Commons:Deletion requests/2023/11/23

22 November 2023

24 November 2023

Deletion requests on 23 November 2023

• archive
• gallery
• purge this page's cache
• ±

November 23

Files uploaded by IFIRMASA (talk · contribs)

Other Firmbee instructional manual PDF uploads from this user (eg. File:Scrum_Guide.pdf) said "Copyright all rights reserved" in the bottom left, I assume these ones are similarly copyrighted.

• File:The ultimate UX Guide.pdf
• File:Python from Beginner to Advanced.pdf
• File:JavaScript from Beginner to Advanced.pdf
• File:Figma dla początkujących.pdf

Belbury (talk) 09:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by IFIRMASA (talk · contribs)

Additional ebook uploads with dubious licensing.

• File:LM - Kluczowe zmiany 2024.pdf
• File:LM-Sprawdź jak możesz zaoszczędzić w 2024.pdf
• File:LM - Obowiązki przedsiębiorcy na przełomie roku.pdf
• File:Ebook rejestracja firmy 2023.pdf
• File:Ebook Basics of Scrum en (1).pdf
• File:E-book Podstawy Scrum pl (1).pdf
• File:Ebook-efektywna-rekrutacja-okładka.pdf

Omphalographer (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Responsible-A.I-and-Privacy-Report.pdf

Out of scope and licensing concerns: plain text content, effectively a marketing "white paper". License is inconsistent with "© 2021 Tsaaro. All rights reserved" in footer, but document would probably be out of scope even if permission were received. Omphalographer (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:DIGI COMP.pdf

Out of scope: blurry photograph with no clear subject. Omphalographer (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Georgy Zhzhonov Postal card Russia 2015 (cropped).jpg

Derrivated from File:Georgy Zhzhonov Postal card Russia 2015.jpg which is PD. The whole postcard with stamps is free from copyright, but the painting is not. For example see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1977 CPA 4774(Cutted).jpg. — Redboston 00:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Keep, Russian law states that stamps are not copyrighted. In general, being uncopyrighted means that any modification, including extraction of parts, is allowed. Public domain is technically not a license; while a license needs to explicitly state that a certain use is allowed since everything is by default not allowed, once you say "not copyrighted" then everything is by default allowed unless explicitly excluded. For example see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dinmuhkamed Konayev.png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Masherov.jpg FlorianH76 (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

File:GillyVendingIncLogo.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Implamedika logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:18, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:BCU Logo.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ahmetculha.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Loving Care NEW.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Tech Ideas NEW.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Full Lifesaver NEW.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Life Saver NEW.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Elide Fire Ball Logo 02.png

COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Elide Fire Ball Logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Techideas.png

COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:ลูกบอลดับเพลิงลูกแรก02.png

COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:ลูกบอลดับเพลิง และลูกบอลดับเพลงลูกแรก.png

COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:ลูกบอลดับเพลิงอัตโนมัติ.png

COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Aditya birla logos.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:DSP logos.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ready Wealth Logo.png

COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:ABSLAMC.png

COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Mirae.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of many promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Logo-capgemini-consulting.jpg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:MadCow Logo posting.jpg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside wikidata Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:BoD Logo.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Brands of Desire (BoD) logo.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:BOD new logo.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:HBMA Logo.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Boatdotcom-black-320x80listings.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Voltlabor Logo.svg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Systango Technologies Pvt Ltd.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Glass Doctor logo.svg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by seeming company rep, no use outside old user sandbox Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Hirehike Logo.svg

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Hirehike Logo Trademark.svg

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Employcred-white.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Employcred-blue.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Employcred-black-white.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Xtrisha inestamr.svg

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Xtrisha.png

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Basel Tinguely museum interior ramp.JPG

The Museums Architekt is Mario Botta who is still alive. FoP - Switzerland does not include the interior of buildings and Switzerland has a standard of life plus 70 years Commons:Copyright rules by territory/SwitzerlandParadise Chronicle (talk) 01:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

I have asked for permission, so please wait until/whether it is resolved this way. JiriMatejicek (talk) 08:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

If the permission arives after the deletion of the file, the admin will restore it. Thus I think @Paradise Chronicle is using the bad procedure. He could tag it OTRS request template or ask for direct deletion. There is nothing to discuss if it viloates copyright rules in Switzerland. Juandev (talk) 08:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

You don't need permission from the museum, but from Mario Botta. Then the museum is allowed to publish photographs for means of publicity, but private people not. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Carver.png

Seems to be above COM:TOO Netherlands for having its own artistic style. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Les Marguerites Fleuriront ce Soir - Flickr - The Central Intelligence Agency.jpg

Probable copyright violation, the {{PD-USGov-CIA}} license tag is probably incorrect because there is no indication that the painter Jeffrey W. Bass was a CIA employee or that this is a work of the US Government. The source is a CIA account on Flickr, where the description includes "Donated by Richard J. Guggenhime" - if the artist worked for the CIA then no donation would be needed. A brief biography of the artist on a University website does not say that he was a CIA employee.[1] A CIA webpage on the painting does not discuss the artist.[2] The Flickr page includes "United States government work", but this appears to be unreliable. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:BrandLogo mbg.svg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Gerhard Richter

Pointless gallery as it just recreates the main category without adding anything different. Plus the persons works are copyrighted anyway. So there's almost zero chance of this being useful any time soon. Adamant1 (talk) 01:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files in Category:1970 Stained-glass windows of St. Ursula (Brockscheid)

There's no FOP for building interiors or churches in Germany and although I couldn't find any information about who created these windows, they clearly haven't been dead for more then 70 years yet since the windows were created in 1970. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until an undetermined date.

• File:St. Ursula (Brockscheid) 49.jpg
• File:St. Ursula (Brockscheid) 50.jpg
• File:St. Ursula (Brockscheid) 51.jpg

Adamant1 (talk) 01:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:YuHu Gifts Logo.tif

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:VegaVend Logo.png

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside declined, spammy AfC draft Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Brohl-Lützing St.Johannes der Täufer58.JPG

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Germany for church interiors and the artist of this stained glass window, Alois Stettner, died in 1957. So the image is copyrighted until at least 2028. Adamant1 (talk) 02:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Multinational - Black (1920 x 1080 px).jpg

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Digital Institute PNG.png

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Digital Institute Logo.svg

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, this logo is my work. I did not upload it for spamming purposes. Can you help me understand which rules it violates and what I should do to prevent it from being deleted?

Thanks. Eraymutlu (talk) 08:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

• Eraymutlu, the claim is that the logo is out of COM:SCOPE. Can you establish that the company is notable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Prado Suzuki Logo.svg

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Prado Suzuki.svg

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Goasiadaytriplogo.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files in Category:Heinz-Werner Eichhorn

Unfortunately there's no FOP for building interiors or churches in Germany and at least one of the artists of this window, Heinz-Werner Eichhorn, seems to still be alive. So the images should be deleted until an undetermined date.

• File:Neustadt(Wied)St.Margarita800.JPG
• File:Neustadt(Wied)St.Margarita801.JPG
• File:Neustadt(Wied)St.Margarita802.JPG
• File:Neustadt(Wied)St.Margarita803.JPG
• File:Neustadt(Wied)St.Margarita99.JPG

Adamant1 (talk) 02:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Santander Consumer USA Logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Santander Consumer USA Logo.png

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use outside wikidata Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Seems to be in scope per w:Banco Santander (mentioned in that article), and below COM:TOO US, if that and not COM:TOO Spain is relevant. Over a plain reading of COM:TOO Spain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:CIC Wiki Logo.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:18, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Concepcion Industries Inc.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:18, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:CII Logo 1920 x 1080.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:18, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:SilverBird Bank Logo 1080px (1).png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:PurpleClick Logo.JPG

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:LATICRETE logo 01.jpg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ceiflo logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Gold tipper.gif

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Greentwip Logo.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:MicrosoftTeams-image (195).png

appears to be image for internal company use, almost certainly out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

• No. Microsoft Teams is a program that anyone can purchase and almost certainly in scope. However, this page looks above COM:TOO US to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Bandpey-logo-1920.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Bandpey-logo-1080.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Bandpey-logo-2368.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Yuga accounting logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Thoughtstorm-logo.svg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep (see cats), no usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Nuevo Logo TyT 2017 Lacrado.jpg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Logo iaas Alinhado.png

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Iaas Logo-08.png

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:لانچینگ مکس.svg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Granddad Communications logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:GranddAD logo.png

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Kraneshares logo.svg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep, no use outside old declined AfC draft Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:LOGO unx shipping.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:FOODIELAL.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Acuite-logo.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside spammy user sandbox Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files in Category:1955 stained-glass windows in Rhineland-Palatinate

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Germany for churches or building interiors, which is where these images were taken. Although I couldn't find any information about the artist of the windows, Walter Bettendorf, they clearly haven't dead for more then 70 years since the windows were created in 1955. So these images should be deleted until an undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

• File:Hümmel St.Cyriacus Fenster769.JPG
• File:Hümmel St.Cyriacus Fenster770.JPG
• File:Hümmel St.Cyriacus Fenster771.JPG

Adamant1 (talk) 02:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Fairplaid Logo.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:WhatsApp profile.jpg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files in Category:Stained glass windows of Mechthildkapelle (Mosbruch)

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Germany for building interiors and although I couldn't find any information about the artist of these windows, they clearly haven't been dead for more then 70 years yet since the windows were created in the mid 1950s. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until an undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

• File:Mechthildkapelle (Mosbruch) 05.jpg
• File:Mechthildkapelle (Mosbruch) 06.jpg
• File:Mechthildkapelle (Mosbruch) 07.jpg
• File:Mechthildkapelle (Mosbruch) 08.jpg
• File:Mosbruch Mechthildkapelle 1.JPG
• File:Mosbruch Mechthildkapelle 2.JPG
• File:Mosbruch Mechthildkapelle 3.JPG
• File:Mosbruch Mechthildkapelle 4.JPG

Adamant1 (talk) 02:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Logo oficial WillBook.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:WhatsApp Image 2016-08-18 at 22.25.43.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:St. Remigius (Retterath) 93.jpg

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Germany for building interiors and although I couldn't find any information about the artist of this, they clearly haven't been dead for more then 70 years yet since it was created in the mid 1950s. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO until an undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 02:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:FlipGive-Company-Logo.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ks-tech-logo.png

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Geefunding.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Geefunding logo.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Pechora03.jpg

Unlikely to be under copyright-free license as claimed. A search on old archived copies of the site from March 2010 and July 2011 does not produce fruitful results. Selecting "О сайте" and then "Copyright" goes to the copyright credits of the website and its contents, and there is no indication of a permissive license in the credits. This is the only upload of a photo uploaded by Dimoncikru (talk · contribs); their other upload is a map. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Scopeer Logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Scopeer logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Scopeer-Logo-2019.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Colored-Logo---White-Background---Horizontal.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Netchoice.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Asan-Original-Logo.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ocapital.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Nidec All for dreams.jpg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files in Category:Stained-glass windows in Deidesheim

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Germany for building interiors and although I couldn't find any information about the artist of this window, they clearly haven't been dead for more then 70 years yet since it was created in 1952. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

• File:20201010Michaelskapelle Deidesheim07.jpg
• File:20201010Michaelskapelle Deidesheim14.jpg
• File:20201010Michaelskapelle Deidesheim15.jpg
• File:20201010Michaelskapelle Deidesheim21.jpg
• File:20201010Michaelskapelle Deidesheim22.jpg

Adamant1 (talk) 03:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:VANDERBILT HERSHEY'S BICYCLE.jpg

Watermark: external source. Cjp24 (talk) 03:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Guinness World Records Museum Hollywood.jpg

From TIME Magazine. Cjp24 (talk) 03:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

 Delete Looking at the description, this image was obviously uploaded for spamming. I guess we have better images of that statue, anyway. PaterMcFly (talk) 08:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Akihabara ad.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Cute anime girls in Akihabara.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Akiba ad.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Love Love ad.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Vtuber chocolate covered pistachios.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Anime advertising.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by User:OllieU

• File:Grounded Series.MIME.png
• File:Block (TV CHANNEL).MIME.svg
• File:Caillou.png
• File:Caillou 2.png
• File:Caillou Anderson (Goanimate).png
• File:Boris Anderson (Goanimate).png
• File:Doris Anderson (Goanimate).png
• File:Cody Anderson (Goanimate).png
• File:Rosie Anderson (Goanimate).png

Per COM:NOTUSED. Unlikely to be used; logos refer to fictional or non-notable subjects.

Pretzelles (talk) 03:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Railgun Arcade Mat.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Quintessential Quintuplets.jpg

Derivative work of copyrighted manga covers A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Anime billboard.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Magazine in Japan.jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted magazine cover A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Cute hoodie advertisement in Tokyo.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Body wipes promotion.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Master Minds Academy poster on an autorickshaw in Hyderabad.jpg

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Dr J Mural.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

I took this picture myself to try to add to the wikipedia, but if it protected by copyright law just because the original work of the mural is not my own, then please let me know and I will delete. I had considered uploading a copyright photo from the mural site itself, but thought that my own photo would be more acceptable. Please also delete photo and entry on my behalf if it does not comply. Thank you. 2600:4040:7A26:E400:D9AF:6E0F:2EF6:7F0E 20:41, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Tommy Flowers - Flickr - Loco Steve.jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Paris 19ème - Flickr - Paola Breizh.jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:20211229 114504 - Flickr - 7beachbum.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Poster of a company offering to buy ancient Japanese items.jpeg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep Blurred potentially copyrightable parts. Syced (talk) 05:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:ClickBricks.org - Logo.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Kienbaum Logo 2019.jpg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:MSCLogo.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by seeming company rep, no use outside spammy userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:18, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:KSS logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:KSS Design Group.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Восток-Сервис.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File talk:Adolf-hitler-medium.jpg

This photo is sourced from On This Day, https://www.onthisday.com/people/adolf-hitler and not created by the user claimed. Dimensions and even filename are the same. 60.49.92.223 04:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Buenos Aires street art tour.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Mural ESI.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 04:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Mural BUT.jpg

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Jfa.world mural in wynwood.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Guanxi crowdfunding africa.png

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Guanxi invest.png

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Jaribha.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Mural Yawareté.jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:MURAL DE JUANJUÍ.jpg

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Google Chrome Windows 10.png

Google Chrome screenshot on Windows OS is Copyright CSR2Forever (talk) 04:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Michinthecat.jpg

Lorenzo Jaramillo died in 1992. Not in the public domain. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Downtown Mural with Gray Hair and Plants.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Logo Investbook.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files with fake "Mil.gov.ua" license 7

• File:SherpTheShuttleUANV 02.jpg
• File:Snake island on the morning of June 30, 2022.jpg
• File:Shaptala S O.jpg
• File:Spaitech Sparrow UA.jpg
• File:SPH Bohdana firing on russian troops on the Snake island.jpg
• File:SSOUkraineTrenchRaid.gif
• File:Stormer HVM in Ukraine.jpg
• File:Su-25 299th aviation brigade.jpg
• File:T64Reload.gif
• File:T90SExplode.gif
• File:Training 103rd brigade 2.jpg
• File:Training 103rd brigade.jpg
• File:UA 10th bgd Burevii 01.jpg
• File:UA 10th bgd Burevii 02.jpg
• File:UA 10th brigade T-80BVM.jpg
• File:UA 110th bde RM-70 01.jpg
• File:UA 110th bgd Dana 04.jpg
• File:UA 110th bgd Dana 05.jpg
• File:UA 110th brigade EDM4S 01.jpg

Invalid license. Probably a non-free images. License (Mil.gov.ua) applies only to materials posted on the web-site Mil.gov.ua, not on their social media. Needed link where this fotos published at Mil.gov.ua. --Kursant504 (talk) 05:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Also see: was a topic at Village pump, but no one has provided any evidence that such content can be considered free:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/11#Media_published_by_press_services_of_Ukrainian_military Kursant504 (talk) 05:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Given that we know the official Facebook accounts of military units like the Mil.gov.ua site only broadcast media from the declassified public fund of the Ukrainian army, I do not think it is wise to delete these files to punish the contributor who has not succeeded or did not know how to find these media on the Mil.gov.ua site.

However, files coming from Reddit or an invalid Facebook account indeed do not have the correct license. (I have detailed each file in the discussion page).

It might be wise to adapt the ""Mil.gov.ua template"" so that it does not only include media broadcasted on the Mil.gov.ua website, but also on the official sites of the Ukrainian military which also include all the Facebook accounts that display a coat of arms of a Ukrainian military unit, since these Facebook accounts, like the Mil.gov.ua site, use images from the same declassified public fund of the Ukrainian army.

Christian28TMA (talk) 12:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

"I do not think it is wise to delete these files to punish the contributor who has not succeeded or did not know how to find these media on the Mil.gov.ua site.' - you may feel free to help the contributor and found this media on Mil.gov.ua site. Why not? Kursant504 (talk) 05:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Sakura Miyawaki Signature.png

With a smiling face in the signature, IMO it is a calligraphic signature and not OK per COM:SIG Japan A1Cafel (talk) 05:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep.

• This is not copyright eligible Japanese calligraphy.

• This is below the "threshold of originality" for Japan. (Different from the lower ToO in COM:TOO Hong Kong)

• This signature cannot claim a copyright for the "smiley face" or "happy face."

See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=calligraphy+of+japan&title=Special:MediaSearch&go=Go&type=image

The "smiley face or happy face" is found worldwide. This file's happy face is below COM:TOO. Example here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sabritas_smiley_face.svg Also, this signature cannot claim a copyright for the "smiley face" or "happy face."

In https://www.courts.go.jp/app/hanrei_jp/detail7?id=13555 the English translation found at "citation 16" quotation,

"...[I]f the work has aesthetic elements that express thoughts and feelings through the selection of letters, the shape and size of the letters, the shading of the ink, the stroke of the brush, and the composition of the letters in combination with each other, it may be eligible for copyright protection as a work of art that shows the writer's individual expression. If the work has aesthetic elements that express ideas and feelings through the size of the ink, the shading of the ink, the movement or strokes of the brush, the composition of the letters in combination with each other, etc., it is considered to be a work of art in which the author's unique expression is expressed and can be protected by copyright."

"A signature must have aesthetic properties capable of artistic appreciation, not just beauty in terms of practical functionality, to be copyrightable." Quoted from COM:SIG Japan. This signature ONLY has "... practical functionality ..." and is NOT copyrightable. --Ooligan (talk) 19:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Logo Mobee HD Orange.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:E2make.png

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:E2make.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:ERSA Group logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:ERSA Group Logo White.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:ERSA Group.tif

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Melo Madeiit (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: upload for self promotion.

• File:Melo madeiit image.jpg
• File:Audimelo - Melo Madeiit.jpg
• File:Melo Madeiit beats playlist on SoundCloud.png
• File:Melo Madeiit.jpg
• File:Melo Madeiit in F.T.S Studios.jpg

0x0a (talk) 06:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Grey Matter India Company Logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:StealthChat logo.png

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:StealthChatLogo.png

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Anex technology.jpg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Ane Technology.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Thechatchaoslogo.jpg

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Vogelgruppe (Christoph Bechteler)

This statue is located on the grounds of a private apartment complex, which is also where the photographs seem to be taken from. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Freedom of panorama "a work is located "in" a public place if it can be observed from a public place.[45] In other words, what needs to be public is the place from where the photograph is taken; it does not matter if the work itself is accessible to the public." So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO since they don't qualify for FOP due to not being taken from a public street or the like.

• File:Skulptur Vogelgruppe von Christoph Bechteler.jpg
• File:Vogelgruppe von Christoph Bechteler in Hamburg-Lurup (1).jpg
• File:Vogelgruppe von Christoph Bechteler in Hamburg-Lurup (2).jpg
• File:Vogelgruppe von Christoph Bechteler in Hamburg-Lurup (3).jpg
• File:Vogelgruppe von Christoph Bechteler in Hamburg-Lurup (4).jpg
• File:Vogelgruppe von Christoph Bechteler in Hamburg-Lurup (5).jpg
• File:Vogelgruppe von Christoph Bechteler in Hamburg-Lurup (6).jpg

Adamant1 (talk) 23:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

As public as it gets: https://www.google.com/maps/@53.6057765,9.8699775,3a,77.6y,149.28h,77.7t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sSyNzna1OliINnUJL-bNWsg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?hl=de&entry=ttu. --Polarlys (talk) 08:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

You must have missed the part of the deletion request where I quoted from the guidelines that says "what needs to be public is the place from where the photograph is taken; it does not matter if the work itself is accessible to the public", which is weird since I boldened it. Regardless, the statue is on private property, which is why the photographs were taken from and what matters here. Not that people can see the statue from the road or adjacent sidewalk. The photographs have to actually be taken from them to qualify for FOP. Not on the grounds of the apartment complex. Since it's obviously not a public place. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

I haven't checked the land register entry - have you? Maybe this "private apartment complex" isn’t even located on the same property, maybe the property is owned by the city like a regular park or green strip? --Polarlys (talk) 08:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

It's not like I wouldn't have thought of that before I nominated the images for deletion if it had anything to do with this, ownership doesn't matter here though. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Public "Whether a place is "public" for purposes of § 59(1) does not depend on whether it is public or private property." --Adamant1 (talk) 09:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

This is a public lawn, freely accessible from the sidewalk and paths. User Adamant is hounding me. He needs to be blocked, and soon. —Minderbinder (talk) 13:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

You really need to stop with the insults and personal attacks like I've already asked you to in other DRs. Its not hounding to nominate multiple images that were uploaded by the same user for deletion. Especially in this case since its only been a couple and at least one of them is clearly COPYVIO. Although I'm sure the rest are to, but its not hounding regardless. More on topic though, the lawn is clearly on the apartment complex property and it doesn't magically become public because you through it to take the photographs. Although I'm more then willing to leave it up to whomever closes this to decide since its not a bright line by any means as to makes somewhere in Germany a public place or not. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

It’s not hounding said the hounder. The same guy who just looked through my recent uploads with a pounding heart, looking for a way to stick it to me. Great stuff, keep it coming. —Minderbinder (talk) 14:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

---

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Files in Category:Vogelgruppe (Christoph Bechteler)

The earlier DR by Adamant1 was closed after just 15 hours as "no valid reason for deletion". That was much too early IMO, as this is not a clear-cut case, and Adamant1's argument isn't completely outlandish. Reinhard Kraasch didn't want to re-open the DR, so I'm nominating the files (minus one where you don't really see the sculpture) to allow for a longer discussion about the case and hopefully get a more detailed closing statement addressing it.

I've looked at aerial photos of the place where this sculpture is located, and while some of the photos could have been taken from the nearby street or sidewalk, others quite clearly must have been taken by stepping onto this strip of grass (right next to the street, without any fence, wall or hedge) where the sculpture is located. The question we have to ask is is this piece of land sufficiently public as required by German fop, is there a sufficient dedication to the general public as mentioned by legal commentators (Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Public)? In the case of the street or the sidewalk this would quite clearly be the case. For the strip of grass, one could still come to the conclusion that yes, there is a sufficient dedication to the general public, but that question should be adressed. I myself will go  Neutral here.

• File:Skulptur Vogelgruppe von Christoph Bechteler.jpg
• File:Vogelgruppe von Christoph Bechteler in Hamburg-Lurup (1).jpg
• File:Vogelgruppe von Christoph Bechteler in Hamburg-Lurup (2).jpg
• File:Vogelgruppe von Christoph Bechteler in Hamburg-Lurup (3).jpg
• File:Vogelgruppe von Christoph Bechteler in Hamburg-Lurup (4).jpg
• File:Vogelgruppe von Christoph Bechteler in Hamburg-Lurup (5).jpg

Rosenzweig τ 06:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

The sculpture is a couple of metres away from the sidewalk, clearly visible on Google Street. it is situated on a public lawn, no fences, no gates, with footpaths crossing it. And yes, I did step on the lawn for some of these pictures. Is this a crime? Everybody uses the law for shortcuts, it is public access. The apartment houses belong to Wohnungsbaugesellschaft SAGA, which is owned by the city of Hamburg. If I were to share this customer with somebody living there, they would laugh out loud. That lawn (Grünanlage) being private? Please.

Here is a procedural question: assume that these DRs are turned down as well, how about yet another user does not like that outcome, and puts in another DR? It’s going to be ground hog day. Strange customs. —Minderbinder (talk) 18:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Well heck, I guess all we have to do next time is ask a tenant of the property about it and if they laugh, then we're good to go. Wow, who would have thought it was that easy. Anyway, there's no footpath crossing the grass on the Google Street View images. I don't know why there would be or what exactly it would be a shortcut to when there's a fence on the other side of the grass anyway. Otherwise where exactly are people using the lawn as a shortcut to? --Adamant1 (talk) 22:30, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

There is even a plaque with the title and artist on the base of the artwork, which faces the street and can only be read without binoculars if someone steps onto this piece of greenery. It is marked with SAGA. So the local housing association put an artwork there that is freely accessible from the road and has a plaque that requires you to step on the grass if you want to read it. This is dedicated to the general public. --Polarlys (talk) 22:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

No offense, but both of you seem to be making a lot of tangential arguments instead of addressing if the lawn is sufficiently dedicated to the general public enough. Random tenants potentially laughing about this or the existence of a plaque on the statue aren't evidence that the lawn is sufficiently dedicated to the general public enough to qualify as a public place. Although I did ask Minderbinder a question about where people are using the lawn as a shortcut to when it's fenced off and I'd like an answer without someone trying to change the subject. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

This was an argument in favor of "the one who put the statue there likely allows the public to step on the lawn". --Polarlys (talk) 13:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

And I asked Minderbinder a question that your getting in the way of me getting an answer to. So what's yout point? I don't care that the statue has a plaque on it. I asked Minderbinder where people are using the lawn as a shortcut to and I'd like an answer without you playing defense for them by bringing up something that has nothing to do with what I'm asking them or anything else in the message your responding to. Honestly, its a little wierd that both of you seem to have all the time in the world to capitulate about this and talk in circles about how meritless these DRs are, but then Minderbinder apparently can't even be bothered to answer a simple question about where the lawn is a shortcut to. Go figure. Anyway, I think I'm done with my side of this. I'm sure whomever closes this will make the best decision based on the evidence. I don't really have anything else to say about it though. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Es handelt sich einfach um eine öffentlich zugängliche Grünanlage rund um Wohnblöcke der SAGA. Die SAGA ist das größte Wohnungsunternehmen für Sozialwohnungen in Hamburg und gehört der Stadt Hamburg. Da kann jeder über den Rasen gehen, ob nun Mieter, Spaziergänger oder spielende Kinder. Die Frage der öffentlichen Zugänglichkeit erstreckt sich nicht darauf, ob da ein Trampelpfad verläuft oder nicht. Die Skulptur ist ein paar Meter vom Bürgersteig entfernt, aber genauso zugänglich. Mit dem unermüdlich Löschanträge stellenden Benutzer diskutiere ich das nicht weiter. Wer hat den zum Richter gewählt? Erst einen Löschantrag stellen und dann alle Argumente wegwischen? Das ist eine Umkehrung der Beweislast. Ich finde es ziemlich enttäuschend, wie du hier agierst, User:Rosenzweig. Erinnere dich mal an das Projektziel. --Minderbinder (talk) 21:51, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Noch etwas Kontext: Die Skulptur stellt drei Vögel dar. Vor ein paar Jahren wurde die Arbeit teilweise zerstört. Jemand hat die Hälse und Köpfe von zwei der Vögel abgesägt, ob nun aus purer Zerstörungswut oder um ein paar Euro für das Buntmetall zu bekommen. Das ist der Grund, warum ich für Foto 5 so dicht herangegangen bin. In Hamburg (wie auch in anderen Städten) sind in den letzten Jahren reihenweise Bronze-Skulpturen im öffentlichen Raum gestohlen worden - für das Kilo Bronze bekommt man je nach Legierung zwischen 7 und 10 EUR. Im Vergleich zum Wert der Kunstwerke ist das lächerlich wenig. Bevor die Skulpturen in den Altmetallhandel kommen, werden sie zersägt und zerkloppt, später dann eingeschmolzen, verloren für immer. Das Projekt des Wikipedia-Kontors Hamburg mit der Hamburger Kulturbehörde soll mehr Aufmerksamkeit für diese Kunst schaffen. Sie ist komplett vom Steuerzahler bezahlt worden, sie dient der Öffentlichkeit. Ich finde es sehr traurig, wie hier ganze ein oder zwei Benutzer mit einem unerbittlichen Fanatismus und Starrsinn agieren, ohne Blick für die Hintergründe und den Sinn eines Projektes wie Wikipedia. Die Freude am Vernichten der Dokumentation dieser Kunstwerke kann ich nicht nachvollziehen. --Minderbinder (talk) 07:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

@Minderbinder: Ich finde es gelinde gesagt seltsam, dass du hier quasi per Ferndiagnose "Freude am Vernichten der Dokumentation dieser Kunstwerke" unterstellst. Soweit ich's überblicke, hat hier niemand die guten Absichten oder Projektziel bzw. -sinn in Abrede gestellt. Wikimedia Commons und Wikipedia bewegen sich aber nun mal in einem Rahmen, der einerseits von einer der Projektvorgaben (nur freie Inhalte), andererseits von den rechtlichen Vorgaben (in Gestalt von Gesetzen, Entscheidungen, Kommentarliteratur) bestimmt wird. Das Problem sind oft genug weniger die rechtlichen Vorgaben, da ginge bspw. mit den de:Schranken des Urheberrechts (in Deutschland) oder ähnlichen Regelungen in anderen Ländern sicher eine ganze Menge. Dem steht aber oft der eigene Anspruch der ausschließlich freien Inhalte im Wege. Die Wikipedien können das im Sinne einer exemption doctrine policy (EDP) zumindest ein Stück weit abändern und ein bisschen fair use zulassen (was die de.wp aber abgelehnt hat). Wikimedia Commons darf aber lt. Festlegung der Wikimedia Foundation keine EDP beschließen, und die freien Inhalte sichern wir eben auch allen möglichen Nachnutzern zu, völlig losgelöst von einer wie auch immer gearteten Einbindung in enzyklopädische Inhalte oder Absichten wie der Dokumentation von öffentlich aufgestellter Kunst. Wir müssen also versuchen, unseren eigenen Anspruch der freien Inhalte bestmöglich mit der Rechtslage in Einklang zu bringen, und stützen uns dabei bspw. auf Spielräume durch Gerichtsentscheidungen in unserem Sinne. Wobei diese Spielräume manchmal durch spätere Entscheidungen eingeengt oder komplett abgeschafft werden (siehe die Loriot-Entscheidung zur Frage von Briefmarken als amtlichen Werken, wo wir immer noch am Aufräumen und Bereinigen sind), manchmal gibt es aber auch neue Spielräume wie bpsw. die AIDA-Entscheidung.

In manchen Fällen, so auch hier, scheint es nicht möglich oder zumindest fragwürdig, den eigenen Anspruch und die Rechtslage in Einklang zu bringen, und das Mittel der Wahl, um so etwas zu diskutieren, ist nun einmal de facto oft genug ein Löschantrag. Man kann solche Fälle auch anderswo diskutieren, aber wenn jemand wegen begründeter rechtlicher Zweifel einen Löschantrag stellt, ist das legitim. Es ist vor allem kein persönlicher Angriff auf die Person oder Reputation derjenigen, die die Dateien erstellt bzw. hochgeladen haben. Manches Mal ergibt sich in der Diskussion durchaus auch eine Lösung, die weitgehend akzptiert wird. Die Diskussion entgegen den üblichen Regeln schon nach kürzester Zeit zu beenden, trägt aber sicher nicht zu einer solchen Akzeptanz bei. Deswegen kann ich Forderungen, den Löschantrag ganz schnell wieder zu schließen, nicht zustimmen. Es gibt Fälle, in denen das üblicherweise gemacht wird, reine Juxanträge bspw. oder Löschanträge, in denen der Hochladende selbst nach kurzer Zeit wieder um Löschung bittet, weil ein Fehler passiert ist. Das ist aber keiner dieser Fälle, und ich kann auch keinen Konsens zur frühzeitigen Beendung erkennen. Also sollte man das die übliche Zeit laufen und dann einen möglichst unbeteiligten Admin entscheiden lassen. --Rosenzweig τ 10:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Das mag so ein, und ich schätze auch deinen sachlichen Tonfall dazu. Nur nehme ich dem LA-Steller nicht ab, dass das Heraussuchen gerade dieser Fotos Zufall oder irgendwie "Eingangskontrolle" war. Der hat sich per Ententest nach einigen vorigen Zusammentreffen bewusst auf meine Uploads gestürzt, ist die durchgegangen um mir eins auszuwischen. Das man gegen diese Art von Hounding hier auf Commons nicht geschützt wird, ist eine neue Erfahrung für mich. Dass ich darauf gereizt reagiere ist nicht ideal, aber doch wohl verständlich. --Minderbinder (talk) 11:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

The question of public accessibility does not extend to whether there is a trail there or not. Yet yesterday you were the one arguing it a was a public place because it supposedly had footpaths crossing it lmao. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Vegetatives Wachsen (Klaus-Jürgen Luckey)

This sculpture is located in what looks like a fenced off business park, which is also where the photographs were taken from. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Freedom of panorama "what needs to be public is the place from where the photograph is taken; it does not matter if the work itself is accessible to the public...If a statue is located next to a public street, photographs of the statue taken from that street enjoy freedom of panorama, but photographs of the very same statue taken from a non-public spot do not." So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

• File:Skulptur Vegetatives Wachsen 1.jpg
• File:Skulptur Vegetatives Wachsen 2.jpg
• File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (1).jpg
• File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (2).jpg
• File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (3).jpg
• File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (4).jpg

Adamant1 (talk) 00:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

This is not a business park, but a residential area that is separated from the main road by a fence, but can be entered from other directions freely. --Polarlys (talk) 08:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

If you look at Google Maps the statue is in the backyard of a building that houses a shipping company and a contractor. Maybe they are home based businesses, but I guess it doesn't matter since it's still private regardless. Just because someone can walk around whatever the building is into the backyard to photograph the sculpture doesn't mean it's a public place or that the photographs would qualify for FOP either. Otherwise they should have taken from the street or adjacent walkway, which they clearly weren't. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Taking a photo over a fence doesn’t rule out FOP if you could reach the artwork freely. I miss your proof why this should not be possible. The artwork is likely located on one of the park like green strips that often separate larger housing estates from thoroughfares in Hamburg and are separated from the road by a fence for the safety of children/dogs, although the entire estate is freely accessible from other places. --Polarlys (talk) 08:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Sure, if the photographs were taken on the other side of the fence then they would qualify for freedom of panorama. It would be ridiculous to assume the images were taken from the road just because it's possible to photograph the statue from there though and there just isn't any evidence that's where they were taken from. Like if you look at this image it was clearly taken at ground level and the fence isn't visible in the foreground. The same goes for the rest of the images. The fence should be visible in foreground if the photographs were taken from the sidewalk though. Really, I don't think it's possible to even take ground level shots of the statue like that from the sidewalk to begin with since there's bushes in the way. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Polarlys has described the local situation correctly. I took the first two images in the list definitely from the public sidewalk on the eastern side of the main road "Elbgaustraße". There is/was a fence partially covered with plants between the lawn area around the residential buildings and this sidewalk. But the sculpture is/was clearly visible from the public sidewalk, especially during winter months. If you use a telelens in winter, you can/could take an image thats nearly unobstructed by the fence or the plants. Take a look into the EXIF-Data of my images and you find, they were taken in February with a focal length around 130 mm. I think, the other images were taken under similar circumstances. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 12:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

I took these pictures from the sidewalk. —Minderbinder (talk) 13:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

I don't think you did for the reasons I've stated and the fact that you've apparently taken pictures of statues in other non-public places before, like in fenced off school grounds. And completely ingnoring the string of false statements you've made other DRs to. So really no reason to think you didn't just go on the property to take the pictures. Although I'm more willing to leave it up to whomever closes this to decide if they want to give you the benefit of the doubt or not, but there's really no reason to IMO. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

---

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Files in Category:Vegetatives Wachsen (Klaus-Jürgen Luckey)

The earlier DR by Adamant1 was closed after just 15 hours as "no valid reason for deletion". That was much too early IMO, as this is not a clear-cut case, and Adamant1's argument isn't completely outlandish. Reinhard Kraasch didn't want to re-open the DR, so I'm nominating the files to allow for a longer discussion about the case and hopefully get a more detailed closing statement addressing it.

I've looked at aerial photos of the place where this sculpture is located, and it seems to me that none of the photos could have been taken from the nearby street or sidewalk, they all must have been taken by stepping onto this strip of grass where the sculpture is located. That piece of land is behind some residential building, next to a street, and apparently there are some bushes or trees between the grass and the street. The question we have to ask is is this piece of land sufficiently public as required by German fop, is there a sufficient dedication to the general public as mentioned by legal commentators (Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Public)? In the case of the street or the sidewalk this would quite clearly be the case. For the piece of land where the sculpture is located, one could still come to the conclusion that yes, there is a sufficient dedication to the general public, but that question should be adressed. I myself will go  Neutral here.

• File:Skulptur Vegetatives Wachsen 1.jpg
• File:Skulptur Vegetatives Wachsen 2.jpg
• File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (1).jpg
• File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (2).jpg
• File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (3).jpg
• File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (4).jpg

Rosenzweig τ 06:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

OK, I'll rephrase: Some of the photos could have been taken from a sidewalk as stated. Let the deciding admin be the judge of that. --Rosenzweig τ 07:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

I don't like to repeat myself: all of my images were definitely taken from public ground. As stated above. The other images seem to be taken at nearly exactly the same position. By the way: I've been at the location personally and Adamant's argument IS completely outlandish, if you`ve been there only once. I am extremely annoyed that Rosenzweig is accusing me of lying. Close this silly deletion request as soon as possible --Dirtsc (talk) 07:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

@Dirtsc: I have not, I repeat not accused you of lying. I have just stated that it seemed to me that the photos could not have been taken from the street. I may be wrong in that, but that was my impression. I mainly nominated these files again because DR should generally stay open at least seven days (Commons:Deletion requests) and Adamant1 clearly felt this DR was closed too early and there was still need for discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 07:57, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

I was actually going to vote to keep your images since its more plausable they were taken from the street then it is with the others. The way your acting about the whole thing really doesn't help though. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

I wonder what is not clear here and why people who are not familiar with the area doubt, based on interpretations of satellite images or maps, that the sculpture can not be seen from public ground as it was photographed. The sculpture was clearly visible from public paths when I took the photos and could easily be photographed while there were no leaves on the bushes. In the above mentionend Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Public is clearly stated, that "what needs to be public is the place from where the photograph is taken; it does not matter if the work itself is accessible to the public". In my opinion, the reopening of the discussion is completely unnecessary. --Dirtsc (talk) 11:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Es geht doch nicht darum, ob das Foto von Privatgrund oder öffentlichem Grund aus aufgenommen wurde (das können wir doch gar nicht überprüfen), sondern ob der Weg oder Park "der Öffentlichkeit gewidmet" ist oder nicht. In diesem Fall handelt es sich um ein von kleinen Fußwegen durchzogenes SAGA-Gelände, da steht ganz sicher nirgendwo ein Schild "Betreten verboten". Ich gehe bis zum Beweis des Gegenteils davon aus, dass dieses Parkgelände - egal wem es gehört - öffentlich zugänglich ist, und dass es keine Rolle spielt, ob die Skulptur vom Fußweg an der Elbgaustraße aus aus aufgenommen wurde oder der Fotograf ein paar Schritte näher herangetreten ist.

Mein Eindruck ist auch, dass es hier auch gewisse kulturelle Missverständnisse im Spiel sind, indem vom US-amerikanischem Verhältnis zu Privateigentum ausgegangen wird, wo gleich jemand mit der Schrotflinte kommt, wenn man sich ein paar Meter zu weit von der Straße entfernt. Das ist hier definitiv nicht der Fall. Also noch mal: Ich sehe keinen Grund zur Löschung.

Englisch: It's obviously not about whether the photo was taken from private or public property (we can't even check that), but whether the path or park is "dedicated to the public" or not. In this case, it is a SAGA site criss-crossed by small footpaths, and there is certainly no sign saying "No trespassing" anywhere. Until proven otherwise, I assume that this park area - regardless of who owns it - is open to the public, and that it doesn't matter whether the sculpture was photographed from the footpath on Elbgaustraße or whether the photographer took a few steps closer.

My impression is also that there are certain cultural misunderstandings at play here, assuming the US relationship to private property, where someone comes with a shotgun if you move a few meters too far from the road. That is definitely not the case here. Again: I don't see a reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 09:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Very good, thank you. That is the kind of background information (re "dedicated to the public" or not) needed to decide such a case. --Rosenzweig τ 10:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

I appreciate the background information. Although just to clarify since you didn't seem to get it on your talk page, I never said this had anything to do with if the statue is on private property or not. By "private" I merely mean "not a public place." It has nothing to do with who owns the property though. As to the whole thing about it supposedly being a park area crisscrossed by small footpaths, they don't seem to exist either on OpenStreetMaps or Google. There are paths in the front of the building going up to the entrances. As well as the sidewalk next to the street on the other side of the fence. Neither one makes where the statue is a park that has footpaths around it though. Anyone can look at either Google Street View or OpenStreetMaps to see there's no paths anywhere near the statue. In fact it, doesn't even look there's a path going around the back of the building to where the statue is. Let alone do they crisscross each other. So I don't think your justification for keeping the images is valid. It would be ridiculous if the standard for what makes something a public place was simply a footpath going up to a buildings entrance. Just as a side to that, I encourage anyone to look at the Google Street View images from in front of the building on Lüdersring. Even the front is fenced off and the parking lots have swing gates baring people from entering them. So in no way is the property a public place. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

On several photos (e.g. File:Skulptur von Klaus-Jürgen Luckey, Lüdersring 91, Hamburg-Lurup (1).jpg you can see in the background the more of less fenced off backside of the buildings. For me, it is also obvious that the location is not part of the properties that you have viewed from the front on Google Street Map, but a strip of land behind these properties, the green stripe I mentioned earlier. --Polarlys (talk) 10:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

That's fencing for someone's patio. You can see them on the Google Satellite images. Most apartments or office flats have their own private areas in the back of the building. That doesn't make the larger backyard area completely different different property though. Regardless, if you look slightly north of there at Elbgaustraße 205 on the satellite images the property for the larger complex ends right below it and there doesn't even seem to be a way to get to the back of the property because it's blocked by the house and a fence. So the only other option would be in front of the complex on Lüdersring, which as I've said is also mostly fenced off and there's still no path going around the back. So even if where the statue is was separate property, it's still not "sufficiently dedicated" to the public enough to qualify for FOP. But I still think it's part of the complex. BTW, if you look at this Street View image there's no fence there and it's clearly part of the property the building is on, not a separate area. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

@Adamant1: Thank you for posting the StreetView image. As this is a location in germany, I didn't expected some usable street view there. ;-) This should settle the case. In the image you see the public footpath along the Elbgaustraße, behind that the fence and some plants, behind that the lawn and the sculpture. Compare the fence und the plants to the pedestrian at the left and you'll find, that there is an nearly unobstructed view from the footpath towards the sculpture. So the images qualify for freedom of panorama, as stated in my above statement. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 07:53, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

@Dirtsc: You must have missed the multiple times I've said there isn't an unobstructed view from the ground where the photographs uploaded by Minderbinder seem to be taken from. Nowhere have I claimed there is no way at all to photograph the statue from the street, just not at the angle where these photographs seem to be taken from. I'm sure you get the difference. It's getting rather tiring having to repeat myself over and over because no one on your side of this wants to use an ounce of fairness or honesty when responding to me for some reason. In case your wondering this seems to be about the place where Minderbinder took their images from. How about you tell me how it was possible for him to take photographs from that angle while on the other side of the fence since your apparently the expert here. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

How can I prove that the images are made from the public footpath? They have been taken just a few weeks ago, so if I visit the site now, the conditions should not have changed a lot. Maybe I can do this this weekend. Shall I take a video of the site, shall I duplicate Minderbinders images? Would you believe me, if I take images or videos with my smartphone (because it is the only device I own, that takes images and GPS-coordinates simultaneously)? Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 18:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Ich habe die von mir angefertigten Aufnahmen komplett vom Fußgängerweg aus angefertigt, dabei über die Bewachsung am Zaun hinweg fotografiert. Dazu würde ich auch eine eidesstattliche Erklärung abgeben. Ich finde es wirklich langsam ganz schön albern, wie hier argumentiert wird. —Minderbinder (talk) 18:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

When I take pictures, I do not upload them in raw format. Rather, I take care to select only the good pictures, frame them by cropping, correct slanting angles, white filter, brightness and saturation. I also usually remove the EXIF information, because I do not care for other people to identify me by the ID of my camera, or follow my footsteps hour by hour, minute by minute. I am making an exception here, and have uploaded the pictures as taken, with EXIF information:

• File:Sculpture as seen from Elbgaustraße, Hamburg-Lurup with EXIF (1).jpg
• File:Sculpture as seen from Elbgaustraße, Hamburg-Lurup with EXIF (2).jpg
• File:Sculpture as seen from Elbgaustraße, Hamburg-Lurup with EXIF (3).jpg
• File:Sculpture as seen from Elbgaustraße, Hamburg-Lurup with EXIF (4).jpg

Check the locations taken, they follow the public footpath by the road.

@Rosenzweig: It would seem to me that you have an obligation to end this strange trial. Like I said above, I took these pictures from the public footpath (Bürgersteig) along Elbgaustraße. The EXIF information backs that up. If anybody else wants to challenge that, I would suggest they call me a liar to my face. I have been active on Wikipedia with this account since 2005. That's 18 years. I was elected a sysop on de:WP first in 2008. I know many people there personally, I have a reputation to defend. I am not some punk smearing other people's honesty. Time to stop this behavior. --Minderbinder (talk) 21:44, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

@Minderbinder: I'd rather not close this deletion request early again, and I'd rather not close a DR I opened myself if multiple parties with opposing views are involved; another admin should close this. I will however change my vote to  Keep after the extensive contributions by you, Dirtsc and Reinhard Kraasch, you have convinced me that it was and is indeed possible to take these pictures from the sidewalk (through some bushes), so fop does apply. This is not a "trial" BTW, you are not indicted, and nobody called you a liar. The thing here is that this DR was closed very early, with just the standard rationale not addressing the situation while the original nominator was not convinced. Looking at the images (and aerial images of the place), the situation wasn't really clear to me either, so it seemed that additional time for discussion and explanations could be helpful. And it was, you have convinced me. --Rosenzweig τ 08:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Jameh Mosque of Semnan2019 2.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 07:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Jameh Mosque of Semnan2019 3.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 07:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Jameh Mosque of Semnan2019 4.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 07:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Jameh Mosque of Semnan2019 5.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 07:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Jameh Mosque of Semnan2019 6.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 07:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Jameh Mosque of Semnan2019.jpg

all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license {{User|POS78}} ^talk 07:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:CallOffice.png

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:41, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:AB BB.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:AB Bb.png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Gavfx.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg

Violation of architect's copyright. Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. The modern building dates to 2008 and is authored by architect Youssef Melehi (source). The image nominated obviously focuses on the building and the commercial Creative Commons license used here has no clearance from the architect. Doesn't matter if this was imported from Panoramio in 2017. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

 Info Melehi appears to be alive as of 2019, so this work is still copyrighted. Several more Moroccan public railway stations are also authored by him, the "station architect of Morocco" per the article, so more image reviews must be needed. See also this site for more Moroccan buildings authored by him. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Gare de Marrakech (3093403616).jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. Doesn't matter if this is a Flickr import. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Gare de Marrakech at night.jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Gare de Marrakech in November 2015.jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:O1000066715008300556.jpg

Decent quality, no exif, only upload of new user. PCP Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:GARE DE MARRAKECH MOROCCO APRIL 2013 (8694650375).jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. Doesn't matter if this is a Flickr import. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

 Question When was this built and by whom? Also, I'm not sure this is copyrightable, because it looks like an old mosque, and those aren't so special in Marrakech. PaterMcFly (talk) 08:39, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

@PaterMcFly go to the deletion nomination link I provided here. The architect is stated there. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Using old style of architecture is an idea. We are commonly informed that copyright protects an expression of an idea. Ideas are not protected, like the style of architecture, but expressions are. The architect implemented his idea through designing of this modern-era railway building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I'm also not sure this applies here, but I guess someone has to decide how special this building is compared to older, existing buildings in the surroundings. I've never been there, so I cannot tell. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:57, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:GARE DE MARRAKECH MOROCCO APRIL 2013 (8703365453).jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. Doesn't matter if this is a Flickr import. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:GARE DU MARRAKECH MOROCCO APRIL 2013 (8695950991).jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. Doesn't matter if this is a Flickr import. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:GARE DU MARRAKECH MOROCCO APRIL 2013 (8752603075).jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. Doesn't matter if this is a Flickr import. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:La gare de Marrakech.png

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Marrakech 71DSC 0925 (42460250265).jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. Doesn't matter if this is a Flickr import. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Marrakech 71DSC 0926 (42647714434).jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. Doesn't matter if this is a Flickr import. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Marrakech 71DSC 0927 (42460249775).jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. Doesn't matter if this is a Flickr import. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Marrakech 71DSC 0928 (42647713924).jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. Doesn't matter if this is a Flickr import. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Marrakech main railway station, Morocco - panoramio.jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. Doesn't matter if this is a Panoramio import. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Marrakesh railway station 04.jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Marrakesh railway station 07.jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Marrakesh railway station main entrance.jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Marrakesh Train Station (6858199801).jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. Doesn't matter if this is a Flickr import. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Marrakesh, Morocco - panoramio (51).jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. Doesn't matter if this is a Panoramio import. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:30, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Railway station Marrakech.jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Train station, Marrakech, Morocco (23847259231).jpg

Architectural copyright violation, since Morocco does not provide commercial freedom of panorama. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Der im traditionellen Stil gehaltene neue Bahnhof von Marrakesch. - panoramio.jpg for the information about who is the author of the building. Doesn't matter if this is a Flickr import. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Əlipənah Bayramov - Həyatım, mühitim.jpg

Looks like a recently published book's cover. 0x0a (talk) 08:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Nuran Bayramlı (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own works. The photos have been widely disseminated. See [3].

• File:Atamoğlanov Əbülfət Sabir oğlu.png
• File:Atamoğlanov Əbülfət.png

0x0a (talk) 09:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Nuran Bayramlı (talk · contribs)

Shots of printed photos. The souce and copyright status of the original work are not indicated.

• File:Əlipənah Bayramov 3.png
• File:Əlipənah Bayramov 2.jpg
• File:Əlipənah Bayramov.jpg

0x0a (talk) 09:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohamed Kaddur Pablo (talk · contribs)

Source description of De mi archivo particular ("From my private file") appears to mean images that the uploader has saved from the internet. Some are dupes of other files on Commons (File:Mezquita Actualidad 3.jpg is a scaled down version of File:Mezquita Muley El Mehdi, Ceuta.jpg), others like File:Mezquita15.jpg and File:Mezquita 16.jpg are watermarked to different websites.

• File:Mezquita Actualidad 3.jpg
• File:Mezquita Muley el Mehdi 2020.png
• File:Mezquita Actualidad 2.jpg
• File:ESPAÑA ARQUITECTURA. Ceuta, 1941.-Exterior de la mezquita de Muley el Mehdi, en la av de Africa, se construyó en 1940 planos del arquit sr Tejero col.jpg
• File:Mezquita Actualidad 1.jpg
• File:Mezquita 17.jpg
• File:Mezquita 16.jpg
• File:Collage conmemorativo 2.jpg
• File:Collage conmemorativo 1.jpg
• File:Mezquita15.jpg
• File:Mezquita13.jpg
• File:Mezquita14.jpg
• File:Mezquita12.jpg
• File:Mezquita11.jpg
• File:6 Inauguración y Discursos el 18 de Julio de 1940 page-0020 col.jpg
• File:6 Inauguración y Discursos el 18 de Julio de 1940 page-0019 col.jpg
• File:6 Inauguración y Discursos el 18 de Julio de 1940 page-0018 col.jpg
• File:6 Inauguración y Discursos el 18 de Julio de 1940 page-0017 col.jpg
• File:6 Inauguración y Discursos el 18 de Julio de 1940 page-0016 col.jpg
• File:6 Inauguración y Discursos el 18 de Julio de 1940 page-0015 col.jpg
• File:6 Inauguración y Discursos el 18 de Julio de 1940 page-0011.jpg
• File:6 Inauguración y Discursos el 18 de Julio de 1940 page-0010 col.jpg
• File:6 Inauguración y Discursos el 18 de Julio de 1940 page-0009 col.jpg
• File:6 Inauguración y Discursos el 18 de Julio de 1940 page-0008 col.jpg
• File:6 Inauguración y Discursos el 18 de Julio de 1940 page-0007 col.jpg
• File:6 Inauguración y Discursos el 18 de Julio de 1940 page-0006 col.jpg
• File:6 Inauguración y Discursos el 18 de Julio de 1940 page-0001 col.jpg
• File:3 Construcción de la Mezquita Muley el Mehdi (Julio 1938 - Diciembre 1939) page-0013.jpg
• File:6 Con Alcalde Ceuta col.jpg
• File:3 Construcción de la Mezquita Muley el Mehdi (Julio 1938 - Diciembre 1939) page-0015.jpg
• File:3 Construcción de la Mezquita Muley el Mehdi (Julio 1938 - Diciembre 1939) page-0011 col.jpg
• File:3 Construcción de la Mezquita Muley el Mehdi (Julio 1938 - Diciembre 1939) page-0012 col.jpg
• File:3 Construcción de la Mezquita Muley el Mehdi (Julio 1938 - Diciembre 1939) page-0010 col.jpg
• File:3 Construcción de la Mezquita Muley el Mehdi (Julio 1938 - Diciembre 1939) page-0009 col.jpg
• File:3 Construcción de la Mezquita Muley el Mehdi (Julio 1938 - Diciembre 1939) page-0008 col.jpg
• File:3 Construcción de la Mezquita Muley el Mehdi (Julio 1938 - Diciembre 1939) page-0007 col.jpg
• File:3 Construcción de la Mezquita Muley el Mehdi (Julio 1938 - Diciembre 1939) page-0006 col.jpg
• File:3 Construcción de la Mezquita Muley el Mehdi (Julio 1938 - Diciembre 1939) page-0005 col.jpg
• File:2a Firma del Acta de colocación de la primera piedra 1 col.jpg
• File:3 Construcción de la Mezquita Muley el Mehdi (Julio 1938 - Diciembre 1939) page-0004 col.jpg
• File:3 Construcción de la Mezquita Muley el Mehdi (Julio 1938 - Diciembre 1939) page-0003 col.jpg
• File:003Villa Yamina, emplazamiento de la Comunidad col.jpg
• File:2 Firma del Acta de colocación de la primera piedra 2 (Beigbeder) col.jpg
• File:0001 Despacho Comunidad col.jpg
• File:0002 Despacho Comunidad2 (2).jpg

Belbury (talk) 13:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

---

Deleted: per nomination. Description is very poor and unreliable, thus even though some images might be encyclopedic and in PD, it would be easier to find sourced and better copies on the web. These are mostly unused anyway. Some do violate FoP and other copyright laws. --Materialscientist (talk) 03:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Mohamed Kaddur Pablo (talk · contribs)

Per previous request against this user, the "from my private file" source for these very different photos of the same building probably means the images are taken from the web. Several have a signature on the image that says "F Ruiz", not matching the uploader username. File:Mezquita Muley el Mehdi 20.jpg has some kind of watermark logo in the top left.

• File:Mezquita Muley el Mehdi 26.jpg
• File:Mezquita Muley el Mehdi 27.jpg
• File:Mezquita Muley el Mehdi 25.jpg
• File:Mezquita Muley el Mehdi 23.jpg
• File:Mezquita Muley el Mehdi 24.jpg
• File:Mezquita Muley el Mehdi 22.png
• File:Mezquita Muley el Mehdi anocheciendo.jpg
• File:Mezquita Muley el Mehdi 2020bis.jpg
• File:Mezquita 12.10.2020.jpg
• File:Mezquita Muley el Mehdi 20.jpg

Belbury (talk) 09:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Kazım Can.jpg

According to EXIF data, the photographer is Orkhan Rahmanli (and so not an "own work"). There is no indication that he allowed the photo to be available with a compatible license. Delete as possible copyvio. C messier (talk) 09:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Portrait Prof. Dr. Christian Fischer.jpg

possible copyvio © Schernau, Ute M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Емблема додатку «Розмінування України».webp

Not free image. Source didn't have any statements that its content is free. Kursant504 (talk) 09:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Franklin.png

This file was initially tagged by Gnomingstuff as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image appears to have a trademark and unlikely to be cc Yann (talk) 09:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:The Royal Coronation Ceremony of King Maha Vajiralongkorn Sil RR.png

Reproduction of a recent coin/metal. Protected by copyright per COM:THAILAND. C messier (talk) 09:39, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:佐竹台幼児遊園ジャングルジム.jpg

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Alfrieak (talk) 09:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Goecki (talk · contribs)

None of these are own work as claimed

• File:Kurt naber col2.jpg
• File:Kurt naber col.jpg
• File:Naber K.jpg
• File:K Naber.tif

Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Watermjau (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work as claimed, PCP

• File:Sorro.jpg
• File:Nabbo.jpg
• File:ASinyavsky.jpg
• File:ASolzh.jpg
• File:ISteinberg.jpg
• File:PSorokin.jpg
• File:VNabokov.jpg
• File:VladimirNabokov.png
• File:IsaacSteinberg.png
• File:PitirmSorokin.png

Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Keep The following, now with correct attribution: --RAN (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
• File:IsaacSteinberg.png
• File:PitirmSorokin.png
• File:Sorro.jpg
• File:ISteinberg.jpg
•  Delete Russian still under copyright:
• File:VNabokov.jpg
• File:VladimirNabokov.png
• File:Nabbo.jpg
• File:VNabokov.jpg
• File:ASinyavsky.jpg

File:John Pannell - Morocco - 2005-04 - DSC 0181 (33579722).jpg

Copyrighted work by Michel Pinseau, and there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Morocco. See prior nominations at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Hassan II.jpg

Copyrighted work by Michel Pinseau, and there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Morocco. See prior nominations at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:John Pannell - Morocco - 2005-04 - DSC 0182 (33579741).jpg

Columns and details of copyrighted work by Michel Pinseau, and there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Morocco. See prior nominations at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:John Pannell - Morocco - 2005-04 - DSC 0194 (33579747).jpg

Interior architecture of the copyrighted work by Michel Pinseau, and there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Morocco. See prior nominations at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:John Pannell - Morocco - 2005-04 - DSC 0204 (33579781).jpg

Interior architecture of the copyrighted work by Michel Pinseau, and there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Morocco. See prior nominations at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:John Pannell - Morocco - 2005-04 - DSC 0195 (33579756).jpg

Interior architectural details like columns of the copyrighted work by Michel Pinseau, and there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Morocco. See prior nominations at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:مسجد الحسن الثاني 2.jpg

Copyrighted work by Michel Pinseau, and there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Morocco. See prior nominations at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg

Copyrighted work by Michel Pinseau, and there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Morocco. See prior nominations at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

It appears the file name translates as "Hassan II Mosque" and was used as the file name of a deleted file taken down at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mosques in Casablanca#Files in Category:Mosques in Casablanca 2, so perhaps this file name must be locked (w:en:WP:SALT) to prevent future uploads of the same unfree mosque that should not be hosted on Wikimedia Commons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:D.Michigan.jpg

cross wiki promo spam - reupload of the file done by account User_talk:DavidMichigan#File:David-Michigan.jpg. ---Hoyanova (talk) 10:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files by Rungruang Yookrud

• File:The 110th Anniversary of Vajira Hospital RR.png (from 2022)
• File:The 110th Anniversary of Vajira Hospital FF.png (from 2022)
• File:The 100th Anniversary of the Metropolitan Police Headquarters RR.png (from 2022)
• File:The 100th Anniversary of the Metropolitan Police Headquarters FF.png (from 2022)
• File:The 29th APEC Economics Leader's Meeting RR.png (from 2022)
• File:The 29th APEC Economics Leader's Meeting FF.png (from 2022)
• File:The 90th Birthday Anniversary of H.M. Queen Sirikit RR.png (from 2022)
• File:The 90th Birthday Anniversary of H.M. Queen Sirikit FF.png (from 2022)
• File:The 90th Birthday Anniversary of H.M. Queen Sirikit Nik-Pol RR.png (from 2022)
• File:The 90th Birthday Anniversary of H.M. Queen Sirikit Nik-Pol FF.png (from 2022)
• File:The 90th Birthday Anniversary of H.M. Queen Sirikit Sil-Pol RR.png (from 2022)
• File:The 90th Birthday Anniversary of H.M. Queen Sirikit Sil-Pol FF.png (from 2022)
• File:The 90th Birthday Anniversary of H.M. Queen Sirikit G RR.png (from 2022)
• File:The 90th Birthday Anniversary of H.M. Queen Sirikit G FF.png (from 2022)
• File:The 75th Anniversary of Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Bangkok RR.png (from 2022)
• File:The 75th Anniversary of Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Bangkok FF.png (from 2022)
• File:The 100th Anniversary of the Ministry of Commerce RR.png (from 2021)
• File:The 100th Anniversary of the Ministry of Commerce FF.png (from 2021)
• File:The 70th Anniversary of the Office of the National Economics and Social Development RR.png (from 2021)
• File:The 70th Anniversary of the Office of the National Economics and Social Development FF.png (from 2021)
• File:The 60th Anniversary of King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi RR.png (from 2021)
• File:The 60th Anniversary of King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi FF.png (from 2021)
• File:The Royal Marriage of King Maha Vajiralongkorn and Queen Suthida RR.png (from 2021)
• File:The Royal Marriage of King Maha Vajiralongkorn and Queen Suthida FF.png (from 2021)
• File:The Royal Marriage of King Maha Vajiralongkorn and Queen Suthida Ni-Pr RR.png (from 2021)
• File:The Royal Marriage of King Maha Vajiralongkorn and Queen Suthida Ni-Pr FF.png (from 2021)
• File:The Royal Marriage of King Maha Vajiralongkorn and Queen Suthida Si-Pr RR.png (from 2021)
• File:The Royal Marriage of King Maha Vajiralongkorn and Queen Suthida Si-Pr FF.png (from 2021)
• File:The Royal Marriage of King Maha Vajiralongkorn and Queen Suthida G RR.png (from 2021)
• File:The Royal Marriage of King Maha Vajiralongkorn and Queen Suthida G FF.png (from 2021)
• File:The 100th Anniversary of Thai Public Health RR.png (from 2020)
• File:The 100th Anniversary of Thai Public Health FF.png (from 2020)
• File:The Royal Coronation Ceremony of King Maha Vajiralongkorn RR.png (from 2019)
• File:The Royal Coronation Ceremony of King Maha Vajiralongkorn FF.png (from 2019)
• File:The Royal Coronation Ceremony of King Maha Vajiralongkorn Sil RR.png (from 2019)
• File:The Royal Coronation Ceremony of King Maha Vajiralongkorn Sil FF.png (from 2019)
• File:The Royal Coronation Ceremony of King Maha Vajiralongkorn G RR.png (from 2019)
• File:The Royal Coronation Ceremony of King Maha Vajiralongkorn G FF.png (from 2019)
• File:The 90th Anniversary of the Treasury Department Nickel Proof RR.png (from 2023)
• File:The 90th Anniversary of the Treasury Department Nickel Proof FF.png (from 2023)
• File:The 90th Anniversary of the Treasury Department RR.png (from 2023)
• File:The 90th Anniversary of the Treasury Department FF.png (from 2023)
• File:The 130th Anniversary of the Prosecutor's Organization RR.png (from 2023)
• File:The 130th Anniversary of the Prosecutor's Organization FF.png (from 2023)
• File:The 72th Anniversary of Port Authority of Thailand RR.png (from 2023)
• File:The 72th Anniversary of Port Authority of Thailand FF.png (from 2023)
• File:The 60th Anniversary of Rajaprajanugroh Foundation Under Royal Patronage RR.png (from 2023)
• File:The 60th Anniversary of Rajaprajanugroh Foundation Under Royal Patronage FF.png (from 2023)
• File:The 130th Anniversary of Phranakhon Rajabhat University RR.png
• File:The 130th Anniversary of Phranakhon Rajabhat University FF.png

Reproductions of recent coins/metals. Protected by copyright per COM:THAILAND, as copyright duration is 50 years and thus all images of coins designed after 1973 should be deleted. --C messier (talk) 09:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Girish prabhu.jpg

A version of this was online in Feb - before upload - https://www.outlookindia.com/topic/neha-pandey - we need permission to keep IMO Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Weingut J. Hofstätter - ©Mattia Mionetto.jpg

Apparently, according to EXIF, it is a work by Mattia Mionetto. C messier (talk) 10:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Mattia Mionetto took this photo on behalf of Tenuta J. Hofstätter, which owns the photo. The picture portrays the Tenuta J. Hofstätter. 5.170.219.29 12:54, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Entrevista.png

Image looks like an TV screen capture. 0x0a (talk) 10:41, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Sveriges Nationaldag 2014- barnens dag.jpg

This image has been used on several commercial web sites. The persons in the image have not given consent to this image. Therefore, the photographer is breaking the law. 185.147.238.246 10:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

The image is quite old, so please give a link to an older article where this image is being used. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Please provide links to the various commercial web sites. I've tried to find some but haven't been successful. /FrankieF (talk) 16:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by P. Stejskalík (talk · contribs)

Needless low-quality screenshots of File:India administrative map 1956 PL.png. The original author isn't properly attributed.

• File:Indie po State Reorganisation Act 1954.png
• File:Nové uspořádání Indických po State Reorganization Act 1954.png
• File:Indie po.png

0x0a (talk) 11:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete --Gampe (talk) 09:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

File:ShanyrakQozgalisi.jpg

Out of scope: neonazist propaganda Enyavar (talk) 11:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Uzbek Kids.JPG

This file was initially tagged by Threbirah as Dw no source since (dw no source since).

I don't understand why it was tagged with a derivative work missing source. It is a photo from the 2000s, the photographer is mentioned, there is nothing to suggest that this is a derivative work  Keep. C messier (talk) 11:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:OAUrasov.jpg

Possible copyright violation. Person in the photo died in 1989. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Юрасов Олег Александрович в Афганистане.jpg Rave (talk) 11:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Sberdila (talk · contribs)

Unused screenshots, no educational value. See COM:PS.

• File:L2G13OA.png
• File:NEtfglix.jpg
• File:Qskjdhqmlsdj.png
• File:654qsd654.png
• File:Qdqsdqsdqsd.jpg
• File:C Random com(5,10,ul).jpg
• File:C Random com(5,10,ul).png

0x0a (talk) 11:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Brassens dans Poètes d'aujourd'hui.jpg

Derivative work (photo) of a copyrighted book cover. C messier (talk) 11:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

J'ai posté la photo du livre que je possède depuis sa parution en 1963 Jcb-caz-11 (talk) 13:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Copyright duration in EU is 70 years. C messier (talk) 14:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Eliquete (talk · contribs)

Unlike own works: photos have different authors in the metadata, would need VRT permissions from the photographers/copyright holders.

• File:Sorgina-txirulina-ipuin-kontalaria.jpg
• File:Sorgina-txirulina-erica-liquete.jpg

0x0a (talk) 11:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Nhà báo Nguyễn Khuê (talk · contribs)

Out of project scope: personal photos.

• File:Nhà báo Nguyễn Khuê.jpg
• File:Thâm nhập casino.jpg
• File:PhotoRoom-20231111 143708.png

0x0a (talk) 11:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Orbitalraketenstartstatistik SpaceX.png

I uploaded the wrong file, this is the right one: File:Orbitalraketenstartstatistik SpaceX.svg PM3 (talk) 11:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Durian pangsasix.jpg

copy vio, from this link Wiki Farazi (talk) 11:57, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Kg pangsenam.jpg

copy vio, from this link Wiki Farazi (talk) 11:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by ARamadan-WMF (talk · contribs)

Mapbox reserves all rights to the map tiles and other Mapbox data, so any screenshots are also copyrighted.

• File:Screenshot for the nearby feature on Wikipedia's iOS app.png
• File:Screenshot for the nearby feature in Wikipedia's iOS app.png

0x0a (talk) 12:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, these pictures were added to be used in updates to the apps team pages on MediaWiki. However, it seems they have not been added to any pages as of now.

Therefore, you are free to go ahead and delete them.

Thank you. ARamadan-WMF (talk) 17:48, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Półwysep Wustrow.webp

Duplikat pliku. Umgebung von Wismar Ostsee (49836880408).jpg Pamulab (talk) 12:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Болеч.png

I have better map for this DusanBolec (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:2018-04-22 16.10 edited FOR WIKI.jpg

Metadata credits Makoto Yamauchi, permission needs to be submitted to COM:VRT Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Stolpersteinlage Puderbach Mittelstraße 27.jpg

Im the owner of this building please Delete the Picture. Attention the carnummber Licence a visible!!! 79.215.45.131 12:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

 Keep: de:Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache. --Achim55 (talk) 15:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Kesultanan Melayu Melaka.jpg

book cover Wiki Farazi (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Commons has tens of thousands of book cover images, they're in scope and no reason for deletion. The question is, is this a copyright violation? --Enyavar (talk) 14:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Khilafah Islam.jpg

copy vio; fair use Wiki Farazi (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by WilliamDeschenes74 (talk · contribs)

User with a bad history. Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

• File:Osmanesa.jpg
• File:Osame Sahraoui.jpg

Yann (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Orbitalraketenstartstatistik SpaceX.svg

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) PM3 (talk) 13:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Have added the license template. PM3 (talk) 13:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:New Axia.jpg

This image isn't taken from the camera, thus this is not his own work. Guyrichtheman (talk) 13:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Perodua Axia New.png

This image is taken from the website, not his own work. Guyrichtheman (talk) 13:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Das Lied der Deutschen.ogg

I am sorry but we will have to delete this file, as it does not indicate the source and the date of the recording, and it is probably still protected by a neighbouring right of the performing ensemble. Gnom (talk) 13:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Preußens Gloria.ogg

I am sorry but we will have to delete this file, as it does not indicate the source and the date of the recording, and it is probably still protected by a neighbouring right of the performing ensemble. Gnom (talk) 13:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Farewell of Slavianka Instrumental (getmp3.pro) (1).ogg

I am sorry but we will have to delete this file, as it does not indicate the source and the date of the recording, and it is probably still protected by a neighbouring right of the performing ensemble. Gnom (talk) 13:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Admirmusicady (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work. Single uploads, no EXIF. All photos can be found previously published.

• File:Terminal Tuzla Airport-1.jpg
• File:Opce-informacije.jpg
• File:Aerodrom-1-780x340.jpg

Smooth O (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:علیرضا بختیاری.jpg

This is not own work. [4] رودکی (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Seyed Hatem village.png

unlike own work: low resolution, no EXIF data. 0x0a (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:W.Brzeski.jpg

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Citeclogo vector big.png

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:GLAM Wiki Conference 2023, Day 1, by Darafsh 00 49 34 378000.jpeg

As the Conference organizer for this event, I have a handful of photos that do not comply with the guidelines we established for the event: 1) avoid photos without context; 2) avoid photos while people are eating; 3) avoid red eyes & other unflattering photos of people; 4) make sure people are at least aware of being photographed. These photos do not have an encyclopedic value and they are only for the purposes of documenting the Wikimedia movement, so let's make sure we respectfully document our community. Scann (WDU) (talk) 14:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Here are other images that follow the same rationale for deletion (Day 1):

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023,_Day_1,_By_Darafsh_15_10_56_739000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023,_Day_1,_By_Darafsh.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_03.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_17.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_22.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_37.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_40.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_43.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_44.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_49.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_54.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_55.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_56.jpg

Here are other images that follow the same rationale for deletion (Day 2):

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_08_54_27_949000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_08_54_38_091000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_09_00_26_521000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_09_05_12_692000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_09_46_24_961000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_09_48_58_456000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_09_49_58_257000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_09_50_07_167000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_09_50_33_585000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_09_53_03_088000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_09_53_19_983000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_10_07_19_060000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_10_08_18_118000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_09_49_06_650000.jpeg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scann (WDU) (talk • contribs) 15:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_131.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_132.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_57.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_63.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_70.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_73.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_74.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_75.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_76.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_77.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_78.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_79.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_80.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_83.jpg

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_09_50_15_870000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_09_50_25_039000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_2,_by_Darafsh_09_50_41_985000.jpeg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scann (WDU) (talk • contribs) 17:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Here are other images that follow the same rationale (Day 3):

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_3,_by_Darafsh_14_13_41_601000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_3,_by_Darafsh_14_13_52_398000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_3,_by_Darafsh_14_19_22_192000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_3,_by_Darafsh_14_19_56_690000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLAM_Wiki_Conference_2023_-_Day_3,_by_Darafsh_14_20_08_288000.jpeg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_149.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_157.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_162.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_167.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_168.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlamWiki2023-Montevideo_172.jpg

Scann (WDU) (talk) 14:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Göknet Logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Göknet İletişim A.Ş..png

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Göknet İletişim Logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Support3214.jpg

Unused personal doodle, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Badamjav Munkhbayar.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Zimtschnecken 1.png

Source - https://instagram.com/chanel.yagalbi Instagram story Mauiiiiiiiii (talk) 14:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Homenaje José Luis Cabezas.jpg

Sculpture installed in Buenos Aires after 1997. There is no freedom of panorama for 3D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 14:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:IGTS . COM.png

Spam; no indication of notability. --Karim talk to me :)..! 15:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:King Mohammed VI of Morocco.jpg

I'm not sure about this one. As it's an official photo, it should be public domain, but i can't confirm it and the source site only says "All rights reserved". Vincent P. (talk) 20:06, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Delete No permission. "All Rights Reserved" is not allowed on Commons. @VincentPalmieri: Next time you can directly use {{Copyvio}} to tag images that are obviously copyvio. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:48, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

---

Deleted: per nomination. --Pyb (talk) 21:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

File:King Mohammed VI of Morocco.jpg

Reproduction/redistribution not allowed by AFP [5]. "AFP videos, text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for commercial purposes, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium." No copyright information found for MAP agency. Mr. Lechkar (talk) 15:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Arend Johannes van der Veen (1859-1932).jpg

I uploaded this file eithout a proper license therefore it should be deleted. M J Hurter (talk) 15:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Keep License is now correct. --RAN (talk) 17:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Krotoa Picture.jpg

I uploaded this image without a copyright license therefore I believe it should be deleted. M J Hurter (talk) 15:41, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Keep License fixed. --RAN (talk) 17:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:สมเด็จพระมหารัชมงคลมุนี.jpg

No traceable or verifiable indication that this image is freely licensed, neither is this indicated as the uploader's own work, therefore suspected to be in violation of copyright. KrebsLovesFiesh (talk) 16:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Dis Naweek Single Cover 30 June 2023.jpg

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Ramaes3ooo (talk · contribs)

likely outside Commons:Project scope

• File:میدان نزدیک برج ایفل.jpg
• File:زیر برج ایفل دوستان دوست داشتنی من.jpg
• File:کلیسا رم ایتالیا محل تولد مادرامام زمان حضرت نرجس.jpg
• File:داخل موزه لوورفرانسه.jpg
• File:حاج کاظم ملکیان اصفهان عکس درعکاسخانه سنتی.jpg
• File:فرودگاه فرانکفورت با چینی ها.jpg

Polarlys (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Muuoja (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: 2x Self-Promo; 1x bad resolution

• File:Aizemi Muuoja Koosking (Ombara yaMaheke).jpg
• File:Aizemi Muuoja Koosking and His Excellency Dr Sam Nujoma.jpg

Enyavar (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:CopyRight Osmod.jpg

Possible Out of scope: No realistic use, and Possibly not in free domain, because of the logos appearing in the image. Aspere (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Temperence karnataka (3830309638).jpg

Per COM:FOP India there is no freedom of panorama in India for 2-dimensional art and the photo violates artist's copyright. Taivo (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files in Category:Mikhail Svetov

Fake CC license, copyrighted source website.

• File:Михаил Светов во время митинга 23 июня 2019 (cropped).jpg
• File:Михаил Светов во время митинга 23 июня 2019.jpg

Komarof (talk) 16:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Mikhail Svetov.jpg

Low resolution, missing original EXIF, uploaded from Flickr account, full of copyvios. Komarof (talk) 16:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Give Me Liberty - Hong Kong Graffiti 6 October 2019 (48851461613).jpg

Graffiti where there is no FoP and of art that is a non-free subject. I know COM:GRAFFITI is often kept, so despite COM:FOP Hong Kong giving protection for 2D graphic works. What puts it over the line for me is that it seems to be in intrinsically COM:DW (not de minimis) of en:Pepe the Frog, and images of that are often deleted on commons as nonfree (and likewise tagged nonfree on enwiki). DMacks (talk) 17:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

The graffiti is created by the protesters during the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests. It is an illegal action and it will be charged for criminal damage to property. I think we can  Keep per {{Non-free graffiti}}--A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

File:SEGPHOS.png

Low-quality chemical structure with pixelated bonds and opaque (white) background. Superseded by File:R-SEGPHOS.svg as high-quality SVG version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Suneil Anand 2023 INDIA.jpg

Error in upload Sunkuen1 (talk) 17:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Памятник Я. М. Свердлову.png

Not an official document of state government agencies Komarof (talk) 17:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:HEA-LOGO-Zwart-geledriehoek.png

no permission from company used for advertising on nl-wiki - see www.headoffice.be Hoyanova (talk) 17:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Значок «Джубга».png

Not an official document of state government agencies + non-free photo of a 3d object. Komarof (talk) 17:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Значок Всесоюзного химического общества им. Менделеева.png

Not an official document of state government agencies + non-free photo of a 3d object. Komarof (talk) 18:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Значок «Юный химик» Всесоюзного химического общества имени Д. И. Менделеева.png

Not an official document of state government agencies + non-free photo of a 3d object. Komarof (talk) 18:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:593b26e70e23f452-jalur-kereta-ai-01.jpg

self request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bala Arizalu (talk • contribs) 2020-07-15T09:18:24‎ (UTC)

---

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 10:36, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

File:593b26e70e23f452-jalur-kereta-ai-01.jpg

I cannot find an indication by either the document itself or the source site that this was created by the Indonesian government. Abzeronow (talk) 18:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Vishak Dudhee.jpg

copyright violation, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 18:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Véronique Laveau en 2023.jpg

The person photographed messaged me stating that she wanted the picture removed. AulusPersiusFlaccus (talk) 18:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Why does she want to remove the photo? What is her interest in not wanting her photo being on Commons? It is a good and decent photo, she is not depicted in a compromising position and she has an occupation (cineast and filmmaker) that goes along with some publicity, she is not anonymous. What does Canadian law say about this matter? JopkeB (talk) 04:43, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Nov 2019 Venezia ghetto 3.jpg

This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Italy has no freedom of panorama (work is by Arbit Blatas, d. 1999) -jkb- (talk) 18:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Nov 2019 Venezia ghetto 4.jpg

This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Italy has no freedom of panorama (work is by Arbit Blatas, d. 1999) -jkb- (talk) 18:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Orussus abietinus.png

This appears to be a redundant file of File:Orussus coronatus.jpg. The current file is a lower quality, lossy, later scan from British Entomology Volume 3. I do not think this file has any use not already covered by the higher quality File:Orussus coronatus.jpg. Lhikan634 (talk) 18:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Los libros póstumos de Waldo Santos.jpg

Modern book covers need VRT-permission from copyright holder (cover artist? publishing company?). If the cover art author is deceased, then his heir must give the permission. Taivo (talk) 19:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete, the portrait on the book on the right is by Ana Franco,[6] who died in 2010.[7] We need evidence of permission from her heirs. I have not identified the picture on the other book, but we would need evidence of permission or of public domain status. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Waldo123.jpg

Probable copyright violation, derivative work of a portrait by Ana Franco (1954-2010).[8][9]. See Commons:Derivative works. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Also delete File:Cosasdehoydeayer.jpg, a black-and-white version of the same image from the same uploader. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Pablo Iglesias Turrion.jpg

The same image was uploaded recently by another user File:Pablo_Iglesias_2023_(portrait).jpg (also as own work) and deleted for lack of permission The image depicts a prominent Spanish journalist and politician and according to this diff from eswiki the photographed person requested to change the image in his entry. The uploader Dani Gago is a known professional photographer. As the account was created today, and it is likely a sockpuppet of the earlier uploader, we cannot keep this image unless we have a explicit permission from the actual photographer. Günther Frager (talk) 19:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Actuastiu.pdf

Out of scope: plain text, personal fiction. Omphalographer (talk) 19:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:БАШЕНЁВ Валерий Алексеевич.pdf

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 19:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Anabel Barnston.png

Privacy. Subject requested in special:diff/824520091. Not in use.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 20:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Apparently our only free licened image of this person. Quick web search suggests they are a notable actor. (Note: Uploading better quality free licensed photos of notable people is welcome.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Tipa na khuj Gatsa gliazhu.jpg

out of scope Gower (talk) 20:30, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Retouch 1700758236671.PNG

Si tratta di un doppione caricato in maniera errata, esiste già la stessa versione Beaest (talk) 20:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Daniele Del Giudice, 2005.jpg

COM:DW: picture of another picture (on a TV). Who's the original photographer? Is the picture truly free? Titlutin (talk) 21:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Buongiorno, non ho fotografato una fotografia, ma un'immagine di un film/documentario trasmesso in TV. Manuela Musco (talk) 22:40, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello Manuela Musco. It doesn't make any difference, films and documentaries are also usually protected by copyright, unless proven otherwise. Do you remember the title of this film? Do you know if it was published under a free licence? --Titlutin (talk) 09:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

La RAI, dopo la morte dello scrittore, ha mandato in onda questo documentario dal titolo: "La Venezia di Daniele Del Giudice - Atlante Veneziano", durata: 29 minuti. Il fotogramma in questione è verso la fine del video, 3/4 minuti prima. Si può ancora vedere su raiplay. Manuela Musco (talk) 15:10, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Graphix Editor BD (talk · contribs)

Personal photos, out of project scope.

• File:04112023 171023.-- TimeToFly -- by Ayan.PORTRAIT.png
• File:Mr. MH. Babu.jpg
• File:Signature2007.jpg
• File:Niceshot.jpg
• File:Wownice.jpg
• File:Seetdown.jpg

0x0a (talk) 21:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Cerniauskaite Laura Sintija.jpg

Bad quality, author unknown, dead source link + the website's copyright policy states : "Photos and icons originate from various sources and are protected under copyright. Any duplication, processing, distribution or any form of utilisation for commercial purposes is prohibited" : https://www.euprizeliterature.eu/privacy-policy Titlutin (talk) 21:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by MBerk 93 (talk · contribs)

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images, missing EXIF data and DW of newspaper.

• File:Pancarköy Disaster Aftermath.jpg
• File:FU7fKWaWQAA063n.png
• File:Alpullu-pancarkoy sehitligi-3.jpg
• File:Nortrop F-5.jpg

P 1 9 9  ✉ 21:36, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete all
  • File:Pancarköy Disaster Aftermath.jpg, used in multiple webpages dated before the upload here, including wider crops.[10][11][12]
  • File:FU7fKWaWQAA063n.png, photograph of a modern newspaper.
  • File:Alpullu-pancarkoy sehitligi-3.jpg]], the URL at the bottom of the image does not match the uploader's username.
  • File:Nortrop F-5.jpg, on airliners.net, with a higher resolution, attributed to a different author and with a non-free copyright statement.[13]

Verbcatcher (talk) 22:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Mberk 93.png

Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 21:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

 Delete: It looks like the image came from Minecraft and grabbed from YouTube or something to me. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 06:44, 24 November 2023 (UTC); edited: 06:49, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Rif Brillant (talk · contribs)

Œuvres de fr:Charles Menneret mort en 1954 téléchargées par le propriétaire et non par les ayants droit : à restaurer en janvier 2025.

• File:Charles Menneret 7.jpg
• File:Charles Menneret 6.jpg
• File:Charles Menneret 5.jpg
• File:Charles Menneret 3.jpg
• File:Charles Menneret 4.jpg
• File:Charles Menneret 1.jpg
• File:Charles Menneret 2.jpg

Habertix (talk) 22:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:BabyMonster Logo (2023).jpg

COM:TOO South Korea - While simple typefaces are not copyrightable, this appears to be more than just a simple typeface, thus it may be PD ineligible USonly and not allowed on Commons. Aasim (talk) 22:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

• Comment It appears as though this would be considered boarder line as the "B" and "M" are distinguishable? It states: "[...] that typefaces are not copyrighted" at COM:TOO#South Korea, not specifically inclining it had to be entirely simple. Regardless, these seem like similar cases (1) (2); whether these also need to be nominated for deletion can also be done if you feel the need. Rain Forest (talk) 08:40, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Gato pitufo meme.webm

Copyrighted internet meme Di (they-them) (talk) 23:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Лютеранская кирха 1929 год.jpg

Изображение 1929 года не может быть own work -- Tomasina (talk) 23:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:В школе во времена румын.jpg

Фото 1 половины XX века не может быть own work -- Tomasina (talk) 23:30, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Г.Шушпанов.jpg

Фото 1 половины XX века не может быть own work -- Tomasina (talk) 23:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by JSMonster (talk · contribs)

Not educationally useful: Low-quality, low-effort (probably) AI generated images with no educational or any other value whatsoever. They serve absolutely no purpose.

Affected Files:

• File:JavaScript Mascot.png
• File:JavaScript Mascot 02.png
• File:JavaScript Mascot 03.png
• File:JavaScript Mascot 04.png
• File:Js-monster-sketches.webp — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickwellington (talk • contribs) 01:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Mickwellington (talk) 23:30, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

I'm not sure how these files were judged.

• They are not AI generated, but sketched by hand and then digitized. Here is proof.

• They are not low-effort, but instead created from the JS-Logo which is a yellow square with the letters JS.

• They match similar files on this website around programming language characters

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Free_software_mascots

Why was this set deleted, but the other LISP inspired versions were not tagged. - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:JavaScript_mascot

This set is original and ties back to the JS logo. To be consistent either they should all stay or all be deleted.

JSMonster (talk) 15:12, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete as OOS. Apparently personal fiction artwork, not official nor widely used mascot for JavaScript. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:13, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete as OOS.Personal fiction artwork. Completely unknown and unheard of by everyone except its creator. The only purpose it serve is spamming Wikimedia Commons. -- Mickalbhof43 (talk) 1:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)