фотографии данной книги находятся в свободном доступе. А информация о художники размещалась с разрешения правообладателей его наследия. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Саша 4х4 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. Посмотрите на COM:OTRS, пожалуйста. Нам нужно письменное согласие правообладателей на свободную публикацию работ. rubin16 (talk) 18:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Rubin16. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Juan R. de la Cruz.jpg

I'd like to request the Juan R. de la Cruz.jpg file to be undeleted. There is no living author of this photograph, and since the person portraited is a relative of mine (and I am his only living descendant) then I should be able to post it. I don't understand why bots keep deleting it. I've stated before is was an unknown photographer from almost 100 years ago who took the picture. --Familiaresrdz1 (talk) 22:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - This is not how copyright works. Copyright initially vests in the author (here, photographer) and does not transfer but through written conveyance. Further, inheritance (perhaps implied by "I am his only living descendant") generally also requires written conveyance with specific attribution of the IP and, absent the aforementioned transfer, would be to the photographer's heirs, not the subject's. You claimed yourself to be the author, which you now acknowledge to have been an untruth ("was an unknown photographer"). You also claimed this photograph to be dated around 1950, which is not "almost 100 years ago" and at 71 years old (2021 - 1950) is well short of our 120 year threshold for public domain assumptions with unknown authors. Эlcobbola talk 23:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)


Thank you for clearing this up for me. If I made any wrong assumption I now apologize. However, to conclude: am I not able to use this photograph then? Although I have the physical image and the portrayed is my late direct relative? Or am I supposed to wait years to be able to use it? I'd also like to clarify that What I meant by "almost 100 years ago" is that he/she (the photographer) was born about 100 years ago as well as my relative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Familiaresrdz1 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Atlantic Denture Clinic (2).jpg

I was given written permission from the photographer, Elizabeth Pepler Amoud to upload this image to the wikimedia commons and to use it on wikipedia. She had taken the pictures herself and posted them originally via Facebook.

<gallery> Permission_from_Elizabeth_Pepler_(Amoud).png|Screenshot of written permission to me. </gallery>

--Darkman042 (talk) 00:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. No evidence of a free licence. @Darkman042: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission and there is no other valid rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Atlantic Denture Clinic (3).jpg

I was given written permission from the photographer, Elizabeth Pepler Amoud to upload this image to the wikimedia commons and to use it on wikipedia. She had taken the pictures herself and posted them originally via Facebook.

<gallery> Permission_from_Elizabeth_Pepler_(Amoud).png|Screenshot of written permission to me. </gallery>

--Darkman042 (talk) 00:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. No evidence of a free licence. @Darkman042: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission and there is no other valid rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Atlantic Denture Clinic (1).jpg

I was given written permission from the photographer, Elizabeth Pepler Amoud to upload this image to the wikimedia commons and to use it on wikipedia. She had taken the pictures herself and posted them originally via Facebook.

<gallery> Permission_from_Elizabeth_Pepler_(Amoud).png|Screenshot of written permission to me. </gallery>

--Darkman042 (talk) 00:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. No evidence of a free licence. @Darkman042: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission and there is no other valid rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Elerria-hemeroteka.jpg is CC-BY-SA

Hi, @Patrick Rogel, Explicit, Eniisi Lisika, and Theklan: this image was deleted. It seems that the argument for deletion was the following: "Again, Egunkaria is not within the material covered by Berria.eus CC license: "Baldintza horiek ondoko salbuespenak dituzte: ez diete eragingo EFE eta Argazki Press agentzietatik datozen edukiei eta Euskal Editorea ez den beste enpresa batzuetatik datozenei." Patrick Rogel (eztabaida) 08:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC). But there is no doubt about it, all the contents of the hemeroteque of the "Euskaldunon Egunkaria" (or "Egunkaria") are covered by Berria.eus CC license. You can verify it in the webpage of this image, in the homepage of the Egunkaria's Hemeroteque or even in the homepage of berria.eus where Egunkaria's Hemeroteque is included). You can read a similar discussion resolved in 2020 here: File:Koldo_Losada_Manolto_GafotasEgunkaria2000.jpg. Eleria was a journal in Basque about Law, Surviving is difficult for scientific journals in minority languages. with this image I wanted to recognize the effort made by a group of university professors to create and maintain this magazine from 1996 to 2003. Please, tell me if I need to send you further explanations. Ksarasola (talk) 17:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@Ksarasola: Indeed, the content is covered by the cc-by-sa license, except the images from other media outlets included in the newspaper, that in some cases may be considered de minimis. -Theklan (talk) 20:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
@Ksarasola: Would you reupload the page with the image removed? Ankry (talk) 23:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done the photo on this page is not COM:DM. Ankry (talk) 08:43, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Director Selvendran during the latest shoot

Hi Team,

I was creating my page and testing my page. I was unable to edit my Title and so I have re-created my page with my name. (From Director Selvendran to Selvendran).

So, i'm requesting for undeletion of my page. Now my entire content available on sandbox is ready to use and publish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selvendran.selva85 (talk • contribs) 14:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. @Selvendran.selva85: Your draft en:Selvendran (and its duplicate en:Draft:Selvendran) has declined twice, and deleted twice by administrators over at English Wikipedia. Therefore, the files are out of project scope and, additionally, are copyright violations (Please note: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights.). Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:06, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:"Profilo Image of Renato Novara".jpg

Buonasera, con la presente, richiedo il ripristino del file in quanto fornitomi dallo stesso Renato Novara, attore e doppiatore, con la specifica di rendere più completa la pagina Wikipedia a lui dedicata. In caso di necessità di una dichiarazione scritta da parte di Renato Novara vi prego di counicarmelo. --CrisTheTuber (talk) 22:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Lunedì 22/03/2021

Cristiano Paglionico

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone.

@CrisTheTuber: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights.)

For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:16, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Angelo Vermeulen at KAdE Amersfoort.jpg

I had previously deleted it myself as I am the owner of the picture. However, I would like to use the photo now for the Wikipedia page of Angelo Vermeulen, so I would like to request undeletion.

Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YourBestFriend3000 (talk • contribs) 22:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

  • @YourBestFriend3000: According to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Angelo Vermeulen at KAdE Amersfoort.jpg, the deletion request was not initiated at your request. The rationale for deletion was “Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. Commons:Derivative works from photos.” Ownership of a picture does not equate holding the copyright. With regards to this image, there are multiple copyrights in question:

        (1) that of the photographer of the picture
        (2) those of the creator of the works depicted (the photographer or artist of the works hanging on the wall).

    For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holders must send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission and there is no other valid rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:26, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Korkishko Victor.jpg

This image of Victor Korkishko was provided by his widow Ekaterina Korkishko few months ago when I was collecting data for the article about this scientist. It may appear also in his published books. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leonid Rosca (talk • contribs) 10:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close, file has never been deleted. Thuresson (talk) 14:55, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:History HD Logo.svg and File:History Logo.svg

As per the file history of the first image, it appears to have been restored once before, and appears to have now been deleted without proper discussion. The lack of discussion similarly applies to the second file. The logo originates in the United States, which has a rather broad threshold of originality, where gradients and 3D effects do not add to the complexity of the image. Other than that, it's a simple "H" letter, similar to File:HistoriaHD Logo 2015.png. Fry1989 eh? 16:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Pinging @EugeneZelenko --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
    Logo seems non-trivial for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
    Based upon what reasoning? Fry1989 eh? 15:55, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
    @Fry1989:  Info Per policy, it is up to the requester to provide evidence that the image is free. However almost all TOO based decisions are very subjective unless there is a court case applying to this particular image. IMO, the logo is below US TOO as PD-shape applies to any part of the logo that is not clear PD-text. So  Support undeletion. Especially, as {{Speedy}} should not be applied to a file that has already been undeleted. Ankry (talk) 08:52, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
EugeneZelenko deleted it as non-trivial. Whether they were aware of the previous restoration or not is unclear, but they have repeated that viewpoint here, and I would simply like to know why. I've already explained the US copyright situation, which you appear to agree with. Fry1989 eh? 16:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Regular discussion opened at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:History Channel @Fry1989, EugeneZelenko, and Ankry: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:10, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:shotokan karate easiest way to get Black Belt.jpg

Please undelete my photo "Shotokan Karate easiest way to get Black Belt " as this is my own photo and I have it's copyrights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prdp777 (talk • contribs) 05:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

@Prdp777: As the photo has been published on the book cover, you need to follow COM:OTRS. Ankry (talk) 08:37, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. Furthermore, the file was not deleted only for copyright reasons, but per COM:ADVERT and per COM:SCOPE. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1XBet-1.jpg

This was released by the Bryansk police department, to the general public. As such it is freely available and posted all over the internet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wukiki (talk • contribs) 16:30, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Pinging @Alex Spade for comment. @Alex Spade: Would {{PD-RU-exempt}} apply? The work (pictures of the three individuals) can be seen here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:08, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
    • This is not PD-RU-exempt. Alex Spade (talk) 08:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
      • @Wukiki: then what is legal basis making this not copyrighted? Freely available is not a synonim for public domain nor for freely licensed. Every photo is copyrighted unless an exception in copyright law applies. Ankry (talk) 08:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC) Ankry (talk) 08:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Iván Duque Márquez - Presidente.jpg

This picture comes directly from the Office of the President of Colombia, it is the official picture that should be used in his Wikipedia article

The picture that is currently on Iván Duque´s article is not a dignified take of the President of Colombia. President Duque himself has requested that File:Iván Duque Márquez - Presidente.jpg be used instead, as this is his official presidential picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sr Justicia (talk • contribs) 15:53, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose It is not the president's call to decide about a Wikipedia article. Copyright owner is professional photographer Nicolas Galeano, nicolasgaleano.com. Thuresson (talk) 20:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:03, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Old UCH Building.jpg

This is my image and was given to me to use by the university. I work for the university and attended as a student. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FirstPrezzzz1776 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - This is not coherent. If you were the author, as you purported and as you claim here, how is it that you needed to receive it from another party? Being a student and/or employee of a university does not confer the ability to license the univerity's intellectual property. Previously published images require COM:OTRS evidence of permission. Эlcobbola talk 02:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A_Miliaresion_of_Theophilos.jpg

I request undeletion of File:A Miliaresion of Theophilos.jpg. This file was sourced from Classic Numismatics Group, Inc., who state under their Terms of Use (https://cngcoins.com/Terms+of+Use.aspx) "The content of the Site may be used as a shopping and educational resource." emphasis mine. Since I would constitute Wikipedia being an educational resource (and since CNG numismatic images are used elsewhere on Wikipedia), I think that this should be restored. Sadly, I forgot to include the license info there by mistake which is why it was removed. Ambarenya13 (talk) 02:44, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - The very next sentence is " Any other use of the Site, including the reproduction, modification, distribution, transmission or display of the content, is strictly prohibited." (underline added) We require use for any purpose (not limited to shopping and education); we require that the creation and publication of derivatives be allowed; and we require the license to be perpetual/irrevocable (this appears absent from the terms of use.) Эlcobbola talk 02:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

Richiedo di reinserire l'immagine "Apologia di un destino comune" in quanto proprietario della stessa immagine. Cordiali saluti — Preceding unsigned comment added by Music079170 (talk • contribs) 11:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Music079170: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission and there is no other valid rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:GoodBarber Logo.png

Would you please undelete that file which is not under any copyrights restrictions and free available on the web and on Website owner at the address https://www.goodbarber.com/press/kit/ Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fsalati (talk • contribs) 13:27, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplised here. File not deleted as of 14:42, 24 March 2021 (UTC). However, no evidence of free licence at source. In fact, there is a clear notice of "© 2021 GoodBarber - Made in Corsica" at the source, and sections 5.19 and 7.2 of their terms restricts any reuse. Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. @Fsalati: If you seek to challenge the nomination for speedy deletion of the file, please open a regular deletion discussion by following the instructions on the tag located on the file description page or at COM:DR. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:42, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Kumy (talk) 17:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Since the uploaded files were proposed for deletion, I've contacted France Tv group asking their consent to publish their logo on wikimedia. The files we in the meantime deleted. Today, I've received written consent. 

Bonjour Monsieur xxx,

Tout d'abord je tiens à vous faire part de nos excuses pour le délai de réponse.

J'ai le plaisir de vous informer que vous êtes autorisé à publier nos derniers logos sous réverve que vous précisiez clairement sur votre site que l’utilisation de ces logos est soumis à accord préalable du groupe France Télévisions.

Je reste à votre disposition pour toute autre information et vous souhaite un bon week-end.

Cordialement,
---
Hello Mr. xxxx,

First of all I would like to express our apologies for the delay in responding.

I am pleased to inform you that you are authorized to publish our latest logos under the reminder that you clearly specify on your site that the use of these logos is subject to the prior agreement of the France Télévisions group.

I remain at your disposal for any other information and wish you a good weekend.

Regards,

Is it possible to undelete the following files please?

 Support if an evidence of COM:SCOPE is provided (where the images will be used in Wikimedia?) as the images are clearly {{PD-shape}} and ineligible for copyright. Note: copyright info/licensing template is required here for ANY image. Ankry (talk) 22:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 14:45, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Twitter Administrative Panel July 2020.png

Closing admin said "unclear copyright status" but software interface screenshot was ineligible for copyright. Opencooper (talk) 21:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

@Opencooper: Have you any new arguments that you wish to present in the DR if it is reopened? We cannot override community decisions here. Ankry (talk) 22:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: The argument is that the closing admin did not use proper judgement here. The arguments made were in favor of keeping. Opencooper (talk) 02:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 Support reopenning the DR. Closing it by an uninvolved admin may be fair. Ankry (talk) 08:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deletion requests are not simply closed based on consensus when it comes to copyright matters, but also based on the closers knowledge of copyright law and their interpretations of it. Even if everyone in the DR would say "keep" on a DR, if it were a clear copyvio, the admin would be well within their right to delete it, regardless of consensus. In this case, I wish to second the closing admin's decision. The elements in the image might not be above TOO by themself, but the elements put together like in this file might push it above TOO, and due to official Commons policy we err on the side of caution. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
I think this clarifies the deletion rationale so closing this case as

 Not done per Jonatan. Ankry (talk) 14:31, 25 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Stack of bills bath 2020-01-03.jpg

This CG does not correspond to the reason for deletion "CSD G1 (test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content)". A naked rich man and young girls in a bath tub filled with stacks of bills is one of the typical advertising images in Japan, used for fortune amulets. Most of Japanese (especially male) know it and the Japanese article "ja:札束風呂" (literally, "A bath filled with stacks of bills") has been maintained for that pictorial stereotype. This CG shows typical style of the image and will be helpful for readers. -- Asanagi (talk) 13:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

@Túrelio: pinging the deleting admin. Ankry (talk) 14:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 Support per no complaints from the deleting admin unless there is a copyright doubt. Can be used, so in scope. Ankry (talk) 08:40, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Supplementary information: This CG was put on the article on 2020-01-03[8] and since then over 9,500 visitors saw it[9] but nobody made any objection to this CG for 14 months. -- Asanagi (talk) 12:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done in scope. However, it can be considered a screenshot or a DW of non-free content. Please, nominate for deletion or delete if it is obvious copyvio. Ankry (talk) 15:08, 25 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Girra west village - North Sudan 1.jpg

https://photos.google.com/?tab=rq&pageId=none&pli=1
الصور التي قمت بحذفها لاتخرق حقوق النشر بل الآخرين من سرقوها وهي مرفوعه في برنامج بانوراميو عام 2008 والذي تم ايقافه فيما بعد
ومعها صور أخرى في عام 2007 ايضا رشحت للحذف وبدون مناقشه

--معاويه عبد الكريم (talk) 11:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

@معاويه عبد الكريم: I see no free license for the image on the abovementioned page. Per policy, if an image has already been published elsewhere without evidence of free license, the copyright holder needs to follow COM:OTRS process. Also, we cannot host an image if there is a doubt who the copyright holder is until the doubt is resolved (eg. in a court). Ankry (talk) 15:35, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Opera bastille.JPG

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Photos were deleted because "no FOP in France". However, according to the note at Category:Opéra Bastille, this can be freely photographed as "parmi les monuments récents seul l’Opéra de la Bastille peut être librement photographié. L’architecte [...] l’ayant souhaité libre de droits" ("among recent monuments only the Opéra Bastille can be freely photographed because the architect had wished it to be copyleft"). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:24, 25 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fred Colantonio en 2015.jpg

We got an OTRS permission with Ticket:2021032310007664. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

@Mussklprozz: Temporarily undeleted. Thuresson (talk) 21:57, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
@Thuresson: Thanks. IMO the permission is okay. I have put the OTRS permission tag. --Mussklprozz (talk) 12:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg Yani adamı az araştırırsanız bence siz de geri alırsınız

Adam Yüzlerce eseri düzenlemiş.Türkiye,Irak,Suriye,İran,Lübnan,Rüsya,Amerika hatta İsrail'e bile müzik yapıyor —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.104.99.23 (talk) 01:07, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No file(s) listed for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:09, 25 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Second Mistress of Mountains and Forests - Cô Đôi Thượng Ngàn.jpg

The file was deleted because "No OTRS permission for 30 days". I would like to update that I indeed have the permission to upload the file. I commissioned an artist for a series of paintings (including this) and already sent the agreement to an OTRS member. The system is quite complicated to me. I know this is my fault and I hope there is anyway I can prove that I have the permission. If you need me the send the contract again, please inform me how to do it and to whom I should send. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riolam (talk • contribs) 08:04, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission(s) and there is no other rationale for undeletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:29, 25 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Berlinskie widoki-Okładka.jpg

We have an ORTS permission with Ticket:2021032310009181. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 12:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done per OTRS agent request. @Mussklprozz: FYI Ankry (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:130404 A1PlakateBallett Digitaldruck RZ X3 Seite 1(2).jpg

Can someone please restore that one, maybe temporarily? We got a permission with Ticket:2021030310007531. It contained other works of the same photographer. Maybe I just missed to put the permission tag into this one. --Mussklprozz (talk) 13:54, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Mussklprozz: Please, verify the permission. Ankry (talk) 14:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:Logos of Mass Transit Railway (MTR) Hong Kong

According to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of Mass Transit Railway (MTR) Hong Kong, some logos of Mass Transit Railway (MTR) Hong Kong have been deleted as above COM:TOO Hong Kong. This may affect many other photos in Category:MTR Hong Kong containing the logos, they may be subject to deletion. Therefore to be cautious, I'd like to ask for a review for this deletion request. If the decision is not to restore the files, I'll notify editors and photographers in Chinese Wikipedia to pay attention and prevent uploading photos containing MTR logos. Thank you. --Baycrest (Talk) 14:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done not an undeletion request. Other requests should go to appropriave venues; likely to COM:VPC in this case. Ankry (talk) 14:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tomasz-Bonek.jpg

File:Tomasz-Bonek.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 31.0.88.44 (talk) 14:15, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Ankry (talk) 14:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. Additionally, there is no valid rationale for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Charlie Crist Football Wake Forest 1974-75 Season.jpg

Hi there - I recently received authorization from the owner of the image to use the photograph. All they ask is that it states “Used with the permission of Wake Forest University” when it is republished. I am happy to share proof of authorization separately. Please let me know if this is enough to get the image back up. Thank you. --SamRamirezQ (talk) 15:38, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @SamRamirezQ: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission and there is no other valid rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:59, 25 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Trump Statue.webm

== [[File:Trump Statue.webm|thumb|Statue chroming process]] ==

I have authorization to use the file --Superfaces (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Superfaces: "I have authorization to use the file" is insufficient per Commons' licensing policy. Furthermore, there are at minimum 2 copyrights here: (1) that of the artist that created the statue or its design and (2) of the videographer. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holders must send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission and there is no other valid rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dom cedula 2014 minor.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Please undelete so the file can be transferred as fair use content to en.wikipedia.org, where it was originally uploaded. I believe this would be allowed under the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content_criteria to "Illustrate the current design of the Dominican Republic Cédula de Identidad y Electoral for the purpose of identification." Unlobito (talk) 11:09, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Unlobito: FYI. Ankry (talk) 15:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: File migrated. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sdq boletoviajero.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Please undelete so the file can be transferred as fair use content to en.wikipedia.org, where it was originally uploaded. I believe this would be allowed under the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content_criteria to "Illustrate the current design of the Santo Domingo Boleto Viajero smartcard for the purpose of identification." Unlobito (talk) 11:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Unlobito: FYI. Ankry (talk) 15:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: File migrated. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:electronicdesigncover-jul-aug-2020.png

I think I set up the licensing incorrectly. It is on par with File:EDN_(magazine_cover).jpg. I am the editor the Electronic Design (magazine) where this image will be used. It is a low res version of the a cover page for one issue being used as an example of the publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Devprogrammer789 (talk • contribs) 02:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Please use COM:OTRS to lodge permissions. Despite your declaration no-one knows who you are. Commons is not Wikipedia, and has very different rules. Timtrent (talk) 14:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Angel horseman.jpg File:Hovhanness John Babakhanyan.jpg File:Officer Barrel From "Urinetown".jpg File:Hovik's portrait.jpeg File:Hov n.jpg File:Hovik o.jpg File:HovikB.jpg

Hello,

I would like to request undeletion for the following files

File:Angel horseman.jpg File:Hovhanness John Babakhanyan.jpg File:Officer Barrel From "Urinetown".jpg File:Hovik's portrait.jpeg File:Hov n.jpg File:Hovik o.jpg File:HovikB.jpg

The reason being that the pictures above are not copyrighted, and so they belong in creative commons. Thank you

Best, Hbabakhanyan

--Hbabakhanyan (talk) 06:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Why would these pictures not be copyrighted? --rimshottalk 15:39, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose @Hbabakhanyan There is no such thing as 'not copyright'. There may be correct licensing, but all material is copyright, even though the copyright may have expired after a period.. Please use Commons:OTRS to show that permission has been released by the holder or give a better explanation of what you mean Timtrent (talk) 20:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:caratula.jpg

With Ticket:2021032410000105 we have something which is possibly a valid permission, but considering the long history of this file in the delete log, I am distrustful. Can someone please have a look at it and tell me their opinion, or possibly temporarily restore? Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 07:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alabama License Plate Pike County 2017 55BC577.png

I am unsure about this particular file, but I am very concerned about the other uploads by the user having been deleted. As per a conversation with the knowledgeable seeming @Jmabel: here, standard license plates do not meet the threshold of originality. See Commons:TOO. Perhaps {{PD-textlogo|type=license plates}} should be applied to all license plates that are ok?

That said, it is quite possible that this user's uploads were all taken from elsewhere (the pattern fits), but leaving them all deleted for the wrong reason opens the door to future purges of license plates. Thank you, mr.choppers (talk)-en- 16:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Numbers and letters are not copyrighted but Alabama license plates since 2014 are issued with a lake and forest graphic, alabama.gov. Thuresson (talk) 23:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
@Mattbuck:  ? Ankry (talk) 23:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Here are the user (Gojira91's) other uploads:

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:06, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Looking through the deleted files. I'm inclined to agree with the deletion. Plates that include complex graphics would normally be protected under copyright, unless they're from a state that releases official works into the public domain. Even then, only if it was an official work of a government employee, or if there was a contract explicitly transferring ownership of the intellectual property. I don't know that most states keep artists on staff to make plates, or are copyright savvy enough to contractually transfer the IP, and even if they did/were, it may be near impossible to verify. GMGtalk 12:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Per above. Furthermore, even if they were by a state government employee, and, unlike those of the federal government, works of a US state government is not automatically in the public domain. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

Hi please undelete this. As I want to share this with my fans and they search for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramizking (talk • contribs) 16:52, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close. No deleted file requested for undeletion. Thuresson (talk) 21:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cirilo J. Guzmán Abogado dominicano.jpg

Hello, I have authorization from the person who appears in this photograph. I do not know why they have erased it. --Guaigui (talk) 17:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

@Guaigui: While permission from the subject is important, the one requested here is a free license permission from the photographer. And we need an evidence that it has been granted. Especially as the image is widely used without such declaration. Note also, that claiming authorship to somebody else's work (photo) is against Wikimedia Commons policies and illegal. Ankry (talk) 23:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Afrodita-teplohod-Mojka 01.jpg

Не согласен с удалением фото. Изображение сделано судоходной компанией (владельцем данного судна). Получено согласие на размещение фото. — Preceding unsigned comment added by D.datsky (talk • contribs) 10:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC) I do not agree with the deletion of the photo. The image was made by the shipping company (the owner of this vessel). Consent to post the photo was obtained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by D.datsky (talk • contribs) 10:55, 27 March 2021 (UTC) D.datsky (talk) 13:00, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @D.datsky: "Consent to post the photo was obtained" is insufficient per Commons' licensing policy. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission and there is no other valid rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Afrodita-teplohod-Mojka 02.jpg

Please Undelete file, this is my photo, i want to share it — Preceding unsigned comment added by D.datsky (talk • contribs) 12:57, 27 March 2021 (UTC) D.datsky (talk) 13:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: procedural close. file not deleted as of 15:14, 27 March 2021 (UTC). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:14, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Afrodita-teplohod-Mojka 03.jpg

Please undelete, this is my photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by D.datsky (talk • contribs) 12:58, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @D.datsky: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission and there is no other valid rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Afrodita-teplohod-Mojka 04.jpg

Please undelete, this is my photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by D.datsky (talk • contribs) 12:58, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: procedural close. file not deleted as of 15:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Reopenning: file already deleted. @D.datsky: However claiming that User:D.datsky, Судоходная компания "Теплоход СПб", Dmitry Saynov and Natalia Litvinova are the same person sounds highly unreliable and needs to be proven. Providing false or incorrect claims is against policy makes all your other statements unreliable. Ankry (talk) 15:22, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

@Ankry: Dmitry Saynov and Natalia Litvinova are the photographers who took these photos for the company Teplokhod SPB D.datsky (talk) 15:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

This does not make the company the author. Authorship is not transferable. And if copyright has been transferred, we need an evidence of this. It can be provided by the copyright holder together with a free license permissions following COM:OTRS instructions. If you provide a photo that is not made and owned personally by you, you need to provide license evidence in the permission field while uploading. Ankry (talk) 15:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @D.datsky: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under an accepted free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded statements or proxy permissions for legal reasons. Once OTRS has determined to have receive sufficient permission and there is no other valid rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:00, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Crop spraying - geograph.org.uk - 636226.jpg

Despite its low quality, this photo can be a useful illustration of the local countryside and farming practices. Considering it was taken abut 18 years ago, it may even have some historical significance. --Schlosser67 (talk) 09:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

{{S}} reopenning the DR. Ankry (talk) 23:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
After looking more carefully at the photo of a field with a small blurry tractor in the distance, I cannot imagine how can it illustrate farming practices. IMO, the photo could be made anywhere in the world and almost at any time. @Schlosser67: Do you wish to use the photo somewhere? Where exactly? Ankry (talk) 14:58, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: no response to query. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Etnie.jpg

The file has been published by the Nation Bureau of Statistics of the Republic of Moldova ("Ethnicity by district") and consequently is licensed under CC-BY 4.0, as indicated in Terms of Use. Anonimu (talk) 13:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

 Support per above; source needs to be fixed. @Anonimu: You need to provide a link to the appropriate site licensing page in the "Permission" field in such cases. And the licensing info must correspond with the source. License info is also required: at the upload or just a minute later. Ankry (talk) 08:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
I am not the original uploader. I wanted to upload it anew and the system detected it as a previously deleted image. I will add required attribution, permission and licensing no later than one day after the file is undeleted.Anonimu (talk) 19:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done per request. Ankry (talk) 16:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello, thank you very much for answering. Tell me what you need me to provide and how I can get it to you. I gladly do that errand.

Thanks.--Guaigui (talk) 22:25, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Jbulogo.jpg

The file was deleted due to copyright issues. I changed the file information yesterday. I'm sorry, I forgot to use the right information when I uploaded it. I'm employed at the organisation from the logo so I have permission to use it. Yours sincerely, Lucelshout (talk) 18:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

@Lucelshout: Permission "to use" is not the same as the right to grant a license. The latter is restricted to the exclusive copyright holder. Please note, that for any image alredy published elsewhere we need an evidence of free license. A free license permission may provided following COM:OTRS process if it is nit available in public records. Ankry (talk) 23:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello, thank you very much for answering. Tell me what you need me to provide and how I can get it to you. I gladly do that errand.

Thanks. --Guaigui (talk) 22:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Seal of Badji Mokhtar Annaba University.png

The Seal of Badji Mokhtar Annaba University is a free content and is not subject to any copyright. --Université Badji Mokhtar - Annaba (talk) 10:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

@Université Badji Mokhtar - Annaba: This contradicts your claim at upload that it is copyrighted personally by you. Note also that using an organization name as user name is against Wikimedia Commons policy. User names are considered personal, especially if the users claim to be an author of a work (an author needs to be a human). Ankry (talk) 15:37, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:00, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Justice Natwarlal Harilal Bhagwati.jpg

This is clearly from the gov India hence public domain Germartin1 (talk) 04:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

  • @Germartin1: Why do you believe that the photo is in the public domain? Per COM:India, government works are copyrighted under Indian copyright law for a duration of 60 years after publication, and photos are generally protected for 50 years after creation. Additionally, U.S. law applies on Commons. If a pre-1978 work was under copyright in the source country on 1 January 1996, then the work is protected protected for 95 years after the date of first publication. Let's say the image was created and first published in 1952, then, while, yes, the image is in the public domain in India as of either 2002 or 2012, the image is still copyrighted in the United States until the end of 2047 (i.e. U.S. copyright protections will expire on 1 January 2048). So  Oppose undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Not done. Since it was uploaded as the uploader's own work it is not obviously a work by the government of India. Deleted after Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sid54126. Thuresson (talk) 15:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Artwork of Amy Karle

Can those two please be restored:

We have a permission from the artist with Ticket:2021032410013511.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:24, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

@Mussklprozz: Temporarily undeleted. Thuresson (talk) 13:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
@Thuresson: Thanks! Permission is valid IMO. I have added the permission tag and removed the Temporarily undeleted tag. Cheers, --Mussklprozz (talk) 18:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fran Kapilla.jpg

Hola he visto que has borrado la imagen de wikimedia commons de Fran Kapilla. La imagen fue realizada en 2011 con una cámara Nikon D3200 de la propiedad del autor Fran Kapilla y desde esa fecha ha estado colocada en el artículo. Dígame por favor qué necesita para corroborar autoría y procedencia para restablecerla, gracias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aryekaix (talk • contribs) 16:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

@Aryekaix: The description contains inconsistent authorship information which cannot be verified on-wiki. Also providing a 0.1Mpx photo made using a 24Mpx camera constitutes doubt about authorship. As many users simply copies photos taken from various sites, we need an evidence that this one was not. These doubts can be resolved through COM:OTRS. Ankry (talk) 22:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: perAnkry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:37, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ayeza Khan.jpg

PLease Undelete this file as it is available on Flickr

Url : https://www.flickr.com/photos/143355431@N05/27406983490/in/photolist-J4TKqn-HKRXm7 Rights: Commercial use & mods allowed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fa8479 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - Please review COM:LL. Image appeared here April 2015, well before June 2016 Flickr upload. (If the 320x322 resolution on Flickr didn't betray the image as a copyvio, the date in the Flickr EXIF of June 2015 is a demonstrable fabrication per the April 2015 appearance elsewhere.) Эlcobbola talk 23:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:37, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:被遺忘的勤王護國功臣 陳鞠旅將軍.pdf

Dear Editors:

This pdf file is a history account of a forgotten general in Chinese armies during World War II against Japanese invasion and the internal civil war afterwards. His contribution to defending the Republic of China is evidenced by the rewords, citation and medals attached in the file. History is a part of education and this article certainly serves the educational purpose. This article is written in Chinese for all public who can read Chinese. This general died in a POW camp in PRC after his army defeated in 1049. His last words delivered to his army when he summoned all officers above ranks of company commanders were " A general in a lost battle could not claim bravery, but soldiers certainly can", " The path to serve your country is interrupted, but the roads to take care of your parents are wide open"

If this is not educational, what else could be.

Thanks you for your attention and wish you could read Chinese to comprehend the content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 陳建民 (talk • contribs) 03:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

If you want to write an article about a subject, please write an article in Wikipedia instead. Thuresson (talk) 15:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: File is not in project scope. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:36, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bastien Ughetto en 2021.jpg

L'autrice de la photo a envoyé un mail pour donner son accord à la publication du portrait. File:Bastien Ughetto en 2021.jpg Tout est en droit selon les termes d'usage de Wikipédia pour utiliser le fichier pour représenter l'artiste. Bastuctuc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bastuctuc (talk • contribs) 06:55, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

@Bastuctuc: OTRS ticket number, please. Thuresson (talk) 20:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here @Bastuctuc: Une fois l'OTRS a determiné qu'il ont reçu une autoriasation suffisiante, un(e) agent(e) de l'OTRS effectura ou demandera la restaurantion. Merci de votre compréhension. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bernhard Spalt Wikipedia Wolfgang Zac.jpg

Please restore. We have an OTRS permission with Ticket:2021032810004685. – thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 07:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Has OTRS Ticket. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2021-03&oldid=548338709"