共享资源:恢复请求

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Undeletion requests and the translation is 96% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Undeletion requests and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Shortcuts: COM:UNDEL • COM:UR • COM:UND • COM:DRV

Other languages:

在此页面，用户可以请求恢复一个被删除的页面或文件（下文主要介绍文件）。用户可以在请求上评论附带上标记，例如保持删除或恢复，并附加相关原因。

此页面不是维基百科的一部分。此页面是关于维基共享资源的内容。维基共享资源是维基媒体基金会各个项目的公共媒体文件库。维基共享资源不收录百科全书条目。 如您要请求恢复中文维基百科中被删除的文章或其他内容，请前往该项目的存废复核请求页面。

共享资源删除 (方针)
查 • 论 • 编

文件被删除的原因

首先，检查删除日志并找出文件被删除的原因。 并且通过链入页面检查是否有链接到页面上的讨论。若您上传了该文件，则请查看您的讨论页是否有任何关于删除的消息。 然后，请再次阅读删除方针、项目范围方针和许可协议方针以了解图片是否适合共享资源。

如果删除原因含糊或您认为其有争议，您可以联系执行删除的管理员并要求他们解释删除的原因或向他们提供反对删除的新证据。 您同样可以联系其他活跃的管理员（或许是会说您的母语的管理员）。他们将乐于提供帮助，并在删除出错时纠正该错误。

申诉删除

基于目前删除方针、项目范围和授权协议而执行的无误删除不能撤销。但可在这几项方针的讨论页中讨论改进事宜。

如果您认为被删除的图片既不侵犯版权又不超出目前的项目范围：

  • 建议您先与删除文件的管理员进行讨论。 您可以要求管理员提供详细的解释或显示证据以支持恢复文件。
  • 如果您不希望直接与任何人联系，或者某个管理员拒绝恢复文件，或者希望有更多人参与讨论，则可以在此页面上请求恢复文件。
  • 如果文件因无法证明获得了版权持有者的许可而被删除，请参照提交授权许可证明的程序。 如果您已经这样做了，那么没有必要在此处请求恢复文件。如果提交的授权许可文件符合规定，在处理授权时，文件将被恢复。请耐心等待，因为取决于当前的积压工作量和志愿者的数量，这可能需要几周的时间。
  • 如果被删除的文件中的“描述”一栏缺乏部分信息，您可能会被询问一些问题。一般来说，您回复后志愿者会在24小时之后回复。

临时恢复

出于协助讨论恢复请求，或是允许其他用户转移图片至其他允许合理使用的项目的目的，文件可能被临时恢复。请在相关的恢复请求中使用{{Request temporary undeletion}}模板，并给出您的理由。

  1. 如果临时恢复旨在协助讨论，请解释为什么临时恢复文件对恢复请求的讨论有帮助，或
  2. 如果临时恢复旨在转移文件至一个允许合理使用的项目，请说明您打算将文件转移到哪个项目站点，并给出该项目的合理使用声明。

为了帮助讨论

如果用户在看不到文件的情况下很难决定是否应批准恢复请求，那么文件可以被临时恢复以帮助讨论。如果对文件的描述，或一段文件描述页面的引用已经足够，管理员可以提供这些信息并拒绝临时恢复请求。 某些情况下出于某些其他因素（例如，恢复可能引起问题的可辨识的人物照片，哪怕只是临时），即使临时恢复图片有助于讨论，管理员可能依旧会拒绝请求。除非删除讨论被关闭，出于协助讨论的目的恢复的文件将在至多30天后删除。

要允许合理使用内容转移到另一个项目

与中文维基百科和其他一些维基媒体项目不同，共享资源不接受合理使用的非自由内容。 如果被删除的文件符合另一个维基媒体项目的合理使用要求，用户可以请求临时恢复该文件，以便将其转移到那里。这类请求通常可以无需讨论而迅速得到处理。 出于转移的目的而临时恢复的文件将在两天后再次删除。在请求临时恢复文件时，请说明您计划将文件转移到哪个项目，并提供对应项目的合理使用声明。

允许合理使用的项目
* Wikipedia: als | ar | bar | bn | be | be-tarask | ca | el | en | et | eo | fa | fi | fr | frr | he | hr | hy | id | is | it | ja | lb | lt | lv | mk | ms | pt | ro | ru | sl | sr | th | tr | tt | uk | vi | zh | +/−

Note: This list might be outdated. For a more complete list, see meta:Non-free content (this page was last updated: March 2014.) Note also: Multiple projects (such as the ml, sa, and si Wikipedias) are listed there as "yes" without policy links.

添加申请

首先，确保您阅读了文件被删除的原因。其次请在添加申请前阅读下列指导：

  • 请不要请求恢复一个未被删除的文件。
  • 请不要向公布自己或他人电子邮件地址或电话号码。
  • 在Subject:字段中，请输入适当的对象。如果仅申请恢复一个文件，建议使用[[:File:删除的文件.jpg]]格式。（请记住链接中应以半角冒号开头。）
  • 鉴别你所申请的文件，可如上提供文件链接。若你不知道准确名称，则请尽可能多地提供该文件的信息。无法提供足够信息的恢复申请将会不经提示而被存档。
  • 为恢复申请说明理由。
  • 使用四个半角波浪号（~~~~）在申请中签名。如果您在共享资源上拥有账户，则请先登录。若您是原图片的上传者，这将有助于管理员找到这些图片。

请在页面底部加入申请点此进入您应添加申请的位置。同样你可以通过点当前日期下的击“编辑”链接提交申请。请监视您的申请一节以获得更新。

Closing discussions

In general, discussions should be closed only by administrators.

存档

关闭的请求会被每日存档存档。

当前的申请

File:ROC Ministry of National Defense Seal.svg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This file had been deleted per this DR due to "Logos are not covered under {{PD-ROC-exempt}} or {{GWOIA}}" and then it was re-uploaded by User:人人生來平等.

However, according to the email response by the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office "故政府機關之部徽、署徽或局徽，如其形式係依法所制訂者，依著作權法第9條，不得為著作權之標的。" (English Machine Translation: "Therefore, the emblems of ministries, departments or bureaus of government agencies, if their forms are made in accordance with the law, shall not be the subject of copyright in accordance with Article 9 of the Copyright Law." ) Since this logo is the Seal of Ministry of National Defense, in my opinion, it is not copyrighted and is covered under {{PD-ROC-exempt}} . The previous delete decision should be overturned and the previous page history also need to be recovered. cc @Wcam、​Mdaniels5757、​和Ericliu1912：​ Thanks. SCP-2000 18:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@SCP-2000：​ If the emblem is made in accordance with the law, such law needs to be specified. In the email you quote, the national flag is defined in 中華民國國徽國旗法第4條, and the Taipei City's seal is defined in 臺北市市徽市旗設置自治條例第4條. A seal/emblem/logo is only in the PD if it is based on a law. Wcam (talk) 19:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK, it is based on 《陸海空軍軍旗條例施行細則》第五條. Looks ok to keep. --Wcam (talk) 19:18, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Support. (And should recover all revision history altogether) —— Eric Liu（Talk） 23:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The revision history of File:Seal of the Ministry of National Defense of the Republic of China.svg should be merged with this file if the latter get restored. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 10:22, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Only this file (to request restoration of all deleted revisions) or for all deleted files of that DR? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Portrait_de_Nicolas_&_Bruno.jpg

Bonjour, désolé je ne suis pas un spécialiste de wikipedia mais je ne comprends pas pourquoi la photo dont je suis l'auteur a été refusée sur la page de "Nicolas et Bruno" que j'actualise régulièrement.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolas_et_Bruno

Je me suis sans doute trompé dans la définition de la licence. Je souhaite que cette photo soit libre de droit, dans le domaine public, sans restriction d'un quelconque copyright.

Parallèlement on m'a informé que ma photo a été utilisée sur le site Focus-cinema, mais à l'époque avec mon autorisation. >>>> Reason for the nomination: file under copyright (See https://www.focus-cinema.com/7741868/what-we-do-in-the-shadows-vampires-entre-toute-intimite-sortira-fin-octobre-en-france/)

Pouvez-vous m'aider et me donner la procédure pour que ma modification soit possible? Ou pouvez-vous le faire vous-même?

Merci d'avance pour votre aide! — Preceding unsigned comment added by FilmsChecker (talk • contribs) 15:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC) (UTC)Reply[reply]

@FilmsChecker：​ Bonjour,
Avez-vous l'image originale ? Si oui, vous pourriez l'importer pour prouver que vous êtes bien le photographe. Si non, il faudra confirmer la licence par email en suivant la procédure à COM:VRT/fr. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Merci Yann pour votre réponse! Ça y est, je crois que ça a fonctionné!! Merci beaucoup. FilmsChecker (talk) 09:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Oppose The image as uploaded has a black border and appears in a number of places on the web. It is only 640px square. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Question Isn't this resolution a standard for this camera model? Ankry (talk) 17:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Aha -- I think you are probably right, but it does appear in a number of places without a free license. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:18, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Do any of those other places include the EXIF? The one I found does not. Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:32, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Support undeletion of the deleted version as the uploader was able to upload the version with EXIF. However, this is probably not meaningfull at the momen as the original version is not deleted~and I see no reason to do so. Ankry (talk) 13:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Videos by Bandai Namco

Hi, This discussion concluded that there is no reason to believe that the free license at the source of these files is not valid. This also applies to files published by Bandai Namco under a free license. Yann (talk) 17:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The discussion you linked to had the closing admin specifically say Bandai Namco was not trustworthy. I'd be inclined to undelete the ones which Bandai Namco had complete ownership on but not the others especially given the complexity of Japan's production committee model for animated works. Abzeronow (talk) 16:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK, fine with me. Yann (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
AFAICT there were all license reviewed, and they still have a free license at source. Yann (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Age of Empires videos

Hi, This discussion concluded that there is no reason to believe that the free license at the source of these files is not valid. This also applies to files published by Age of Empires official account under a free license. Idem as above. Yann (talk) 19:23, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • I'm inclined towards supporting this request even though there may have also been intent for this material to have a noncommercial restriction per the first DR. Abzeronow (talk) 16:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I undeleted File:Age of Empires II DE - May-hem Event!.webm which is available with a CC-BY license at archive.org. I don't have time to search for free licenses for the other +100 videos. Thuresson (talk) 19:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Thuresson：​ OK, thanks for looking at this. I checked the first 10 files in the list, and there were all license reviewed, except two, which had a free license according to Internet Archive. Yann (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Afghanistan-Spange.jpg

And also:

I created the picture myself. So please restore it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User85521 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • User:User85521, I think that it would be a good idea for you to state here under which of the free licenses we recognize you plan to release this image. I always use public domain for my images. Geo Swan (talk) 09:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • @User85521：​ The problem is not who created the images, but who created the presented objects and where did they grant a free license for them? They do not seem to be more than 70 years old for copyright expiration. Ankry (talk) 09:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thank you for looking into this matter. I would like to kindly point out to you that your comments do not comply with Wikipedia's image rights or the German copyright law applicable to this image. All coats of arms, medals or other official German works are in the public domain according to German Law. The “70 year rule” only affects the copyright of other people, but not of self-created pictures of public domain objects. An example here:
  • File:Bayerische Verbandsabzeichen als Brusttaschenanhänger (GrePo, StMI, PP München, PVA).jpg – Wikimedia Commons
    So please release images. User85521 (talk) 11:41, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
     Neutral here as I cannot judge whether these objects are "coats of arms of a German Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts". Another opinion (or more information needed). I cannot recognize who released the badges and whether they were official or not. Ankry (talk) 12:43, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The photo belongs to myself and there’s is no copy right from anyone else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happyfruit288 (talk • contribs) 22:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC) (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Oppose The only deleted file by this user is File:KimmyLowMissJewelryHK.jpg which an obvious copyright violation from Internet. Yann (talk) 22:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Oppose Agreed. I have deleted a second upload of the image. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 20:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:30 STM - Love Lust Faith + Dreams.jpeg

Reason: Below COM:TOO US: just a grid of dots with text in boxes. Cc. @Taivo、​George Ho、​和Blackcat. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Oppose I disagree. The arrangement of dots shows clear artistic sense. If Mondrian and Pollock works can have copyrights (which they do), this probably does. Three users, including two Admins, agreed with me. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Comment I don't know how high is the threshold of originality in the USA. Here in Italy would be rather weak, a work must be very original to be protected as 'original', but I suppose that the USA have a lower threshold. Thus I trust Jim, who for sure knows the American laws and customs better than me. -- Blackcat 23:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:KimmyLowKissJewelry2017.jpg

Why is the picture deleted? I have no idea what is wrong, o have the copy write do the picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happyfruit288 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 23 November 2023‎ (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kablukov IA.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This image is in the public domain as the scientist in the photograph died in 1941 and the photographer is unknown. This image is used on many chemical websites with his biography, as well as on the Russian wikipedia. Arturopt12 (talk) 10:11, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • @Arturopt12：​ Death date of the subject proves nothing about copyright unless you can prove that the photo is 120+ years old basing on this date. For anonymous photos, the initial publication date is crucial: Was it published before 1946? (URAA case) Was it published more than 95 years ago? (US copyright cut-off term for anonymous publications) Ankry (talk) 12:55, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Daniel Donato.jpg

I've got the rights to this photo but may not have indicated that the right way when I uploaded it. Can you help me code it properly? Not sure if the best way to do this is to UL to Wikimedia Commons, apologies for still being somewhat of a n00b when it comes to uploading pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewehoffman (talk • contribs) 15:42, 24 November 2023‎ (UTC)Reply[reply]

Advice on how to fix this was already given at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive#File%3ADaniel_Donato.jpg Abzeronow (talk) 15:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:National Anthem of Palestine (Vocal).ogg

the Commons:Deletion requests/File:National Anthem of Palestine (Vocal).ogg is unfair and enreasonable, please bring back the anthem as it is a very important bit of information deleted unfairly and unjustly, it was removed unfairly from the state of Palestine page and from the Fida'i page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.247.160 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 24 November 2023‎ (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Oppose The authors of the anthem have not been dead for 50 years per copyright law of Palestine. Additionally there was significant doubt on whether the performance of the song was freely licensed. I acknowledge the file's importance, but we cannot host it here if both the composition and the performance are both under copyright and are not freely licensed. Abzeronow (talk) 19:43, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Memorial plaque for Viacheslav Trubnikov 2.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission recived. Ticket:2023102610011707. Please restore the files. Niklitov (talk) 21:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/zh&oldid=756610998"