Commons:Deletion requests/2023/11/22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

November 22[edit]

File:Jamia-Millia-Islamia.jpg[edit]

Personal promotion ThePoeticFrame (talk) 18:51, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Delete or maybe just speedy. The image reveals some personal information but what is at en:User:Cricketmayank/sandbox suggests self-promotion. Irony that this image has remained "unseen" for last six years. Thank you ThePoeticFrame for patrolling stuff related to Jamia Millia Islamia. ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mario-Figure.jpg[edit]

Violation of COM:TOYS. (Oinkers42) (talk) 00:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Phenomena logo.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logoancora.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Seguroc logo.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:LOGO REDES-SOCIALES2.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Caliadadwebrg.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no usage (does not appear related to the notable entertainment company) Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:FEMASPORT.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ADS-UPGOAL-POST-20221220 134557.webp[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:CJP-FGV.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Textotevel.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logotevel.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Okifa Consulting Logo.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo-Rouge-Eurogroup Consulting.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Egc-avatar.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo-Eurogroup-Consulting.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Morawiecki Mateusz w 2023.jpg[edit]

Zdjęcie posiada niewłaściwą licencję, niedozwolone jest użycie komercyjne. "materiały zamieszczone w SIS, w szczególności transmisje bieżące oraz materiały archiwalne realizowane przez iTV Sejm, nie mogą być elementem komercyjnej oferty żadnej agencji, stacji telewizyjnej, portalu ani innego podmiotu" [1] Mateusz.ns (talk) 00:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cirem Consulting.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ABCoS.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Global Consulting Partners.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Primal Ape Consulting Logo.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Opset logo png cropped.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside wikidata Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Opset logo rajattu.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo blanco chico.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo menor.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nuevo Logo de Grido Claro.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nuevo Logo 2021 Grido Oscuro.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo Netronix Colombia.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Netronix Logo.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:LOGO SGIT.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:54cuatroRM.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sgit logo.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo Alteo.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jignov.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MECOSUN.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Universitätsbibliothek Basel[edit]

The architect of the library is Otto Senn who died in 1993, interior spaces are not included in FoP-Switzerland. And Switzerland has a standard of life plus 70 years. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Switzerland. I suggest to undelete in 2064. Some interior views I did not nominate for deletion as I did not really see something architectonical special in it, but if someone does, I suggest for them to do an additional DR.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This part of the library dates from the 19th century and is not from Otto Senn. Therefore it would be wrong to delete this picture. Hadi (talk) 13:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Besides that some of these images, e.g. File:UniversitätsbibliothekBasel-Freihandarchiv.jpg and File:UniversitätsbibliothekBasel-FreihandarchivTreppe01.jpg don't show any architecture at all. PaterMcFly (talk) 15:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Do yo mean the ones of the Freihandarchiv? That could be, but not the interior view of dome and stairway. Here is an article from 1968 about the building after its inauguration in an architectonic journal with a pretty detailed map that includes the dome and the several learning halls. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Part of my answer concern also the Freihandarchiv because I took a bit longer in my answer. I believe it's good we discuss the files. Here, here and here some DRs where files were deleted with similar rationale that FOP Switzerland is not valid for the interior of buildings. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I don't think there's any reason to delete the interior photos from the open archive (Freihandarchiv). Because this old building was designed by Emanuel La Roche (1863-1922). Therefore, the deletion discussion here is superfluous. [[User:Matutinho|Matutinho]] (talk) 16:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for that @Matutinho, I removed the ones of the Freihandarchiv. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Files in Category:Bronze-Mann[edit]

FOP of Panorama in Germany doesn't allow for temporary works and per the description for these images "A male bronze sculpture was temporarily located under the subway viaduct at Rödingsmarkt in Hamburg's old town." So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 01:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Du verstehst §59 UrhG immer noch nicht? Ich könnte alle Anmerkungen dir gegenüber zum Thema wiederholen, aber ich befürchte es nützt nix. Beschäftige dich doch bitte mal mit dem Wort "bleibend" und seiner Interpretation durch den Bundesgerichtshof, bevor du weiter Fotografen belästigst, die sich immerhalb der deutschen Rechtssprechung bewegen.--Hinnerk11 (talk) 02:10, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have zero clue what your talking about or how its related to the DR. But the statue was clearly meant to be temporary. So this seems like a pretty open and closed case to me. Otherwise it would be cool if you stated why I'm wrong instead of just capitulating about how I'm bothering people or whatever. I can guarantee whomever closes this isn't going to keep the images just because your annoyed by the deletion request. I'm more then willing to have it precedurally closed as keep if you can make an actual arguement though. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:22, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Denk einfach mal darüber nach, wieviel unnötige Zeit Admins auf Commons nun verschwenden müssen, um über Deine unsinnigen Löschanträge zu entscheiden. Wärest Du so korrekt im Einhalten der Regeln hättest Du erstmal geprüft, ob der Künstler dieser Skulptur diese nicht doch zum dauerhaften Verbleib dort aufgestellt hat und somit sehr wohl unter FOP fällt. Diese Skulptur wurde schließlich nicht vom Künstler selbst entfernt sondern sie wurde umgesetzt auf Weisung des zuständigen Bezirksamtes zum Schutz vor Zerstörung durch den dortigen Verkehr und an einem besser geschützten Ort aufgestellt. Und vermutlich zum dauerhaften Verbleib. Wie lange der dauerhafte Verbleib allerdings sein muss spielt dabei keine Rolle.Ich geh mal davon aus, dass Du den Künstler selbst dazu befragt hast bevor Du Deine Löschanträge in Bezug auf diese Skulptur gestellt hast - oder etwa nicht ? Ansonsten solltest Du belegen, dass der Künstler für diese Skulptur von vornherein nur vorübergehend einen öffentlichen Standort gewählt hat, aber ich glaube nicht, dass Du das belegen kannst. Entscheidend ist außerdem nicht der Standort, wo sich eine Skulptur befindet, sondern dass sie geschaffen wurde, um dauerhaft der Öffentlichkeit präsentiert zu werden und nicht nur vorübergehend. Und ansonsten müsstest Du für etliche Bilder, die bei irgendwelchen Ausstellungen entstanden sind ebenso Löschanträge stellen, aber dann wird wohl jedem klar werden, dass Du den Sinn von Wikipedia und ihren Projekten und auch die Deutsche Rechtsprechung nicht verstanden hast. Danke an Hinnerk11. --Pauli-Pirat (talk) 23:21, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Why don't you ask the artist for them to give us permission to host the images on Commons if you care about it that much? Also, this isn't Wikipedia. Nor is it a "Wikipedia project." At least I know what website this is despite all your talk about how ignorant I am lol. Anyway, no one anonymously places a statue on the middle of the sidewalk as some kind of street art project under the assumption that it will be there permanently. Nor is such a work ever permanent either. But again, this could easily be solved by the sculptor giving us premission to host the images. So be my guest and ask them to do it if you care about it so much. Otherwise, you have no argument. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:49, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Files in Category:Volk Ding Zero[edit]

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany "Whether a place is "public" for purposes of § 59(1) does not depend on whether it is public or private property. Instead, the question turns on its actual accessibility, which, according to the prevailing view, needs to be such that one can infer a (sufficient) dedication to the public." In this case the statue is on the fenced off grounds of a museum, which by the virtue of the fencing and fact that it isn't a public street, way, or open space means it isn't "sufficiently" dedicated to the public enough for photographs of it qualify for freedom of panorama. There's also zero evidence these particular ones were taken from the street or another public place. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 02:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  • Ich habe die Aufnahmen "Hamburger Bahnhof - Museum für Gegenwart 01.jpg" bis "Hamburger Bahnhof - Museum für Gegenwart 08.jpg" vom öffentlichen Gehweg vor dem Musuem (52.52764,13.37285) gemacht, um Bilder von öffentlichem Grund nach Panoramafreiheit zu erhalten. Dabei habe ich die Zoom-Funktion der Kamera verwendet. Der Kamera-Standpunkt läßt sich von den tele-perspektivisch typischen Größenverhältnissen der Bildgegenstände (Gebäude, Skulptur, Weg, Pflanzen) berechnen. --C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 07:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I would think that a museum by definition was “dedicated” to the public. A fence to protect it from illegal entrance outside opening hours is a not uncommon sight at museums in Germany and elsewhere, but it does not diminish the public function a museum has. As for possible deletion, I could not care less. But I like precise reasoning, and I think yours is wrong. Dosseman (talk) 10:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I rather not get in a debate about it, but actually generally speaking museums in Germany aren't considered "dedicated" enough to the public for FOP. What we are really talking aabout here though is the outside of the museum and if the grounds around it are "dedicated" to the public enough to be considered something like a public street, way, or public open spaces. At least going by Google Street View the grounds are behind a gate that seems to be locked during the day, or at least it was when the images were taken. So the grounds around the museum inherently can't be an "open public space." To quote the guidelines "private property that cannot be freely accessed, for instance because there is some type of access control in place (or even an entrance fee is charged), does not fall under § 59(1)." It has nothing to do with the opening hours of the museum though. Otherwise museums would qualify for FOP in the first place, which they clearly don't. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Da ich einen Hinweis erhalten habe: Der "Hamburger Bahnhof" (in dem sich heute das Museum befindet) heißt so, weil es der Bahnhof in Berlin war, von dem die Züge nach Hamburg abgefahren sind. Und das Tor, das sich vor dem Gelände des heutigen Museum befindet ist offen während der Öffnungszeiten des Museums (was für meine Bilder aber schon deshalb keine Rolle spielt, weil meine Kameraposition höher war als das Tor.). Während der Schließung während der Covid-Einschränkungen war es zu. --C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 13:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I still don't think it matters since usually gated off areas aren't considered "sufficiently" public enough anyway. If you want an example, there was a DR awhile back having to do with a German school, where the images were deleted because the school had a fence. Obviously schools have opening hours just like museums do, but it doesn't matter. Hence the word "sufficiently." The only exception for fenced off areas seems to be graveyards. But they are an exception for a reason, because in most other cases fenced off areas that are generally closed during none business or otherwise restrict free flow to the public don't qualify for FOP. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Um es noch mal klar zu machen: Ich habe kein Stativ benutzt, keine Drohne, keine Leiter, keinen Stuhl. Ich habe keine Äste abgeschnitten oder weggebogen. Ich habe mit den Schuhen auf öffentlichem Grund gestanden, als ich die Bilder gemacht habe. Dass sich die Kameraposition aus der Perspektive errechnen läßt, habe ich bereits geschrieben. Ich habe noch weitere Bilder von der Front des Hamburger Bahnhofs, die ich noch nicht publiziert habe, aus denen der Kamerastandort aber klar ersichtlich ist. Nimm doch meine Bilder einfach aus dem DR raus, dann ist das alles viel einfacher. C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 13:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It was more a general comment more to do with what you said about the fence probably being locked during COVID then anything having to do with any particular images. Although now that you mention it, I was probably going to remove File:Hamburger Bahnhof - Museum für Gegenwart 08.jpg. But I don't really like the tone. Especially you saying "everything will be much easier" if I do it sounds needlessly threatening. So I think I'll just leave it up to the closing administrator. Although there is someone else photographing the statue from close up in the image already. So I don't know why you wouldn't have done the same thing. But again, I leave it up to whomever closes this to the do the proper calculations of the camera position or whatever to determine if the image should be kept. That's a little out of my area of expertise anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Keep If the images where really taken from the public road, then any fence or similar is irrelevant. Anything visible from a public place is under the FOP rule, it doesn't matter where the object itself is. It's also legal to take pictures of private buildings from public streets. --PaterMcFly (talk) 15:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Die Bilder, die ich gemacht habe, sind von der Straße gemacht - und möglicherweise ein bis drei der anderen. Die übrigen aber sind eindeutig auf dem Gelände des Museums aufgenommen worden. C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 18:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yeah after another look C.Suthorn's probably were taken from the road. Some of the others clearly weren't though. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As my picture clearly was taken from the garden and in view of your remark above " At least going by Google Street View the grounds are behind a gate that seems to be locked during the day, or at least it was when the images were taken" do you think I climbed the fence? I do not recall if I opened a door in the fence (that could bew closed to keep stray dogs out and foir similar practival reasons), but I got into the garden without any trouble, Google notwithstanding. Also PatereMcFly's remark would make (if right) the point a picture was taken from unimportant. So": Keep indeed. Dosseman (talk) 07:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No offense, but your personal experience has nothing to do with if it's a public place or not since it's possible they just opened the fence during the time that you took the photographs, but it's usually closed. The gate can obviously be closed most of the time and you could still have walked on the property to photograph the statue when it happed to be open. They aren't mutually exclusive. Nor would it somehow mean the photographs qualify for FOP just because you were lucky enough to be there when it was open for some reason. Again, the key phrase here is "sufficiently dedicated to the public." --Adamant1 (talk) 07:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Penis, deutsch.jpg[edit]

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


There are so many penis pictures here that are badly photographed. I think a well-photographed picture is necessary and important. Stefan der Schreiberling (talk) 14:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ere.ct 01.jpg[edit]

Random penis photo, nothing special, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Native Fashion? (36668323341).jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Missing (37483508241).jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Jayriggioart (30020939044).jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Drama (30612308171).jpg[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Cheap Advertising (16479146487).jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Mural of woman's neon face (Unsplash).jpg[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:BSX2022 20220905 150909, Poster on SDSC-SHAR.jpg[edit]

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:26 Iyar monument (Anatevka).jpg[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Le Mirabeau.jpg[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Monaco A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Lezgin map RU.png[edit]

Карта не соотвествует реали. Например, вся северная часть Хачмазского района лезгины, а на карте это не отмечено. Тоже самое южные части Дербентского района, где лезгины состовляют около 80-90% также не отмечено. В Кабалинском районе по официальным данным переписи 2009 почти более 15 тыс лезгин, а на карте олно пятно и тд. Переделайте карту или удалите эту не соотвествуюшее действительности карту. 212.154.56.32 03:24, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Претензии надо предъявлять вот этой карте, я всего лишь её перевёл на русский язык. Вы, кстати, можете загрузить новую версию карты, если у вас есть авторитетные источники по ареалам расселения, которые тут не указаны. Soul Train (talk) 07:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dsc Strategy Logo + Text.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dsc Strategy Consulting logo.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The Flag of Oslolulu.png[edit]

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 03:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:HAGER Executive Consulting Logo.svg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo-peru.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:LOGO AQUARIUS 2015.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jimmy20.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ck2024.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside user sandbox Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:BayernetsGmbH-Logo-RGB.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use; last deletion request ended in Delete Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bayburt Haber.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bayburthabercom.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Ham Wafush (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope: plain text, homework assignments.

Omphalographer (talk) 03:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo prime contabilidade 2016.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside abandoned talkpage(?) Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo prime 2016.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo Prime Contabilidade.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Real State Paradisus.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:PlasmarNET.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Plasmarnet-logo.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Headrest dvd player.jpg[edit]

The file is a likely derivative work of the copyright-protected DVD player screen. Filename and Wikipedia usage disqualify de minimis exception. 107.134.86.17 03:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep. The images seen in the photo look like an audio player displaying a graphic equalizer or an audio spectrum, not a frame from a movie. This is unlikely to be copyrightable. Omphalographer (talk) 05:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kajot-poker.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kajot-intacto.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kajot-games.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Easy-k.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kajot-fun.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kajot.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Prestigious Travel and Consulting Logo.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use, other deleted already Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Chameleon Pharma consulting Logo.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:BANTS Consulting Logo.svg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Atlantis Consulting 2017.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep, no use outside userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:On Sports News Premium.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:On Golf Premium.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:On Phim Việt.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:On Sports.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:On Football.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:On Cine.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mss holdings place of business.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Holdingslogo.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ftbank.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Homewise Logo Hi-Res.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside user sandbox Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yakey.png[edit]

Personal pic, out of scope and non-educational Fred the Oyster (talk) 01:18, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Yakey.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use; original deletion request closed w/ Delete Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vehiculos-ecologicos.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Teldiux-Wiki.JPG[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Teldiux-Logo.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vehículos Teldiux.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:COUPLE SAC.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside spam userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo Gestión Integral de Proyectos S.A.S.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo gip.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logotipo Gestión Integral de Proyectos.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sima Proyectos Integrales.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kahlil Watson in 2021.jpg[edit]

Copyvio. There is nothing to support the CC license listed. Denniscabrams (talk) 04:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:XCDC2KMACRBR5NZR43HELVTGYU.png[edit]

Copyvio. This is an Associated Press photo and does not have a CC license. Denniscabrams (talk) 04:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo 1 negro.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Eka Yazılım.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, low quality promo image uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:TactiX Strategic Consulting.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo Ineco Azul.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photographs by Jean-Marie Liot[edit]

Jean-Marie Liot is a professional photographer and without explicit permission it's safe to assume that these files are not free. --BadzilBot (talk) 04:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mansoor.png[edit]

It seems as screen shop from a video clip. EXIF is missing AntanO 04:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unfree fotos of the monument[edit]

Not free images. There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Ukraine#Freedom_of_panorama This monument is installed in 1982 ( https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Памятник_основателям_Киева ).
One author is died in 2010 and another one is still alive. Still under copyrights.
Description on some wikis also says about that (it's foto used as unfree): https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Памятник_основателям_Киева.JPG https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Пам%27ятник_засновникам_Києва.jpg
Also the same closed DR: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Наводницкий_парк_монумент_основателям_Киева.jpg --Kursant504 (talk) 05:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Kenne3te (talk · contribs)[edit]

There's no EXIF data provided, and each also seems to be derivative of another photo without COM:EVID, fairly small, and of low quality.

It appears all were uploaded to support abandoned en:Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Lanka Bandaranayake by an SPA; only the last survived in new article en:Lanka Bandaranayake.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 07:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Monument to Mark Bernes (Kharkiv)[edit]

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.

A1Cafel (talk) 07:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Mamayev Kurgan Volgograd (cropped).jpg[edit]

No FoP for 3D works in Russia, the crop fails de minimis A1Cafel (talk) 07:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Ink road (Apo Whang-od) 28.jpg[edit]

derivative work, photo of magazine, content likely copyrighted Polarlys (talk) 07:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The Motherland Monument in Kyiv (51879024667).jpg[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 07:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:The Motherland Monument in Kyiv (51879991401).jpg[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 07:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Street Art (25887643256).jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Face (24252992753).jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:39, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Bushwick (16284517727).jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Street Art (24768345438).jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Global Food Security Summit, London, 20 November 2023 (53347487584).jpg[edit]

Duplicate of same file, by same User here: [2] Ooligan (talk) 07:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:"Suits Won" (43823846120).jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in USA, seems above COM:TOO US A1Cafel (talk) 07:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Vev-Logo.png[edit]

nu permission from company nor designer given. Hoyanova (talk) 07:44, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Global Food Security Summit, London, 20 November 2023 (53347396243).jpg[edit]

Duplicate upload of the same file, by same User here: [3] Ooligan (talk) 07:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Global Food Security Summit, London, 20 November 2023 (53347164681).jpg[edit]

Duplicate upload of exact same file, by the same User here: [4] Ooligan (talk) 07:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Carlo Carrà, Veduta della Rotonda del Brunelleschi.jpg[edit]

Violazione di copyright. Il quadro non è in pubblico dominio Carlo Dominioni (talk) 07:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:"Michael Johns" Mural in Brixton By DREPH. (37487764416).jpg[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in UK, artist Dreph is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 07:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Carrà - Inseguimento.jpg[edit]

Violazione di copyright. Il quadro non è in pubblico dominio Carlo Dominioni (talk) 07:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Carrà - Manifestazione interventista.jpg[edit]

Violazione di copyright. Il quadro non è in pubblico dominio Carlo Dominioni (talk) 07:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hypnotoad (5919725708).jpg[edit]

Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 07:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Internat Solling Daemmerung-1920x1080.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Gnomingstuff as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image found online as early as 2014, not uploader's own https://tineye.com/search/c71dbfa8aa68a3375c7c0ae2061fbba029bfee30?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1 Polarlys (talk) 08:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Probably uploaded by the school (name of the uploader), on whose page the picture can also be found. --Polarlys (talk) 08:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fair enough -- still probably should go per COM:PCP, the claimed license is incredibly dubious Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Eddyjunior19 (talk · contribs)[edit]

professional architecture renderings/photos, unlikely to be own work

Polarlys (talk) 08:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bush and Yang 5-1987.jpg[edit]

highly unlikely to be own work Polarlys (talk) 08:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Alumni Stadium panorama.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Crop of image #6 of 14 at https://bceagles.com/facilities/alumni-stadium/2 with the players erased from the field for some reason. If you ignore the field and look for the woman in the baseball hat to the left and the image on the big screen to the right, you’ll see that it’s the same photo. Polarlys (talk) 08:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am not sure what you can see on the external website, I don’t see any photo that can be cropped and look like the upload. --Polarlys (talk) 08:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Polarlys Theres a carousel at the top of the page and one of the photos is this: https://dxbhsrqyrr690.cloudfront.net/sidearm.nextgen.sites/bceagles.com/images/2015/9/23/50_yard_EMAIL.JPG
It’s an uncropped version of the Commons photo. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 10:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks, I have seen enough. delete --Polarlys (talk) 20:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete - There is a phone number on the bottom of the bceagles.com photo - "1-800-317-8207". Googling that number, it belongs to "Aerial Photography by Don Couture". The original uploader's name is User:Kempthorne. Presumably, Kempthorne is this uploader's surname, which means he is not "Don Couture". And if we look at all of the images they uploaded on :en, they are all different sizes and probably all copyright violations. File:Alumni Stadium 2005.jpg seems to be the only one still around and it should be deleted too. I have no idea whether or not bceagles.com was the original source (certainly something uploaded to bceagles.com in 2015 was not the original source of something uploaded to Wikipedia in 2006). But the uploader is not Don Couture and therefore this is a likely copyright violation. --B (talk) 18:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Eriase Belardi Merlo.jpg[edit]

PD-Italy after 1976 Caulfield (talk) 08:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Australia pialba.jpg[edit]

I own this photo and will be contacting google and your web host 218.215.153.24 09:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Italiannudist.JPG[edit]

"Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Private image collections, e.g. private party photos, photos of yourself and your friends, your collection of holiday snaps and so on." 95.199.22.105 21:28, 19 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep Categories show in-scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:40, 19 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Keep, free usage licensed image, licensed as public domain, unique image, showing jolly stroll in the surf. -- Cirt (talk) 02:13, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Keep as per Cirt. Handcuffed (talk) 01:00, 22 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: I don't agree it's unique, but no expectation of privacy IMO. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:23, 30 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Italiannudist.JPG[edit]

The woman shown never gave his consent to the publication of her picture. The case has been treated by magistrature in Italy. The user does not own the rights to publish this picture. Veroforus (talk) 09:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep Not a copyright issue, see COM:Non-copyright restrictions. --PaterMcFly (talk) 16:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Delete Generally for nude images we want to see exif data to be be more sure the uploader is the copyright holder, this is a small image with no metadata, and the quality is poor. The account has only posted three images. --RAN (talk) 19:18, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
True, but on the other hand, the image is quite old (from 2010), and exif data wasn't so consistently used back then. --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Comment General notes: I did not see other versions online in a reverse image search. Image is not currently in use; we seem to have a fair number of alternative images in Category:Nude women at beaches. @Veroforus: Can you please give information about the legal case in Italy &c? If you don't wish to share here publicly you can send via COM:VRT. If what you say can be verified, that might settle the matter in favor of deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Albert Stürchler[edit]

The files are seemingly duplicates with the wrong file information. The sculptures are works by Albert Starchier and not Fritz Bürgin. We have two very similar files if not the same in the category. The files would be deleted with the support of the original uploader.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Bryantriplex (talk · contribs)[edit]

if RSO Records is british, then this logo is definitely too complex.

RZuo (talk) 09:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kulka Frigyes szoborportréja.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Hungarikusz Firkász as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Mind a szobrász, mind a fotó készítője kortárs személy. A szobrász még él, a fotóst nem tudom, de gyanítom, ő is. Emiatt, mivel ez egy kortás művész épületen belül elhelyezett szobra, mindkettőjüktől kell az engedély. Nem tudom, melyiküktől érkezett be a VRTS-be, de a másik engedélye nélkül ez a fájl {{vote delete
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion and input from OTRS wrt the existing ticket. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Oren Patoka Miluim 2011.jpg[edit]

it is not relevent any more Oren1973 (talk) 09:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Oren Patoka and Miki with Corner shot.jpg[edit]

it is not relevent any more Oren1973 (talk) 09:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ehud barak.jpg[edit]

it is not relevent any more Oren1973 (talk) 09:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by IFIRMASA (talk · contribs)[edit]

Other Firmbee instructional manual PDF uploads from this user (eg. File:Scrum_Guide.pdf) said "Copyright all rights reserved" in the bottom left, I assume these ones are similarly copyrighted.

Belbury (talk) 09:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by IFIRMASA (talk · contribs)[edit]

Additional ebook uploads with dubious licensing.

Omphalographer (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:CLS Portrait - Yellow.jpg[edit]

Author is Calvin Yeung, not uploader. See EXIF shizhao (talk) 09:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

and File:CLS Portrait - Grey.jpg--shizhao (talk) 09:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Patrice Vergriete, Maire de Dunkerque.jpg[edit]

Source erronée 185.24.184.194 10:24, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Patrice Vergriete, Maire de Dunkerque.jpg[edit]

Source erronée 185.24.184.194 10:24, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:نمتن.jpg[edit]

Suspicious image Photo not suitable for Wikimedia Commons. 211.197.54.36 10:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep Photo is used here. No case of copyright infringement given with this image. Mosbatho (talk) 17:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Star of the DPRK.jpg[edit]

Suspicious image Photo not suitable for Wikimedia Commons. 211.197.54.36 10:26, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep No reason for deleting this image. Whatever you mean with "Suspicious image", this is a valuable contribution for Commons. Mosbatho (talk) 16:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Коммунистическая партия социальной справедливости.jpg[edit]

Suspicious image Photo not suitable for Wikimedia Commons. 211.197.54.36 10:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep Actually the nominator did not provide a valid reason for deletion. The image quality is not the best but "not suitable" for Commons is not correct. Mosbatho (talk) 17:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Логотип ПСРМ.pdf[edit]

Suspicious image Photo not suitable for Wikimedia Commons. 211.197.54.36 10:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Трудовая Россия logo.png[edit]

Wrong place Trotskists (talk) 14:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think you'll have to clarify what you mean by that! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Трудовая Россия logo.png[edit]

Copyrighted photo. Suspicious image Photo not suitable for Wikimedia Commons 211.197.54.36 10:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete There is a better quality analogue. 91.122.153.113 18:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:VkMyU1BL5W83yKZG0K7OjTQdLV2lhjSQdyLw0YWueyP jRdle5l9FY9vXnsZbEF8dMzK2uZ-wZvxsS86YENz-xct.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted photo. Suspicious image Photo not suitable for Wikimedia Commons. 211.197.54.36 10:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Faces (36768419533).jpg[edit]

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 10:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Емблема Комуністичної партії України.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted photo. Suspicious image Photo not suitable for Wikimedia Commons. 211.197.54.36 10:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Trudovaya Rossiay logo.2.png[edit]

Copyrighted photo. Suspicious image Photo not suitable for Wikimedia Commons. 211.197.54.36 10:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep Image is widely used and its licensing is ok. Mosbatho (talk) 17:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Animated flag of the SR Macedonia.gif[edit]

Copyrighted photo. Suspicious image Photo not suitable for Wikimedia Commons. 211.197.54.36 10:39, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep PD simple, no case of copyright infringement. Mosbatho (talk) 17:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:PR logo.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted photo. Suspicious image Photo not suitable for Wikimedia Commons. 223.39.210.166 10:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Failuresque Twiggy drawing.jpg[edit]

Directly derived of this 1967 photo from the Michael Ochs collection. -- Asclepias (talk) 10:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:1st Bn. 13th Inf. Reg. graduation, Feb. 2023.webm[edit]

Inferior unused duplicate, superseded by higher-quality version. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 10:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by RPWORLD1 (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:SPAM, advertising images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use

Netora (talk) 11:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:NIUMA.webp[edit]

apple emojis are copyrighted Kelly The Angel (talk) 11:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:DieSterne Pressefoto Brigitta Jahn 2022.jpg[edit]

Copyvio, user is not author of picture, "own work" is wrong, no permission Mautpreller (talk) 11:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mojang Studios.jpg[edit]

Lower-quality version of File:Mojang Studios Logo May 2020.png; unused. IceWelder [] 11:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Frank Spilker-Brigitta Jahn 2.jpg[edit]

Copyvio, user is not author of picture, no permission Mautpreller (talk) 11:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Anagyrine-2D.svg[edit]

Expired {{Disputed chem}} only used on a user subpage in nowiki. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fructosamine.png[edit]

Unused image tagged as {{Disputed chem}} since 58 days. The reason is that one stereocenter is missing. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • In carbohydrate chemistry, it is common for a sugar to epimerize at the anomeric center. Therefore, leaving the stereochemistry unspecified at that position is normal. I disagree with the disputed chem tagging. Marbletan (talk) 13:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, the image has colored atom labels. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 09:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Reaction mechanism of Wolff-Kishner reduction.jpg[edit]

Tagged as {{Low quality chem}} since 14 years and fallen into disuse, with only used on the list of (formerly) 200 low-quality chemical images and Shuhei's user page. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dnyeszter Menti Kzt. Zászlaja és címere.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted photo. Vichycombo (talk) 11:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:(Unofficial) Redesign Transnistria.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted photo. Vichycombo (talk) 11:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Флаг ПМР!.png[edit]

Unreasonable photo with very poor quality. Vichycombo (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Флаг ПМР..png[edit]

Unreasonable photo with very poor quality. Vichycombo (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lactic.png[edit]

Tagged as low quality chemical image due to being a low resolution PNG since February 6, 2009. Only used on the list of low-quality chemical images. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 12:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lactate formation.JPG[edit]

Unused JPG of a chemical reaction. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 12:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Visitenkarte 1.png[edit]

Out of scope: self-promotion. 0x0a (talk) 12:18, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bordeaux Cathedral organ.jpg[edit]

At request of file owner - EXIF contains personal information 81.101.176.115 12:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Ilikemeetingprettygirls (talk · contribs)[edit]

the original looks like a screenshot. uploader has no other edits.

RZuo (talk) 12:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Giathi and Daisy.jpg[edit]

No longer at ease with its usage Kelvin Giathi (talk) 12:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Beatrice Boca.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (c) Andreas Zauner www.beatriceboca.de M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

keine verletzung, zauner hat das bild in meinem auftrag erstellt, das ist bezahlt und nutzbar NilpferdNully (talk) 12:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:LuganskTramSystem.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Nzeemin as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: G7
Converted to regular DR as file does not qualify for G7-speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • This file is not used, and also there's better vector version, so please delete the file. -- Nzeemin (talk) 18:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by يونس22 (talk · contribs)[edit]

screenshots or taken from internet.

RZuo (talk) 13:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by KrisnaAPM (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of project scope: personal photos.

0x0a (talk) 13:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mr adel j2.jpg[edit]

COM:DW. It's a photo of a screen. (see Moiré pattern). 0x0a (talk) 13:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kimjooryung2017bluebeard.png[edit]

Don't think this is an own work. All movies/cartoons are licensed as CC by the channel which are obviously copyrighted/ --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Peter Hug.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (c) Patrick Pfeiffer Konstanz M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fotototototo.jpg[edit]

Per COM:PERSONAL: personal photo. 0x0a (talk) 14:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:IamStyloxVai420.png[edit]

Signature of a non-notable person. No educational value. Out of Commons scope. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 14:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Clinton9996quote (talk · contribs)[edit]

unlikely to be useful for reuse.

0x0a (talk) 14:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Clinton9996quote (talk · contribs)[edit]

Text typed onto a (possibly uncredited third party) background image, out of COM:SCOPE as nothing educational other than raw text.

Belbury (talk) 14:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by LuciusWetterau (talk · contribs)[edit]

Coats of arms of non-notable fictional entities. Outside of COM:SCOPE.

Marbletan (talk) 14:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kwakye-Maafo.jpg[edit]

Two different official portraits. Requires COM:VRT permission from original photographer(s). plicit 14:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Twiggy study room, Toronto Reference Library.jpg[edit]

Photo of uncredited and presumably non-free work. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:F isYzcXEAA0X5N.jpg[edit]

Not CC, seems to come from Reuters ✶Mitch199811 14:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Apoyo de Alberto Scavarelli a la candidatura presidencial de Tabaré Vazquez..jpg[edit]

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 15:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jeddah Light(1).jpg[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 15:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


C-SPAN images of congressional hearings[edit]

Per {{PD-CSPAN}}, PD "does not apply to congressional committee hearings". Therefore these files are not free to use. --BadzilBot (talk) 14:44, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by SafderKhan0800 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Vanity/self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.

Achim55 (talk) 15:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kenia OS 1.jpg[edit]

copyright violation JosefinaDiLeo (talk) 15:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete: Possible copyright violation, since the source of the file is private

Possible copyright violation, since the source of the file is private

JosefinaDiLeo (talk) 15:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Images by "Staff of rep"[edit]

These files are marked {{PD-USGov}}. Staff of US representatives are likely not employees of the US government and therefore these pictures are not in the public domain. --BadzilBot (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • {{Vd}} per nom.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Keep per Toohool and Cryptic. I struck my previous !vote.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep. False premise. Congressional staff are governmental employees. Toohool (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • @Toohool: I think that's actually not true. Members of Congress (and committees, and some other entities) are given budgets to hire staff, but I think they are technically employees of the individual member of Congress. Could someone cite something clear on this?
@Jmabel: Do you have a cite for that? You may be thinking of the fact that Congressmembers get their own budget and a lot of independence in how they hire, manage their staffs, and set salaries. But the Congressmembers are federal employees, deploying federal money to hire people to work under their direction to carry out their official duties. There's little room under common law employment principles to doubt that the staff are federal employees. Toohool (talk) 17:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • en:Congressional staff begins "Congressional staff are employees of the United States Congress or individual members of Congress," which strongly suggests both cases exist. Does anyone have something definitive? - Jmabel ! talk 23:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    •  Comment if these prove not to be the work of federal employees, it seems we should make at least a reasonable effort to get licenses for these images. - Jmabel ! talk 16:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • If they are all from AOC's office, then they are proabably work for hire, with a single source we could go to for licensing. - Jmabel ! talk 16:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I agree that Congressional staff are governmental employees. Some of the smaller cropped images should be deleted. --RAN (talk) 19:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Keep per Congressional staff< staffers are employees of Congress. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 20:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Keep Congressional staff are also US federal government employees [5]. From what I see these photos are sourced from official 'govenment' representative social media accounts/sites and such. If it was from a personal account, I would be more skeptical.
PascalHD (talk) 02:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lucia Lucas Short Film Preview.webm[edit]

COPYVIO. I represent the rights holder of this video. A free license was never granted for this video. Cons154 (talk) 15:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Apparently, it was once posted under the provided license, otherwise the bot wouldn't have found it to be. --PaterMcFly (talk) 16:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Babydelisha.png[edit]

above COM:TOO US. 0x0a (talk) 15:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MissUniverse2023 SheynnisPalacio-Cornejo.jpg[edit]

clear copyright violation - screenshot from television broadcast of Miss Universe 2023 Jjj1238 (talk) 15:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Delete Screenshot. Clearly it's copyright infringement. Minerva97 (talk) 17:43, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fl 11.jpg[edit]

The photo is of professional quality and previously published onfacebook. Would need a VRT permission from the copyright holder. 0x0a (talk) 16:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Sin4ez (talk · contribs)[edit]

No Freedom of Panorama in Russia for sculpture.

Komarof (talk) 16:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

what is going on?! Sin4ez (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Loinstalo 9 jpg.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Baloxinh.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2-768x1024.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Resized Logo Northyatra.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:LOGO NORMAL NORTHYATRA.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:YAMADA Consulting Group LOGO.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:LOGOIMAGEN.gif[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logito.gif[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cercar S.A.S.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Practichem-logo-horizontal 02.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Practichem-logo-horizontal 01.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Practichem-logo-horizontal-for-header (1).png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Prepaze.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:DYLAND PROJECTS & CONSTRUCTION.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo-Merehead-Black.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ToSeCo Consulting.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by seeming company rep, no use outside userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Circ Med Tech.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Prepex.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ww-logo.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep, no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nativa - Grupo Forestal.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Centro de estudios hamilton.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hamilton colombia - centro de estudios hamilton.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:S & F Consulting Firm Limited official logo.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wwlogo2016.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MARMARA BARBER.jpg[edit]

Unused advertising image, metadata credits Mustafa Kagan Hekim Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Tonymanshed (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unused logo, no evidence of notability and value to Commons.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:AXPE Consulting logo.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vivian Chow Photo.jpg[edit]

I don't know whether the uploader actually made this photo. The subject of the photo looks well poised and polished, but seems to be directed by a professional photographer. Furthermore, the background appears well lighted and well contrasted, but is this the work of the uploader? George Ho (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Carisca528 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope: plain-text.

0x0a (talk) 16:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:כרזת השיר "יונת העצב".jpg[edit]

A formal PR picture clearly taken by a photographer. As mentioned in the file's details (in Hebrew), this was a CD cover. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper VRT (formerly, OTRS) release note. Ldorfman (talk) 16:44, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ירדנה ארזי - יחפה.jpg[edit]

A formal PR picture of a known Israeli singer and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper VRT (formerly, OTRS) release note. Ldorfman (talk) 16:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ירדנה ארזי המלכה היחפה.jpg[edit]

Unused file, not really needed (the article can be cited and referenced via link, as it is still online). Commons cannot be a repository for just everything.. Ldorfman (talk) 16:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Флаг СССР.png[edit]

Duplicate of File:Flag of the Soviet Union.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:FIBD Gally 1512330.jpg[edit]

Deletion requested by the subject herself, who claims through VRTS that she did not consent neither to be photographed nor that any photo would be published. (No opinion on my side, I just transfer the request from de fr-WP file of VRTS - ticket 2023112010010735) JohnNewton8 (talk) 16:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I requested a replacement everywhere with File:Gally.jpg. Once it is done, that can be deleted. Yann (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:SentinelTrioProfile.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation - see https://open.spotify.com/playlist/37i9dQZF1E4ophwAfndthZ GoingBatty (talk) 17:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tableau de Lino Ventura par Jean-Loup Othenin-Girard.jpg[edit]

Il me semble toujours sous droit d'auteurs (ainsi que tous les autres portraits de cet artiste) Jacques Ballieu (talk) 17:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Finoglio 3.0 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Photos watermarked "MIMMO DONGHIA", would need a VRT permission to verify copyright ownership.

0x0a (talk) 17:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Entropy-logo update big.png[edit]

Uploaded with wrong licence on accident Muuskanuikkunen (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:GLAM Wiki Conference 2023 - Day 2, by Darafsh 09 49 06 650000.jpeg[edit]

Photo of an identifiable person taken without consent Niamfrifruli (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:GLAM Wiki Conference 2023 - Day 2, by Darafsh 09 48 58 456000.jpeg[edit]

Photo of an identifiable person taken without consent Niamfrifruli (talk) 17:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Carlos ramiro c.jpg[edit]

From https://www.agronet.gov.co/Noticias/PublishingImages/Forms/DispForm.aspx?ID=1860&Source=https%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eagronet%2Egov%2Eco%2Fnoticias%2Fpublishingimages%2Fforms%2Fthumbnails%2Easpx%3FPaged%3DTRUE%26p%5FSortBehavior%3D0%26p%5FFileLeafRef%3Dpresidente%252DBol%252Ejpg%26p%5FID%3D2147%26PageFirstRow%3D871%26%26View%3D%257B5195FC95%2D8A0B%2D4C26%2D8FAA%2DE233096E27B0%257D&ContentTypeId=0x0101009148F5A04DDD49CBA7127AADA5FB792B00AADE34325A8B49CDA8BB4DB53328F214003E374C4CAA479346B4B0D39C0F1A4FA6, no evidence for the license Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Platform construction at Medford Tufts station (2), September 2020.jpg[edit]

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts does not seem to be the author/copyright holder of this photo. The EXIF data gives the copyright holder as Don Couture (a professional photographer). There is no evidence provided that he assigned his copyright to the Commonwealth. B (talk) 18:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm inclined to believe this was a work for hire and thus the copyright would belong to the Commonwealth, but I'm not the most familiar with those rules. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:BenderBucowski2023.jpg[edit]

The source is stated as the band's official website (https://benderbucowski.com/); I could not find this size there but I could find smaller versions. The main page says "Todos los derechos reservados" (all rights reserved) - no indication of a licence suitable for Commons there. Peter James (talk) 18:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

After starting the deletion request I remembered Template:No permission since and added that to the file page; a separate deletion request is probably unnecessary. Peter James (talk) 18:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Element 78 Partners Logo.svg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:42, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dimensi Research & Consulting Logo Resmi.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2021-10-18-195736586-IBM-Consulting-brand-launches-with-140 000-consultants-globally-spot.jpg[edit]

Taken from news/press release, licensing unclear https://www.consultancy.uk/news/29256/ibm-consulting-brand-launches-with-140000-consultants-globally Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:44, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Monument to Sailors of Dnipro Flotilla[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and at least one of the sculptors of this statue, Pavlo Chechelnytskyi, seems to still be alive. So these images should be deleted until an undetermined date.

Adamant1 (talk) 02:50, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Mohammed VI 2023.jpg[edit]

Copyright Aréat (talk) 18:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Speedy delete The source linked isn't free : "©2022 par Maghreb Arabe Presse" --Titlutin (talk) 09:55, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:New Born Photography in Sivakasi.png[edit]

did the parents agree? Xocolatl (talk) 18:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete. This appears to be an advertisement by the photographer; it also has multiple rights issues, both for the photographs (which may have been works for hire by a professional photographer) and for the Canva clip art used in the background. Omphalographer (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Margaret Bruton market scene ca1929.jpg[edit]

Could somebody decide if this should be deleted. I added it but Margaret Bruton died in 1983. I do not understand clearly what are the rules here. Puncinus (talk) 19:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stevenson House Margaret Bruton woodengraving 1930.jpg[edit]

could somebody decide if this file can be in Commons. I added it (and made a photograph myself) but Margaret Bruton died in 1983 Puncinus (talk) 19:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Richard webber grey's anatomy.png[edit]

Un gros doute sur le "travail personnel" Bertrand Labévue (talk) 19:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ishwa Odíne.jpg[edit]

Unused file that the uploader wishes to delete. Author name seems to contradict information in metadata which names the author as someone else. Abzeronow (talk) 19:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Concorde 1 94-9-5 kix cropped.jpg[edit]

Image vandalized by adding wrong information at the bottom left McSly (talk) 20:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete. Original is File:Concorde 1 94-9-5 kix (cropped).jpg. Omphalographer (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sarah Boone Update Page.pdf[edit]

Old version of English Wikipedia article w:en:Sarah Boone. It serves no purpose as a PDF on Commons - outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 20:26, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:47 Гостинка (правая часть) Ж-1368 small.jpg[edit]

1990 artwork by Victor Serov and Andrey Kamalov. Uploader could be related to one of the artists, but we'd need VRT confirmation of that. Abzeronow (talk) 20:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:5. Выемка горной массы проходческим комбайном - шахта им.Тихова.jpg[edit]

Metadata says that Evgeny Zolotuhin is the author, who would appear to not be Afedchenko Abzeronow (talk) 20:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:51 street.jpg[edit]

Metadata indicates the source of this photograph is Facebook. Also it is watermarked with a different name than the uploader's name. Abzeronow (talk) 20:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2022 Michaelsen Swantje c Stefan Kaminski.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by LexICon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photographer & copyright holder = STEFAN KAMINSKI; so for clearly not an: "own work of Musfeldt123". Polarlys (talk) 20:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We have other photos of party members from this photographer, this one is also likely coming from the source. Wait for Commons:OTRS. --Polarlys (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Manoj Kumar Goswami.png[edit]

This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather than the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ruskin Bond Launces Muppet and other stories.jpg[edit]

This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader (in company), but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather than the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Manojwiki2021 (talk · contribs)[edit]

This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader (in company), but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather than the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:William Cheung 1990.jpg[edit]

This is a slightly retouched crop of File:Anthony Arnett and Eric Oram.jpg which was deleted as part of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Australianblackbelt where a VRT team member says that the permission for the deleted file was added in error. Abzeronow (talk) 21:18, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ледниковный.jpg[edit]

Out of scope, used for cross-wiki vandalism, possible copyvio. Хоббит (talk) 21:26, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:BigAre Ben.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata, F10 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cdc-wDxFn dBEC0-unsplash.jpg[edit]

uploaded to Unsplash after 2017, license not accepted on Commons Adeletron 3030 (talk) 21:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Aarif-dr.jpg[edit]

Professional image by a new user, unlikely to be own work. Also used here. Yann (talk) 21:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Snqawnqaw.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Denny-muller-jLjfAWwHdB8-unsplash.jpg[edit]

Uploaded to Unsplash after 2017, license not accepted on Commons Adeletron 3030 (talk) 21:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ابراهيم علاء فاروق.jpg[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope --Alaa :)..! 21:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:UOSSM logo.png[edit]

Not sure this is below COM:TOO France and COM:TOO US. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete Leaning delete. This isn't the typical Rod of Asclepius and the shine in the middle of the circle probably pushes this above TOO France. And since it cannot be determined whether this should follow TOO France or TOO US. I suggest that we delete this file per COM:PCP. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Neutral This is officially an international organisation, but the headquarters are in Paris. GAllegre (talk) 09:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:1700684350-annapurna-i.jpg[edit]

Used for vandalism on WP:fr : added image on the left (ridge of the mountain) considering this as a joke Couleys (talk) 21:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:53rd NZ Parliament Shield.png[edit]

I have enquired with Parliamentary Services whether they could make individual photos from this shield available to WM Commons as there are many MP bios where we don't have a photo. Their reply was as follows: "Unfortunately we don’t hold any right to reuse those images from the 53rd Parliamentary Shield. The images of the Members came from the Political Parties so they would hold the copyright of those images and would have to give approval for the to be made available for individual images."

Therefore, the images themselves don't fall under the CC-BY notice on parliament's website. Hence, the license as provided is wrong. Which leaves the question whether we could claim "de minimis". I'd rather see this file deleted TBH. Schwede66 21:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hermes Rafael Saguier junto a Jimmy Carter.webp[edit]

Lower resolution duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hermes_Rafael_Saguier_junto_a_Jimmy_Carter.png CzarJobKhaya (talk) 22:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:1-10-23 Lisa Marie Presley on her way to the Golden Globes.jpg[edit]

Seems to be flickr laundering - see the album https://www.flickr.com/photos/ruthdaniel/albums/72177720306249835/with/52709806295, which contains numerous images that don't seem to originate with the uploader (screenshots from various sites). D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 22:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Structure of Chitosan.png[edit]

This is chitin (N-acetyl) not chitosan (free amine). Seems content-wise equivalent to File:Structure of Chitin.png that is correctly named. DMacks (talk) 22:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete, misleading. Also, the image has overlapping letters. Also, the actual chitosan structure from the same source also has an overlapping number (the twos are all overlapping with the C–H bond next to the glycosyl bonds). Alfa-ketosav (talk) 09:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Davorko Vidovic portrait.jpeg[edit]

Not PD-US or PD-Croatia-exempt. Site says "All rights reserved. Content from these pages can be used without a prior consent by the author under the condition that the source of information is quoted.", which does not seem to be a free license? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Which site? This picture is taken from official site of croatian goverment (https://www.sabor.hr), where it says that all content that is created by hrvatski sabor is free to use without further modification. (https://www.sabor.hr/hr/pravne-napomene) and there is no second author named for the picture. Vidyapoky (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Vidyapoky I read that on https://www.sabor.hr/en/legal-notice. The google translate I see of https://www.sabor.hr/hr/pravne-napomene says "Content authored by the Croatian Parliament can be downloaded without special permission and the source must be cited and published publicly without changing their original content.", is that right? If so, "without changing their original content" is a restriction we do not allow, see COM:L. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I did not upload the picture; I just moved it into Commons because it had been verified by a human source as being okay to add. I figured I would just add my two cents here. Not sure if it adds anything to the conversation. Packer1028 (talk) 21:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]