User talk:Ruslik0

So if i can make them clearer they will be acceptable? Once i can get them accepted will they be seen on Google when name is typed in? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustinAutrey886 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Image:Uranium rings scheme.png

Should be "Uranian", not Uranium... AnonMoos 16:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Portrait of Jupiter from Cassini.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Portrait of Jupiter from Cassini.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 09:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Mercury in color - Prockter07 centered.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mercury in color - Prockter07 centered.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 16:50, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Patroller and/or Rollbacker ?

Hi Ruslik0,

I've seen some of your edits and see that you are also active in Undo'ing bad edits. If you are interested, I would like you to request the Patroller right and/or the Rollback right. By then marking the edits you have undone as [patrolled], you save us 1 additional edit to check. Since you're a trusted user on English Wikipedia you can simply leave a message here and it will be taken care of shortly. –Krinkle^talk 12:02, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I will probably apply. Ruslik (talk) 13:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Redirected category

Why? - dcljr (talk) 10:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

It contained only one article as I remember, so I decided to redirect it. You can reinstate the category if you want. Ruslik (talk) 16:43, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

The one file you saw was just because there's only one NGC object in the range 1 to 100 that's classified as a planetary nebula, and that's as far as I've gotten working on "fully" describing and categorizing (example) the NGC objects by number, location and type. (Obviously most of the work will require a bot; I haven't figured out exactly how I'm going to do it, though, as the vast majority of the NGC objects don't actually have any files here.) Trust me, there will be more going into all of the by-type subcategories. The category has been resurrected. Thanks for the explanation. - dcljr (talk) 00:55, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Why the dupes in that direction?

There has been a number of star photos, where you have favoured the duplication in the favour of the new photo over the long existing photo with all the links. I am not sure why you are favouring that direction? Especially not understanding that thought in lieu of the extra work involved.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:30, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

New photos are often have better names and descriptions. Ruslik (talk) 13:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

{{Bian}}

Hi Ruslik. I hope you don't mind me asking more about this here, but I'd rather sound like a dummy on a talkpage than VP. ;) Where do I put {{subst:CURRENTMONTH}} and {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}? In the bian template? INeverCry 18:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

You should replace the month and year, respectively, with them in the template. And then use {{subst:bain}} when you want to put this template on a talk page. Ruslik (talk) 06:51, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

I did this, but I get this red-link category? INeverCry 17:58, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

In this case use January. Ruslik (talk) 07:32, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

file deletion

Dear Ruslik0,

I noticed a mistake in your's uploaded file (image:Voyager 2 picture of Oberon mod.jpg) and made a correct version (image:Oberon-NASA names en.png). So, I nominated the first file for deletion. Stas000D (talk) 00:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Voyager 2 picture of Oberon mod.jpg

File:Voyager 2 picture of Oberon mod.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas000D (talk) 00:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Ruslik0. You have new messages at Hedwig in Washington's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Antennae panel 420.jpg

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

???????

[1], just why? -- RTA 20:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Because it was floating over your text hiding it. Ruslik (talk) 20:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

In it browser? -- RTA 20:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

In Chrome. Ruslik (talk) 20:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

thanks

thanks for helping me with the pageanalysis tool :) Rebecaluvsbirds (talk) 05:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Rebecaluvsbirds

No machine-readable source provided

Hi Ruslik. Thank you for your help at COm:VP/C#File:Therese.delisieux.jpg and File:Marthe.robin.jpg. I've got another question about two similar files. File:Miss Univers 2001.JPG and File:Denise Quinones.png were both uploaded as {{Self}}, but they also appear to be scans and list the source and author as "No machine-readable source provided". Do you think these should be tagged with {{No permission since}}? -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:41, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I think so. Ruslik (talk) 16:07, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for checking. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:22, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Raul E Escribano photos

Hi Ruslik. You helped me out at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/11#File:Raul E Escribano.jpg‎, so I am wondering what (if anything) should be done about File:Escribano flag casing.jpg , File:Escribano CoC.jpg and File:LTC Raul Escribano.jpg. Same uploader whose claiming them as "own work". There's no EXIF data for any of the files, and I can't find them online. Do you think these are OK as is? -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:13, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

They are not obvious scans but may qualify under {{PD-USGov-Military}}. Ruslik (talk) 17:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for checking. I will post something on the uploader's user talk and ask them to clarify. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi again Ruslik. I posted something on the uploader's talk page and they responded. Would you mind taking a look at User talk:Marchjuly#Raul Escribano Image when you have some time? Thanks. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

File:BIO.png

Hi Ruslik0,

sorry for removing the categories. I had to figure out the exact topic of the file, which is endosymbiosis. "Bacteria" and "Symbiosis" was just a tagging. Greetings, Sascha GPD (talk) 21:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Saturn

Why did you delete my changes? You have a problem with the multilingual? --77.132.127.102 18:52, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

I do not have a problem multilingual (What is it?) but I have problems with misleading edit summaries. Ruslik (talk) 19:30, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Phylloscopus trochilus

Hi, I'm sorry, but It is Phylloscopus BONELLI ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kookaburra 81 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Viruses

Hello Ruslik0
I have seen you do some changes in Category:Bunyavirales
Maybee I can help you with those.
Which source do you want to follow ?
Best regards Liné1 (talk) 06:38, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

@Liné1: I do not understand why you reinstated Bunyaviridae category? The family does not exist any more (more precisely it was renamed to Peribunyaviridae). Ruslik (talk) 18:59, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Sadly, nothing is as simple.

Renaming a taxon is done by a taxonomist and has to be accepted by the community.

Some sources/authors still recognize Bunyaviridae (See Bunyaviridae wikidata links).

That is the reason of my previous question "Which source do you want to follow ?"

I don't mind following any source if we can provide it {{Taxa}}, {{Genera}} ...

I will even enforce this source for you.

Best regards 11:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

I am not sure that any sources "recognize Bunyaviridae". They are simply too slow to update. The only authoritative source is ictv. Ruslik (talk) 20:11, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Encounter 01 lg.jpg

File:Encounter 01 lg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kees08 (talk) 06:46, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Adam Harasowski - kompozytor, 1932.jpg

What to do now? Is there any conflict with the names? Could you please try? Warm regards- Henry39 (talk) 20:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

editToken

Hello Ruslik0. I just wanted to let you know that editToken is deprecated, and you still use it in one or more of your userspace scripts. If you want your user script(s) to work properly, please replace editToken with csrfToken in source code of the scripts. You'll need to change the following script(s):

• User:Ruslik0/Gadget-Favorites.js

Regards, Ahmad^talk 20:51, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Help Desk query

for an upload of another author's pic please help him. DBigXrayᗙ 16:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2019/12#File:Graffiti Bridge.jpg

Hi Ruslik0. Would you mind looking at File:Graffiti Bridge.jpg to make sure I correctly tweaked its licensing? -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:34, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

I see no problems. Ruslik (talk) 20:01, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for checking. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:26, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Massive copyright violation

Hi. Not sure if and how pinging works at Wikimedia Commons, so please look here. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators/De-adminship

Hello,

There must have been an error somewhere, I have been de-admin-'ed today (your action, no reproach meant) on Commons without the expected warning mentionned in Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

My main use of admin tools is mainly to rectify erroneous or ill-named files in the ancient chineese character project, as needed; the project is still ongoing (even though on a slow pace) and those actions are still needed. My activity as admin is indeed episodic, but when notified an inactivity I usually work on a batch of immediate deletion request, which is enough to raise the counter as needed.

In that case, I have been credited for four admin actions in Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2020 following the notification, but just a single one in Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2020, which is incoherent. I suppose the admin actions identified in section/Feb-Mar 2020 were undertaken the very day I had the notification, and thus, were counted as performed in that period and not the next (?) Anyway, section/Feb-Mar 2020 shows a correct response has been given at that time. The next thing is I get a notification through Commons:Requests for rights stating that I request autopatrol rights (???) — unexpected indeed.

Could you please check the situation and (hopefully) re-admin me, or hint me as to how to deal with this situation? I'm quite willing to perform some admin actions from time to time, when formally needed, to show I'm still alive and willing to be so, but then, I need admin tools to perform those admin actions...

Thanks in advance, Michelet-密是力 (talk) 06:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

COM:AN

---

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators noticeboard#Possibly wrong inactivity desysops. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Best, —Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:31, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

File:20100701 cthulhu poster.jpg

File:20100701 cthulhu poster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Jakubhal 20:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Notification

Hello. I would like to notify you about this subject as you have shown in the past an interest in it.

Help

Hello, Ruslik0. You recently answered my question at COM:HD, and you said that i can't upload the photos of this album. However, i have the suspicion that you didn't realize that some of the photographs are under other license: [2][3] [4][5]. So my questions are the same: could i upload them, and after that, may i cut the images and upload them? Thank you a lot, melodrartma 22:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

You can cut watermarks out of those images that are under cc-by or cc-by-sa licenses. Ruslik (talk) 20:13, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Red category links

Hi, Please don't delete red categories for astronomical objects when they're the name of the object. Having those links allows us to check if there are multiple files for an object and to create the category when there are. Kwamikagami (talk) 19:36, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

It is an inappropriate use of categories. Ruslik (talk) 20:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC)