Commons:Deletion requests/2023/10/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
26 October 2023
28 October 2023
Deletion requests on 27 October 2023

October 27[edit]

File:Denizkent gün batımı.jpg[edit]

Başka bir fotoğraf yerine yanlışlıkla yüklendi. Sare Eltimur (talk) 22:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Gallus Fischenthal[edit]

FOP Switzerland does not apply for interior places. It is generally held that the interior of a church cannot be depicted under Article 27. The church's architect was Karl Higi who died in 2008 and Switzerland has a standard of life plus 70 years. I suggest to delete now and undelete in 2079.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Peter-Banks.jpg[edit]

Not own work, from a Beat-Club performance of "Survival" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EfHfYh1rT8&t=61s Miklogfeather (talk) 00:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Madre e hija de Plaza de Mayo.jpg[edit]

Photograph by Adriana Lestido published in a La Voz newspaper in Argentina in 1982. The image is currently in the public domain (25 years after publication), but is was not in 1996 at URAA time. Therefore, it is still protected by copyright in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep this image. Günther Frager (talk) 00:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Files found with Special:Search/insource:"ISBN 978-987-26311-7-8"[edit]

Posters taken from the book "76.11 afiches. Momentos que hicieron historia" published in Argentina in 2011. The book was published by the Argentine Education Ministry and it is available online [1]. The has the tag {{Copyrighted free use}} that I think it is incorrect. The copyright text in says: "Prohibida su venta. Se permite la reproducción total o parcial de este cuadernillo", that means "Selling is forbidden. Reproduction total or partial is allowed". It is clear the simplest commercial use of selling this work without any modification is strictly forbidden, and there is also no explicit mention of derivative works. There is another problem: these posters are the intellectual property of different human rights organizations. The book itself is a commentary of the posters and their historical background, and one can argue that the inclusion on the book is a typical case of de minimis. Isolating images is such case is not allowed.

Günther Frager (talk) 00:53, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Queen Logo.png[edit]

The crest logo goes way beyond the threshold of originality, especially of UK origin. Per COM:TOO UK. I see that the original text logo was overwritten recently, perhaps it can be reverted to and kept. PascalHD (talk) 01:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tage Erlander April 1925.jpg[edit]

I,the user who uploaded this image to Commons, was able to upload a higher quality version of this image from the same source here: Tage F. Erlander In April 1925.tif. As a higher resolution image is now available, this version is now obsolete. ThaddeusOrlando55 (talk) 02:30, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep Usually we keep both filetypes. --RAN (talk) 03:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vojvoda Vuk (pogibija, Staravinski vis).jpg[edit]

duplicate Mile (talk) 02:42, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Oso azul.jpg[edit]

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Files uploaded by Gcitizen and socks[edit]

These files were already rightly removed by Wutsje as G10 or F10. They were then restored because of permission but the problem was not permission in the first place, the problem was they were spam. Like Wutsje wisely said "spam is spam regardless of permission". It's a cross-wiki spam from someone with many globally locked socks. All of the attempts to spam on all projects except here are already deleted, meaning it's not notable as determined by all projects. --Tehonk (talk) 04:30, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Comment Wikipedians weren't satisfied by the sources used for citations, but there are a goodly number of search results. I would consider him notable enough for Commons, but I fully expect that I just wasted my keystrokes and everything will be deleted per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Search results don't mean anything, the results are mostly spam, paid, SEO links, etc. Commons exists to serve Wikimedia projects, if the consensus on every single project is that it's not notable and cross-wiki spam, then it's not notable and out of scope. Commons is not a place for advertising or spam. And also this is not really a place to determine notability. Tehonk (talk) 21:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Commons does have some kind of standard of notability. If it didn't, how would we choose which photos of dogs, cats or, say, chairs to keep or delete? Anyway, I think the closing admin will agree with you that because there's no Wikipedia article about this company, we should delete all of these files, but I think some might be useful and could be kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:13, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Valentina Matviyenko (12).jpg[edit]

Дубликат файла File:Valentina Matviyenko (9).jpg MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 05:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kazinetz.jpg[edit]

There is no confirmation that this photo was published (!) anonymously anywhere more than 70 years ago, the source website is dead. Probably not in the public domain. Kursant504 (talk) 05:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Alyoshin.jpg[edit]

This photo does not even look 70 years old, the earlier publication of it known was Журнал «Смена» № 4, 1968 г. Confirmation is required that it has been published somewhere before. Kursant504 (talk) 05:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Mahmoud Tawalbah[edit]

These are very unlikely to be own work. One is a propaganda poster by w:Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the uploader was banned by the Wikimedia Foundation.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Destroyed Bridge of the Taedong River.jpg[edit]

Duplicate of File:대동강 철교의 피난민들 1950-12-03.jpg Toobigtokale (talk) 07:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:대동강 철교의 피난민들 1950-12-03.jpg is a 2,400 × 3,600 pixel, 988 KB file vs. this one being a much larger 5,000 × 7,500 pixel, 2.32 MB file. If one is to be deleted due to being a duplicate, the larger one should be kept and the smaller one deleted after the file information is harmonized. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:46, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The larger size is deceptive, they should be identical. I converted the image from pdf, and the pdf is 2400x3600. I need to sit down and read how pdf to jpg conversion works; did it hastily using a Linux command and the files came out artificially large Toobigtokale (talk) 03:38, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo Moneytrans.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, SEO keyword stuffing cats, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete In use, but in a stale draft from 2015 that has no chance of going live. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Comment Decent number of search results. Appears to be a Belgian country, but I don't see any COM:TOO Belgium. If the logo was uploaded by the company, that wouldn't be a problem, though. I expect deletion but don't favor it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:45, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ulbrokas raiditaju antenas.jpg[edit]

Doubtful own work tag, image is found on the internet - https://www.freefm.lv/articles.php?article_id=141 DJ EV (talk) 08:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/insource:"Naomi Osaka at the 2020 Summer Olympics"[edit]

The Argentine government is not the copyright holder of this images. It appeared in the ITF website on July 26 July 2021 (six days before the source in the image). There the image is credited to Kopatsch/Sato/Sidorjak.

Günther Frager (talk) 09:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:PFLP Infobox Flag.svg[edit]

Derivitive work of a non-free logo (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_of_PFLP.png). The author attempted to get around the copyright by stripping it down to basic shapes, but I'm concerned that it's still substantially similar to the original. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose Simplified deriviates are all over Commons. Plus, this one would probably fall under the threshold.Joaquinazo (talk) 19:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment If the 22 May 2021 version is too similar to the copyrighted logo, instead of completely removing the file, we should revert it to the 29 September 2018 version. It still looks decent at 20px sizes, and is composed of only a few circles, rectangles, and triangles. -Thespoondragon (talk) 16:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:August Von Mackensen 2.jpg[edit]

Colorized AI fantasy image based on File:General Feldmarschall August Von Mackensen.png, out of project scope. Rosenzweig τ 11:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Files in Category:Église Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption de Suarce[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and although I couldn't find any information on the architect of this building or the statues neither one has been dead yet since at least the building (but probably also the statues) was created in the early 70s. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 11:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep! The other way: If there is verifiable evidence, delete because of COPYVIO, not on suspicion of a deletion freak. Rauenstein (talk) 15:29, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The insult aside, the last time I checked it's not 2042. So what evidence do you have that the architect has been dead for more then 70 years other then just being snide about it? --Adamant1 (talk) 15:34, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abandoned Bridge in Lovachora Tea Forest.jpg[edit]

Author request InfoShahriar (talk) 15:58, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    For your kind information, not matter how useful this is, I am the content author and the copyright owner. So, I can request to remove this at any time. InfoShahriar (talk) 04:05, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Of course you can request courtesy deletions, but you've given no good reason to delete useful images, let alone COM:INUSE images. If you think you have the right to get all your photos deleted, years after you uploaded them with irrevocable Creative Commons licenses, you are really likely to have another think coming. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 16:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Abandoned Bridge in Lovachora Tea Forest.jpg[edit]

This photo is not mine. I uploaded it and it's someone else's. I don't want any problem. So delete it. 2400:C600:4816:8683:A054:2087:486C:7125 12:22, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This photo is not mine. I uploaded it and it's someone else's. I don't want any problem. So delete it. InfoShahriar (talk) 12:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • You stated on June 14 that you are the "content author and the copyright owner." Were you lying then, or are you lying now? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bangladeshi Dog.jpg[edit]

Author request InfoShahriar (talk) 15:56, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bangladeshi Dog.jpg[edit]

This photo is not mine. I uploaded it and it's someone else's. I don't want any problem. So delete it. 2400:C600:4816:8683:A054:2087:486C:7125 12:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This photo is not mine. I uploaded it and it's someone else's. I don't want any problem. So delete it. InfoShahriar (talk) 12:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lalakhal 2021.jpg[edit]

Author request 160.238.0.117 15:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Author request InfoShahriar (talk) 15:25, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No valid reason: Uploaded half a year ago and in use on enwiki. --Achim55 (talk) 16:24, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: in use. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lalakhal 2021.jpg[edit]

This photo is not mine. I uploaded it and it's someone else's. I don't want any problem. So delete it. 2400:C600:4816:8683:A054:2087:486C:7125 12:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This photo is not mine. I uploaded it and it's someone else's. I don't want any problem. So delete it. InfoShahriar (talk) 12:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Comment You appear to be trying to delete all your uploads, giving a new reason you think we'll have to honor. Whose photos are they if you didn't shoot them? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lohalia River.jpg[edit]

Author request InfoShahriar (talk) 16:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: in use. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lohalia River.jpg[edit]

This photo is not mine. I uploaded it and it's someone else's. I don't want any problem. So delete it. 2400:C600:4816:8683:A054:2087:486C:7125 12:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lohalia River.jpg[edit]

This photo is not mine. I uploaded it and it's someone else's. I don't want any problem. So delete it. InfoShahriar (talk) 12:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Schönbühl-Wohnturm[edit]

Unfortunately FOP in Switzerland doesn't include interior views and the architect of this building, Alvar Aalto, died in 1976. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2047.

Adamant1 (talk) 12:33, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks.
I just would like to comment, as person who concluded a Creative Commons Certification for GLAMs, that:
1. these photos are so low-quality and in so much into darkness that no lawyer in the world could try to discuss about any potential economic harm from any use of these pictures in the world, after these were shared by the Museum and Wikimedia Commons. There is no known historical case about such ugly and dark photo reclaimed from an architect and reclaiming economical damage and/or winning that lawsuit. So, this is totally under fair-use to me in good faith.
2. the Iconoteca dell'Accademia di Architettura di Mendrisio is a trusted organization and clearly indicates a Free license. As Wikimedia Movement, we should keep our eyes open, but we should not play with the rules to express our political orientation (that is, we know, we want FOP in Switzerland - so, we are in conflict of interest at the moment - this may be nice for us, and I would agree to share that political line, but unfortunately this deletion will be unnoticed by every political person in the planet, and, the architect, so, we will just lose a Free photo).
3. Nobody in the world has a proof that the museum has not followed their copyright processes. We have no indication of the contrary. So, we should avoid to trigger a deletion request, if we are not the copyright holder of these low-quality photos.
4. the copyright holder, can, and always has been, able to leave a comment in the talk page, or open a ticket to share complaints to VTRS, or write a blog post on their website. That never happened.
Indeed, my comment will be archived and this photo will be deleted :) By the way, I hope my comment was still interesting to read. Thanks --bozz (talk) 13:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes an interesting read in indeed and I appreciate that you stuck to the facts without making the comment personal. If your allow me a few counter points though.
1. Maybe it's your monitor settings, but I can make out the architecture of the building in all three photographs despite their darkness. Especially with the second photograph, which isn't even that dark to begin with. Shaded, sure, but the claim that it's so dark and low quality no one could make out the details of the building is clearly false. That doesn't even take into the ability of lightening the photographs through image editing software either.
2. I don't doubt that the organization released the photographs under a free license. That's different then if the building depicted in said photographs is copyrighted though, which is what this DR is about. Not the copyright status of the files. The idea that they have full time legal staff that carefully check what's depicted in every single photograph that comes into their collection for possible violations is completely unfounded in reality. Most GLAM organizations don't know or care about the copyright status of works in their holdings. Let alone do they review images to make sure nothing in them is copyrighted. Also, this has nothing to do with anything political and I'd appreciate if you left politics out of it next time.
3. Again, this has nothing to do with the copyright status of the photographs, but the building in said photographs being copyrighted, which I was pretty clear about in my original message. The architect of the building obviously can't and never will write a blog post or get VRT permission for us to host images of the building because they died in 1976. Nor will whomever owns the copyright now probably either. So your suggestion that totally moot. Also COM:PCP "The copyright owner will not bother to sue" applies.


File:Josef Zauner.jpg[edit]

Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als Eigenes Werk - Der Hochlader Konditorei Zauner ist ein Unternehmen, Urheber kann aber per definitionem immer nur eiene natürliche Person sein. Lutheraner (talk) 12:37, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Änderung vorgenommen. Konditorei Zauner (talk) 12:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So geht des leider net ;-) ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 12:33, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Santa Maria Assunta (Riola, Vergato) - Interior[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architects of this building, Alvar and Elissa Aalto, died in 1976 and 1994 respectively. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2082 2046 due to the lack of solid evidence about the degree to which Elissa Aalto was involved in the project. Otherwise 2082 if any materializes.

Adamant1 (talk) 12:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Adamant1 I think that you mixed two churches... This is the one by Aalto and copyrighted only until 2046 (I couldn't find any hint of a role by Elissa Aalto). The church designed by Giacomello is this one. Friniate (talk) 19:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wierd. I know there was a DR where I wrote the church was built by the Aaltos. Now I got to figure out which one it is. I'm not to hung up on what role Elissa Aalto played in the design, but it is connected to her category, which I assume there's a reason for (I don't think just because you couldn't find anything means she's not connected to it somehow either. But again, I'm not hung on the specifics of the undeletion date either. Maybe something about it will materialize between now and 2046). --Adamant1 (talk) 19:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Adamant1 Yes, you wrote it in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Santi Guglielmo e Pellegrino (Foggia) (that on the contrary is the one designed by Giacomello). Friniate (talk) 21:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:USB Parlament Izba Reprezentantów 2021.svg[edit]

United States of Burtannia does not exist, fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:54, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Alzano sopra chiesa SLorenzo.JPG[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architects of this building, Luigi and Sandro Angelini, died in 1969 and 2001 respectively. So this image is copyrighted until at least 2072. Adamant1 (talk) 12:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Cris Miró por Gianni Mestichelli.jpg[edit]

The image was used on the book "Hembra" (ISBN 978-9874010506) published in 2016. Gianni Mestichelli took this photo during the 1990s and it might have been published before. Due to the time frame it is still copyrighted in the US. Günther Frager (talk) 13:07, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sandrine Bisson.jpg[edit]

bad picture of sandrine bisson Stéphane Goyette (talk) 13:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sandrine Bisson (cropped).jpg[edit]

Bad picture of sandrine bisson Stéphane Goyette (talk) 13:12, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In my opinion, this is not a bad photo. Bad as in the subcategories of Category:Photographic mishaps. This photo is a cropped version of the photo you uploaded yourself. Wouter (talk) 14:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Frederic Gossiaux 04-12-1991.jpg[edit]

out of project scope - used for advertising/privacy violation on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Frederic (Ricky) Gossiaux geboren op 04-12-1991.jpg[edit]

cannot be a selfie as is claimed, also out of project scope - privacy violation/promotion on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 13:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kaart Harskamp - De Berenboer.png[edit]

Map where the uploader claims to have seen his fictional "bear-boar" in 2023. (Without the red markings, the map would be in scope, although I doubt it was created in 2023!) Enyavar (talk) 13:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Escuela Municipal Eugenio Mendoza, carretera vieja caracas la guaira Caracas.pdf[edit]

Promotional text for a school. Plain text document outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 13:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:GamerBoyKarl.jpg[edit]

Very low res image of an American YouTuber, unlikely to be own work of the uploader. Belbury (talk) 14:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Haydos fitzy.jpg[edit]

not educationally useful Kelly The Angel (talk) 14:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by DatukSinga (talk · contribs)[edit]

over com:TOO UK if malaysian law is similar to english common law.

RZuo (talk) 14:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Photo on 1-22-15 at 9.22 PM.jpg[edit]

COM:TOYS Kelly The Angel (talk) 14:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Ecotxe Logo.png[edit]

Not freely licensed, copyrighted logo Brunnaiz (talk) 14:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Structure49.png[edit]

copyvio from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/ribose-5-phosphate Elmidae (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Structuep2.png[edit]

copyvio from https://homework.study.com/explanation/draw-the-product-you-would-obtain-by-reaction-of-d-ribofuranose-with-ch3co-2o-pyridine.html Elmidae (talk) 15:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kim et al STUDY.jpg[edit]

Incorrect licensing info - uploader is not copyright owner, but material is from CC-BY licensed article (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021925820845505). If that can be updated without deletion, might be the better solution Elmidae (talk) 15:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep Yes, the file is clearly licensed CC by SA 4.0 at the source. Just remove {{Self}} and use {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} alone. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Activesite101.png[edit]

Incorrect licensing info - uploader is not copyright owner, but material is from CC-BY licensed article (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021925820845505#fig4). If that can be updated without deletion, might be the better solution Elmidae (talk) 15:12, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep Yes, the file is clearly licensed CC by SA 4.0 at the source. Just remove {{Self}} and use {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} alone. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:35, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Babski (talk · contribs)[edit]

Uploader has asserted that all of these are "own work" but the claim is dubious. File:Mike Smith composer and musician.webp is copied from here. I do not believe that they created the UK MS Society logo. AS a UK logo, this may be above COM:TOO UK. It appears that the uploader simply chooses "own" work for any upload. Not included in this nomination is File:Mike Smith Blur.jpg which was uploaded as own work but is a duplcaite of another file already uploaded to Commons from Flickr.

Whpq (talk) 15:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello sorry I'm doing this wrong - I can see on the Wikicommons upload how to show when you're uploading something that's someone else's, but not how to attribute when you upload during editing. So you know I'm not doing this nefariously deliberately, on the Mike Smith pic, the source (Mike) gave permission for me to upload. On the logo and photo, the MS Society UK brand team gave me permission to upload (Head of Brand Vix Proctor) Jasmine Rodgers gave permission for her pic and the Flickr account the other Blur pic is from is marked for reuse with attribution. Is this something I can edit within commons or do they all need to be deleted and re-uploaded? Babski (talk) 15:51, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The copyright holder needs to declare that the image is under a free license. Proof of such a declaration must be provided. See Commons:Email templates for a template of what the copyright holder must send in to the Volunteer Response Team. -- Whpq (talk) 14:16, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of Port-au-Prince.svg[edit]

fake flag like File:Flag of Moroni, Comoros.svg Strenatos (talk) 15:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

uh Strenatos (talk) 01:56, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/Olympic Flame during the 2020 Summer Olympics opening ceremony.[edit]

The Argentine government doesn't hold the copyright of this image and therefore they cannot license it. The image appears in several newspapers, for example this ESPN article published 8 days before credits the photo to Geoff Burke/USA TODAY.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just a note: these images on Commons and ESPN are not the same ones; different time, position and angle. Apparently taken from a place for photographers, so even the same photographer is uncertain. I don't know the Argentine licensing issue. I have no problem with deletion. Kacir (talk) 22:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, you are right the ESPN image is different. However, if I'm not again mistaken it is the same as this one (warning it downloads the image) from ITF, originating from this article. The Argentine website has a site-wide CC-BY license, but they almost never cite their sources. A similar issue using the same page is Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:"Naomi Osaka at the 2020 Summer Olympics". Günther Frager (talk) 23:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Josef Zauner 01.jpg[edit]

Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als Eigenes Werk - Der Hochlader Konditorei Zauner ist ein Unternehmen, Urheber kann aber per definitionem immer nur eine natürliche Person sein. Lutheraner (talk) 16:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Änderung vorgenommen. Konditorei Zauner (talk) 12:28, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Josef Zauner 02.jpg[edit]

Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als Eigenes Werk - Der Hochlader Konditorei Zauner ist ein Unternehmen, Urheber kann aber per definitionem immer nur eine natürliche Person sein. Lutheraner (talk) 16:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Änderung vorgenommen. Konditorei Zauner (talk) 12:29, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Eldenhet 98 IRIS-T SLS (cropped).png[edit]

This image is a COM:DW of a copyrighted image that was not permanently displayed during a aviation trade show. FOP does not apply then. At least one older version could be kept but this older version is a dupe of the original photograph by Matti Blume. Mosbatho (talk) 16:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete, this image has served its purpose.--Blockhaj (talk) 16:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I hope in a positive matter. Mosbatho (talk) 16:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dmitry Medvedev attended an Italian military parade 05.jpg[edit]

Дубликат File:Dmitry_Medvedev_in_Italy,_June_2011-7.jpeg MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 16:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:RWB ALI Logo (1).png[edit]

Possibly PD; I doubt uploader is the author and copyright holder. Source website has clear copyright notice [2] -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The uploader is indeed the author. I am Joshua Claybourn, a director with the ALI and the one who created the logo. YHoshua (talk) 00:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Batato Barea.png[edit]

Photo by Gianni Mestichelli [3] taken in the 1980s. This work is in currently in the public domain in Argentina, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Therefore, it is still protected by copyright in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep this image. Günther Frager (talk) 17:12, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Flag of Bamako.svg[edit]

This file already exists as a .gif uploaded by Alexphangia DjLeonard14 (talk) 17:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Comment SVG is normally considered better than GIF for flags, isn't it? Maybe you could link the file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of Abidjan.svg[edit]

THis file already exists as a .png file uploaded by Skiper in 2015 DjLeonard14 (talk) 17:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Comment Commons practice is often to keep both types of files, though I've also seen deletions of the SVG file, so there seems to be no consistency about this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Parakultural-charly-garcia-batato-barea-Tortonese-Urdapilleta.webp[edit]

Image taken from an Argentine newspaper during the 1980s. The image is currently in the public domain in Argentina, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep this image. Günther Frager (talk) 17:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Мінск. Залатая Горка. Касцёл (10).jpg[edit]

and File:Мінск. Залатая Горка. Касцёл (11).jpg.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused out-of-focus photos of subject well represented on Commons. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:51, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Marcos Aguinis01.jpg[edit]

The Argentine copyright doesn't hold the copyright of this image. The metadata states the image is from 2018, but it appeared in several newspapers and magainzes before it, for example En Orsai magazine (2014), La Nación (2016), Diario Hoy (2016). Günther Frager (talk) 18:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:پرچمدار.jpg[edit]

Not a work by Mehr News AGency, this is poster of a film produced by IRNA [4] HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jaleh.jpg[edit]

Not a work by Mehr, the left image is screenshot from a TV series and the one on the right was taken from Instagram HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of Louisville, Kentucky.svg[edit]

Out of scope: low-quality autovectorized version of File:Flag of Louisville, KY.png. No objection to a higher-quality version if one becomes available, but this is substantially worse than the PNG version. Omphalographer (talk) 19:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lamaita logo horizontal dark.png[edit]

I dont want it anymore. Lamaita234 (talk) 19:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Murderdrones.png[edit]

Definitely not owned by KaiSulyma and not CC licensed. May fail COM:TOO US aswell (text has faint grid-like pattern, which may support this.) Jurta (talk) 19:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also requesting File:Murderdrones logo.png for deletion here, which is very close to being a duplicate of the file above. Jurta (talk) 19:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tvfamilia logo.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by MexTDT as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: {{SD|F1}} Yann (talk) 20:53, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Speedy delete as a copyvio of https://www.simple.com.ve/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/maquetaci%EF%BD%BDn_web-16.png as displayed by various pages on www.simple.com.ve like https://www.simple.com.ve/planes/plan-basico/.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:12, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Where is this logo from? It would be PD-textlogo in USA. Yann (talk) 15:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Prime Hydration Flavours 2.jpg[edit]

Design is probably OK, but the license is not (yet). Yann (talk) 20:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The issue with this is in the fact it was released as public domain by the person who took the photograph of copyrighted objects whose copyright they clearly do not own. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Packaging? talks about copyright on packaging. Since the design of the containers is the subject of the photograph, I don't believe deminimis is applicable here. The bottle on the far right clearly meets the threshold of originality. The fourth white bottle could arguably meet originality too because of design within the lettering. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Threshold_of_originality Graywalls (talk) 04:03, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Some of the designs may be under a copyright, yet the picture may be OK if we consider that the complex design(s) is/are de minimis. Yann (talk) 16:46, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'd have to disagree in this context, because it's part of the focus of the image. If it was say a piece of art that was on the wall in the background (totally not the focus of the photo), you'd have a point. Graywalls (talk) 00:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sede Instituto de Seguridad del Trabajo IST.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Carlos yo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Unlikely to be own work. Author IST Yann (talk) 20:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep I can understand that IST could be an institutional account, rather than that of the photographer, though the account name was changed to User:Lduro. But I don't think that's a sufficient reason to delete a 2007 photo COM:INUSE. I'll reconsider if you can show me why I'm wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:!Flag Of Karakalpakstan.svg[edit]

Unused historical revisions of no used Bratleeks (talk) 23:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep if you mean this flag was used in Karakalpakstan but is not currently used on another wiki. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Well, i gotta renamed this name because the name is wrong! Bratleeks (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Delete It's a duplicate of File:Flag of Karakalpakstan.svg and follows the upload pattern of Arkshugh and other socks. Fry1989 eh? 14:07, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • It's not identical. Try toggling between them. The stars are higher in this version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As you will find in my checkuser case, it's a historical revision. Unless there is a clear reason to upload it, it should be deleted. Fry1989 eh? 13:49, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
How does that explain the differences between the two files? I don't understand your point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:56, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Francis Evans.jpg[edit]

Became PD in Israel in 2002, which is after the URAA date of 1996, so unfortunately we cannot host this image as it will not be PD in the US until 2047. Recommend replacement with File:Francis Evans, 1935.jpg. —holly {chat} 23:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Sessão ordinária ACL no MASB 2023.jpg[edit]

According to the image description, the man depicted in it is a certain “André Koehne”. It turns out that the name of the uploader is also André Koehne. Since the photograph is not a selfie, it is evident that the image is not the “own work” of the uploader (André Koehne), so permission should be required and verified by a VRT volunteer—otherwise the file must be deleted. 191.56.146.160 23:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Por favor traduzam: o meu celular - como de resto todos os aparelhos de telefonia móvel atuais - possuem algo chamado temporizador. Como podem ver, o ponto do suposto "fotógrafo" está tão alto que - se não tivesse sido colocado num ponto fixo, certamente fora uma fotografia tirada por algum gigante que, infelizmente, é uma figura mitológica - salvo se povoe a mente de stalker do IP acima... Notem que os dados Exif dessa imagem são os mesmos de vários outros enviados por mim, como File:Sessão da ACL setembro 2023 3.jpg ou File:Fundação Hospitalar Senhora Santana de Caetité.jpg. Tenho dois celulares, usei diversas câmeras e aparelhos ao longo das minhas mais de 10 mil edições aqui. É minha foto, ninguém mais a tinha, apenas... eu. André Koehne TALK TO ME 10:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Another stalk on me, like in this request. Mr. @Achim55: , can you help me? Thanks... André Koehne TALK TO ME 18:45, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2023/10/27&oldid=823562261"