User talk:Samwilson

Rename request[edit]

Renamed File:Miscellaneous Papers on Mechanical Subjects.djvu. If you need these put in place for work at WS, then drop a line on my talk page, and I will attempt to expedite the rename process. By the way, for future files, it would be useful it you were able to lose the Google page at the front. I use DjVuLibre for the task (when I remember). — billinghurst sDrewth 10:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! I should've cleaned up the file, but I wasn't quite sure of the usual practice. I'll do so, and re-upload it, before I start transcribing anything (so the page numbering doesn't get mucked up). — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 10:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Miscellaneous_Papers_on_Mechanical_Subjects.djvu[edit]

File:Miscellaneous_Papers_on_Mechanical_Subjects.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eusebius (talk) 10:50, 7 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Message[edit]

Left a message for you on your WP talk page. --Kelapstick (talk) 04:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also are you going to upload the picture you took at the train station? --Kelapstick (talk) 09:19, 18 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fremantle Society logo.jpg[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fremantle Society logo.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Fremantle Society logo.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Bulwersator (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Fremantle Society logo.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fremantle Society logo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fremantle Society logo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Bulwersator (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Fremantle Society logo.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fremantle Society logo.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Bulwersator (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Freopedia demonstration plaque.png[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:27, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2010-01-24 17-37 Navy insignia on south wall of old warehouse on Cantonment Hill, Fremantle.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2010-01-24 17-37 Navy insignia on south wall of old warehouse on Cantonment Hill, Fremantle.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 21:58, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, I've fixed it up now. — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 01:13, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2013-08-04 1134 Freopedia plaque at Cantonment Hill.JPG[edit]

File:2013-08-04 1134 Freopedia plaque at Cantonment Hill.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2013-08-11 0740 Freopedia plaque at Moore's Building.JPG[edit]

File:2013-08-11 0740 Freopedia plaque at Moore's Building.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2013-08-11 0838 Freopedia plaque for the John Geovich statue.JPG[edit]

File:2013-08-11 0838 Freopedia plaque for the John Geovich statue.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2013-08-11 0958 Freopedia plaque at the Army Museum in Fremantle.JPG[edit]

File:2013-08-11 0958 Freopedia plaque at the Army Museum in Fremantle.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2013-08-11 1024 Freopedia plaque at Victoria Hall.JPG[edit]

File:2013-08-11 1024 Freopedia plaque at Victoria Hall.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:2013-08-11 0740 Freopedia plaque at Moore's Building.JPG[edit]

[Question copied from DR]
"But the oval plaque isn't by a long shot the subject of the photo. Does that count for anything? I've no idea about the rules of how to feature copyrighted stuff I'm afraid. Surely it's permitted in some forms? I mean, you don't mention the other sign in this photo, so I presume that's okay?" Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 12:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes, actually it does count for something, but not enough, see Commons:De minimis. The question here is "what is the subject of the photo". The filename suggests that it is the Freopedia plaque, but that is so small that it is certainly not the principal subject. The Freopedia plaque is there because the Moore Building is historic, so presumably the real subject of the photo is the Moore Building and its historicity. In that context, the plaque describing the building is an important part of the image, so Fastily and I agreed that it was not de minimis. I did not mention the other sign and the sandwich board because neither has enough on it to rise to the level of copyrightable.

There are no hard and fast rules on this and on any given image experienced editors may disagree. If a notable person had been in the image, then the plaque would, in my view, have been de minimis. But in assessing an image taken to show one information plaque you cannot ignore the other, larger, information plaque nearby.

If you have questions, you may ask them at the Village Pump in any of 42 languages or on my talk page. I will also watch for questions here on your talk page for at least a week. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Major George Bland Humble.png[edit]

File:Major George Bland Humble.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Krdbot 11:00, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Renovations at the National Hotel, Fremantle.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Renovations at the National Hotel, Fremantle.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 22:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the notification; I've updated to {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} and removed the deletion notice. — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 05:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Widget class diagram.svg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Widget class diagram.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Have a look at my edits[edit]

I have created a few extra categories for when we upload photos from the trip - cheers JarrahTree (talk) 10:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Have been adding cats randomly[edit]

Very 'unsystematic' hope you dont mind - it is one way to get a metric - as in total photos that get uploaded - and the potential for extra articles and things... North Wharf/North Quay seems a bit like Packenham/Pakenham - probably a few seealso/redirect might be in line... JarrahTree (talk) 10:24, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@JarrahTree: Oh, mind?! Not in the least! Of course, categorise away. :-) I've been trying to look up IMO numbers of the ships. Oh, and I may possibly have a chance to talk to a crew member of the RNZN ship later this week. — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 10:28, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

IA-upload time from djvu creation to upload here?[edit]

The bot has done the creation according to the log, though 2½ hr later, still no upload. I am presuming that is not normal. I presume that I have to prod you, there is no instruction on what to do when things stall. Thx. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Billinghurst: yeah sometimes it hangs and has to be prodded. :-( There are currently no procedures about how to handle this, because I'm looking at it sort of daily to see what's going wrong and hopefully fixing the tool if that's what's at fault. The best thing to do to figure out why it's not uploading is to look at the log; there's a link on the homepage of the tool. What IA item were you trying to upload? I'll have a look at it. — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 13:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

armaghclergypari00lesl and nothing there helpful to me to diagnose the issue. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:45, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Billinghurst: Hm, it looks like it's just running out of memory and not completing. 518 pages is a lot, unforunately. I'll see what can be done. (And it's a tricky one to make it provide better log info about, because it just bombs out and so can't give the script a chance to say anything). — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 21:43, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wasn't criticising, just indicating that I looked and didn't think that it said so. Can the system count pages and and proportionalately allocate extra memory for jobs? Or even a tick box at form time — when asking about front page y/n — indicating if page count is 400 > 500; 500 > 600; +++ ? — billinghurst sDrewth 22:31, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Billinghurst: I increased the memory allowance of ia-upload and File:Armagh clergy and parishes.djvu got uploaded. Is it correct? In phab:T161396 I'll also add a 500 page limit, or warning. — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 03:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

After all of that, no text layer. <shrug> — billinghurst sDrewth 11:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

License tagging[edit]

Hi Samwilson, I love what the IA-upload bot is doing. One minor thing: I just made this change to the license tag on your example case. Any way to make such manual changes unnecessary, or to coach the bot/user through the process? LeadSongDog (talk) 21:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@LeadSongDog: yes, great idea! I'm not sure about the death date parameter, because that's not very retrievable from IA, but the pre-1923 tag should be doable. Could you open a ticket in Phabricator?

The other thing I've been wondering about is linking the book template with Wikidata, so that if a Wikidata item exists for a given edition then that sort of info can be pulled from there. It'd have to be done via a wikidata_id template parameter, rather than a sitelink, but that should be fine. Then we could get author info, copyright info, as well as sitelinks to Wikisources etc.

— Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 23:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not very phab-savy, it might be better if you raised it. Each IA entry should already have an extant OL entry linked, this could be harvested and developed. There's work going on, albeit slowly, to improve the links between OL and Wikidata, e.g. https://github.com/internetarchive/openlibrary/issues/144 which might pertain. Birth and death dates are usually available from VIAF (http://viaf.org/viaf/444796/ or https://viaf.org/viaf/27063124) or ISNI (http://www.isni.org/isni/0000000061343104 or http://www.isni.org/isni/0000000121251077), at least in the case of major authors. LeadSongDog (talk) 18:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I just used it to upload File:Don_Caesar_de_Bazan.djvu and noted a couple of issues. The template couldn't easily handle multiple authors, though I worked around that as best I could. The google first page issue should really be autodetected and autohandled, I got it wrong and others will too. Still, it was quick and easy. Thank you.LeadSongDog (talk) 20:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@LeadSongDog: I removed the cover page. You're right, it shouldn't be manual; but for the time being I think I'm not going to have the time to do anything else (it'd be possible to run it through the Google Vision API logo-detection thingo, and delete based on that, I suspect; not sure if there would be false positives though, which would be bad). — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 23:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

aamh[edit]

Test Malcolmtull (talk) 01:38, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Training at Fremantle[edit]

Peter to Sam - Hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterridgway (talk • contribs) 01:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC) Good Morning Sam 01:43, 17 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angus Callander (talk • contribs) 01:43, 17 March 2019 (UTC) Good morning again Angus Callander (talk) 01:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikimedia/pedia Workshop — Thank you Sam, Tom and Jeremy!:-}[edit]

Thank you Sam, Tom and Jeremy!:-} — Preceding unsigned comment added by SallyMay2115 (talk • contribs) 01:44, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tables in file descriptions[edit]

Hi Sam. If you use editsource when looking at [[File:Thysanotus patersonii DistributionMap.png]], you will see that I have tried to insert a table into the description. Is there some way of doing this? Hoping you can help. Regards, MargaretRDonald (talk) 01:02, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@MargaretRDonald: It's a common problem: any time you need to use a pipe character | inside a template, it can confuse things. The ! magic word can be used instead (replace all the table-pipes with {{!}}) but probably the easier thing to do in this case is to move the table outside the {{Description}} template. — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 01:07, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Samwilson: Thanks, Sam. (So where do I move it to?) MargaretRDonald (talk) 01:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@MargaretRDonald: I made this change to put the table below the {{Information}} template. I think there's some incorrect formatting within the table though — where should the 'BRT' cell be? — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 01:54, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, Sam. All fixed now (and now I know where to put a table) Regards, MargaretRDonald (talk) 03:45, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FYI[edit]

When you're doing the stats for w:Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/57, note that I'm uploading photos from User:Evad37alt (since Commonist doesn't seem to be compatible with 2FA). Cheers, - Evad37 [talk] 11:35, 28 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Evad37: Noted. The event is https://eventmetrics.wmflabs.org/programs/77/events/489 if you want to check it out. I'll update the meetup page with the stats tomorrow or the day after; give us some time to get more uploaded. — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 11:40, 28 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Charlotte Davis Memorial Plaque[edit]

Re: [1] - Wouldn't inscription mentions be more appropriate than depicts? Mitch Ames (talk) 00:30, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Mitch Ames: perhaps, but I'm not sure how to add any statements other than depicts; is there a UI for that? — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 00:35, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have no idea - I've not done anything with Wikidata. I was notified of this change because my uploads are automatically on my watchlist, and I saw inscription mentions under depicts' "see also" section. Mitch Ames (talk) 00:53, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think at the moment Depicts is all we've got. I'll hold off adding any more for now though, where there's uncertainty. — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 02:22, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Depicts gives a property option of shown with, t=fill that field in for inscription Gnan garra 03:23, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:3346 Town of Canning, health Inspection, noise level checking, 1970s (back).tif[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:3346 Town of Canning, health Inspection, noise level checking, 1970s (back).tif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:3346 Town of Canning, health Inspection, noise level checking, 1970s (back).tif]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Samwilson,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Samwilson,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Samwilson,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks![edit]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2019[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--01:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cafe interior in South Fremantle.jpg[edit]

File:Cafe interior in South Fremantle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 17 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Holy Trinity Anglican Church porch.jpg[edit]

File:Holy Trinity Anglican Church porch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The boathouse, Rottnest.jpg[edit]

File:The boathouse, Rottnest.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Western Australia Local Government Areas.svg[edit]

Hi Samwilson, User:Jarrah Tree recommended contacting you about File:Western Australia Local Government Areas.svg, suggesting you might be able to help. The map about the WA LGAs could do with an update. I spotted the following outdated features, but I don't know how to fix it:

en:Shire of Broomehill–Tambellup is still displayed as two individual shires, Shire of Broomehill and Shire of Tambellup
en:City of Greater Geraldton, still displayed as Shire of Mullewa and City of Geraldton-Greenough
en:Shire of Narrogin, still displayed as Town of Narrogin and Shire of Narrogin
en:Shire of Northam, still displayed as Town of Northam and Shire of Northam
en:City of Karratha, still listed as en:Shire of Roebourne

Do you have the skill set to update this map or know somebody who does? Calistemon (talk) 08:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:WMAU MediaWiki skin screenshot 2021-05-10.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:WMAU MediaWiki skin screenshot 2021-05-10.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:WMAU MediaWiki skin screenshot 2021-05-10.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--00:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Cossack Cemetery[edit]

@Samwilson: , since you created the category, I was wondering if you would consider renaming it, like for example: Category:Cossack Cemetery in Cossack or something else because there is also a Category:Cossack cemetery in Busha, Category:Cossack cemetery in Stina, etc... Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:02, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Lotje: Sure, that sounds fine. I think Category:Cossack Cemetery, Western Australia would be most suitable. It sounds less like it's a cemetery for/of Cossacks. — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 07:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done Lotje (talk) 13:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great, thanks! I also updated its Commons category (P373) to match. — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 22:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion at COM:HD#Allentown discussion resumed[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at COM:HD#Allentown discussion resumed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just notifying you as a courtesy since you were a participant in the previous discussion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Diary of Susie Cone, 1918.pdf[edit]

File:Diary of Susie Cone, 1918.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Prosfilaes (talk) 00:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Asphalt machine in Beaconsfield 4.jpg[edit]

File:Asphalt machine in Beaconsfield 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Perfectnews.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 12:16, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Curious about the history of exactly which licenses work on Wikimedia Commons, would love some pointers[edit]

Hi Sam -- we've connected on Mastodon, I'm the Community Manager for Flickr Commons and do some outreach for Flickypedia. I have been poking around this week looking at the history of the way Flickr's "no known copyright" (NKC) designation is or is not accepted on Wikimedia Commons. Here are the things I know:

if you use the WC upload wizard you can share NKC content from Flickr Commons with the "share images" button
if you use Flickr2Commons images with NKC it silently fails and I'm not sure if this is by design because of the odd status of NKC or just a bug (I did check here and it was not clarifying)
I read the discussions linked off of this page

Since this is not entirely my native habitat, though I am a regular Wikipedia user, I wanted to reach out and ask you if you think something has changed in terms of how WC accepts NKC licenses, or if this is just a quirky bug in F2C? If the former, something has changed, if you could point me towards a discussion so I could go read it and get my head around it, I'd be super grateful. We're stoked about the development of Flickypedia but really want to make sure we understand this aspect of the background and our partners at WMF suggested reaching out. Thanks for any info you have. Jessamyn (talk) 15:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jessamyn: I'm not really sure of the history of it all, I'm afraid. It looks like the No known copyright restrictions license is listed here as a valid license in F2C (and nothing's changed there recently). I can't see anything that would be making it fail differently to other licenses. The licenses.setLicense API method says it can't be used there (presumably because it can only be set by Flickr Commons partners and not normal accounts), but that doesn't matter for Wikimedia Commons' purposes, and licenses.getInfo still returns it (not that either of our tools are dynamically looking up the licenses). Sorry I can't be of more help! Sam Wilson 01:27, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No worries. Any and all information is helpful. Thank you. Jessamyn (talk) 15:46, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User talk:Samwilson

Rename request[edit]

File:Miscellaneous_Papers_on_Mechanical_Subjects.djvu[edit]

Message[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fremantle Society logo.jpg[edit]

File tagging File:Fremantle Society logo.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Fremantle Society logo.jpg[edit]

File:Freopedia demonstration plaque.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:2010-01-24 17-37 Navy insignia on south wall of old warehouse on Cantonment Hill, Fremantle.jpg[edit]

File:2013-08-04 1134 Freopedia plaque at Cantonment Hill.JPG[edit]

File:2013-08-11 0740 Freopedia plaque at Moore's Building.JPG[edit]

File:2013-08-11 0838 Freopedia plaque for the John Geovich statue.JPG[edit]

File:2013-08-11 0958 Freopedia plaque at the Army Museum in Fremantle.JPG[edit]

File:2013-08-11 1024 Freopedia plaque at Victoria Hall.JPG[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:2013-08-11 0740 Freopedia plaque at Moore's Building.JPG[edit]

File:Major George Bland Humble.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:Renovations at the National Hotel, Fremantle.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Widget class diagram.svg[edit]

Have a look at my edits[edit]

Have been adding cats randomly[edit]

IA-upload time from djvu creation to upload here?[edit]

License tagging[edit]

aamh[edit]

Training at Fremantle[edit]

Wikimedia/pedia Workshop — Thank you Sam, Tom and Jeremy!:-}[edit]

Tables in file descriptions[edit]

FYI[edit]

Charlotte Davis Memorial Plaque[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:3346 Town of Canning, health Inspection, noise level checking, 1970s (back).tif[edit]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks![edit]

Wiki Science Competition 2019[edit]

File:Cafe interior in South Fremantle.jpg[edit]

File:Holy Trinity Anglican Church porch.jpg[edit]

File:The boathouse, Rottnest.jpg[edit]

File:Western Australia Local Government Areas.svg[edit]

Copyright status: File:WMAU MediaWiki skin screenshot 2021-05-10.png[edit]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started[edit]

Category:Cossack Cemetery[edit]

Discussion at COM:HD#Allentown discussion resumed[edit]

File:Diary of Susie Cone, 1918.pdf[edit]

File:Asphalt machine in Beaconsfield 4.jpg[edit]

Curious about the history of exactly which licenses work on Wikimedia Commons, would love some pointers[edit]

Navigation menu

Search