Commons:Deletion requests/2023/10/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
30 October 2023
1 November 2023
Deletion requests on 31 October 2023

October 31[edit]

File:Daffy - The Commando (Restored)-xFdG8lZ4PJw.webm[edit]

Daffy is still under copyright. See Warner Bros. cartoons containing characters under copyright protection. Should be undeleted in 2033. SDudley (talk) 02:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also see title card. SDudley (talk) 02:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sir, The Cartoon is Listed in the Public Domain. While we see that The Character is still under WB Property, the Propaganda film of the Golden Age Is not, Due to the owners at the time, AAP, Not Renewing their Copyright. This puts the Short at the Public Domain for Free Use. Monkeisquad (talk) 04:14, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes the short is in the public domain due to a lack of renewal. However, the short contains a copyrighted character (please see my original link to a past mass deletion). Using the same rulings as we apply to elsewhere on the commons we can't host this short. If Mickey Mouse as depicted in The Mad Doctor, a public domain short, can't be hosted yet (until Mickey's initial copyright expires in 2024) then we can't host this one either. It can be undeleted when Daffy Duck is in the public domain. Also see this deletion request relating to past times materials related to this short have been uploaded. SDudley (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:新渡戸稲造が札幌農学校から提供された校宅.jpg[edit]

cropped from doi:10.11501/12123559. the book published in 1981.the uploader says 'photographed in absolutely before 1944', but no evidence. eien20 (talk) 04:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

お任せいたします。 遠藤進之助 (talk) 04:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Keep「札幌農学校・新渡戸稲造とエッセイスト・近藤 健の稀有な関係」→ https://w.wiki/8ALY
これは、Wikipediaの「近藤健（エッセイスト）」に掲載された記事（セクション）ですが、Wikipedia外部にこれを裏づける資料も存在します。
これによれば、民間人が、1925年(大正14）2月15日、「札幌区北３条西１丁目２番地」（当時の住居表示）で亡くなったという史実が明らかになっています。
この史実を証明する資料は、「除籍謄本」です。外部資料の中にこの資料のことが書かれています。→ http://karansha.com/merake.html
つまり、1925年の時点で、新渡戸稲造らが暮らした官舎はすでに存在していなかった、と思われます。
また、官舎など建物の写真は、他の紙面に自由に掲載できることとなっています。 遠藤進之助 (talk) 20:14, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Delete This image is presumed to be copyright violation.--禁樹なずな (talk) 01:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:IR 02 09.jpg[edit]

It does not appear to be own work. A scanned copy for sure. Сале (talk) 05:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Здравейте, моля за съдействие от вас! Как мога да допълня информацията за авторските права на съответните снимки? Adorabletime (talk) 08:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:FirstBigCase.jpg[edit]

Unlike own work, possibly from Sina Weibo profile image: https://weibo.com/xingminshan?tabtype=album (imgbb). 0x0a (talk) 05:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Posternoise logotype.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is no a company logo, it's a user profile picture. Not spam. Posternoise (talk) 02:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Posternoise never created any spam on wiki pages, it's donating time reading and checking facts about history of posters and was created with good intentions only. Posternoise (talk) 02:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Yamag.png[edit]

Though the badge design itself is PD, the photo of this 3d object must also be free, while the source website is All Rights Reserved. Komarof (talk) 07:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lakalaka.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Masur as no permission (No permission since) Krd 08:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MUKS Museum Kultur & Spiel Riehen. Foto- Gaspard Weissheimer.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (c) Gaspard Weissheimer M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rafael Lemus3.jpg[edit]

No es de mi licencia User030184 (talk) 09:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Флаг Союзного Государства.jpg[edit]

mystification, an attempt to introduce one's own drawing as official symbol Olgerts V (talk) 10:12, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Флаг Новорумынской Империи.png[edit]

mystification, an attempt to introduce one's own drawing as official symbol Olgerts V (talk) 10:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:خالد بوسحاقي.jpg[edit]

Published previously on https://www.famousfix.com/topic/khaled-boushaki, so COM:VRT procedure required. Achim55 (talk) 10:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2019-01-28 19 55 14 A Snickers bar with the wrapper still intact in the Dulles section of Sterling, Loudoun County, Virginia.jpg[edit]

COM:PACKAGING DanielPenfield (talk) 12:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Layla Birlik budget speech.jpg[edit]

The file is a from a YouTube video where it counts with a CC license, but I believe it might be from the official parliamentary video. The nomination is encouraged by some deletion requests of three of my own uploads, and there are very few other similar files on commons and one of them is this one. So in order not to encourage further wrong uploads I suggest to delete this one as well. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:45, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm the uploader, and admit, I'm not up on the details of Turkish parliamentary videos. It was uploaded by Halkların Demokratik Partisi – HDP - YouTube, the official YouTube channel of the Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey), which was the third largest in the Turkish parliament some years ago according to our article about it. It is an established channel, around for 10 years, 196000+ subscribers,‧ 4000+ videos. Being an established channel of a major political party doesn't guarantee they know what they are doing by licensing this video, but it does imply it, so I would be against deleting it "just in case". If you can show real evidence that they don't actually own the video, then I would support removal, but not just COM:PCP. --GRuban (talk) 13:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi @GRuban, thanks for the reply. I found Article 32 of the Turkish copyright lawː
The reproduction, public recitation or broadcasting by radio and distribution by any other means, of speeches and addresses made in the Grand National Assembly and at other official assemblies and congresses, in courts of law or at public meetings, is permitted for the purpose of giving news and information.
Where the nature of the event or of the situation does not so require, the names of the speakers do not need to be cited.
The right to reproduce or distribute speeches and addresses for purposes other than those mentioned in the first paragraph belongs to the author.
It is from this link.
What do you take from this? Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That's not quite what I meant by details of Turkish parliamentary videos; sure, if the HDP didn't take the video, the HDP can't license it for reuse. The question is, is this an official parliamentary video, or did the HDP take it? In the United States, where I'm from, there is a semi-official but non-governmental news channel called C-SPAN, that records most Congressional events on video. However, the individual Senators, Representatives, and major political parties, also have many people working for them who know how to hold a video camera. Since the HDP is a major political party, I'm guessing some of them know how to hold a video camera as well. If I wasn't sure whether a specific video on a US politician's or political party's YouTube channel was actually their work, then I would go to the C_SPAN web site and search for it, then I could give the link to prove it. Here, for example, is a US congressional hearing on copyright law from 2022: https://www.c-span.org/video/?522654-1/hearing-copyright-law-online-piracy (It also has the C-SPAN logo prominently in most frames, so that part would be obvious, but just finding it there even without the logo would be enough.) What is the equivalent for the Turkish parliament? Is there a website for the official parliamentary video that you can find this specific budget speech video on? --GRuban (talk) 13:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You are right, we have no evidence that it is not of the HDP as it was published under a CC license and has no Turkish parliament seal. It's all an assumption that they are copyrighted by the one who nominated my files for deletion. But I don't understand why other prominent parliamentarians like Recep Tayyip Erdogan (I haven't gone though all years, but some) and Binali Yildirim of the AKP or Devlet Bahceli of the MHP or Meral Aksener of IYI don't have files from their parliamentary speeches on commons. I believe now all files of parliamentary speeches are nominated for deletion (some uploads from myself, others of other editors), and depending on how these end, I'll likely upload others as well, but if they get deleted of course not.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Julian Szumlański фото.png[edit]

wrong date, probably wrong source and author. Xocolatl (talk) 13:50, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep Now fixed, you can fix too. --RAN (talk) 17:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:News Paper- HW.jpg[edit]

An article from The Times of India cannot be claimed as "Own work" GoingBatty (talk) 13:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Neeraj's Strategy.jpg[edit]

This magazine article cannot be claimed as "Own work" GoingBatty (talk) 13:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:CEO Neeraj Sharma.jpg[edit]

An article from Asian Age cannot be claimed as "Own work" GoingBatty (talk) 13:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:IFalls Collage.jpg[edit]

We need source, author, and licensing information for each image in the montage. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Inputoutputer (talk · contribs)[edit]

Claims to have permission but we need that permission in writing

Gbawden (talk) 14:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by LA VERDAD MAS ALLA (talk · contribs)[edit]

Dubious photo edits that purport (in their usage on eswiki) to be an Argentinian cartel leader. Unless uploaded by somebody claiming to also be a cartel member, these are either very badly restored copies of genuine second hand images, or some kind of photoshopped joke.

Belbury (talk) 14:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Delete. "Jhon jairo mateo" is an edit of a news photo of a captured drug trafficking truck. The other two photos show distinctive signs of the head having been edited into the photo. (In particular, there's a blurry oval surrounding the head, suggesting that it was pasted in from another image.) Omphalographer (talk) 18:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:JHON JAIRO ALIAS JOEL ..... EL EXGENERAL DE LAS TROPAS DEL INFIERNO C.D.N.jpg should probably be deleted as well; it's largely identical to the other similarly named image. Omphalographer (talk) 18:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Santi Gioacchino e Anna (Rome)[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Sandro Benedetti, seems to still be alive. So these images are copyrighted until an undetermined date.

Adamant1 (talk) 14:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Only after 14 years do you notice these photos? If there really was copyright infringement, don't you think anyone would have noticed? Continue deleting photographs that are of no interest to anyone. Do what you think is right. I stopped uploading photographs to Commons years ago, as they are then deleted.--Croberto68 (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's not at all surprising the images have been on here for 14 years when Italian users don't police themselves when it comes to copyright violations and then bullies anyone else who's does. Anyway, this is pretty simple. Just don't upload images that violate copyright. Otherwise you should be fine. this isn't a file sharing network where people can indiscriminately upload whatever they want regardless of the law though. So it probably isn't for you if you can't handle a couple of your uploads being deleted as COPYVIO once in a while. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Offerus Ablinger.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (c) THEO HAUSKNECHT M2k~dewiki (talk) 14:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:39c7d Cihan Çevirme, Vorsitzender Bund türkischer Jugendlicher Hannover, Adis Ahmetovic, stellvertretender Vorsitzender Jusos Region Hannover.jpg[edit]

I didn't give any consent to use this picture. I wasn't informed about the interest to use this in Wikimedia. As i can see this file isn't in use for any article on Wikipedia. In addition i am very unfavorable on this picture. I ask you to delete this picutre. My image rights outweigh the interest in keeping this image public. 91.22.177.40 14:43, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nein, lieber Cihan, das geht leider nicht. Du bist damals als Vorsitzender der Organisation Bund türkischer Jugendlicher Hannover auf einer öffentlichen, über Wochen angehenden öffentlichen Demonstration in Form eines Mahnzeltes mit "Mahnwache" aufgetreten. Das Bild zeigt Dich auf der von Dir als Vertreter des Bundes türkischer Jugendlicher Hannover mitgetragenen öffentlichen Veranstaltung auf dem Klagesmarkt in Hannover, und zwar gemeinsam mit dem stellvertretenden Vorsitzenden der Jusos, Region Hannover, Adis Ahmetovic, der heute einen Sitz als Abgeordneter im Deutschen Bundestag (MDB) innehat. Du bist als Vertreter einer ordentlichen Organisation auf einer öffentlichen Demonstration aufgetreten - kannst Dich dann aber nicht nach Jahren plötzlich auf Deine - privaten - Persönlichkeitsrechte berufen. Das Bild mit Dir und Adis Ahmetovic (wir haben ja zusammen mehrere Fotos gemacht) ist heute ein historisches Zeitdokument und Teil einer - historisch wertvollen - Foto-Dokumentation zum damaligen Anlass, siehe hier. Wenn Dir Dein damaliges Aussehen heute nicht mehr gefällt: I am sorry; das musst Du aushalten. Vielleicht können wir bei Gelegenheit ein aktuelleres Foto von Dir ergänzen. Eine Löschung des historischen Dokumentarfotos ist jedenfalls nicht möglich. Besten Gruß vom Bild-Dokumentaristen Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 19:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Basiglio - Milano 3 - chiesa di Gesù Salvatore.jpg[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and at least one of the architects of this building, Marcello Michiara, seems to still be alive. So this image is copyrighted until an undetermined date. Adamant1 (talk) 14:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:مهدی خدابخشی.jpg[edit]

It looks like a professional photograph. User has uploaded images from a variety of sources, claiming own work on all. This does not look like "own work". However, Tineye does not find it. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:51, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:San Bartolomeo nuova (Passo del Tonale, Vermiglio)[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and although I couldn't find any information about who the architect of this building is, they clearly haven't been dead for more then 70 years since it was built in 1982. So these images are copyrighted until an undetermined date unless someone can figure out who the architect is and when they died.

Adamant1 (talk) 15:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Files in Category:San Bartolomeo nuova (Passo del Tonale, Vermiglio)[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and although I couldn't find out who the sculpture of these statues is it's unlikely they have been dead for more then 70 years the statues were apparently made in the 1980s. So these images are copyrighted until an undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 15:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The upload of images for the whole church has been authorized as part of Wiki Loves Monuments (see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q59727468 ). -- Syrio posso aiutare? 16:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm aware, but the agreement doesn't seem to be valid for reasons I don't really feel getting into into. Except to say either they don't have anything to do with copyright to begin with, which in that case means the images should still be deleted as copyright violations. Or the church only owns the copyright for two years and then it reverts back to the architect, which again would mean the images should be deleted since this was built in 1982. Or the church can't and doesn't own the copyright in the first place, which again, means the images should be deleted. There's zero consensus about which is the correct one though and none of them allow for the images to be hosted on Commons. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If you have objections on the authorization go and contest it, but as long as it is in place I don't see how can it be allowed to start random deletion request like these. -- Syrio posso aiutare? 19:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
What exactly is there to contest? The law and guideline already say that the copyright reverts back to architect after two years and their clearly aren't who WLMI got the permission from. I'm not the one who disagrees with the law or guideline either. You are. So be my guest and contest them if you think they aren't valid, but it's not my job to start a discussion about if I can follow the guideline you law just because you don't think either one is valid. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:17, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
... and yet again with the theory that buildings can be considered as essays... Moreover, how could the Catholic Church be considered a "public cultural institution"? Italy is not the Vatican City, I hope that you are aware of that... Friniate (talk) 17:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Pakhribas.jpg[edit]

unfortunatelly there's No FOP in Nepal, permissions from builders of em might be required.\ Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The Luxembourg electronic identity card (SPECIMEN).jpg[edit]

Bogus license. Alejitao123 (talk) 15:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stemma di Casalbordino ridisegnato.png[edit]

Inaccurate depiction of the coat of arms. New version in the file: Stemma di Casalbordino corretto.svg Nonunabanana (talk) 15:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Sant'Antonio da Padova (Corsico)[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Francesco Clerici, seems to still be alive. So these images are copyrighted until an undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. And in case anyone decides to bring it up, no the WLM agreement isn't valid.

Adamant1 (talk) 15:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:DanielJEvans.jpg[edit]

New version appears to be a version of this file, not the one it overwrote, and it does not seem that rights have been released. Star Garnet (talk) 15:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

They seem to be the same photograph to me? It's just been rotated and cropped. ~ AlaskaGal (talk) 16:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It does look like it might be the scan in the UW collection, but that appears to be a different print of the same image (if you adjust the contrast in the Congressional Bioguide version you can see the suit appears to have the same stripe pattern). UW doesn't name the source or photographer, but does date it to c. 1985 when Evans was a U.S. senator. I'm not seeing anything that makes it look like the PD-USGov license is incorrect, although maybe it should have {{PD-scan}} applied too. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Keep It appears to be his official USGov portrait. It matches the style of others using the license from that time period, this is before they switched to color and having the flag behind and to the left. A boilerplate "Permission to Use Images" statement is not claiming that they own the copyrights, just that they have a print in their archive, and want to be recognized as the source of the image. --RAN (talk) 17:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Chiesa san gaspare dall'alto.jpg[edit]

This image should be deleted as OOS due to being personal and unsubstantiated conspiracy theory nonsense. Plus the church doesn't even look like the compass to begin with. Adamant1 (talk) 16:43, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:San Gaspare del Bufalo (Rome)[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Italy and although I couldn't find information on who the architect of this building is, they clearly haven't been dead for more then 70 years since it was built in 1981. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO undetermined date unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Showa Emperor Hirohito in 1970.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation
Sashi Suseshi (uploader) says "PD-Japan-exempt". And 81.41.175.237 says "PD-Japan". But this photo was taken on January, 1970. (c.f. 秦澄美枝『昭和天皇御製にたどるご生涯』PHP研究所、2015年。 This book says that this photo was taken on "昭和45年1月".) Therefore, the copyright of this photo has not yet expired in Japan. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 16:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Delete This photo was taken on January, 1970. Therefore, the copyright of this photo has not yet expired in Japan. --Nnkrkrhhdi (talk) 17:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ttsk2000 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Apparent copyvios - professional quality/posed, generally lower res with no EXIF, watermarked (and with different watermarks; e.g., File:แป้งหอม มิสแกรนด์ศรีสะเกษ.jpg, File:เตย มิสแกรนด์.jpg, etc.), elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:มิ้ว มิสแกรนด์.jpg is here; File:แป้งหอมมิสแกรนด์ศรีสะเกษ.jpg is here; etc.)

Эlcobbola talk 22:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, several with FB/transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:16, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files uploaded by Ttsk2000 (talk · contribs) 2[edit]

More low-res/web-sized screengrab images with inconsistent or missing metadata. Unreliable uploader.

P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ram kick.jpg[edit]

cropped watermark in the corner indicates this is a previously published work. Please provide additional detail so other editors can verify that the license is correct. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Doctor Manuel Ricardo Villacorta Orantes.jpg[edit]

No free Lord Maximoff (talk) 18:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kuvasiskojen 30-vuotisnäyttely (II), avajaiset (HK7155-10016.23a).tif[edit]

Repetitive, out-of-focus photograph with no educational value. Uploaded only for the sake of uploading it. Mlang.Finn (talk) 18:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Confirmed. It was uploaded because we were using Kuvasiskot and Kekkonen as keyword for example/test case for uploading photos from Finna using pywikibot script. I will try to add sanitycheck for detecting overly blurry images to the script. -- Zache (talk) 10:37, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Also, it is ok to delete the photo. --Zache (talk) 12:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:©Raphael Hustedt IMG 0939.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio ©Raphael Hustedt M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Iranian NID Card.jpg[edit]

There is an issue of privacy and copyright regarding the holder of the ID card. This is not a sample ID card. Milad2017 (talk) 14:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Keep. Here is no issue of privacy, because all private information is removed. The file is used in multiple projects, so it's in scope too. Taivo (talk) 19:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. --Wdwd (talk) 19:44, 26 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Iranian NID Card.jpg[edit]

Due to the privacy issues. This is a real person's ID not a sample. Milad2017 (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Puerto e iglesia San Juan Baptista de Bastia.gif[edit]

Grainy version of a clear JPG: File:Bastia-st-jean-baptiste-church-harbour.jpg. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 18:43, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also no more slanting, but in better resolution
That other photo is slanting. I turned it by a few degrees to make the horizontals horizontal. Nevertheless, the resolution should be better.--Ulamm (talk) 19:00, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Just I have created a new horizontalized version, of better resolution and more appropriate suffix, see thumb.--Ulamm (talk) 19:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Screenshots from Salo (film)[edit]

These screenshots fail criteria #2 of {{PD-1996}}. This Italian film was released in 1975 with a US-compliant copyright notice and therefore remains copyrighted in the U.S. until 2071 (95 years after release). It has also been registered for copyright in the USA.[1][2] See also the recent consensus to delete all screenshots from a 1974 film by the same director (w:Pasolini) for similar reasons. The screenshots may be out of copyright in their country of origin (Italy), but not in the USA, as required by COM:Licensing. Muzilon (talk) 19:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:46-101-3108 Lviv SAM 8431.jpg[edit]

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1969. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:58, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:An Act for continuing several temporary statutes made in this kingdom, and Now near Expiring; and For the Amendment of the Statutes therein mentioned Fleuron T224438-1.png[edit]

it is a black spot, useless, check also some other files inside Dieu et mon droit ZandDev (talk) 20:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •  Keep I would say that if this is an accurate example of how some 1730s stamp of this actually looks, it is of historical interest. - Jmabel ! talk 20:51, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files by C. Spizzirri[edit]

1986 photographs by now dead photographer. No indication that the uploader is the copyright owner. --BadzilBot (talk) 20:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That was when I first started Uploading. The original negatives were donated to the Sister's of St. Joseph Archives. Do I have to get permission from them? They are historically important to them and London history so how does one upload such photos after the photographer has passed? At the time of upload I owned the negatives but with instruction and clarification from someone who was assisting me at the beginning I now know the difference between the copyright owner and the negative owner buthow can historical images get on her under this situation??? ̴̴ Photo Archives (talk) 17:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Photo Archives: who, exactly, issued the CC license that you stated when uploading these photos?
We don't post copyright violations just because they are historically important. Someone is the heir to the intellectual property rights, and that is the only person who can offer a license. Otherwise, we have to delete them and then undelete when they enter the public domain, presumably 70 years after the photographer's death (and long after my own). - Jmabel ! talk 18:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for the reply. I put the most recent CC the 4.0 one. What should I have put on the collection? I stated that the photographer was deceased, I stated his name and the provenance so I see your point about the 75 years but it was an estate sale and Attic books in London had no record of the owner other than his name? I tried to find more info on Spirrizzi but found none. What do I do if this comes up again? Just forget about dissimination of information and keep in my archives, Thanks. ̴̴ Photo Archives (talk) 18:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The Great Detective Stories, a Chronological Anthology (1927).djvu[edit]

Has a story by English author Henry Christopher Bailey (died 1961), and that stories is not in the public domain in its source country. Prosfilaes (talk) 20:43, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Files in Category:Johann Ulrich Steiger (Werke in Flawil)[edit]

Switzerland

According to article 27 of the Copyright Act (en/de/fr/it), works installed at or on publicly accessible places or ground may be pictured, and such pictures may be offered for sale, sold, transmitted, or otherwise published. The image must not be three-dimensional and it must not be possible to use the picture for the same purpose as the original.

The works must be permanently installed, but for the purposes of the law, "permanent" means a fixed installation which may be temporary -- time limited -- but not "accidental", e.g. due to transport of the work.

For more information, see COM:CRT/Switzerland#Freedom of panorama.

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ sicilianu ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ Nederlands ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ +/−

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry mistake, withdraw deletion request Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have added a FoP Switzerland and did not want to nominate for deletion Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Keep nominator here. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:43, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Statue of Iman Xin Chemjong, Bhedetar[edit]

Sadly, there's no FOP in Nepal, unless for some else reasons this statue is public domain (e.g. as their national symbol), we need permissions from its builder for this category and files within it. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bharatadhikarimb, BRPever, and Wallflowernepal: ^^ --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226 kindly list the image files here so those can be undeleted if copyright expires or if FoP is introduced in Nepal. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
listed. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Sorry, can't identify the owner. They were uploaded in the early days when I wasn't aware of FOP in Nepal, feel free to delete them.--BRP ever 12:26, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2023/10/31&oldid=824563324"